Own a Humanoid Robot for $1,000? : Kscale Labs is Making It Possible

What if owning a humanoid robot wasn't just the domain of tech giants or research institutions, but something you could achieve for the price of a mid-range smartphone? It sounds like science fiction, but thanks to Kscale Labs, it's now a reality. For just $1,000, you can bring home a fully functional, open source humanoid robot—one that's not locked behind proprietary systems or inaccessible price tags. This bold move is shaking up the robotics industry, challenging the status quo, and opening doors for developers, hobbyists, and researchers alike. Imagine the possibilities: a robot you can customize, upgrade, and program without restrictions, all while contributing to a global community pushing the boundaries of innovation.
In this overview, DEMi explores how Kscale Labs is transforming the robotics landscape with their affordable and modular designs, designed for everyone from curious tinkerers to seasoned engineers. You'll discover the unique features of their flagship robots, the Kbot and Zbot, and how their open source philosophy is fostering a collaborative ecosystem. We'll also delve into the innovative technologies, like reinforcement learning and simulation tools, that make these robots smarter and more adaptable. Whether you're dreaming of building the next breakthrough in robotics or simply want to experiment with an accessible platform, this is a story about more than just machines—it's about providing widespread access to the future of humanoid technology. Open Source Humanoid Robotics Affordable and Modular Robots for Diverse Users
Kscale Labs offers two flagship products designed to meet the needs of different user groups: the Kbot and the Zbot.
– Kbot: A full-sized humanoid robot priced at $9,000, tailored for advanced research and development purposes.
– Zbot: A smaller, more affordable alternative priced at $1,000, ideal for hobbyists and developers seeking a customizable and accessible platform.
Both robots are built with modularity at their core, allowing you to easily replace or upgrade components. This design philosophy not only reduces costs but also encourages experimentation, allowing you to test new configurations and explore innovative applications. Whether you are conducting innovative research or pursuing robotics as a hobby, these robots provide a flexible and scalable solution. Reinforcement Learning and Simulation: Smarter Robots
To enhance the capabilities of their robots, Kscale Labs integrates reinforcement learning into their systems. This advanced technology enables robots to adapt to real-world scenarios by training in simulation environments such as Mujoco. These virtual settings allow you to test and refine algorithms in a controlled environment before deploying them on physical robots. This approach results in a more efficient development process, saving both time and resources while making sure that the robots are prepared to handle complex, real-world tasks. By using simulation tools, you can accelerate innovation and achieve higher levels of performance in your robotics projects. $1,000 Humanoid Robot: The Future of Robotics is Here
Watch this video on YouTube.
Discover other guides from our vast content that could be of interest on Open source robotics. Low-Cost Components and Open source Tools
Kscale Labs prioritizes affordability without compromising on functionality. Their robots are constructed using low-cost components such as Raspberry Pi systems, CAN bus motor controllers, and budget-friendly actuators. These hardware components are complemented by a Python SDK, which simplifies the development and deployment of applications. This combination of accessible hardware and user-friendly software enables you to innovate without the financial or technical constraints often associated with proprietary systems. By lowering the cost of entry, Kscale Labs is allowing a wider audience to participate in the advancement of humanoid robotics. Driving Innovation Through Community Collaboration
A cornerstone of Kscale Labs' mission is its commitment to fostering a global community of developers and researchers. The company actively supports this community through initiatives such as: Hackathons that encourage creative problem-solving and innovation.
Open source contributions that promote collaboration and knowledge sharing.
Developer-friendly tools that reduce barriers to entry and simplify the development process.
By engaging with this ecosystem, you can contribute to the collective advancement of humanoid robotics while benefiting from the shared expertise of a diverse and global network. This collaborative approach accelerates progress and ensures that the technology evolves to address a wide range of applications and challenges. A Vision for the Future of Robotics
Kscale Labs envisions a future where humanoid robots are as commonplace and versatile as smartphones. Inspired by the success of the Android ecosystem, the company aims to commoditize humanoid robotics hardware, making it accessible to all. Beyond individual products, Kscale Labs is working toward the development of a platform for embodied artificial general intelligence (AGI). These robots are designed to be energy-efficient and adaptable, aligning with global goals for sustainability and technological advancement. By focusing on accessibility and innovation, Kscale Labs is paving the way for a future where humanoid robots play a significant role in society. Leadership Rooted in Expertise
The vision and direction of Kscale Labs are guided by its founder, Benjamin Bolty, whose extensive experience in robotics and artificial intelligence drives the company's mission. Bolty has contributed to high-profile projects such as Tesla's Autopilot, the Optimus humanoid robot, and AI research at Facebook and Google. His leadership combines technical expertise with a passion for making robotics accessible to a broader audience. Under his guidance, Kscale Labs is positioned as a leader in the open source robotics movement, shaping the future of the industry. Key Features at a Glance Modular design that supports easy customization and cost efficiency.
Integration of reinforcement learning for adaptive and intelligent performance.
Use of affordable components, including Raspberry Pi and CAN bus systems.
Python SDK and simulation tools like Mujoco for streamlined development.
A global, community-driven approach to innovation and collaboration.
Media Credit: DEMi Filed Under: AI, Hardware, Top News
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Auto Blog

44 minutes ago

• Auto Blog

Tesla Insurance 2024 Losses, Combined Ratio & Safety Score Data-Driven Risks

Customer complaints mount as payouts lag In May 2025, Tesla's insurance arm posted a combined ratio of 121% — meaning for every dollar in premiums, it paid out $1.21 in claims and expenses. For context, most insurers break out into a profuse, 'I am going to lose my job' sweat if that number nudges above 95%. Elon Musk pitched Tesla Insurance, a subsidiary of Tesla Inc. as the 'missing piece' in the Tesla ecosystem. He argued Tesla owners now crave more than torque — they want their insurance bill to shrink as fast as their 0–60 mph time. 0:07 / 0:09 2025 Audi S3: 4 reasons to love it, 2 reasons to think twice Watch More Tesla Insurance Loss & Combined Ratios versus Industry Average, 2023–2024. In this chart, you can see just how far off the mark Tesla is compared to the industry average. The loss ratio shows what portion of premiums is paid out in claims, while the combined ratio adds all expenses. Above 100%? You're losing money on every single policy you sell, even before you count the cost of keeping the lights on. For Tesla, that means underwriting losses — $42 million in the first nine months of 2024 alone. It might not look like a lot, but by insurance industry standards, year over year 2023-2024 Tesla are still bleeding profusely. These are very serious 'in the red' numbers for an insurance company. The chart highlights that Tesla Insurance's loss and combined ratios were much higher than the industry averages in both 2023 and 2024. Even as Tesla improved in 2024, it still paid out far more in claims and expenses than it collected in premiums — underscoring ongoing profitability challenges compared to traditional auto insurers. The Third-Person Cinematic Scene The Tesla Insurance sold by Musk offered a 'disruptor' view of car insurance, no doubt spurred on by asking himself what in the data they already collect from owners' cars could they captialize on. Picture a Model Y idling in a suburban driveway, the morning sun glinting off its glass roof. The owner sips coffee, scrolling through the Tesla app — not for a new FSD beta, but to check how must she will have to pay this month in car insurance. The number flickers, driven by last week's hard braking and that one questionable left turn. A push notification: 'Safety Score: 92. Your rate may decrease.' But as the birds chirp and the caffeine kicks in, a question lingers: Is Tesla's insurance experiment a revolution in risk or just another Silicon Valley mirage? Let's also not forget a Tesla Y is meant to also be able to go off-road. What happens to this month's premium if our owner decides to take the family for a spin to a favorite camp site? What about when you decide to go hands-free? The premium will surely spike. The Disruptor's Dilemma: When Data Meets Damage Claims Tesla Insurance launched with a promise: harness real-time driving data, reward safe behavior, and undercut legacy insurers. The pitch? 'We know our cars best, so we can price risk better.' For a while, it worked—sort of. By 2024, Tesla Insurance had reached a $300 million annual premium run rate and was available in 16 states (Tesla Q1 2025 Earnings). But then came the numbers: a combined ratio of 145% in 2023, easing to 'only' 121% by Q3 2024. Progress, sure, but still deep in the red. Any other insurer would be firing people hand over fist. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Safety Score: The Algorithmic Tightrope Tesla's secret sauce is the Safety Score — a real-time, black-box rating that turns every commute into a behavioral audit. Hard brake at a yellow light? That's a ding. Take a corner with a little too much verve? Another. Go off-road? God only knows. In theory, this should incentivize safer driving and lower claims. In practice, owners complain about 'phantom dings', lifestyle choices they didn't have to make before, and inscrutable penalties. Again, Tesla's monitoring feels both opaque and invasive. And then there's the repair bill. Teslas remain expensive to fix, with parts and labor often pricier than their ICE counterparts. And mostly VIN-locked. Even with all that data, Tesla Insurance can't escape the gravitational pull of high repair costs — especially as increased vandalism and accident rates tick up in urban markets. The Investor's Paradox: Growth vs. Gravity For investors, Tesla Insurance is both a carrot and a stick. The business is growing — fast — but the losses are stubborn. As Tesla expands coverage and refines its algorithms, the combined ratio is falling, but not fast enough. The industry gold standard is a combined ratio below 95 percent. Tesla's 121 percent is still a very long way from liquid. Tesla Insurance has kept being able to pay claims despite earning less than the costs by cash infusions from Tesla Inc, their parent company. Tesla Insurance lost $30 million in 2023, and $42 million for the first 9 months of 2024; so it will be well over $50 million for the full 2024 so expect the line for 2024 in the chart to rise. The stakes are real, of course. If Tesla cracks the code, using its data edge to drive down claims and costs, and its owners feel it adds to their life, it could rewrite the rules of auto insurance. It needs to do this without alienating the insured with premium increases on every hard brake. If they can't do these things, the business becomes a costly distraction, a cautionary tale for tech giants who think they can outsmart old-school actuaries. Real-World Rituals: The Human Cost of Disruption For owners, the promise of lower premiums is offset by frustration with claims processing and the opaque Safety Score, which nudges their premiums up and down seemingly at random. The ritual of checking your rate has become a new form of range anxiety. Will this month's premium spike because of a single swerve? Meanwhile, Tesla forums buzz with tales of denied claims and customer service black holes. So, is Tesla Insurance the promised disruptor? Is it a revolution in the making or a slow-motion fender-bender? The numbers say 'not yet' — but the experiment is far from over but shrouded in corporate blood lost. At 70 mph, with the Safety Score whispering in your ear, you have to wonder: is this the future of insurance, or just another beta test by a known conjurer? In the end, all we really want is a policy that's as smart — and as fair — as the car it covers. About the Author Brian Iselin View Profile

Auto Blog

44 minutes ago

• Auto Blog

Honda's Pikes Peak Debut Hints at Hydrogen's Future in U.S. Defense Strategy

Honda CR-V e:FCEV proves hydrogen has a promising future Hydrogen hasn't quite caught on like automotive manufacturers hoped, with refueling stations largely limited to California. While many experts and consumers alike have written off hydrogen in favor of battery-electric vehicles, the Honda CR-V e:FCEV is out to prove that fuel cell modules have a future by taking a run at the Broadmoor Pikes Peak International Hill Climb, better known as 'Race to the Clouds.' The 156-turn, 12.42-mile mountain climb will take place on June 22nd, and it's only possible because of Zero Emissions Industries' (ZEI) FTcase, a portable hydrogen refueling system. 0:00 / 0:09 Nissan's revolutionary self-driving tech hits Japan's streets Watch More ZEI FTcase, a portable hydrogen refueling solution — Source: ZEI Honda has a long history in zero-emission competition This isn't Honda's first rodeo when it comes to entering zero-emission vehicles in the intense mountain climb. The automaker's history of zero-emissions competition at Pikes Peak dates back to 1994, when Honda won the first-ever EV Class race with an electric Honda Civic wagon. In 1999, the manufacturer entered a race-ready EV Plus into the EV Class, taking home another win. 15 years later, in 2014, an electrified Honda Fit won the EV Class for a third time. The following year, Honda ventured into the Exhibition Class with an EV concept based on the CR-Z. In 2016, a four-motor EV with NSX styling completed the Pikes Peak run in just over nine minutes. 2025 Honda CR-V e:FCEV — Source: Honda The 2025 Honda CR-V e:FCEV will compete in the Exhibition Class on June 22nd, powered by a stock zero-emission powertrain on June 22nd. Other modifications include a one-inch lowered suspension, 18-inch wheels, racing brake pads, racing seat, and safety cage. There's no hydrogen refueling infrastructure available at the local level, which means the CR-V e:FCEV is relying on ZEI's FTcase, a portable hydrogen fueling system, to stay in the race. The refueling system allows a single driver with no hydrogen expertise to refuel a hydrogen fuel cell vehicle safely. The 2025 Honda CR-V e:FCEV utilizes the automaker's second-generation fuel cell system, which improves durability, increases efficiency, and lowers costs compared to the previous generation. The hydrogen-powered crossover features plug-in charging capability, offering up to 29 miles of electric-only driving and an EPA-estimated 270-mile driving range. The plug-in hybrid powertrain uses a single electric motor that produces 174 horsepower and 229 lb-ft of torque. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. 2025 Honda CR-V e:FCEV — Source: Honda The CR-V e:FCEV is hand-built at the Honda Performance Manufacturing Center in Marysville, Ohio. It's the only fuel cell passenger vehicle made in the United States, and the first to combine hydrogen fuel cell technology with a plug-in hybrid system. Available in one trim level, the 2025 Honda CR-V e:FCEV starts at $50,000 and is only available for purchase in California. The hydrogen-powered CR-V acts as proof of concept for military use If anything, ZEI's FTcase proves that hydrogen can be a logistical solution in military applications, namely in sensor-heavy environments. Specifically, the U.S. Special Forces Operations Command has prioritized 'Reduced Signature' capabilities in its search for an alternative fuel source. Such a fuel source would need to have low thermal, visual, and audible signatures. 2025 Honda CR-V e:FCEV — Source: Honda The Army is also currently developing alternative power sources for unmanned vehicles, command equipment, and power generation. Hydrogen fits the bill to a T, with no greenhouse gas emissions and low thermal signatures that would help the alternative fuel source fly under the radar. Army researchers are taking hydrogen generation methods a step further, with a focus on improving the life of fuel cells, catalysts, and cleansing systems. Fuel cell power sources also need to be compact, easy to move, and relatively undetectable. Under the Obama administration, the Department of Defense put a heavy focus on solar power. More recently, however, the Pentagon has shifted to hydrogen fuel cell adoption. The Air Force, for example, deployed a 600-kW fuel cell microgrid at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii last year. While a single microgrid is a start, the hydrogen puzzle is still one that needs to be solved. 2025 Honda CR-V e:FCEV — Source: Honda Natural gas is the primary source of hydrogen, but coal also makes its own contribution. As a proposed alternative to fossil fuel dependency, hydrogen sourced from coal isn't exactly a solid game plan. Fortunately, new hydrogen sources are within reach, with electrolysis proving one of the most promising. Electrolysis is essentially a fuel cell in reverse – hydrogen is extracted from water via a membrane, a catalyst, and electricity. That's where the existing solar arrays from the Obama administration come into play. By using the solar arrays already available at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, the military plans become self-sufficient in its hydrogen fuel production. 2025 Honda CR-V e:FCEV — Source: Honda Final thoughts The Honda CR-V e:FCEV's Pikes Peak run has essentially acted as a proof of concept for compact, portable hydrogen refueling stations. Without ZEI's FTcase, odds are the hydrogen-powered CR-V wouldn't be able to compete. Since hydrogen infrastructure hasn't exactly taken the nation by storm, the alternative fuel source has fallen by the wayside simply due to infrastructure and cost, but not everyone has written it off completely. Several automakers are still researching and developing hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. Now, with the military dipping its toes into the water, it's only a matter of time before we see fuel cells fulfilling logistical needs where battery-electric power isn't feasible. About the Author Joseph Pudlewski View Profile

Geeky Gadgets

3 hours ago

• Geeky Gadgets

Apple vs. Samsung: iOS 26 Takes on One UI 7

The ongoing rivalry between Apple's iOS 26 and Samsung's One UI 7 continues to shape the smartphone landscape, offering distinct features tailored to different user preferences. From interface design and customization to multitasking and ecosystem integration, each platform brings unique strengths to the table. The video below from Nick Ackerman explores the key differences to help you determine which operating system aligns better with your priorities. Watch this video on YouTube. Interface and Design: Simplicity vs. Functionality iOS 26 exemplifies Apple's commitment to simplicity and elegance. Its cohesive design, refined widgets, and intuitive navigation create a seamless and visually consistent experience. If you value a polished interface that prioritizes ease of use, iOS 26 delivers on all fronts. In contrast, One UI 7 emphasizes functionality and flexibility, blending Samsung's design language with Android's adaptable framework. While it offers a feature-rich experience, minor inconsistencies in visual design may arise due to the integration of Samsung, Google, and Android apps. For users who prioritize utility and versatility over uniformity, One UI 7 provides a compelling interface. Customization: Depth vs. Simplicity One UI 7 leads the way in customization, offering extensive options to personalize home screens, lock screens, themes, and more. Tools like Good Lock further enhance your ability to tailor the interface, making it ideal for users who want complete control over their device's appearance and functionality. On the other hand, iOS 26 maintains a clean and minimalist aesthetic but limits customization options. While Apple has introduced features like widgets and lock screen personalization, they remain less versatile compared to One UI 7. If you prefer a straightforward, uncluttered experience, iOS 26 may suit your needs better. Multitasking: Power vs. Simplicity For multitasking, One UI 7 excels with features like split-screen mode, app pairs, and pop-up views. These tools are invaluable for power users who frequently juggle multiple tasks and demand efficiency from their devices. iOS 26, while efficient for single-app usage, offers fewer multitasking capabilities on iPhones. Advanced multitasking features are primarily reserved for iPads, leaving iPhone users with limited options. If managing multiple tasks simultaneously is a priority, One UI 7 is the better choice. AI and Smart Assistance: Practicality vs. Potential Samsung's One UI 7 integrates advanced AI features designed to enhance productivity and convenience. Tools like writing assist, interpreter functions, and audio eraser showcase Samsung's focus on practical applications of AI, making it a strong choice for users seeking robust smart assistance. Meanwhile, iOS 26 introduces Apple Intelligence, which is still in its early stages. While promising, its AI capabilities are less developed and lack the versatility of Samsung's offerings. For users who rely heavily on AI tools for daily tasks, One UI 7 currently holds the advantage. Ecosystem Integration: Cohesion vs. Flexibility Apple's ecosystem is renowned for its seamless integration. If you use an iPhone alongside an iPad, Mac, or Apple Watch, you'll appreciate the effortless synchronization and connectivity across devices. This level of cohesion is unmatched, making iOS 26 ideal for users deeply invested in Apple's ecosystem. Samsung's ecosystem, while robust, offers greater flexibility for users who mix and match devices from different brands. Its Galaxy devices, tablets, and wearables work well together, but the experience can feel slightly fragmented compared to Apple's unified approach. If you value adaptability over strict integration, Samsung's ecosystem may be more appealing. Privacy and Security: Consumer vs. Enterprise Focus Both platforms prioritize privacy and security but take different approaches. iOS 26 emphasizes consumer-friendly features like app tracking transparency, fast updates, and a tightly controlled App Store. These measures make it a strong choice for users concerned about personal data privacy. Samsung's One UI 7 focuses on enterprise-grade security with tools like Samsung Knox and secure folders. While these features are powerful, they often require additional setup to maximize their effectiveness. If you prioritize business-level security and advanced protection, One UI 7 may be more appealing. Performance: Speed vs. Polish Both operating systems deliver smooth and responsive performance, but their priorities differ. One UI 7 offers faster animations and caters to users who value speed and efficiency in their daily interactions. iOS 26, on the other hand, emphasizes visual polish, making sure transitions and interactions feel refined and cohesive. Battery performance also varies: iOS 26 excels in standby time, while One UI 7 is better suited for power users who demand more from their devices throughout the day. Hidden Features: Innovation vs. Simplicity One UI 7 stands out with a range of hidden features designed to enhance usability. Tools like edge panels, advanced one-handed mode, and S Pen functionality provide added convenience. Good Lock further expands customization options, allowing users to fine-tune their devices to an impressive degree. In comparison, iOS 26 offers simpler hidden features, such as back tap shortcuts and emergency SOS. While useful, these features lack the depth and innovation seen in Samsung's offerings. If you enjoy discovering and using advanced tools, One UI 7 offers more to explore. Choosing What Matters Most The decision between iOS 26 and One UI 7 ultimately depends on your priorities. One UI 7 stands out for its superior customization, multitasking capabilities, and advanced AI features, making it an excellent choice for users who value versatility and innovation. However, iOS 26 remains a strong contender, offering a polished design, seamless ecosystem integration, and robust privacy features. It's ideal for those who prioritize simplicity and a cohesive user experience. Both platforms continue to push the boundaries of smartphone technology, making sure users have access to innovative features tailored to their needs. Consider your preferences and choose the operating system that best aligns with your lifestyle and priorities. Take a look at other insightful guides from our broad collection that might capture your interest in iOS 26 vs One UI 7 comparison. Source & Image Credit: Nick Ackerman Filed Under: Android News, Apple iPhone, Mobile Phone News, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.