Ajith shares story of becoming 'accidental actor': Took up job to pay my debts
Ajith Kumar, one of the most celebrated actors of Tamil cinema, called himself an 'accidental actor'. In his exclusive sit-down conversation with India Today, he spoke about how he chanced upon acting. He recounted the time he took up acting gigs just to pay his debts. The 'Thunivu' actor candidly stated that he was 'terrible' in his initial films. Later, he ended up working hard on his diction, language and everything else to become the star that he is today.advertisementThe actor opened up about getting into modelling to support his passion - racing. "Acting was never on my radar. I am an accidental actor. I was working as a merchandiser in a government firm. In fact, after school, I worked for an automobile company. I was with them as an apprentice for about six months. When I started racing, I was 18. My parents were way ahead of their time. I remember my father telling me, 'Ajith, motorsports is very expensive, I cannot support you financially. But, I cannot stop you. You'll have to find your way," he began.Continuing further, "It so happened that I was at the racetrack that I was approached by a model co-ordinator who handed me his card and asked me to contact him if I was interested in modelling. I thought let me give it a shot. I started getting assignments and the money I made there [in modelling], I used to spend it on racing. " advertisement
Talking about how he made his film debut, he said, "Initially, I got an audition for a Telugu film - a language that I couldn't speak. I decided to pursue it. My parents were very concerned and said, 'Ajith, nobody in the family has been in the film industry. Think about it'. I told them, 'I know I'm leaping into the dark. But, imagine people who want to become actors come to know that I had refused an offer that came to me. Imagine how angry they would be.' It's something that's coming my way. To not make use of an opportunity that comes your way is a sin. That's how I became an actor."Ajith Kumar also recalled how journalists were taken aback by his honesty in the early days of his career. "I was very naive, and I remember being asked a question by a journalist about what made me take up acting. I told the person that I had debts due to my failed business and that my idea was to do a couple of films and pay my debts. He was flabbergasted. So he asked me if I came in for the money. I told him, 'how many people have the intention of paying back debt? So, why don't you appreciate me agreeing to take a leap into the dark - an unknown territory?' It wasn't like someone casually asked me to come and act. It was an audition and I cracked it. I had to prove myself worthy of an opportunity and that too, in a language I didn't know."advertisementCalling it destiny, Ajith spoke about how he wanted to improve once things got serious at work. He admitted that he was a terrible actor in his early days, but eventually worked his way up."Certain things are destined. You just live the day, be honest, have strong work ethics. I didn't come to the industry wanting to be famous or seeking fame. I wanted money to pay back my debts. If you see my first few films, I was a terrible actor. Even in Tamil, I had other actors dub for me for my first few films. I was criticised for my anglicised accent. Even till this day, mimicry artists mimic my earlier diction. But, I worked on it. I worked on my diction, I worked on my Tamil and a lot of things. I was sincere and honest in my career," he concluded.Ajith Kumar was last seen in director Adhik Ravichandran's 'Good Bad Ugly', which hit theatres on April 10. The film grossed Rs 200 crore and still running successfully in select theatres.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
41 minutes ago
- Economic Times
‘What wrong is Deepika demanding?': Kajol and Rani did 8-hour shifts too, says director Siddharth P. Malhotra as Bollywood debate heats up
Agencies Deepika Padukone's reported exit from Spirit over her request for an eight-hour workday has reignited debate on humane work hours in Indian cinema. Director Siddharth P Malhotra defended her stance, citing past examples like Rani Mukerji and Kajol who also worked limited shifts post-motherhood. Last month, reports broke that Deepika Padukone had stepped away from Sandeep Reddy Vanga's much-anticipated Telugu cop drama Spirit . The reason? Her request for an eight-hour workday. The demand, made just eight months after the birth of her daughter Dua Padukone, sparked debate across the industry and social media, with many questioning whether actors should dictate such terms in big-budget productions. Now, director Siddharth P Malhotra has come out in her support, pointing out that such working conditions are not only reasonable but have long existed in the industry. Speaking to IANS, Malhotra recalled wrapping his 2018 film Hichki —starring Rani Mukerji—in just 28 eight-hour shifts. The film, produced by Aditya Chopra under Yash Raj Films, marked Rani's return to the screen after giving birth to her daughter Adira in 2015. 'For 14 months, I have been there in front of her face. So I kept asking myself, 'Is it going to be worth it?'' Rani had shared in a past interview, reflecting on her emotional struggle as a new mother rejoining work. But Malhotra confirmed the working hours were kept tight and clear. 'She's asking for family time, what wrong is she demanding?' he asked bluntly. 'People are just gaining publicity in the name of Deepika Padukone.' Malhotra also pointed to his debut film We Are Family (2010), in which lead actor Kajol, a mother herself at the time, insisted on fixed working hours. 'When I shot with Kajol in 2010, she used to do eight-hour shifts. She made it very clear she'd either come from 10 am to 6 pm or 7 am to 2 pm,' he said, underscoring that the practice predates the current noise around Deepika's decision. Kajol recently echoed this sentiment to PTI, stating, 'I didn't work for 20 or 30 hours. I was always very clear that we would work a certain amount only, and my mom (veteran actor Tanuja) also backed me up big time on it.' Malhotra believes that directors should match their production plans with the availability of their actors—especially when such conditions are set transparently from the outset. 'If Deepika Padukone has made these conditions clear right from the start, then the director shouldn't work with her if it doesn't suit them,' he said. 'If I need an actor and am confident I can finish the film within those working hours, I'd work with them even for six hours a day.' He added that if Vanga's vision for Spirit required longer working hours, he was within his rights to recast. And that's exactly what has happened: Vanga has now brought Animal star Triptii Dimri on board as the lead opposite Prabhas in the film. While the industry is known for grueling shifts and punishing timelines, the conversation sparked by Padukone's stance opens a new chapter—one that addresses work-life balance, especially for women returning to work post-motherhood.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Rapper Tommy Genesis faces backlash for dressing as Maa Kali in explicit music video
Canadian rapper Tommy Genesis, born Genesis Yasmine Mohanraj, has come under fire for appearing as Maa Kali in a series of explicit music videos. The visuals, shared as part of her latest promotional material, have sparked widespread backlash from those who see the portrayal as a form of cultural appropriation and a blatant disregard for Hindu religious have called on the artiste to stop appropriating Hindu culture and show greater sensitivity toward religious sentiments. The controversy erupted after Tommy Genesis shared visuals promoting her new track 'True Blue', in which she appears in blue body paint, adorned with gold jewellery and a bindi, while holding a Tamil and Swedish descent, Genesis's imagery drew sharp criticism from both Hindu and Christian communities, many of whom found the portrayal deeply offensive. Watch a video here: The videos have sparked widespread disappointment on social media, with many users demanding greater respect for sacred traditions. Several Hindu users criticised the portrayal as deeply disrespectful, calling it 'pathetic' and urging the artist to take down the members of the Christian community also voiced objections, particularly over the use of the crucifix in a provocative another clip: 'True Blue' is a track from the rapper's upcoming album Genesis, with the music video released on Saturday. In the controversial visuals, Tommy Genesis appears in a gold bikini and stilettos, adorned with gold jewellery. At one point, she is seen licking a crucifix and performing a 'namaste' gesture with folded hands - imagery that many found provocative and backlash was swift and vocal. One user wrote, 'Appropriating Hindu culture has become a trend among these so-called Westerners. My culture isn't your aesthetic (sic)." Another wrote bluntly, 'Doing all this just for the music to f***g sk (sic).'A Christian viewer shared their frustration, saying, 'Man, I'm so disappointed with what you did with that cross in the video. That's just straight-up disrespectful - and I'm not only talking about the licking (sic).' Urging the artist to remove the content, another user simply stated, 'Disrespectful AF. Delete this (sic).'Read all the comments here: Photo: Instagram/Tommy Genesis Photo: Instagram/Tommy Genesis Photo: Instagram/Tommy Genesis Photo: Instagram/Tommy Genesis Genesis is yet to respond to the backlash.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Telugu actor Vijay Deverakonda booked under SC/ST Act for derogatory remarks against tribals
Telugu actor Vijay Deverakonda has been booked under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act by the Raidurgam police for allegedly making derogatory remarks against tribal communities during a public event. The case was booked following a complaint filed by Nenavath Ashok Kumar Naik, State President of the Joint Action Committee of Tribal Communities, citing the comments made by the actor on April 26, 2025, during the pre-release event of the film Retro. According to the First Information Report (FIR), seen by The Hindu, the actor allegedly referred to tribal people as lacking intelligence and common sense and likened them to Pakistani terrorists. 'He insulted their tribal community by saying that they had beaten them 500 years ago without any intelligence and minimum common sense. Moreover, he made comments comparing them to Pakistani terrorists,' the complainant said. Attaching the YouTube link in the written complaint, Mr. Naik stated that these comments were not only offensive but deeply insulting to the dignity and self-respect of the tribal community. He said that the content was shared across multiple media channels, including YouTube via Sithara Entertainment's channel, drawing widespread criticism. Investigation is under way.
