Officials: Russia strategy group disbanded amid Trump frustration

WASHINGTON, D.C.: A quiet shift inside the Trump administration has stalled a key diplomatic initiative aimed at pushing Russia toward peace talks with Ukraine.
According to three U.S. officials, a working group formed earlier this year to explore ways to increase pressure on Moscow has been quietly shelved — a casualty of dwindling presidential interest and sweeping staff changes.
Set up by high-ranking members of the White House National Security Council (NSC), the group included officials from the State Department, Pentagon, Treasury, and intelligence community. Its mission was to craft strategies for tightening the screws on Moscow and boosting U.S. leverage in negotiations. However, the group lost momentum by May, as President Donald Trump grew increasingly disillusioned with the pace of progress.
"It lost steam toward the end because the president wasn't there," said one U.S. official familiar with the matter. "Instead of doing more, maybe he wanted to do less."
The group's demise, which has not been previously reported, adds to growing concern in Europe about Trump's approach to Russia, particularly ahead of a key NATO summit this month. On June 16, speaking at the G7 in Canada, Trump repeated that removing Russia from the old G8 alliance had been a mistake.
The final blow came about three weeks ago when most of the NSC's Ukraine team was dismissed in a broader White House shake-up. Among those removed was Andrew Peek, the top NSC official for Europe and Russia.
Though it's unclear who ordered the effort to halt, officials say the scale of NSC personnel cuts made its continuation impractical.
While the group never finalized its recommendations, officials say ideas on the table included economic deals to loosen post-Soviet countries' ties to Moscow, covert operations, and incentives for Kazakhstan to enforce sanctions better. The Kazakhstani embassy in Washington did not respond to a request for comment.
The working group had emerged in March or April as some of Trump's advisers began questioning Putin's willingness to deal and hoped Trump might shift to a tougher stance.
In late March, Trump told NBC News he was "furious" and "pissed off" at Putin's comments about Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. An April 1 NSC statement to Reuters cited "deep frustration with the Russian government over negotiations."
But frustration eventually gave way to fatigue. Despite campaign promises to end the war on "day one," Trump has grown increasingly doubtful about his ability to deliver. Officials say he has recently floated abandoning U.S. mediation efforts altogether.
Meanwhile, Trump has seen little success in other peace efforts, including in the Middle East, where tensions have escalated sharply between Iran and Israel. A March Reuters report also revealed that parts of the U.S. government had suspended work on countering Russian disinformation and sabotage.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Winnipeg Free Press

an hour ago

• Winnipeg Free Press

Trump's go-it-alone strategy on Iran risks dividing an already split Congress

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump's decision to launch a military strike on Iran's nuclear sites without fully consulting the U.S. Congress layered a partisan approach onto a risky action, particularly because the White House briefed top Republican leaders beforehand without doing the same for Democrats. While House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Republican leader John Thune and the GOP chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee were all briefed before the action, their counterparts were not. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer was given a perfunctory heads-up by the White House shortly before the strikes were made public. And House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries' office received a 'courtesy call' before Trump announced it. The so-called Gang of Eight congressional and intelligence leaders were not notified before the mission, according to two people familiar with the situation and granted anonymity to discuss it. One, Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said he learned of the strikes on social media, which he said 'is an uncomfortable thing for the ranking member of the Intelligence Committee.' 'Bad enough that we weren't informed,' Himes, of Connecticut, said Sunday on CNN, 'but unconstitutional that we didn't have the opportunity to debate and speak, as the representatives of the people, on what is one of the more consequential foreign policy things that this country has done in a long time.' It's a highly unusual situation that is complicating the difficult politics ahead for the president and his party as the U.S. enters an uncertain national security era with the surprise military attack on the nuclear facilities, an unprecedented incursion in Iran. Trump faces a vote in Congress as soon as this week on a war powers resolution from Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., that would 'direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.' Another resolution has been introduced by lawmakers from both parties in the U.S. House. And at least one Democrat, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, said Trump's actions are 'clearly grounds for impeachment.' At the same time, the Trump administration is expecting Congress to send an additional $350 billion in national security funds as part of the president's big tax breaks bill also heading soon for a vote. Senators are set to be briefed Tuesday behind closed doors on the situation in Iran. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Sunday that the White House made 'bipartisan courtesy calls' to congressional leadership. She said in a social media post that the White House spoke to Schumer 'before the strike' but that House leader Jeffries 'could not be reached until after, but he was briefed.' While the president has authority as the commander in chief of the U.S. armed forces to order specific military actions, any prolonged war-time footing would traditionally need authorization from Congress. The House and Senate authorized actions in Iraq, Afghanistan and beyond after the Sept. 11, 2001, attack. 'Congress should be consulted,' Kaine said on CBS' 'Face the Nation.' 'We were not.' As soon as Trump announced the actions late Saturday, he won swift support from the GOP leadership in Congress. Johnson, Thune and the Senate Intelligence Committee chairman, Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, were all briefed ahead of time and sent almost simultaneous statements backing the military campaign, as did the House Intelligence Committee chairman, Rep. Rick Crawford, also of Arkansas. But by apparently engaging with only one side of the political aisle, Trump risks saddling his Republican Party with political ownership of the military action against Iran, which may or may not prove popular with Americans. Rather than rally the country to his side, Trump risks cleaving its already deep divisions over his second term agenda. Johnson, who praised Trump's action against Iran as 'the right call,' said the president's targeted strike was within his authority and in line with past presidential actions. 'Leaders in Congress were aware of the urgency of this situation and the Commander-in-Chief evaluated that the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act,' Johnson, R-La., said on social media. Trump himself has shown little patience for political dissent from within his party, even as criticism rolls in from among his most trusted backers. The Iran military campaign threatens to splinter Trump's Make America Great Again movement, which powered his return to the White House. Many Trump supporters aligned with his campaign promises not to involve the United States in overseas actions and instead to be a peace-making president. 'I think I represent part of the coalition that elected Trump,' said Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., on CBS. 'We were tired of endless wars in the Middle East.' Massie and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California have introduced their own war powers resolution in the House, a sign of how close the far left and far right have bonded over their opposition to U.S. campaigns abroad, particularly in the Middle East. The Trump administration insisted Sunday the U.S. is not seeking a war with Iran. 'We're not at war with Iran. We're at war with Iran's nuclear program,' said Vice President JD Vance on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' And Trump swiftly attacked Massie, who is one of the most steadfast non-interventionist GOP lawmakers in Congress — along with Sen. Rand Paul, also of Kentucky — and the president suggested he would turn his Republican Party against the congressman. 'MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER, Tom Massie, like the plague!' the president said on social media. 'The good news is that we will have a wonderful American Patriot running against him in the Republican Primary, and I'll be out in Kentucky campaigning really hard.' __ Associated Press writer Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.

Toronto Star

2 hours ago

• Toronto Star

Trump is open to regime change in Iran, after his administration said that wasn't the goal

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration on Sunday sent a series of conflicting messages to Iran — with U.S. officials initially indicating a willingness to resume negotiations after a surprise attack on three of the country's nuclear sites and President Donald Trump talking up the possibility of regime change. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' Trump posted on social media. 'MIGA!!!'

Globe and Mail

2 hours ago

• Globe and Mail

Ukrainian troops brace for Russian assault on Sumy, top general says

Ukraine's top general says his troops are preparing for a potential Russian assault on the northern city of Sumy, as worries grow that the war here is being forgotten after the United States waded into the Israel-Iran conflict. General Oleksander Syrskyi, commander-in-chief of Ukraine's armed forces, said Ukraine had created what he called 'a special group' to defend Sumy, which had a prewar population of 255,000. Russian troops, he added, were on the verge of entering the central Dnipropetrovsk region for the first time in more than three years of war. 'There really was a difficult situation there a week ago,' Gen. Syrskyi said of a Russian thrust that he said reached the administrative border between the Donetsk and Dnipropetrovsk regions before it was repelled by Ukrainian troops. More than 70 per cent of the southeastern Donetsk region – which Russian President Vladimir Putin claims to have annexed – is under Russian occupation. In a briefing with reporters in Kyiv, Gen. Syrskyi gave a grim assessment of a war that is now being fought along a front line that stretches for 1,200 kilometres. In addition to ground fighting in six different regions of Ukraine, Russia regularly launches missile-and-drone attacks on cities around the country. 'They are preparing for a protracted war, a war of attrition. This is their main strategy. They want to pressure us with their human resources, exhaust us with their mass,' Gen. Syrskyi said. Zelensky still to make decision on attending NATO summit, seeks meeting with Trump Putin says all of Ukraine is 'ours' as he eyes capture of Sumy The Russian thrust toward Sumy became more menacing after Mr. Putin said his troops had entered the Sumy region to create a 'buffer zone' to protect the neighbouring Kursk region from attack. 'Next is the city of Sumy, the regional centre. We don't have the task of taking it, but in principle I don't rule it out,' Mr. Putin said Friday in a speech to the annual St. Petersburg International Economic Forum. In the same speech, Mr. Putin said he considered all of Ukraine to be Russian territory. 'I consider Russians and Ukrainians to be one people. In that sense, all of Ukraine is ours.' Gen. Syrskyi said he had no choice but to take the threat to Sumy seriously. He said he had assigned a special unit to begin building new fortifications in and around the city, with a special emphasis on anti-drone nets to protect the soldiers guarding those trenches from danger posed by unmanned aerial vehicles. 'The main direction, of course, is Sumy … we know that the Russian commanders have received the appropriate task,' Gen. Syrskyi said, referring to Mr. Putin's speech. Gen. Syrski said Russia had deployed some of its best units, including airborne units and marines, on the Sumy front. The threat to Sumy emerged after Ukraine launched a surprise incursion into Russia's Kursk region last summer. That opened a new front in the war, forcing Russia to pull some 63,000 troops from the front line in the Donetsk region and redeploy them to Kursk to repel the attack. Ukraine now clings to about 90 square kilometres of territory inside the Kursk region. While some of the redeployed units are now being used in the Russian push toward Sumy, Gen. Syrskyi said the Ukrainian incursion into Kursk was nonetheless a success because it had kept the Russians from achieving their goal of capturing the strategic Donetsk region city of Pokrovsk. Speaking of the overall situation, Gen. Syrskyi said there were currently 695,000 Russian troops stationed inside Ukraine, with another 121,000 troops in reserve. The size of the Russian army was growing by 8,000 or 9,000 soldiers a month, he said, because of financial incentives the Kremlin is offering to new recruits. Russian media have reported that – in addition to regular payments – those who join the army will have up to US$100,000 in debts written off by the state. Gen. Syrskyi wouldn't give any numbers regarding Ukraine's efforts to recruit new soldiers, but said Ukraine would be forced to increase its recruitment push. Conscription, he said, was 'an unpopular measure – but in conditions of war, no country has avoided mobilization.' Gen. Syrskyi gave his briefing hours before U.S. President Donald Trump ordered his country's air force to attack Iran's nuclear program. The fear in Kyiv now is that Mr. Trump, who briefly tried to push Russia and Ukraine towards a peace deal, will focus his attention on the Middle East, leaving Ukraine without the support of what had been its biggest ally, in terms of providing military assistance. Ukraine received US$64.6-billion in military assistance from the U.S. under former president Joe Biden, after the start of the Russian invasion in February, 2022. No new weapons shipments have been authorized since Mr. Trump took office in January. On Friday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky told a group of reporters that 'for President Trump, the Israel-Iran issue is certainly a higher priority today.' Mr. Zelensky was referring to Mr. Trump's abrupt departure from last week's G7 meeting in Kananaskis, Alta., less than 24 hours into the two-day summit. Mr. Trump's return to Washington and focus on the Iran file meant that he left without meeting Mr. Zelensky, who had planned to ask Mr. Trump to authorize new weapons sales to Ukraine and to adopt new sanctions against Russia. Mr. Zelensky has been invited to this week's NATO summit in The Hague but said his decision on whether or not to attend would depend on several factors, including whether he would get a meeting with Mr. Trump, something he called 'very important.' It's unclear whether Mr. Trump still plans to travel to The Hague while the U.S. is involved in the war against Iran.