International mutual funds offer 14% average return in 1 year. Are global markets the new hotspot?

International
mutual funds
have delivered an average return of 14.5% over the past year, ranking second among all fund categories. Market experts attribute this performance to a strong rally in U.S. tech stocks, a rebound in Chinese equities, and improved investor sentiment across European markets.
'A softer dollar, easing inflation, and a global shift toward rate cuts—already initiated by some central banks—have supported risk assets. While some volatility may persist, the broader orientation is supportive, making this a good time to start SIPs/STPs rather than wait for a better entry,' Sagar Shinde, VP of Research at Fisdom, shared with ETMutualFunds.
Also Read |
Explained: How thoughtful asset allocation enhances mutual fund performance?
Best MF to invest
Looking for the best mutual funds to invest? Here are our recommendations.
View
Details
»
Another expert, comparing the returns of international mutual funds with the Nifty50 over the past year and month, noted that these returns are significantly influenced by global geopolitical events, such as Trump-era tariffs, speculation around the upcoming U.S. elections, and shifting trade agreements, making
international funds
more event-driven and volatile.
'Over the long term, Indian markets are much more consistent compared to international funds, which shows that domestic funds have higher return potential with a wide range of categories to pick from,' Chirag Muni, Executive Director, Anand Rathi Wealth Limited, shared with ETMutualFunds.
Live Events
According to Chirag, if we look at the long-term risk adjusted returns of global markets, the U.S. and Indian markets have shown better efficiency compared to China, Hong Kong and Japan and in recent months, international markets have seen sharp, event-driven rallies like China's stimulus-led surge or U.S. trade-related volatility, but these are often short-lived.
There were 66 international funds which have marked their presence in the last year, and out of these, 44 gave double-digit returns, 21 gave single-digit returns, and one gave a negative return. DSP World Gold FoF offered the highest return of 70.47% in the same period.
Mirae Asset Hang Seng TECH ETF FoF
and Mirae Asset NYSE FANG+ETF FoF gave 52.06% and 41.06% returns, respectively, in the said period. PGIM India Global Equity Opp FoF gave the lowest single-digit return of around 0.07% in the mentioned period. Mirae Asset Global Electric & Autonomous Vehicles Equity Passive FOF lost 1.70% in the same period.
After reviewing the performance of international funds, Shinde suggests a 10–15% allocation for optimal diversification. He recommends keeping the U.S. as the core exposure, citing its innovation and strong earnings, while viewing China as a tactical or contrarian bet due to its low valuations and recent policy support.
Also Read |
Up 29% in 5 months! Should you invest or avoid gold mutual funds?
'These funds are best used for long-term allocation (5+ years). SIPs/STPs are more prudent in the current environment, helping average out market and currency volatility better than lump sum investing,' he adds.
While refraining investors from investing in international funds and advising to shift focus on a well-diversified mix of domestic equity funds across categories and sectors, Chirag adds that if one looks for global diversification in the portfolio can explore only up to 5 -10% of the overall portfolio.
'International funds can offer exposure to global opportunities, but given its track record for volatility and uneven performance across global markets, investors are advised not to rely heavily on them. It is more suitable to do an SIP in diversified domestic equity funds over the long term, as they provide stronger long-term growth and better risk-adjusted returns. Trying to time global markets or chase short-term rallies is not advisable, as such moves are often driven by unpredictable events and can lead to poor investment outcomes,' Chirag said.
Over the last three months, international funds have delivered an average return of 5.61%, and 8.58% over the past six months. DSP World Gold FoF topped the charts across both timeframes.
Over the past three years, the best-performing economies included the US, Taiwan, and
Nasdaq
, while Greater China and some US-focused funds lagged during the same period.
Post these funds offering single-digit average return in the short-term, Shinde mentions that the outlook for international funds remains constructive but nuanced and as several central banks—especially in Europe and emerging markets—have already begun their rate-cutting cycles, which supports global liquidity and risk assets.
'At the same time, global equities benefit from resilient growth, improving earnings, and attractive valuations outside the US. However, headwinds like rising trade tensions, tariffs, and geopolitical risks could cause intermittent volatility. Overall, international funds remain a valuable long-term diversification tool, with opportunities across the US, China, and selective global themes,' Shinde adds.
While sharing India's strong economic outlook, IMF projections, RBI rate cut, and with a stable fiscal deficit projected at 4.4% for FY26 and strong tax revenues, macro fundamentals remain solid, Chirag advises investors not to go for international funds.
Also Read |
14 equity mutual funds offer over 30% CAGR in 3 years. Are there any included in your portfolio?
International funds invest across a range of geographies, commodities, and global indices. Markets like the NYSE, NASDAQ, the broader US economy, and Taiwan delivered strong performance, while regions such as Hang Seng and Greater China underperformed. Ultimately, a fund's returns hinge on the specific geography it's exposed to.
That means you should pay extra attention to your investments in international funds. Pay extra attention to which geography or indices you are investing in.
(
Disclaimer
: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
If you have any mutual fund queries, message on ET Mutual Funds on Facebook/Twitter. We will get it answered by our panel of experts. Do share your questions on
ETMFqueries@timesinternet.in
alongwith your age, risk profile, and twitter handle.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

42 minutes ago

• Time of India

No more TACO? What happens to Trump's tariffs after US attack on Iran? From ‘World Chickening Out' to ‘No One Chickens Out' - here's what may happen

Donald Trump's decisions on tariffs have become more crucial than ever. (AI image) US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities have had one important consequence - globally markets are aware that Donald Trump will not always 'chicken out'! US President Donald Trump's military strike on Iranian nuclear installations, alongside Israel's ongoing conflict with Iran, has introduced additional geopolitical uncertainties into an already unstable global economic landscape. In this backdrop, Trump's decisions on tariffs have become more crucial than ever. Prior to the weekend attacks, financial markets and America's trading partner were possibly operating under the principle that "Trump Always Chickens Out, or TACO". This notion suggested that each severe threat, including that of high reciprocal tariffs, would ultimately be watered down Trump's implementation of tariffs risks elevating prices and hampering economic growth. However, the prevalent belief suggested these effects would manifest as mild economic discomfort rather than severe financial distress. The widespread acceptance of "TACO" has encouraged market optimism, despite economists' warnings about the impending effects of Trump's tariffs on domestic and international economies. Also Read | Nightmare scenario: How Iran, hit by US & Israel strikes, may choke world's oil supply via Strait of Hormuz - explained This belief has also strengthened the resolve of nations in negotiations with the president, who has openly expressed his eagerness for agreements and established a July 9 deadline through a 90-day postponement of his most severe tariff measures. Some countries have questioned the necessity of yielding to Trump's demands when retreat appears inevitable. But, that may change now! Operation Midnight Thunder The US president's decision to strike Iran, contrary to advice from his closest allies, demonstrates his unpredictable leadership style. His willingness to take action where previous administrations hesitated shows a departure from conventional diplomatic approaches. According to a Bloomberg report, the global economic impact of "Operation Midnight Thunder" hinges on Iran's response. Should tensions escalate, leading to Iran blocking the Strait of Hormuz and causing oil prices to rise, it would create additional strain on an already vulnerable global economy weakened by existing trade tariffs. The situation might prompt international markets and policymakers to reassess their interpretation of Trump's warnings. This military action proves his readiness to follow through on serious threats when diplomatic negotiations fail to achieve his desired outcomes, the report said. What will happen to Trump's tariffs ? 4 scenarios to consider It's important to note that whilst economic conflicts typically cause less devastation than military ones, every conflict impacts the economy. This situation will likely follow the same pattern. 'The World Chickens Out': The first possibility involves other nations interpreting Trump's actions as a serious warning sign, whilst viewing the strikes as an isolated incident that temporarily halts the Middle East tensions. This prompts countries to offer substantial compromises to Washington, hastening to finalise trade agreements before Trump's Liberation Day tariffs deadline of July 9. This represents the White House's likely preferred outcome: "The World Chickens Out", according to Bloomberg. 'Trump Chickens Out Rationally': The subsequent scenario suggests that the weekend military action intensifies the ongoing conflict, triggering elevated oil prices, worldwide economic disruption and volatile financial markets throughout summer. Trump responds by postponing his tariff implementation. However, the economic consequences remain significant, whilst continued trade uncertainty creates additional challenges. This represents: "Trump Chickens Out Rationally". 'Trump Holds Hands With the World': The third possibility envisions an unexpected global unity, including the US, to counter economic repercussions. A unified approach to stabilise oil prices and financial markets, coupled with renewed international cooperation, results in minimal global economic disruption. This could be termed: "Trump Holds Hands With the World." 'No One Chickens Out': The fourth and most concerning scenario suggests Trump, encouraged by his initial actions, pursues an aggressive strategy. Iran responds by blocking Gulf oil shipments. Despite soaring oil prices and market downturns, Trump intensifies his tariff policies. As the Liberation Day duties suspension ends, American trade barriers reach levels unseen since the 1800s. Major economies implement countermeasures, leading to worldwide trade disruption. Both global and US economies enter recession. Trump maintains his stance as international tensions escalate, potentially leading towards widespread conflict. This scenario could be labelled: "No One Chickens Out." Alternative outcomes or combinations of these scenarios might prove more realistic. Also Read | Iran-Israel war & US bombings: Should possible Strait of Hormuz closure worry India about its oil supply? Explained in 10 points Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Business Standard

42 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Apple's China supply chain remains strong despite focus on India, SE Asia

China still enjoys dominance in Apple's key supply chain segments, even as the global tech giant's share of electronics manufacturing in the country has dropped from around 70 per cent to 50 per cent over the last seven years amid increasing focus on India and Southeast Asia, a report by a US-based public policy think-tank American Enterprise Institute (AEI) said. According to the report, key supply chain segments, such as printed circuit boards, printing and packaging, molded and mechanical components, and especially precision manufacturing remain predominantly in China, leaving scope for policymakers in countries like India to focus on attracting investment from its suppliers in such manufacturing capabilities. Interestingly, despite this dominance, Chinese-owned firms generally only play a role in lower-value segments of the supply chain. Many of the higher-value components— even those made in China— are produced in factories owned by Japanese, Taiwanese, or US firms, the report said. It indicated that the monopoly of China in electronics manufacturing for Apple is declining over the years. The assembly of all components into a device— the final step in the production process— is referred to as electronics manufacturing or assembly. 'Beginning in 2018, Apple began to shift its electronics manufacturing footprint, presumably driven by the 2018 US tariffs on China. Before 2018, around 60–70 per cent of electronics manufacturing locations were in China, including nearly all final assembly of key devices like iPhones. Today, by contrast, around 50 per cent of Apple facilities are in China, with increased factory share in India and Southeast Asia,' the report said. Of the 17 companies conducting electronics manufacturing in Apple's supply chain, only two are Chinese. Of the 34 electronics manufacturing facilities reported in China, only three are operated by Chinese firms. The report suggests that policymakers in India and countries in Southeast Asia seeking to attract investment and upgrade their manufacturing capabilities have substantial scope to continue attracting suppliers of companies like Apple, in not only basic assembly, but also some of the other component categories. 'The fact that many of these China-based factories are owned by foreign firms facilitates potential supply chain shifts. Moreover, as western electronics firms face higher tariffs, they are looking for more diversified production locations,' it said. The report is authored by Chris Miller, a non-resident senior fellow at the AEI, and Vishnu Venugopalan, a fellow at Harvard University and an Indian Administrative Service officer. It added that the assembly process for devices like phones often only cost around $10, a tiny fraction of its price. Hence, if tariffs lead to a shift in electronics manufacturing, shifting final assembly from China to a different country — without any other changes in its supply chain – will have minimal impact. Interestingly, the US major has diversified the battery ecosystem, which was solely dependent on China and South Korea till 2018, to multiple other countries. 'Today, however, it procures battery components from five different regions, including India and Southeast Asia. While over half of Apple's battery component sourcing locations remain in China, more than 40 per cent of locations are now outside China, representing a significant shift in Apple's production footprint. Notably, the concentration of China-based manufacturing facilities is greater than the share of Chinese firms. As of 2023, there were firms headquartered in Taiwan, South Korea, and Germany in Apple's battery supply chain—more non-Chinese firms (five) than Chinese (four)," it stated. The connectors and cables category involve some low-end products and some that require more high-end, specialty chemicals. 'The enduring position of Japan-based manufacturing in this category illustrates the higher-end manufacturing involved in certain components. Other segments, however, have seen a substantial shift from China to India and the 'other' category, mostly Southeast Asian countries,' it added. Of the nine companies producing products in this category, only one is Chinese. Other firms in this category with China-based manufacturing are American, Taiwanese, or Japanese — companies like Amphenol (US), Japan Aviation Electronics Industry (Japan), Furukawa Electric (Japan), and Hirose Electric (Japan).

India.com

42 minutes ago

• India.com

Bad news for Pakistan, China as India not waiting for Russian SU-57 or US F-35 fighter jets, IAF making its own fighter planes more dangerous...

An image of British F-35B fighter jet used for Representational purpose Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) programme: In a significant achievement for India's defence sector, media reports have it that the Indian government is currently not in any formal talks to purchase advanced fighter aircraft like the Russian Su-57E or the American F-35. Instead, it is relying on indigenous Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA). Here are all the details you need to know about India's very own Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), which is being called India's answer to fifth-generation air power. India's Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) programme In a big step towards 'Atmanirbhar Bharat' in Defence sector, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh recently approved the Execution Model for the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) programme. Readers should note that the AMCA clearance marks a critical step towards realising India's goal of joining an elite club of nations in designing and producing its own fleet of next-generation combat aircraft. The project will be helmed by the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA) of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), said the Defence Ministry in a press release. 'Both private and public sector entities would do bidding for the project, either independently or as a joint venture or as consortia. The entity/bidder should be an Indian company compliant with the laws and regulations of the country,' said the MoD statement. India's answer to fifth-generation air power The AMCA, widely seen as India's answer to fifth-generation air power, will give a major boost to achieving 'atmanirbharata' in the defence sector and will become a hallmark of India's growing defence capabilities. Being the fifth-generation stealth multirole fighter equipped with cutting-edge technology, it will be suited for all-weather operation. Designed with low radar cross-section and supercruise capability, the AMCA is seen as the successor to the frontline Sukhoi Su-30MKI fighter jets. Some reports suggest that its mass production is likely to commence by 2035. (With inputs from agencies)