MKP joins escalating call for higher education Minister Nkabane to resign

Calls for President Cyril Ramaphosa to remove Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane have been escalated amid allegations of corruption at the Construction Sector Education and Training Authority (CETA) and claims that she misled Parliament.
Image: GCIS
The umKhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) has joined the calls for the removal of Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane, saying she is not fit to hold the position.
The party was responding to the calls for President Cyril Ramaphosa to remove Nkabane amid allegations of corruption at the Construction Sector Education and Training Authority (CETA) and claims that she misled Parliament.
Nkabane is already under scrutiny for misleading the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education about the composition of the panel responsible for recommending appointments to the boards of Sector Education & Training Authorities (SETAs), which appointed ANC-aligned individuals.
This week, fresh revelations emerged in reports that she ignored whistleblower reports detailing tender fraud and governance irregularities at CETA, which has a budget exceeding R20 billion.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The whistleblower, Tumiso Mphuthi, a suspended CETA senior manager, claimed that Nkabane repeatedly ignored her corruption complaints against CEO Malusi Shezi.
Mphuthi alleged that Shezi rigged tenders awarding contracts to unqualified bidders, yet no investigation was launched despite her submitting evidence to multiple authorities.
MKP MP, Mnqobi Msenzane, said these activities show that Nkabane was not fit for the office, adding that she has displayed a serious level of incompetence.
He said the challenges at CETA were not an island, adding that they include other institutions such as the Services SETA, which date back prior to the arrival of the current CEO.
Msenzane said Nkabane created chaos in all SETAs, including her attempt to appoint highly political, conflicted individuals to be board chairpersons of SETAs, and her closest friends who were board members of the Energy and Water SETA (EWSETA).
'Due to pressures exerted by MK Party MPs and other committee members, the Minister has since withdrawn the corrupt appointments.
"As if nothing worse could have tragically visited the SETAs, the Minister proceeded by misleading the Portfolio Committee on the existence of the so-called Independent Panel, which the Minister must still come and answer to the Committee for her shocking transgressions.'
He said Nkabane also delayed the appointments of the SETA board for two months, adding that this has placed the SETAs in disarray, there is a corporate governance breakdown that have seen Auditor General (AG) reports delayed.
He said this would delay the strategic planning and directions of the SETAs, as well as mandatory grant approval.
'There will be high surpluses in revenues, spending will be less, leading to a hindrance to economic growth. Some stipends and bursaries will not be paid. As things stand, SETAs are similarly under administration currently,' he said.
Nkabane's spokesperson, Camagwini Mavovana, said questions should be referred to Ramaphosa's spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya, who did not respond.
Meanwhile, the DA said it has also filed a complaint with the Public Protector, following the revelation that Nkabane misled Parliament.
'The DA also believes that the level of deceit and misleading of Parliament violates the Executive Members Ethics Code, for which the Public Protector has jurisdiction to investigate and make findings – and therefore the DA has reported Minister Nkabane to the Public Protector for investigation into the serious breach of the Executive Members Ethics Code in numerous counts of misleading Parliament,' the party said.
Prominent academic Prof Malegapuru Makgoba has joined calls for her resignation.
In an opinion piece published in the Sunday Times, former University of KwaZulu-Natal vice-chancellor and national health ombud, Makgoba said the only honourable course for Nkabane was to quit, adding that she had disgraced Ramaphosa and publicly embarrassed him, the higher education and her department.
'She brought this sector into disrepute and her continued presence in the position of Minister continues to damage this vulnerable sector, he said.
manyane.manyane@inl.co.za

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Citizen

an hour ago

• The Citizen

DA anniversary: Can a ‘white party' govern SA again?

The DA is now part of the government of national unity alongside the ANC. Twenty five years since the DA was formed, the party is still trying to convince South Africans that they are not a whites-only party. The party was established on June 24 2000, following a merger between the Democratic Party (DP) and the New National Party (NPP). Over the years, the party has seen many prominent black leaders leave for various reasons, including Mmusi Maimane, Herman Mashaba, Lindiwe Mazibuko, Mbali Ntuli, and former Midvaal mayor Bongani Baloyi. Political analyst Sanet Solomon said the departures of these black leaders have left many South Africans wondering about the internal affairs of the DA. 'The DA has been subject to a lot of critique given its struggle to retain its prominent black leaders. This challenge has translated into its inability to extend its voting base. 'While some of its policies have the ability to positively impact society, voters are also influenced by perception,' Solomon said. Transformation in the top structures Solomon said black leaders do not seem to have strategic positions in the party, which could easily create an impression that the party only really serves one racial group. 'Voters may need to see better integration. This may require the Federal Chair to be one racial group, the Chief Whip of another group, and the leader of a completely different group. 'South Africa is diverse, and this needs to be reflected in their leadership positions. There are phenomenal and competent people across all the diverse groupings. This is what people want to see,' she said. Despite the DA being the second biggest party in the government of national unity (GNU), Solomon said it is unlikely the party will run the country by themselves anytime soon. 'Some of their policies would be suitable for a ruling party, but it is unlikely that they would be able to become a majority party as the current system of proportional representation would result in more coalition governments,' she said. ALSO READ: Zille to the rescue: Will she save Joburg as the city's mayor? DA's balancing act Another analyst, Professor Susan Booysen, said the DA has made progress since it was founded. 'They have managed to keep their electoral territory, opinion polls indicate that they have made slight advances.' Booysen said that even though the DA is not close to being a majority party in SA, it could use the current coalition politics to influence policy. 'If they continue this current but modest progress, then they will probably be a very likely or inevitable coalition partner for future governance,' she said. Booysen said the DA has been forced to tread carefully around issues of race in the party. 'They are doing an often torturous, delicate, intricate balancing trick between coming across as more inclusive and simultaneously playing to their own small, racially-defined constituencies. 'It is the dilemma it is going to run into: simultaneous and competing endorsements by its own small internal constituencies and the broader South African community that is looking for restitution.' DA for all DA spokesperson Willie Aucamp rubbished claims that the party only serves white interests. 'The DA is the most diverse party in South Africa, and we elect leaders on merit, not race. 'Yes, people come and go in politics, but we remain focused on building a capable, non-racial alternative that serves all South Africans.' Aucamp said the party has proven that it can lead where it governs, and is now ready to take over the Union Buildings. 'South Africans are ready for a government that gets things done. The DA has shown we can lead with competence and integrity, and more people are turning to us to rescue the country from decline, including in Gauteng,' he said. The party will celebrate its birthday with a blanket drive on Tuesday. NOW READ: 'I am finally home' – Liam Jacobs ditches DA for Patriotic Alliance

IOL News

an hour ago

• IOL News

Investigation clears CETA of board manipulation accusation

The Construction Education and Training Authority Sector Education and Training Authority is adamant that there has been no manipulation of board members. Image: CETA/Facebook The Construction Education and Training Authority (CETA) Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) is adamant that there has been no manipulation of board members. This, it argued, is backed up by the Department of Higher Education and Training, which it said in a statement, undertook an investigation into the allegations of board manipulation at CETA and 'found no evidence of such wrongdoing'. Its statement followed articles that stated that there was corruption at the CETA. This comes after a Sunday Times article arguing that there was corruption and 'rigging' of board appointments. The Sunday Times piece was preceded by an IOL investigation, which was based on leaked paperwork that detailed alleged irregular disciplinary hearings, as well as allegations of financial misconduct. Pages of letters from the National Education Health and Allied Workers' Union to Nobuhle Nkabane, Minister of Higher Education, shared with IOL showed that CEO Malusi Shezi allegedly interfered in procurement processes as well as instigated disciplinary action against those who questioned him. Late on Sunday, CETA issued a statement in which it said that there had been no board manipulation. 'The allegations against the CETA officials are false and malicious. SETA Boards are appointed by the Minister of Higher Education and Training… with limited input for the SETAS or their CEOs,' it said. It also said that each tender awarded is audited by external auditors who are registered with the Independent Regulatory Board of Auditors. 'That is the highest level of assurance and conclusions about processes compliance with section 217 of the Constitution, the Section 51 of the PFMA and the related CETA policies; one can rely on in this regard,' it said. However, the Minister has, herself, come under fire. In the first week of this month, Nkabane, publicly apologised for her behaviour in a Parliamentary Committee on Higher Education session held earlier this week after being lambasted by President Cyril Ramaphosa. In a post on X, she said that she had reflected and acknowledged 'that the situation could have been handled differently'. This followed her meeting with the Committee to, in theory, explain why she appointed certain people as chairmen of 21 SETAs then withdrew those appointments. MPs accused Nkabane of not providing a detailed explanation or being transparent over her withdrawal of the appointments, and said any process needed to ensure that it was not victim to state capture or be dominated by any one political party when it came to political allegiance of those chosen for the role. She was also accused of not listening and telling Members of Parliament that, even though she withdrew appointments of chairmen, that process was not flawed. One member went as far as to say that no-one would believe her. Ramaphosa indirectly said the Minister had called the process, and Parliament into ill repute. Recently, CETA was given the go-ahead to proceed with disciplinary action against a senior employee who had claimed whistleblower protection. These developments come just days after the employee, identified as Tumi, appeared on a podcast with the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse during which she made allegations of corruption within CETA. 'From the time I assumed office in 2021, one of my key goals has been to eliminate corrupt practices and malfeasance and bring clean governance and administration at CETA. This ruling not only vindicates us but gives us confidence to proceed with action we believe will help clean up the rot and cancer plaguing the Sector Education Training Authorities,' Shezi said at the time of a Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration decision that Tumi had not made her disclosures 'sincerely, honestly and in good faith and thus cannot be regarded as protected disclosures to be protected against occupational detriment'. IOL

TimesLIVE

2 hours ago

• TimesLIVE

Nkabane summoned to parliament as committee chair cites possible legal implications

Higher education portfolio committee chairperson Tebogo Letsie announced plans to summon minister Nobuhle Nkabane as well as her sector education and training authority panels to parliament. This follows the controversy around her recently revoked SETA board chairperson appointments which landed Nkabane in hot water for allegedly misleading MPs about an 'independent panel' she claimed had approved politically connected individuals for the boards of the SETAs. Letsie said at face value, Nkabane appeared to be in breach of section 17 of the Powers, Privileges & Immunities of Parliaments & Provincial Legislatures Act. The legislation makes it a criminal offence to deliberately provide false and misleading information to parliament. 'This looks like she's provided parliament with inaccurate information, either on May 30 or June 17. So, members are saying we must activate section 17, subsection 2 [of the act] of those who lie [to parliament],' Letsie said. The act provides for a prison term of up to 12 months. Letsie added that he was consulting parliament's legal advisers. In a social services cluster briefing, Letsie said the process of the appointments has been a matter of public interest. 'The minister furnished the committee with a list of independent panel members for appointment of SETAs, SFAS, NSA, universities and TVET colleges, with some names on the list still concealed. The independence of the panel was questioned, given that the names on the list are of the minister's advisers, the chief of staff in the office of the minister and departmental officials.' In a surprise turn, one of the people on the list has already denied that he was ever part of that panel, a move which Letsie says raises more questions. 'The committee deliberated on the matter and resolved that the minister is legislatively obligated to furnish parliament with the outstanding names of the panellists who were concealed on the submitted list. She also has to write to all the panel members to submit correspondence exchanged between the minister and each panel member, including their acceptance to be a panellist.' Letsie announced that the committee will also demand terms of reference are given by the minister in respect of their expected roles as panel members. 'We also require a breakdown if the remuneration if any, for the services rendered in their capacity as panel members. The number of meetings attended by each panel member, the minutes of all the meetings of the selection and evaluation proceedings.' Letsie added that the committee is sourcing the report that was compiled and sent to the National Skills Authority for consultation purposes. Both the minister and all panel members are expected to appear before the committee to account for the appointment process. Her two deputy ministers, Buti Manamela and Mimmy Gondwe, have also been invited to the meeting. Letsie said the committee was summoning the two deputy ministers even though they had previously said they played no role in the Seta board appointments. 'Remember that this is a ministry. If they did not play a role, they must put it on record, so it does not look like they told us that in the dark corners. We want them to tell us to our faces, if they played a role or not,' he said. 'In the meantime, I have written to these panellists and said they must give me written submissions to say what their role was in this thing. We want those responses by Wednesday.'