logo
Young banker's death that sparked backlash against Jefferies involved fentanyl and cocaine, autopsy reveals

Young banker's death that sparked backlash against Jefferies involved fentanyl and cocaine, autopsy reveals

The 28-year-old banker whose death led to "vitriolic online attacks" on Jefferies died from the "toxic effects" of fentanyl and cocaine, the Dallas medical examiner said.
Carter McIntosh, an associate with the bank's technology, media, and telecommunications coverage team in Dallas, was found dead in his apartment in January, leading Jefferies CEO Richard Handler to issue a memo defending the bank from "unfounded" speculation about the banker's cause of death.
The police initially ruled it an " unexplained death." An autopsy report by the medical examiner's office now says McIntosh's death was an accident caused by the "combined toxic effects" of fentanyl and cocaine, according to a copy of the report obtained by Business Insider.
Fentanyl, a synthetic opioid up to 50 times stronger than heroin, has proved a rising threat in the US, fueling an alarming surge in overdoses. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says overdoses remain the No. 1 killer of Americans ages 18 to 44.
"Our hearts grieve for Carter and our sincere condolences to his family, coworkers, and friends. Carter is missed by many at Jefferies and beyond," Handler told BI in a statement on Wednesday.
In the wake of McIntosh's death, Handler and the firm's president, Brian Friedman, released a memo to staff expressing their "tremendous sadness" and offering support to employees.
Handler also criticized what he called "unfounded" attacks over Jefferies' work culture.
"At this point, nobody knows exactly what happened and engaging in speculation with cynical assumptions serves no useful purpose and only adds to the grief that the McIntosh family is suffering," the memo said.
McIntosh worked at other financial services firms before joining Jefferies, including stints in equity research at Goldman Sachs and as an investment banking analyst at Moelis & Co., his LinkedIn page said. Before that, he attended Seton Hall University in South Orange, New Jersey.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

4 Ways Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Will Change How You Plan for Retirement
4 Ways Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Will Change How You Plan for Retirement

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

4 Ways Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Will Change How You Plan for Retirement

President Donald Trump's signature legislation, dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' includes plans for tax cuts, green energy cuts, Medicaid cuts and more. It also contains new retirement account provisions that could affect how Americans plan for their golden years. Be Aware: Read Next: As the landmark bill makes its way from the House to the Senate, here's a look at what you need to understand about how it can affect how you plan for retirement. Many Americans would receive a break on their taxes owed if the bill is passed. This means they would be able to channel more money into retirement savings accounts. 'Retirement planning fundamentally comes down to having sufficient resources to make work optional,' said Brett Horowitz, principal and wealth manager at Evensky & Katz / Foldes Financial Wealth Management. 'The proposed extensions of the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act provisions, combined with new deductions for tip income, overtime pay and seniors over 65, could significantly improve retirement outcomes for Americans.' Those who benefited from the cuts in the original Tax Cuts & Jobs Act will continue to enjoy these cuts, allowing them to continue saving for retirement as they had been. 'With many TCJA provisions set to expire at the end of 2025, the House Republican proposal to make these extensions permanent may provide the certainty we need for effective long-term planning,' Horowitz said. 'Retirement modeling depends on clear inputs and stable variables,' he continued. 'The less uncertainty in tax policy, the more accurately we can project success rates. When these changes take effect — pending Senate approval — we'll be able to deliver much better news to clients about their retirement timeline.' Horowitz believes if Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' does not ultimately pass, it could negatively affect Americans' abilities to save for retirement. 'There's a profound psychological difference between telling someone they can retire earlier than expected versus having to extend their working years,' he said. 'The former energizes people about their financial future; the latter can feel overwhelming. These tax provisions create the conditions where more Americans can realistically achieve comfortable retirement.' Learn More: Savvy long-term investment strategies should take taxes into account, so changes to tax laws can shift these strategies. 'Smart investing isn't actually about chasing the highest gross returns — it's about maximizing what clients actually keep after taxes and expenses, and this tax bill addresses some issues there,' Horowitz said. 'While we can control costs through low-fee funds, tax efficiency requires a more nuanced approach that varies by everyone's personal circumstances. 'Higher tax rates push us toward tax-free municipal bonds and tax-efficient ETFs in taxable accounts, while we place tax-inefficient investments in retirement accounts,' he continued. 'This 'tax location' strategy can significantly impact net returns, even if it means accounts perform differently.' 'Two provisions in the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act have created the most anxiety for our clients — the SALT deduction cap and estate tax exemptions,' Horowitz said. 'Both are getting significant relief under the current proposal.' The proposed increase in the SALT deduction cap means retirees will face less of a penalty if they choose to spend their golden years in a state with higher income taxes. 'The SALT deduction increase from $10,000 to $40,000 will reshape where people choose to live and retire,' Horowitz said. 'We've already seen migration patterns shift dramatically since 2017, with high-tax states losing residents to states like Florida and Texas. This change reduces the penalty for living in high-income-tax states, though it doesn't eliminate the advantage of no-tax states entirely.' Estate planning strategies would also change for many Americans if the bill were to pass. 'On the estate side, the current $13.99 million exemption was set to drop to $7.14 million in 2026 — a reduction that had wealthy clients scrambling to implement complex gifting strategies and trust structures,' Horowitz said. 'The proposed permanent increase to $15 million per person, or $30 million for couples, provides enormous relief for families in that middle tier.' This is particularly important because of state-level complications, Horowitz continued. 'Take New York, where you could face no federal estate tax, but still owe state estate taxes on estates between $7.16 million and $13.99 million,' he said. 'The interplay between federal and state rules makes domicile planning critical.' The 'One Big Beautiful Bill' should make estate planning less complex for many people. 'For clients who've already implemented sophisticated estate planning strategies, those structures remain valuable,' Horowitz said. 'But for families with estates under the new thresholds, this eliminates the pressure to make rushed gifting decisions or create complex trusts simply to avoid tax cliffs.' Overall, Horowitz believes the bill will make retirement planning easier. 'The permanent nature of these changes — assuming they pass — finally gives families the certainty to make long-term decisions about where to live, how to structure their wealth and when to implement estate planning strategies,' he said. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 10 Genius Things Warren Buffett Says To Do With Your Money 5 Types of Cars Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on 4 Ways Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Will Change How You Plan for Retirement Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Forget Tesla, Ford is eyeing even bigger EV rivals
Forget Tesla, Ford is eyeing even bigger EV rivals

Miami Herald

time32 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Forget Tesla, Ford is eyeing even bigger EV rivals

When most Americans think of electric vehicles, the first brand that comes to mind is Tesla. The brand revolutionized the EV market in the U.S. by making the first mass-market EV with broad commercial appeal. Until recently, Tesla has dominated the U.S. market, but in recent years, its market share has dropped from 70% to 43.4% in the first quarter of 2025. Related: Ford reports another blowout sales month, but trouble could be ahead Now, newcomers from legacy car brands like General Motors and Ford are gobbling up market share as they look to knock Tesla from the top spot. U.S. electric vehicle sales volume jumped 11.4% year over year in the first quarter to 294,250 vehicles sold. This jump was led by GM, which doubled its EV sales from a year ago, while Ford EV sales were up only modestly. Battery electric vehicles reached 7.5% of all new car sales in the first quarter, an improvement from a year ago, but short of the 8.7% peak reached in Q4 2024. GM went from selling 457 EVs in Q1 2022 to nearly 32,000 in Q1 2025. After a disastrous start to the year, Tesla is basically back where it started in 2022 when it sold 129,743. Ford went from selling 6,734 to 22,500 over the same period, but its path has been anything but straight. The company has struggled with inconsistent sales and elusive profitability. However, Ford remains unbowed, and the company has its sights set on a much bigger prize than the U.S. car market. Image source: Olson/Getty Images Ford's electric vehicle division, Ford Model e, lost $5.1 billion in 2024. That was an increase from the $4.7 billion it lost in 2023. The company says it expects to lose $5.5 billion this year. But despite the daunting landscape, the company thinks it has what it takes to turn its fortunes around. Part of that strategy is making an affordable EV that can compete with Chinese models currently dominating the market. Lisa Drake, who leads Ford's EV industrial plan, recently spoke wth investors during a "candid dinner discussion" hosted by Bernstein lead automotive analyst Daniel Roeska. Related: Ford loses its last cheap vehicle to tariffs "Lisa Drake was explicit: Ford intends to match the cost structure of leading Chinese players. That means not just battery pricing, but full system cost from chassis and thermal systems to inverters and electronics," Roeska wrote, according to Axios. Ford will use its Advanced Electric Vehicle program to build an EV platform that will support eight different body styles, including trucks, crossovers, and possibly sedans. So Ford believes it can compete wth the BYDs of the world that dominate the Chinese EV market, which is much larger than the U.S. one. Ford has already announced that the first product will be a mid-sized pickup. But it will rely on an estimated $700 million federal tax credit this year that a Republican-led Congress could easily cancel. Ford released its May car sales report on Tuesday, June 3. The company reported a 16.3% increase in May sales to 220,959, mainly due to its biggest, most gas-guzzling models. Ford SUVs saw a 23% sales increase to 83,000, led by the Explorer, which had over 20,500 sold in the month. Meanwhile, Ford Trucks saw an 11.2% increase to 121,354 units sold. Overall, Ford has sold 930,925 vehicles to date, a 6.1% year-over-year increase, despite the specter of tariffs upsetting the whole apple cart. However, one area for the company that wasn't in the green was electric vehicle sales. More Ford news Popular Ford newcomer overtakes Jeep in a key areaFord CEO Jim Farley has a strong take on tariffsFord loses its last cheap vehicle to tariffs Ford sold 25% fewer electric vehicles this month than last, accelerating a declining sales trend for a segment of the company's brand that had been experiencing growth. The Mustang Mach-E was the lone electric vehicle model to see sales growth, with an 11% increase to 4,274. In fact, the Mach E is inching toward overtaking its non-electric brother in sales. Mustang sales were down 3% in the month to just over 5,000 sold. Related: Ford CEO Jim Farley has a strong take on tariffs The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Some Americans Are Getting an Extra $156 Check — Do You Qualify for This Lawsuit Payout?
Some Americans Are Getting an Extra $156 Check — Do You Qualify for This Lawsuit Payout?

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Some Americans Are Getting an Extra $156 Check — Do You Qualify for This Lawsuit Payout?

Back in 2020, a class action lawsuit was filed against Thomson Reuters (or Reuters) for using its Clear platform — not to be mistaken for the Clear airline security system — to collect and sell personal data from millions of California residents without their permission. Clear's actions are said to violate the California Consumer Privacy Act, an act that mandates companies to inform users that their personal information will end up in the hands of third parties, as well as how it will be used. Check Out: For You: While Reuters initially argued the benefits of the Clear system, the motion to dismiss the lawsuit was ultimately denied. Fast forward to August 2024 and Reuters finally agreed to settle for $27.5 million — and to change some of its less ideal business practices. So what does this mean for you? Well, if you're a California resident, you might qualify for up to $156.09. Those who were residents of California between Dec. 3, 2016 and Oct. 31, 2024 could qualify for a cut of the $27.5 million — sans attorney fees. You would have had to file a claim, which only took about a minute or so, by Dec. 27, 2024. If you didn't (or if you weren't a California resident), it's too late. Notably, you could have also chosen to opt out of receiving a payout. Or you could have simply done nothing, which essentially means giving up your rights to any payment. You also had the option to object to the settlement. Read Next: If you did qualify and submit a claim in time, initial estimates put the payout at between $19 and $48. That said, only between an estimated 1% and 3% of eligible claimants filed a claim, according to Courthouse News Service. Fewer claims mean a higher payout for those who did qualify — thus, the $156.09 paycheck. This is good news for those who did file. So, when might you receive that payment? According to ClaimDepot, the court formally approved the settlement on Feb. 21, 2025. Final claim payments began going out in April 2025. If you were eligible, your money most likely arrived via Zelle, Venmo, virtual prepaid card or paper check to the address you provided when submitting your claim. More From GOBankingRates Clever Ways To Save Money That Actually Work in 2025 This article originally appeared on Some Americans Are Getting an Extra $156 Check — Do You Qualify for This Lawsuit Payout?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store