Colombia Presidential candidate shot in head: Miguel Uribe undergoes successful initial surgery; condition 'grave', say medics

Miguel Uribe (File photo; taken from X)
A leading Colombian presidential hopeful, critically wounded and battling for survival in hospital after a young assailant shot him twice in the head, remains critical as he underwent initial surgery.
Right-wing Senator Miguel Uribe, aged 39, underwent urgent surgery following Saturday's attack at a Bogota campaign rally, but medical staff indicate his condition remains critical. The Santa Fe Clinic medical team stated he continues in "the most grave condition and the prognosis is reserved", reported AFP.
The shooting has deeply unsettled Colombia, where citizens thought the era of political and drug-related violence was behind them.
Citizens gathered in major metropolitan areas on Sunday for candlelight vigils, prayers and to express their outrage.
"Our hearts are broken, Colombia hurts," said Carolina Gomez, a 41-year-old businesswoman, whilst lighting candles outside Uribe's hospital. Supporters united in chanting "strength to you Miguel" and "the people are with you."
Maria Claudia Tarazona, Uribe's spouse, expressed gratitude for the national support and requested collective prayers.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
This Device Made My Power Bill Drop Overnight
elecTrick - Save upto 80% on Power Bill
Pre-Order
Undo
"He is fighting hard for his life," she said. The senator sustained two head wounds and one leg injury.
Despite the alleged shooter's capture by security personnel, the attack's motivation remains unclear.
Uribe had been outspoken against Colombia's leftist administration, active guerrilla groups and influential drug cartels.
Authorities promised to utilise all available resources to investigate the motive and identify those responsible for orchestrating the attack.
Officials confirmed no specific threats existed against Uribe, though he maintained security protection like other public figures.
The Senator's family narrative reflects Colombia's troubled past, making this incident particularly significant. His grandfather, former president Julio Cesar Turbay, governed from 1978-1982 during guerrilla conflicts and cartel expansion. Uribe is notably the son of Diana Turbay, a renowned journalist whose death by Pablo Escobar's kidnapping devastated Colombia.
Meanwhile, Colombia's Defence Minister Pedro Sanchez announced Sunday that approximately 100 investigators are examining the attack's motive. He previously announced a reward of roughly US$725,000 for crucial information about the perpetrators.
Police director Carlos Fernando Triana reported the suspect, believed to be 15, was injured and receiving treatment. Two additional casualties were reported, and authorities seized a Glock-style weapon.
Politicians across ideological lines have denounced the attack. President Gustavo Petro, a leftist, condemned it as "an attack not only against his person, but also against democracy, freedom of thought, and the legitimate exercise of politics in Colombia."
International condemnation followed, with US Secretary of State
Marco Rubio
describing it as "a direct threat to democracy."
However, Rubio criticised Petro, suggesting "violent leftist rhetoric coming from the highest levels of the Colombian government" contributed to the attack. "President Petro needs to dial back the inflammatory rhetoric and protect Colombian officials," said the US diplomat.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

First Post

40 minutes ago

• First Post

Why Trump attacked Iran 2 days after giving a 2-week deadline

Amid the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, Donald Trump on Thursday said that he would decide in two weeks whether to order a US strike on Tehran. However, two days after this announcement, he shocked one and all by targeting three nuclear facilities in the Islamic Republic. What made him rush? read more A banner bearing a picture of US President Donald Trump accompanied by a message, is displayed in Tel Aviv. President Donald Trump said the US military carried out strikes on June 22 on three Iranian nuclear sites and that Tehran "must now agree to end this war". AFP He did it. He actually did it. On Sunday (June 22), US President Donald Trump addressed the world from the White House announcing that the US military had struck three nuclear sites in Iran, adding that the facilities had 'been completely and totally obliterated'. 'Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success,' he said, adding, 'Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Catch all live updates from US joining Israel war against Iran here He further added, 'Now is the time for peace.' Notably, Trump's attacks on Iran comes just two days after he had announced that he would give Iran's leaders two week's time to negotiate. So, what happened between Thursday and Saturday for the US president to change his mind? Trump's 2-week deadline to Iran Amid escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, on Thursday (June 19), the US president said that he would decide 'within the next two weeks ' on whether to order a US military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' Trump said in a statement read to reporters by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. When asked about providing Iran time, the US president told a reporter on Friday that he was giving Iranians time to 'come to their senses'. When a reporter further probed, 'Does Iran have two weeks or could you strike before that? Are you essentially giving them a two-week timeline?' Trump answered, 'Well I'm giving them a period of time. We're going to see what that period of time is. But I'm giving them a period of time, and I would say two weeks would be the maximum.' People stand in front of a Fox News ticker that displays a headline about US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, in New York City. Reuters Trump's surprise attack on Iran However, two days after announcing a two-week deadline, Trump launched military strikes on Iran, targeting Fordow , Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites in Iran. In an address to the nation, Trump said, 'The strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.' In a speech that lasted just over three minutes, Trump said Iran's future held 'either peace or tragedy,' and there were many other targets that could be hit by the US military. 'If peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He later told Fox News that that six bunker-buster bombs were dropped on Fordow, while 30 Tomahawk missiles were fired against other nuclear sites. US B-2 bombers were also involved in the strikes, a US official told Reuters. Following the strikes, Iran expressed anger, with the Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warning of 'everlasting consequences' and adding, 'US decided to blow up diplomacy with strikes.' He also wrote on X, 'The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences. 'Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people.' Why Trump changed his mind But what led Trump from changing his mind? Why did he attack Iran within two days when he had announced that he would give Tehran two weeks? As one administration official told the Wall Street Journal, 'The goal was to create a situation when everyone wasn't expecting it.' A billboard with an illustration of Iranians supporting their country is seen on a street, amid the Israel-Iran conflict, in Tehran, Iran. Reuters In fact, Trump on Tuesday (June 17) had approved plans to strike Iran but had withheld on that order, giving time to assess once more if Iran would be willing to entirely end its enrichment of nuclear fuel. 'There was real debate earlier in the week about what we should do,' the senior official is quoted as telling Wall Street Journal. 'But Trump signalled on Tuesday he was leaning toward going forward, so that changed everything.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Moreover, Trump was reportedly impressed by the success of Israel's offensiv e, named Operation Rising Lion. The Jewish nation's strikes have eroded Iran's air-defence capability with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu telling Kan public broadcaster that Israeli forces had destroyed at least half of Iran's missile launchers and even eliminated key military leaders. The Atlantic speaking to an ally of the president said that Trump believed that a 'little push from us would make it incredibly successful'. Iran's position in negotiations could also be another reason why Trump chose to forego his two-week deadline to strike Tehran. Trump had dismissed the talks held in Geneva last Friday between European diplomats and Iran's Abbas Araghchi. 'They didn't help,' Trump said of the discussions. 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this one.' Trump is also wary of his own administration's evaluation of Iran's nuclear abilities, namely with Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard . Earlier in March, Gabbard had told US Congress that Iran was not 'building' a nuclear weapon and that Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei had not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD When asked about this, Trump had said, 'She's wrong.' Protesters hold placards showing a caricature of US President Donald Trump as they condemn the US attacks on Iran during a protest against the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran in Seoul. AFP Jared Mondschein, director of research at the United States Studies Centre, also offered one reason as to why Trump fast-forwarded his actions in Iran. Speaking to Sky News, he said that Trump's decision to order attacks on Iran may have been influenced by what happened when North Korea acquired nuclear weapons. Explaining further, he said: 'We have to look at what happened in North Korea, how the George W Bush administration said that a nuclear North Korea would be unacceptable, and they ultimately decided that it was not in their interest to prevent North Korea from becoming nuclear. 'And now we have a stalemate in the region.' Mondschein further elaborated: 'With that said, what you see here in Iran is an expansionist country that has proxy militias around the region, unlike North Korea, and those proxies were a security threat, to both the United States and Israel. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We shouldn't forget the number of Americans, both in the military and civilians, who have been targeted by Iran. Let's also not forget how many Americans have been targeted by the Iranian government.' With inputs from agencies

Hindustan Times

43 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

‘How can Iran return to something it never left': Araghchi on EU call for negotiations

Jun 22, 2025 03:10 PM IST Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi on Sunday accused the United States and Israel of deliberately sabotaging diplomatic efforts by targeting his country's nuclear facilities, saying both powers had 'decided to blow up' negotiations. Iran foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, speaks during a press conference.(AFP File) Araghchi said Israel had 'blown up negotiations' between Tehran and Washington with its June 13 strikes, while the United States had 'done the same' to talks with European powers through its latest attacks. In response to fresh European calls for Iran to return to the negotiating table, he asked, 'How can Iran return to something it never left?' 'Last week, we were in negotiations with the US when Israel decided to blow up that diplomacy. This week, we held talks with the E3/EU when the US decided to blow up that diplomacy. What conclusion would you draw?' Araghchi asked in a post on X. 'To Britain and the EU High Rep, it is Iran which must 'return' to the table. But how can Iran return to something it never left, let alone blew up?' he added

Time of India

an hour ago

• Time of India

Ukraine-Russia conflict: Kyiv vows deeper strikes on Moscow; 'will increase scale and depth,' says army chief

Ukraine's top military commander has pledged to intensify attacks on Russian territory, insisting that Kyiv will only target military infrastructure. 'Of course, we will continue. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now We will increase the scale and depth,' Ukrainian commander-in-chief Oleksandr Syrsky said on Sunday. Syrsky described the strikes as 'effective' and said Ukraine would not remain passive in the face of continued aggression. 'We will not just sit in defence. Because this brings nothing and eventually leads to the fact that we still retreat, lose people and territories,' he said, quoted by AFP. His comments come amid a standstill in peace efforts. The last face-to-face talks between Ukraine and Russia took place nearly three weeks ago, with no follow-up discussions planned. Syrsky also acknowledged Russia's edge in drone warfare, pointing to Moscow's use of fibre-optic drones that are difficult to jam. 'Here, unfortunately, they have an advantage in both the number and range of their use,' he noted. The commander further claimed that Ukrainian forces still hold 90 square kilometres of territory inside Russia's Kursk region, despite Moscow's assertion in April that it had regained full control. Kyiv launched a cross-border incursion into the area last August. 'These are our preemptive actions in response to a possible enemy offensive,' Syrsky explained. Russia currently occupies about one-fifth of Ukraine, including four regions it claims to have annexed since its 2022 invasion, along with Crimea, seized in 2014. Kyiv has accused Moscow of deliberately stalling peace efforts to prolong its offensive and grab more land.