Maria Walsh: Polish election result shows we cannot take trust in Europe for granted
Earlier this month, Poland elected Karol Nawrocki as its new president as he edged out his opponent by the narrowest of margins in a record-breaking 73% voter turnout.
His defeat of liberal Warsaw mayor Rafał Trzaskowski stands in stark contrast to the centrist coalition currently governing in Poland's parliament — and could signal a pivot backwards in one of the EU's most strategically important member states.
With his Maga-style politics and growing nationalist platform, Nawrocki resembles a number of other right-wing populist leaders elected in recent years.
His victory arrives at a fragile moment for the EU, a moment when European unity is being tested by war on its borders, institutional reforms in Brussels, and a steady undercurrent of far-right momentum across the bloc.
This is a result that will have consequences far beyond the Polish borders — reverberations of the June 1 election will be felt across the EU and will undoubtedly arrive on Irish shores.
Conversations in Brussels this week have centred around the reasons underpinning Nawrocki's victory. It appears Poland's membership of the EU played a pivotal role in the end result. For some Poles, there is a growing feeling the European Union has "diluted" the Polish national identity. This feeling has been matched by a growing wave of nationalism, which is linked to a similar sentiment around migration and open borders.
Polish citizens, who have gained considerably from EU membership, much as we have done in Ireland, have elected a resident who is far from a fan of the European project.
While the impact of Nawrocki's victory might not be felt immediately in Brussels — he will not directly dictate Poland's decisions taken across the EU institutions — the presidential role is much more than a ceremonial footnote.
As president, he holds veto power over legislation and has already forced prime minister Donald Tusk — who leads a pro-European government — into calling a parliamentary vote of confidence. Given his power over the prime minister, a legislative stalemate surrounding Tusk's pro-European reforms is highly likely.
Fine Gael MEP Maria Walsh: 'We must ensure Irish citizens continue to see and understand the value of the European project — because trust in Europe cannot be assumed, it must be earned.'
Since Brexit, the EU's centre of gravity has shifted eastward. Poland has been at the heart of this transition, with its influence in the EU continuing to increase thanks to its economic growth, geographic position and strong defence capabilities.
Since joining the EU in 2004, Poland has become the fastest growing economy in Europe.
Alongside its fiscal success, Poland has emerged as a military frontrunner in the EU. The size of its army outweighs that of the UK, France, and Germany, with annual investment in defence reaching almost 5%.
Given its proximity to Kaliningrad and Russia, and past history of occupation, it is no surprise Poland has prioritised its security and defence, and in recent months it has played a central role in the Coalition of the Willing.
Nawrocki's victory puts into question how Poland will now be able to collaborate with the EU on issues of security, and crucially on the Russia-Ukraine war.
As the commander in chief, Nawrocki can shape foreign and security policy, and his current position on Ukraine is nuanced. On the one hand, he does not support cutting off weapons to Ukraine and has not been as pro-Russia as some other Maga-style politicians.
However, Nawrocki has demonised Ukrainian refugees in his country, claimed Zelenskyy 'treats Poland badly', and opposes Ukrainian integration into European-oriented bodies, such as the EU and Nato. Without a strong ally in Poland, the EU is significantly weaker in pushing ahead with its defence agenda.
Perhaps most notable about Nawrocki's victory is what it tells us about the European political climate. With recent gains by right-wing parties in the European parliamentary elections and across France, Germany, and Italy, the Polish result feels less like an anomaly and more like a bellwether.
The election of Romania's Nicușor Dan last month offers a glimmer of hope, but given Nawrocki's close ties to Donald Trump and Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orbán, we cannot ignore the steady erosion of the centre-ground.
In Ireland, we have been fortunate the centre has held in recent elections — underpinned by strong support for European cooperation, inclusion and democratic values. But Poland has shown us how quickly the tide can change.
In less than two years, a shift in public sentiment has deepened divisions on the EU's eastern flank and raised urgent questions about whether our institutions are still connecting with the citizens they represent.
The Polish election has practical implications for Ireland — we must push harder for EU cooperation and commit to a more serious role in European defence. Just as importantly, we must ensure Irish citizens continue to see and understand the value of the European project — because trust in Europe cannot be assumed, it must be earned.
Maria Walsh is a Fine Gael MEP for the Midlands-North West constituency
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
John Whelan: Ireland behind the curve in pharma R&D amid Pfizer call
Pharma companies met with the Trump administration earlier this month to try and defer implementation of the executive order signed by President Trump on May 12, effectively forcing drug companies to commit to aligning their US prices with 'the lowest price of a set of economic peer countries''. At the meeting of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) with the Trump administration, Pfizer chief executive Albert Bourla called for the US government to lead an initiative to increase overall drug spending outside the US. While the exact mechanism of implementing the Trump executive order to reduce drug prices in the US remains unclear, the Pfizer chief proposed an alternative solution, suggesting that other countries should spend a certain percentage of their GDP per capita on innovative medicines. In an attempt to lead on the recommendation, he added that Pfizer could consider not making its drugs available for government reimbursement in some countries if the US carries through on its price control and other countries don't increase their prices. Effectively, Mr Bourla, who chairs the pharma industry lobby group PhRMA, suggested the US should push for a Nato-type agreement, which commits each country to a minimum 2% of their national GDP on defence spending. And whereas there may be good logic in the Pfizer proposal, any commitment of this nature will likely create major challenges for Ireland, as OECD and World Bank figures show Ireland lagging well behind other countries in research and development expenditure. In 2022, the last year for which finalised figures have been released, US pharmaceutical companies' R&D spending amounted to 2.33% of the nation's GDP. There is no comparable figures for the Irish market, in terms of pharmaceutical industry expenditure in research and development. However, the figures available from the World Bank and the OECD for years 2022/2023 show that total R&D for all industry as a percentage of GDP, in Ireland was 0.9%. This is well below the EU average of 2.29%, and even further below countries like the US at 3.6% and Israel at 6.3% who invest more heavily in R&D than Ireland. Economists have inferred that Trump is leveraging unfavourable policies such as drastically lowering prices points of US drugs and tariffs on imports, to coerce the pharmaceutical industry to increase investments in the US. Several large pharma companies, including Eli Lilly, Merck & Co, and Bristol Myers Squibb, have unveiled major US investments planned for the next few years in attempt to curry favour with the Trump administration. But noticeably Pfizer remains an exception to that trend. However, Mr Bourla stated that Pfizer has invested in US manufacturing and will continue to do so, but risks from those Trump policies are making it difficult for the company to commit further. "I don't think it makes sense to make announcements of future investments in an environment that is very fluid,' Mr Bourla said. That suggests Pfizer, one of our largest and longest-term investors in the pharmaceuticals space, is unlikely to back off its Irish investments anytime soon. However , we need to heed the Pfizer CEO's call for more R&D support in Europe, which clearly includes Ireland. Besides Pfizer, many pharma companies are leveraging the United States' threat of tariffs on drug imports to push for policy changes in the EU. In a letter sent on April 11 to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, 32 pharma companies demanded more favourable policies in order for them to maintain operations in the EU . In the same letter they say that policy changes are needed to ensure Europe remains a location to research, develop, and manufacture medicines. The CEOs also included in their letter that European countries should rethink their drug pricing policies and enable a better commercial environment for innovative medicines. Ireland's Research and Innovation Act 2024 , replaces Science Foundation Ireland in an attempt to fast forward the provision for the funding of research and innovation, but this caters for all fields of activity and neither commits to double the level of funding to €2bn per year needed to reach EU level, nor does it commit to meet the specific requirements of the pharma industry.
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Infrastructure taskforce to be updated on project delays
The Government's recently-formed infrastructure taskforce is to be briefed on the delays besetting key projects across the country. Public expenditure minister Jack Chambers is to chair the second meeting of the 'accelerating infrastructure taskforce', which is focusing on removing barriers to delivery. At the meeting, it is expected that members will be briefed on specific projects that have been subject to different types of delay. This will include the M28 Ringaskiddy-to-Cork road, alongside water and energy projects across the country. One government source said taskforce members will examine what changes to current processes and project requirements could be made to 'strike the appropriate balance between the controls and procedures governing the delivery of major capital projects'. It is understood the taskforce will submit a report that identifies the specific barriers to infrastructure delivery to the Government by the end of July. It comes after one member of the taskforce, Economic and Social Research Institute chairman Sean O'Driscoll, told the Irish Examiner there were 'catastrophic consequences' facing Ireland's water, energy, and transport networks if 'radical and brave decisions are not taken to ensure projects get completed quicker'. Mr O'Driscoll said the Government needed to accept that there is a 'national crisis' in Irish infrastructure, while adding that public servants are more 'scared' of the public accounts committee than the economy declining. Meanwhile, Taoiseach Micheál Martin is to bring an update on the Government's expert group on conveyancing and probate, with the group set to be extended for a further six months. The group is recommending a more permanent structure to take over dealing with issues surrounding probate and conveyancing in December. Conveyancing and probate are the legal processes for transferring a property from one person to another, or for when an individual dies. The Government's aim through the group is to speed up the conveyancing and probate processes, to avoid houses being left empty due to being stuck in lengthy processes. There is a target of an eight-week turnaround time for solicitors to complete conveyancing, from the acceptance of an offer to its close. A new e-probate system is expected to be launched later this year, which the Government believes will significantly reduce processing times and delays. The group is continuing to develop proposals around the establishment of an e-conveyancing system over the coming six months. Cabinet will also be briefed around the implementation of the Dublin City taskforce report. It is understood that proposals within the implementation plan include the establishment of a development body for regeneration projects in the city. This would include the future use of the GPO on O'Connell Street, but would also look at regenerating shops, apartments, and offices within the city. Elsewhere, a meeting between transport minister Darragh O'Brien and justice minister Jim O'Callaghan took place last week to discuss options for the establishment of a new transport police. It is understood that any such force would operate outside An Garda Síochána and would not be under the remit of the Department of Justice. Government sources indicated that the current preferred model would see the transport police led by the National Transport Authority, with powers similar to that of the airport police.
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Is Ireland sliding into a gerontocracy where the older generation dominates?
A gerontocracy is a system where the elderly hold sway, governing by and for their own interests. The concept traces back to the classical period, with Plato describing a society where 'the elder man rules, and the younger submits.' In Sparta, the Gerousia, a council of elders including two kings and nearly 30 elite full-citizen men of the city state of Sparta over 60, wielded significant judicial and legislative power, embodying this structure. The term 'senate' derives from the Latin senex, meaning old man. From antiquity to today, gerontocracy persists in places such as China, where CCP leaders seldom retire before their late 80s, perhaps adhering to that Confucian adage that 'when you meet someone older, you must respect and submit to that person's wisdom and power because he must have come across problems you encounter'. Perhaps the most vivid example of modern gerontocracy is in the world's superpower the United States where an octogenarian and septuagenarian candidate dominated the field during the last presidential election in a country where the average age is 38. Polling showed that many voters in the US were uneasy with 81-year-old Donald Trump and 78-year-old Joe Biden, before being replaced by his 60-year-old vice president Kamala Harris, as the two early nominees with age a major factor in their discontent. Beyond the executive branch, the second branch of government - the legislative - is dominated by elders. The current Senate is the second oldest, with an average age of 63, and the House of Representatives is the third oldest, averaging 57 years of age, since the foundation of the US Congress in 1789. It was president Ronald Reagan who, at the ripe old age of 78, in 1984 said he would not make age an issue during his presidential campaign against Walter Mondale. But while candidates may not make age an explicit issue during the campaign it certainly dominates their time in office. Currently, about a third of the federal budget is dedicated to Social Security and Medicare payments which benefits those over 60, who make up less than 20% of the US population. These costs are mainly borne by young workers and employers even as older generations are financially better off than younger cohorts. Talk of cuts to such programmes are usually met with voter rage as candidates and office holders alike walk a tightrope in accommodating older voters and promising to balance budgets. Aside from international examples, Ireland offers a closer look at gerontocratic rule. A recent study carried out by the Electoral Commission reveals the older generation's outsized influence on Irish elections. Titled the National Election & Democracy Study General Election 2024, the findings, carried out by Red C, indicates that 90% of those aged 65+ voted in last year's general election. But while the older generation enthusiastically headed to polling stations in their droves, young people, for the most part, stayed at home - their parents' home, that is. Housing between the generations Housing, the top electoral issue, underscores this divide. While voters express frustration with the crisis, 89% of those who turned out to vote are homeowners, with two-thirds reporting stable or improved economic conditions. Since the Troika's exit in 2013, house prices have doubled, boosting wealth for homeowners — mostly older generations. Meanwhile, wages, especially for younger people, have lagged, rising just 27% since the crash from 2013-2022. The ESRI highlights Ireland's stark generational homeownership gap: nearly 80% of those over 40 own homes, compared to just a third of those under 40. In 1993, 70% of 25-34-year-olds were homeowners; by 2016, 60% of this group were renters, and the 2022 census showed over two-thirds of 18-34-year-olds still living with their parents - way above the EU average. With 30% of Ireland's population aged 18-39, the over-40 cohort, around 10% larger, dominates both homeownership and voter turnout. Despite desperate attempts by the Millennial 'TikTok Teesh' Simon Harris to appeal to the youth, the 34th Dáil's power rests on older homeowners' support. This influence is reflected in government policy. Pensions In 2020, nearly every party opposed raising the state pension age from 66, with Sinn Féin, popular among under-65s, pledging to lower it to 65. A post-election Commission on Pensions recommended gradually raising the age to 67 by 2031. With the average life expectancy standing at 87, it only makes sense that the pension age rise concurrently. Yet the government, seemingly wary of older voters, rejected the recommendation, offering higher pensions for those retiring at 70 and proposing PRSI hikes — largely borne by younger workers. With birth rates declining and the worker-to-pensioner ratio projected to drop to 2:1 by 2050, PRSI costs will likely climb, further impacting working age people. Pensions, like housing, favour the old. Only 30% of 20-24-year-olds have some sort of pension plan, compared to over 70% of 45-54-year-olds, often tied to property wealth. Maybe the government's refusal to raise the pension age is informed by the last time geriatric rage was elicited. Following the crash, and the imposition of brutal austerity, the Fianna Fáil-Green-PD government did away with the automatic entitlement for over 70s to free healthcare and a medical card. This sparked major protests with opposition leaders, including Fine Gael's Enda Kenny and Labour's Eamon Gilmore, addressing some demonstrators. Fearing the electoral repercussions, the coalition government backtracked on their plans but ploughed ahead with gruelling cuts for mainly younger, working-age people. Shortly after the crash, Ireland registered one of the highest unemployment rates among those aged 15-24 at over 40%. Many young people emigrated — nearly 10% during the recession — rather than protest. The housing trap Housing remains the starkest indicator of youth disenfranchisement. Average rents now exceed €2,000 monthly, and post-crash rules requiring 10-20% deposits trap young people in a cycle of paying more in rent than a mortgage would cost. House prices are seven times the average income, compared to 1.5 times in the 1980s. A new report from the Central Bank of Ireland found that the wealthiest 10% of households held just below half of the total net wealth in 2024 mainly due to high house prices. According to the bank, Irish households have financial assets worth €570bn. For them, rising house prices are a positive development with politicians equally richly rewarded at the ballot box. When Mary Lou McDonald proposed lowering house prices to €300,000, her party was accused of recklessness. Fine Gael Senator John Cummins warned: 'We'd see our construction sector and economy crash.' Similar sentiments were echoed by then Taoiseach Leo Varadkar when he stated that "one person's rent is another person's income" when voicing his opposition to rent caps. Such Freudian slips reveal how politicians view housing: as an asset whose rising price must be maintained in order to satisfy the equity of a homeowners' property and yields for a landlord. Meanwhile, those desperate to get onto the property ladder and stuck paying gargantuan rents are left scraping by and politically unrepresented. Independent TD Barry Heneghan, at just 27 years of age, is one of the youngest candidates to sit in the current Dáil. Photo: Sam Boal/Collins Photos While some younger candidates did manage to get elected during the last general election, including Barry Heneghan at age 27, the spectre of career politician and septuagenarian Michael Lowry giving Paul Murphy the two fingers in the Dáil chamber as the new government was formed could not have shown more clearly whose interests they will represent. Minister of state for international development and the diaspora, Neale Richmond, recently mentioned that Ireland's greatest export was its people. With 70% of young people in Ireland contemplating emigration, you can expect bumper figures for exports in the future if this situation continues. The fissures between old and young are widening with housing causing the rupture and youth despair filling the crevice. Going back to first principles and re-examining who housing policy should represent and what the purpose of a home is would go a long way in stabilising that societal chasm.
