Carney heads to Europe with military spending on the agenda
Social Sharing
Prime Minister Mark Carney departs Sunday to meet with European and NATO allies amid heightened tension in the Middle East and mere hours after the United States joined Israel's war with Iran.
The first stop will be in Brussels on Monday, where the prime minister is expected to sign a comprehensive security and defence partnership with the European Union.
U.S. President Donald Trump bailed early on last week's G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alta., saying he was needed at the White House to deal with the evolving war where Israel is attempting to not only destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities, but to instigate regime change.
Early Sunday, the U.S. military bombed three sites in Iran. Addressing the nation from the White House, Trump claimed Iran's key nuclear sites were "completely and fully obliterated." He also warned Tehran against carrying out retaliatory attacks against the United States, saying Iran has a choice between "peace or tragedy."
Following his meeting with EU leaders, Carney heads to The Hague, in the Netherlands, for a slimmed-down NATO summit.
Janice Stein, the founding director of the Munk School of Global Affairs at the University of Toronto, said Western allies are unlikely to formally discuss the war in the Middle East because it is outside of the Euro-Atlantic sphere.
But, in an interview before the U.S. strikes occurred, she said the war is a "very dynamic situation that could easily escalate."
It may not be on the agenda, but leaders "will spend a huge amount of time talking about it" informally, Stein said.
WATCH | What does Europe have to gain from Canada?:
Why Europe would consider inviting Canada into a defence pact
3 months ago
Duration 5:07
With the Western Alliance eroding under U.S. President Donald Trump, could Canada's defence support shift to Europe? As CBC's Evan Dyer explains, the country's understrength military doesn't offer much in the way of troops presence, but it does have other things Europe needs.
Most of the formal agenda at the NATO summit will focus on the U.S. demand that allies up defence spending to five per cent of their gross domestic product (3.5 per cent on direct military spending and 1.5 per cent on defence infrastructure).
Recent data published by NATO shows the U.S. was projected to have spent 3.38 per cent of its GDP on defence in 2024. Interestingly, the Pentagon recently published a chart that projected U.S. defence spending in 2024 — as a share of its economy — at 2.7 per cent.
While those calculations were released prior to the Trump administration's recent budget proposals to Congress, defence experts suggest the proposals won't make much of a difference.
"I will highlight that U.S. defence spending itself is low," said Seth Jones, who heads up the defence and security wing of the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.
He says the next U.S. budget's defence spending will likely be lower, as a share of the country's economy, than the Carter administration in the 1970s.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
America's economy faces a potential war shock: Surging oil prices
The American economy faces the unwelcome prospect of reignited inflation after the United States launched strikes on three nuclear facilities in Iran. High oil and gas prices are a near certainty, experts say. The big question now: How long will the fossil fuels price spike last? Oil prices are expected to rise by about $5 per barrel when markets open on Sunday, according to experts. 'We are looking at $80 oil on the open,' said Andy Lipow of Lipow Oil Associates. U.S. oil hasn't closed above $80 a barrel since January and has largely hovered between $60 and $75 a barrel since August 2024. Relatively tame oil prices have lowered gas prices to below $3 a gallon in many parts of the country, a major source of price relief for inflation-weary consumers. It's unclear if any major spike in oil prices will be sustained for a long period. Oil prices have risen about 10% since Israel's surprise attack on June 13 and then fell on Friday after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a two-week deadline on whether to strike Iran. 'One shouldn't necessarily assume that just because the price of oil goes up, it's going to stay there. It doesn't,' said Joe Brusuelas, chief economist for the accounting firm RSM. The direction oil prices take is likely to depend on whether Iran's parliament decides to block the Strait of Hormuz, a key trade route that accounts for about 20% of the world's crude oil. On Sunday, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said his country has 'a variety of options' when deciding how to respond to the U.S. attacks and a prominent adviser to Iran's supreme leader has already called for the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Bob McNally, president of consulting firm Rapidan Energy Group and former energy adviser to President George W. Bush, said that should Iran cut off the world's oil supply by closing the strait it would risk more military force from the United States and its allies. Iran could also attack infrastructure in the Persian Gulf that treats and exports oil and gas. 'It's possible they will decide the only thing that can dissuade President Trump is the fear of an oil price spike,' he said. 'They have to actually create that fear.' Appearing Sunday on Fox News, Secretary of State Marco Rubio called on China to prevent Iran from closing the Strait of Hormuz, adding that closing it would do more damage to other economies than the U.S. economy. China buys a third of all oil that comes from the Persian Gulf, while the United States buys less than 3%. 'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil,' Rubio said. Rubio added that closing the strait would hurt other countries' economies more than the U.S. economy. Meanwhile, American consumers may soon feel a price shock at the pump. 'It takes five days or so for stations to pass along the prices they see in one day. If oil markets do surge today and then tomorrow, it could start showing up at the pump in a matter of hours,' said Patrick De Haan, vice president of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, a fuel tracking platform. According to Lipow, should the Strait of Hormuz be affected, the price of oil could rise to $100 a barrel, which would raise gas and diesel prices by about 75 cents per gallon from recent levels. Meanwhile, U.S. trade policies combined with the war with Iran 'strongly suggest inflation will be moving faster and higher over the next 90 days,' according to Brusuelas. Many mainstream economists argue that the low inflation of the spring represents a calm before the summer storm, when they expect prices to rise because of Trump's tariffs.
Toronto Sun
2 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
ELDER: Democrats bury heads in the sand as Trump tackles Iran crisis
President Donald Trump gestures as he boards Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews, Md., Friday, June 20, 2025. Photo by Manuel Balce Ceneta / AP Photo When it comes to criticizing President Donald Trump and refusing to give credit for virtually anything, it's full speed ahead for Democrat politicians. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account On the economy, Axios just reported: 'The stock market had been recently scraping new highs … The unemployment rate was 4.2%, and inflation was well-contained near the Fed's 2% target.' Gas prices are down, as is the retail price of eggs. Inflation, despite the tariffs, is at a four-year low. Wages are up. That southern border has become a non-issue for much of the media. The New York Post recently wrote, 'Border Patrol agents didn't release a single migrant into the U.S. last month — a staggering drop after the Biden administration allowed 62,000 illegal crossers in the country in May 2024. … Agents caught 8,725 migrants crossing illegally at the southern border last month. That's a 93% decrease from May 2024, when 117,905 were nabbed, according to internal data obtained by The Post .' Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Last April, then-Homeland Security secretary Alejandro Mayorkas testified before Congress, 'With the authorities and the funding that we have, (the border) is as secure as it can be.' Democrats attack Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' not only as a supposed danger to the so-called entitlements, but as an existential threat to the republic. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said, 'People will die if the (Republicans') tax scam ever becomes law.' On immigration, there is no shortage of Democrats whipping out the fascism card. About Trump's deportation policy, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) recently said, 'They are trying to end legal status in the United States.' But, where are the big Democrat voices on Iran, specifically on Israel military action and our country's support to prevent the No. 1 state sponsor of terror from acquiring a nuclear bomb? This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Former president Barack Obama, about the Trump administration, said days ago at a speech in Connecticut, 'If you follow regularly what is said by those who are in charge of the federal government right now, there is a weak commitment to what we understood — and not just my generation, at least since World War II — our understanding of how a liberal democracy is supposed to work.' But nothing about Iran. For years, Hillary Clinton and Obama said that a nuclear-armed Iran is unacceptable. Then-New York senator Clinton said: 'A nuclear-armed Iran is unacceptable, but it is not just unacceptable to Israel and to the United States. It must be unacceptable to the entire world, starting with the European governments and people.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Obama, in 2012, said: 'I think that the Israeli government recognizes that, as president of the United States, I don't bluff. I also don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that, when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say.' OK, Clinton and Obama, care to comment? Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer recently issued a statement opposing Iran's acquisition of a nuclear weapon, but did not mention Trump, let alone praise Trump's support for Israel or the way he is navigating this crisis. A big exception is Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), who said, 'I really hope the president finally does bomb and destroy the Iranians.' He later wrote: 'To be perfectly clear — destroying the Iranian regime. Free the Iranian citizens from this cancerous, repressive, and authoritarian regime.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Also, Harold Ford Jr., Democrat Fox News contributor and former Tennessee member of the U.S. House, said: 'I give the president a lot of credit. … I was reminded of a Churchill saying — I no longer listen to what people say. I watch what they do because behaviour never lies. And I think the president's come to the conclusion because he's tried. He's tried; other presidents have tried. And I hope he's not persuaded by or even impacted by politics. … And I can tell you I'm one American who's prepared to support the president, whatever decision he makes.' Why have many big-voice Democrats gone into an underground bunker rather than offer even the faintest praise or encouragement for Trump? It's about not giving Trump credit for anything, including accomplishing an objective they supported. Sports Sunshine Girls Canada Relationships Relationships
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
Pledge to reach GDP goal ‘will earn Canada a little bit of a pass' ahead of NATO summit: analyst
Watch Political analyst Lori Williams on what to expect from Prime Minister Mark Carney when he heads to Belgium for the NATO summit.
