Ombudsman warns telcos to help in poor services areas after 3G shutdown
Australia's Telecommunications Ombudsman says the shutdown of Australia's 3G network has resulted in "life-threatening situations".
Cynthia Gebert released her department's first quarter report, which showed that while complaints to the ombudsman about the 3G network had fallen, the issues that remained were complex.
"Particularly in rural and regional settings, where farm operations are impacted, people who need it to operate a small business [and] we have heard circumstances of unreliable service creating life-threatening situations," she said.
Ms Gebert said people had become reliant on phones and connectivity, not just to communicate over the phone.
"Things like medical alert devices, farming equipment, all those sorts of things; they are so important now and people have built lives, communities and businesses around it," she said.
"It's creating all sorts of challenges when they can't be reliant on that."
The data showed complaints to the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman about service providers were up 6.9 per cent in the first three months of 2025, with 25.3 per cent about poor mobile phone coverage, while reports of financial hardship increased by 72 per cent.
The hardship reports included telcos refusing payment plans and disconnecting or suspending phone and internet services.
"Telcos still have work to do in terms of providing tailored support and repayment options for people that reflect their individual circumstances," Ms Gebert said.
The town of Bingara in the north-west of New South Wales has a population of 1,300.
Local accountant Sam Groth said congestion issues resulted in little or no service, even in the centre of town.
"I can be having a coffee with someone in the main street and when we go to open up an email and click on an online link, you just get the wheel of death," he said.
"I get complaints daily from clients who can't even scan a document and email it back."
Mr Groth said EFTPOS services had been intermittent, and text messages and phone calls often did not come through or dropped out, which had a detrimental effect on the town.
"You've got travellers coming through and if they can't connect, that affects your reputation as a tourism provider," he said.
He believed money needed to be spent on increasing the capacity of the tower, but suspected Telstra did not want to spend it on the small town.
"There's not enough subscribers to invest in the infrastructure," he said.
Mr Groth said he had clients running large agricultural businesses who were having significant problems, but complaints to Telstra were getting nowhere.
"Their response has been, 'There are no outages, there is no problem recorded at the tower,'" he said.
In a statement, Telstra regional general manager Chris Taylor said there were plans to upgrade the Bingara site later this year to increase capacity, as well as deliver 5G to the town for the first time."The site can currently get busy during peak periods like the school holidays and this upgrade should help deliver a much better experience all year round," a Telstra spokesperson said.
Farmer Bruce Kreutzberger lives on a property 20 kilometres from Walla Walla in the Riverina region of NSW.
When the 3G network was switched off, he lost phone service at his home and took to driving up a nearby hill to get line-of-sight access to a signal from the nearest Telstra tower.
Mr Kreutzberger later bought a new "blue tick" mobile phone — certified to give superior coverage in rural and regional areas — which he said improved things.
"My new phone shows no bars of signal, but I can actually make a call at the house," he said.
But Mr Kreutzberger said he had experienced congestion issues in his area as well.
He said he had given up complaining about the issue.
Mr Taylor said individual reception could be affected by the handset customers were using and the topography of the region.
"Our 4G coverage is available in and around Walla Walla but the surrounding terrain and vegetation in the area can affect it in some parts," he said.
Mr Taylor said Telstra was also working on plans to upgrade both sites to provide additional capacity and to deliver 5G.
Telstra, Optus and Vodaphone shut down their 3G networks in 2024 to use that spectrum to improve 4G and 5G services, but the ombudsman said she had not seen any signs of improvement yet.
"It's something we're keeping an eye on because … if it doesn't fulfil those expectations, that leads to a lot of frustration," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
26 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Aussies not ready for advanced technology despite tech take off
EXCLUSIVE: As several brands set to launch full self-driving technology on Australian roads, new research reveals many Aussies aren't ready to take their hands off the wheel. According to mycar Mobility Index, a mere 19 per cent of Australians said they would be willing to use a fully autonomous vehicle for most or all of their journey. Additionally, 40 per cent said they don't feel comfortable giving up full control. Many said they don't know enough about the technology or either don't feel safe using it. When Sydney-based marketing professional Tara first heard about fully autonomous vehicles, she didn't feel excited but nervous. 'Honestly, it makes me feel uneasy,' she said. 'Driving involves so many unpredictable situations – like if someone runs into the street or there's a sudden change in weather. It's hard to imagine sitting back and trusting a car to make those split-second decisions for me.' Despite driving a Honda Civic that has cruise control, lane assist and parking sensors, Tara said she rarely uses the features and has no plans to embrace full autonomy anytime soon. The findings by mycar Mobility Index also reveal that driver trust is lacking and far behind the rapidly evolving technology we're seeing on Australian roads. Mycar chief customer officer Adele Coswello said the industry is still facing major trust problems and that is holding back adoption. 'Autonomous technology has the potential to change how we move, but right now, trust is the biggest roadblock,' she said. 'This year's Mobility Index shows that many Australians are still unsure – not just about the safety of self-driving cars, but how they work and what they mean for everyday drivers.' Even smart technology in today's vehicles are being under-utilised. Only 1 in 3 are using assisted driving technology like cruise control (32 per cent), lane assist (31 per cent), brake assist (28 per cent) or parking assistance (22 per cent). That's despite more than 76 per cent having this technology in their car. Coswello believes the reason many drivers aren't using assisted driving technology is because automakers are failing to explain them. 'Only a small number of Aussies are embracing the smart systems that are available in the vehicles of today, and we believe the industry needs to build understanding and confidence in assisted driving technologies. That includes ensuring technicians are upskilled in the latest technologies and systems to help educate drivers. By doing so, we can help prepare drivers for the future – one service and one conversation at a time,' she said. The lack of technical explanations is something Tara has experienced first-hand. 'I'd also want to see more clear, straightforward explanations from car companies about how the systems work, what their limitations are, and what kind of back up measures are in place. Most importantly, though, I'd want to know I could quickly and easily take back control if something didn't feel right,' she said. She also believes brands are failing to strike the right tone in delivery. 'A lot of the messaging feels too technical or overly optimistic. I think companies need to do a better job of breaking things down in plain language and addressing the real concerns people have,' she said. 'This would help to build trust and reassurance that the technology works, and that there are the right safeguards in place.' Internationally, car brands like XPeng, Nio and BYD are racing ahead offering level 3 and 4 autonomous capabilities in their home market. Tesla's Full-Self Driving technology is about to launch in the US next week in their robotaxis.
ABC News
33 minutes ago
- ABC News
Company in charge of proposed incinerator outside Geelong has direct links to the Chinese government
A controversial waste-to-energy project proposed for Geelong's suburban fringe has direct links to two major Chinese state-owned enterprises, it can be revealed. The waste incinerator is designed to burn through 400,000 tonnes of rubbish annually — redirecting the trash from landfill and transforming it into energy for the state's grid. But the proposal has prompted local backlash, with residents concerned the incinerator would be built too close to homes and produce toxic emissions. Community frustrations also centre around the transparency of who is behind the project, as the facility's purported cost balloons from $300 million to $700 million. And while most other Australian waste-to-energy projects have publicised major funding partners, the big bucks behind Lara's incinerator are yet to be revealed — even as Victoria's planning minister considers whether to approve the project. In 2023, the Environment Protection Authority (EPA) granted Prospect Hill International a development licence to build a waste-to-energy facility in Lara, about 10km north of Geelong's CBD. The incinerator aims to burn residential, commercial and industrial waste to produce about 35MW of power to be fed into the state's grid — enough, Prospect Hill says, "to power 50,000 homes". It would also be built just over 1km from Lara's town centre, a few hundred metres from the nearest residential doorstep, and its 80m-tall chimney would become the tallest structure in the region. It is one of about a dozen waste-to-energy plants either operating or proposed across Australia, almost all of which are financially backed — or in partnerships — with international companies. The Geelong plan has prompted sustained opposition from local community members, with state and local federal MPs supporting the push to scrap the project. Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles has said the facility was "utterly inappropriate" and had "no place" in Lara. Community opposition is focused on the facility's proximity to homes and its environmental impact, along with concerns too little is known about who is behind the project. Charles Street, from the No Waste Incinerators in Lara and Greater Geelong group, said the group has had little success in attempts to communicate with Prospect Hill. Speaking at a national parliamentary Environment and Communications References Committee last August, Mr Street said attempts to find who was behind Prospect Hill had turned up little beyond discovering its director was named Jian Qi. "We know very little more than that," Mr Street said. "We've never met Mr Qi; we've never seen him." When asked by the ABC about community concerns over the transparency of Prospect Hill's ownership, Mr Street said: "It's very frustrating, and it's also very, very strange, exceedingly weird actually." Prospect Hill International is a Melbourne-based company registered in 2017, seemingly with the sole purpose of delivering the Lara waste-to-energy facility. Its latest project update from January 2024 assures the community it "proposes to develop a state-of-the-art facility that meets all stringent EPA Victoria and European emissions standards" and promises to keep community members informed as it progresses. Company documents show Prospect Hill has four shareholders — Jian Qi, Wen Dong Huang, Jingchao Pan and former state MP Ken Smith — with Mr Qi listed as its director. The documents show a fifth person, Jing Dong Gao, was previously both a director and majority shareholder of the company. Prospect Hill's business address is a multi-million-dollar home in Deepdene, in Melbourne's inner east — a home owned by Mr Gao and where Mr Qi is listed as living, according to title and business records. Company documents state Mr Huang has a background in the mining and construction development industry, and Mr Qi is a chemical engineer and petrochemical expert, who has previously worked for Petrochina, Shell Global Solutions and GE Oil & Gas. Mr Smith, who served in parliament from 1998 to 2014, is also referred to as a director of Prospect Hill in media responses from the company. The former parliamentary speaker has spent decades building business bridges between Victoria and China, earning honorary citizenships to the Shandong and Jiangsu provinces and an Order of Australia honour for his service to Australia-China relations. A probe of dozens of business documents also shows Prospect Hill has direct connections with two multi-billion-dollar Chinese state-owned conglomerates. In one it states it is using Jiangsu Power Design Institute — a subsidiary of China Energy Engineering Corporation (CEEC) — to "provide technical and design services for the proposed plant". CEEC is a multi-billion-dollar company under direct supervision of the Chinese Communist Party's State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, and has a stated aim to accumulate $16 billion in overseas investments — including through "clean energy" projects. Speaking to the ABC, Mr Smith described JSPDI as Prospect Hill's "joint venture group in China", calling it "the most sophisticated" waste-to-energy company in the world. "We're not messing around with any sort of second-rate engineering company or project companies at all; we've gone for the very best because we want to deliver the best," he said. Everbright International, a subsidiary of Chinese state-owned conglomerate China Everbright, is also linked to Prospect Hill — with the mammoth group named as a "technology partner" in business documents. Despite the connections to these Chinese state-owned enterprises, Mr Smith emphasises the Lara facility is a local project. "It all looks very Chinese, but it's not Chinese, it's Australian," he said. The waste-to-energy plant was originally estimated as having a $300 million price tag, but Mr Smith told the ABC those costings had ballooned to "probably $700 million". "Prospect Hill International currently possesses adequate capital to progress development and will also pursue strategic partnerships to support the project's full delivery," he said. Mr Smith said Prospect Hill had been approached with investment opportunities from companies in China, the Middle East and Singapore, as well as Australian businesses — but indicated no major formal funding arrangements had yet been made to deliver the project. While Mr Smith would not share specific details on potential financial backers of the project, he did say that money spent so far on the project came from Prospect Hill's directors. "That's our money that's going into it," Mr Smith said. He estimates construction of the facility will begin in 2026-27, and take about three years before the incinerator is operational. Before any of this can occur, the state government must give planning approval to the project. As Victoria's minister for energy and environment, Lily D'Ambrosio has played a key role in guiding the state's push to attract waste to energy projects. Her role has also brought her into contact with one of the Chinese state-owned conglomerates linked to Prospect Hill. An Official Ministerial Overseas Travel Outcomes Report outlines Ms D'Ambrosio's $39,707 taxpayer-supported trip to China in 2017, including a bid to "engage with and encourage investment by Chinese companies in renewable energy projects in Victoria". The trip included meeting one of the state-owned conglomerates connected to the Lara incinerator, China Everbright, "to discuss waste to energy, including CEI's interests in investing in waste to energy in Victoria". Ms D'Ambrosio concluded her report with the expectation her visit would "produce significant and tangible benefits for Victoria in terms of improved relationships and actual investment in Victoria's renewable energy capacity". Foreign investment in Australia is nothing new. According to the Australian Treasury, in the first three months of 2024/25 there were 377 foreign investment proposals approved, worth $46.6 billion. Chinese money made up a fraction of that total, mostly via $400 million in residential property investments. Foreign involvement in Australian waste-to-energy projects is not unique either, with the country's first major waste-to-energy plant in Kwinana owned by multinational conglomerate ACCIONA, headquartered in Spain, and supported by Singapore's Keppel Seghers. Earlier this year a Middle-Eastern consortium was selected by the Regional Growth NSW Development Corporation to deliver the $1.5 billion Parkes Energy Recovery facility. Chinese connections, and potential Chinese investment, in the Prospect Hill project should not be surprising. But, the connections raise questions around oversight — including whether the project would need to be approved by Australia's Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB). Under FIRB thresholds, foreign government investors in any non-land investments are required to submit an investment proposal for review, with limited exceptions. When approached by the ABC, the Treasury declined to say whether a project found to be receiving funding from a Chinese state-owned conglomerate would be required to submit a proposal to the FIRB, nor whether it had received a proposal from Prospect Hill. "Under the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975, the Government cannot comment on the application of the foreign investment screening arrangements as they apply, or could apply, to a particular case. We are therefore unable to provide the information you are seeking," a statement from the Treasury noted. Victorian Planning Minister Sonya Kilkenny did not directly respond to questions from the ABC, including whether she was aware of links between Prospect Hill and Chinese state-owned enterprises. A spokesperson for the government instead provided a brief statement, noting: "any proposal will be considered on its merits and all submissions will be considered as part of the assessment process." Do you know more about this story? Contact Harrison Tippet at you're sharing sensitive information, read our tips on how to contact us confidentially.
ABC News
34 minutes ago
- ABC News
Treasurer Jim Chalmers says Albanese government ready to overhaul the tax system
After months of acting coy and playing down expectations of what it might do to shake things up, the Albanese government has officially opened the door to big, beautiful, and maybe even brave tax reform. Big? We don't quite know that yet. Beautiful? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so the jury is out there. Brave? They will have to be brave because the backlash is coming, and it could get ugly. The word reform is so overused as to be meaningless, but if it is to be meaningful, it will have to involve some losers. That's where the ugliness lies. Treasurer Jim Chalmers declared last week that limiting the narrative to "ruling things in or ruling things out" has had a "corrosive impact" on policy debate. On that, he is dead right. Journalists (yes, I'm putting my hand up here) must also take responsibility for sometimes seeking to box in politicians and, as a consequence, short-change the country by limiting the scope of our debate. But the biggest perpetrators of boxing in are politicians themselves — so afraid of their shadows, they have shut down debates as soon as they start. You get the sense watching the treasurer that he has played his cards not only carefully, but expertly. For some time, he has let the temperature and pressure rise and the debate rage outside of the government, letting others build a case for structural change to the way we tax. By letting others do the heavy lifting — making the case for change — from think-tanks, to independent politicians, to millennials on a tear about boomers and their elaborate holidays — he has walked into a political climate that is open to change. It is no longer 2019, when in the wake of Bill Shorten's loss, Labor went into the fetal position. Labor's timidity may finally be evaporating. The demographic shifts among Australia's voting base also help Labor. With Gen Y and Z now the biggest voting blocs, the losers are outnumbered. The preconditions are there for change. This week, the treasurer was pressed on his one existing proposal that changes the tax treatment of superannuation. Chalmers refused to budge on his contentious plan to raise taxes on people with more than $3 million in superannuation, as he signalled he was open to cutting income taxes as part of wider tax reform. The reform has a chorus of critics — some making reasonable points about the design of the tax — but the treasurer is on steady and solid ground on the politics, and he knows it. New polling conducted by pollsters Talbot Mills Research — a polling company used by Labor in the last campaign — polled over a thousand people in early June with the following question: "The federal government plans to raise around $2 billion a year by reducing tax breaks for people with over $3 million in super. How strongly do you approve or disapprove of these proposed changes?" The results speak volumes about why Chalmers doesn't seem like he is in the mood to water down his proposal. Twenty-six per cent strongly approve, 37 per cent said they somewhat approve, 14 per cent somewhat disapprove, and only 11 per cent strongly disapprove. Twelve per cent were unsure. Chalmers is now saying Labor is willing to overhaul the tax system to reduce its growing reliance on income tax while ensuring the government can raise enough money to deal with the structural deficit. Independent MP Allegra Spender has been pushing for sweeping tax reform, calling for lower income and business taxes, fewer concessions for property investors, and a reduction in compliance costs. The member for Wentworth has used her parliamentary platform to argue that the tax system is a barrier to home ownership and is burdening young Australians, something that is getting harder because of bracket creep and an aging Australian population. She said it was a "really positive sign that the treasurer has recognised the importance of tax reform". But she said even achieving revenue neutrality right now was difficult within our tax system because things like fuel excise was dropping, tobacco excise was dropping, GST as a proportion of our tax system was dropping, and we have fewer working-aged people as a proportion of people in the system. Asked how to get voters to embrace a tax change that would slow intergenerational unfairness, Spender said: "When I talk to people in my community, people really worry their kids and grandkids are not going to be able to meet the same milestones as previous generations, and that is really motivating." But even with a whopping majority and a community pushing for change, landing the reforms will still be hard. One tweet from broadcaster Neil Mitchell tells that story. He warned: "Boomers beware. Jim Chalmers is taking [sic] about 'intergenerational justice' in tax. That means a tax on boomers, who actually did a bit to build this country." Subtle? Not so much. The idea that boomers uniquely built this country is indeed a strange idea. All generations contribute during their working age. Tell that to the Gen Xers and Millennials currently slogging it to keep their heads above water. Chief executive of the Grattan Institute, Dr Aruna Sathanapally, who has been pushing for big reform, said the treasurer had now said the quiet bit out loud. And she's relieved. "Chalmers has said the important bit out loud — it's the government's job not just to deliver its election commitments but to lead us through the times we live in, including making the trade-offs that we need to preserve our living standards in the years ahead," she said. "It's great to see tax reform on the table. It has to be on the table: our tax system is simply not fit for our aging society, the global context, or tackling climate change." Sathanapally said she would like to see the government grapple with "the fact that paying for our existing expectations on healthcare, aged care, defence and pensions is going to cost more." "It is unfair to place that burden on today's children, rather than those who have benefited from a tremendous growth in asset prices," she said. "What I want to see is not just the government but each of Australia's sector leaders strive for a system that works for and not against younger Australians. "Intergenerational equity is not a zero-sum game: a system that supports education, innovation, paid work, and care for each other will support a better economy and quality of life overall". The way the Coalition plays this will be fascinating. The politics of opposing contentious changes are delicious and easy, but the demographic time bombs will hit future budgets too if they fail to get behind substantive change. The opposition is already mounting the case that this is Labor on a tax grab. But what they fail to grapple with is that the community's expectations around spending have grown. Unless they can win the argument with voters that substantial spending cuts are necessary, they will have to consider the changes outlined by Labor. Opposition finance spokesman James Paterson said this week that the Coalition was up for a conversation with the government. He said his party was open to working constructively with government to make the tax system more efficient, to collect revenues in less distortional ways, "but we are not going to give them a blank cheque to increase taxes on Australians at the worst possible time for our economy." But if the coalition is going to argue that defence spending should rise to 3 per cent of GDP, they will have to explain how they will pay for it. Endless demands for more spending on key areas of national significance are meaningless without an answer for where the money will come from. Patricia Karvelas is host of ABC News Afternoon Briefing at 4pm weekdays on ABC News Channel, co-host of the weekly Party Room podcast with Fran Kelly and host of politics and news podcast Politics Now.
