Karnataka HC says police can't unnecessarily collect call detail records, it ‘violates right to privacy'
The Karnataka High Court recently ruled that a person's call detail records (CDRs) are private. It said police can't "unnecessarily" collect such information when there is no ongoing official investigation that requires it.
According to Bar and Bench, the judge said that if police are allowed to obtain CDRs that are not part of a lawful investigation, it would lead to a police state.
Justice Suraj Govindaraj made the observation while refusing to quash a criminal case filed against Sub-Inspector of Byatarayanapura Police Station Vidya VM. It was alleged that she had illegally collected the CDRs of a woman.
The Karnataka High Court held that call detail records of an individual are personal and private details and that unnecessarily collecting such details would violate the right to privacy.
"If police are allowed to obtain CDRs that are not part of a lawful investigation, it would lead to a police state," the judge was quoted by Bar and Bench as saying during the hearing.
"The power to obtain the CDR of any individual should only be exercised during a lawful investigation by the investigating officer," the court said before dismissing the police officer's plea.
As per the report, Vidya VM and some other co-accused persons, face a criminal case under Sections 354(D) (stalking), 409 (criminal breach of trust), 506 (criminal intimidation) and 509 (word, gesture, act intended to insult modesty) of the Indian Penal Code, apart from Sections 66(D) (cheating by personation using computer resource) and 66(E) (privacy violation) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
Vidya VM was reportedly accused of illegally obtaining the call detail records of a woman. The woman claimed that police officials illegally accessed her CDRs and shared them with others against whom she had filed another criminal case. The woman alleged that these CDRs were misused by the co-accused, who were troubling her.
The woman had then filed a private complaint against Vidya and others. In December 2024, a trial court summoned Vidya and others accused in the case. Vidya eventually approached the high court to quash the case against her.
Vidya's counsel, Advocate Satyanarayan Chalke, argued that the police officer had sought the CDRs in the discharge of her official duties.
However, the court declined to grant any relief, observing that unnecessarily acquiring the CDRs of a person would violate the right to privacy, as laid down in the Supreme Court's ruling in the Puttaswamy case.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Chhattisgarh HC denies bail to accused in Rs 411 crore 'Hamar-Lab' scam
RAIPUR: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the first bail application of Shashank Chopda, an accused in the alleged Rs 411 crore 'Hamar-Lab' scam. The case, registered by the Economic Offences Wing/Anti-Corruption Bureau (EOW/ACB), Raipur, involves charges under Sections 409 (criminal breach of trust) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code, along with Sections 13(1)(A), 13(2), and 7(C) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha, after hearing arguments from both sides, stated that economic offences are more serious than conventional crimes as they impact the entire economy and pose a grave threat to the country's financial health. The prosecution's case centres on alleged irregularities in the "Hamar-Lab" scheme, launched in 2021 by the Public Health and Family Welfare Department. The scheme aimed to procure essential medical equipment and machines through the Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation Ltd (CGMSCL). The FIR alleged that officials from the Directorate of Health Services and CGMSCL placed disproportionate orders without proper budget evaluation or administrative approval, causing a loss of approximately Rs 411 crore to the state exchequer. Senior counsels Siddharth Mridul and Ajay Mishra, appearing for Chopda, argued that their client had no role in the alleged offence and was merely a bidder. They claimed that Chopda's company incurred a loss of Rs 351 crore and was being made a "scapegoat" to evade payment liabilities. They further contended that the EOW/ACB investigation was selective, as no govt officials were questioned or arrested until directed by the High Court. The defence also maintained that there was no risk of evidence tampering since all documents were submitted online and electronic devices, including mobile phones and computers, were already seized. Bail was sought on grounds of parity, citing a Supreme Court stay on the arrest of co-accused Rajesh Gupta in the same case. Dr Sourabh Kumar Pande, Deputy Advocate General for the state, opposed the bail plea, stating that CGMSCL purchased reagents without following due procedures or assessing actual requirements. He alleged that the specifications for medical equipment were "tailor-made" to favour a particular company, resulting in substantial losses. Pande described Chopda as the "mastermind" behind the cartel who influenced govt officials. The Deputy Advocate General also informed the court that five other co-accused, including public servants and CGMSCL officials, were arrested. He expressed concern that if granted bail, Chopda might tamper with evidence or influence witnesses. The High Court observed that economic offences, involving deep-rooted conspiracies and significant losses to public funds, must be treated seriously. It cited Supreme Court judgments emphasising that such crimes impact the national economy and erode public confidence in the financial system. Chief Justice Sinha noted that while a chargesheet was filed against Chopda, the investigation against other accused persons, including govt officials, was ongoing. He stated that the applicant appeared to be a "direct beneficiary" of the crime and could not be equated with co-accused Rajesh Gupta. The court also highlighted that the equipment supplied by Chopda's firm involved "closed system" technology, which would necessitate future procurement of reagents exclusively from his company, potentially leading to a monopoly and depriving the public of access to pathological tests. The court concluded that granting bail at this stage would "embolden corrupt practices" and undermine public trust in the justice delivery system. Chopda, representing Mokshit Corporation, faces several specific allegations, including procuring EDTA tubes (used for blood sample collection) from Mokshit Corporation at an inflated price of Rs 2,352 per piece, while other institutions procured them for a maximum of Rs 8.50. This was later clarified as a typographical error, with the actual price being Rs 23.52 per piece. He is also accused of purchasing reagents worth Rs 300 crore to prevent the expiry of chemicals held by Mokshit Corporation and supplying CBC machines at Rs 17 lakh per unit—significantly higher than the market price of Rs 5 lakh—after Mokshit Corporation was declared L-1 in the tender process. Additionally, he is alleged to have conspired with other firms such as Recorders and Medicare Systems and Shri Sharda Industries to generate illicit profits.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
WB school recruitment scam: Process to verify applications from 'untainted' jobless teachers begins
KOLKATA: The School Education department has begun the process to verify applications from 'non-tainted' teaching staff who were in state government jobs before clearing the 2016 SSC test and rendered jobless, following a recent Supreme Court order, an official said. The apex court in an order on April 3 invalidated the appointments of 25,753 teaching and non-teaching staff but observed those who had served in state government departments in earlier jobs before opting for the 2016 recruitment test and not classified as "tainted", can make fresh applications for being re-appointed in their earlier workplace and in same earlier position. A senior SSC official told PTI on Sunday that the School Education department on June 20 issued a communique to all district inspectors of schools "for verification and authentication" of applications by those candidates. The School Education department has thousands of such applications and a prepared database of every zone. "Now the database of every respective zone has been forwarded to the DI office concerned and we have asked for verifying each and every name, whether he/she cleared the 2016 test, whether he/she figured in the untainted list and were on service till April 2," the official elaborated.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
83-year-old retiree loses Rs 1.19 crore in fake IPO scam
An 83-year-old retired man from Dadar, Mumbai, has fallen prey to a sophisticated online stock investment scam, losing Rs 1.19 crore after being lured by fraudsters posing as financial advisors. The incident began on March 10, when the senior citizen clicked on a stock investment advertisement on social media. He was subsequently added to a WhatsApp group named G-5 ICICI Stock Exchange Group, which appeared to be managed by two individuals identified as Vinita Patodia and Ashwin Parekh. The group, with over 90 members, frequently posted messages boasting of high returns from stock trades. On April 2, Patodia privately messaged the victim, asking if he was interested in investing. After he agreed, she sent him a registration link. Soon after, a person named Pranay Warma contacted him and, referencing Patodia, persuaded him to invest Rs 7.5 lakh as an initial amount. Over the following weeks—between May 2 and May 23—the victim made multiple transfers to various bank accounts, believing he was investing in IPOs. The scammers sent fake documents and screenshots showing inflated virtual returns to gain his confidence. When he requested a payout, the fraudsters demanded a 10% commission on the supposed profits. His suspicion grew after his messages and calls began going unanswered. He then consulted a friend, who confirmed it was a scam. Live Events The victim filed a complaint via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (1930), and the case has since been transferred to the Cyber Police (Central Division). An FIR has been registered under relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act. Investigations are ongoing. Also Read: $2.4 trillion worth of gold! India's household hoard is 6x Pakistan's economy
