Taiwan: SEF chairman slams China's 'united front' tactics, calls for sincerity in cross-Strait relations
Straits Exchange Foundation Chairman Frank Wu has called on China to cease its "united front" operations, which are perceived as attempts to infiltrate and divide Taiwan. Wu highlighted the contradiction between Beijing's desire for peaceful relations and its ongoing military activities around the island.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) Chairman Frank Wu urged China to abandon its controversial "united front" operations, saying that such tactics, alongside political interference and military provocations , only provoke resentment among the Taiwanese people.Speaking at the seventh SEF board meeting held in Taipei on Friday, Wu emphasised that "United front" is a commonplace phrase in China; however, people of Taiwan consider it swear words, as it stands for Beijing's efforts to infiltrate and sow division in their nation.Despite persistent tensions, Wu pointed to a rare point of agreement between leaders in Taipei and Beijing, the mutual desire for the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations . He said China can either bring peace and improve lives across the Strait by complying with this agreement, or earn the mockery of history and prove the hollowness of its words by not acting on this agreement.He said, "For many years, our opposite number insisted that the peoples across the Strait share the same racial origins and language in hopes that Taiwanese would join the symphony of the Chinese family."He condemned China's ongoing deployment of military aircraft and naval vessels around Taiwan. Wu said, "This song is very much lost amid the ceaseless political infiltration [of Taiwan] and the deafening din of [Chinese] warships and jets."He stated that people of Taiwan would not accept this "deviation between [China's] words and actions." Referencing Taiwan President Lai Ching-te consistent call for peaceful dialogue since his May 2024 inauguration, Wu warned that lasting peace is impossible without sincere mutual respect.He further urged China's Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits to abandon "ancient grudges borne by long-dead men" and focus on benefiting the living.According to Taipei Times, Wu concluded by urging China to find optimism in Taiwan's achievements rather than viewing them as threats.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Seizing the future in the face of America's retreat
President Donald Trump's second-term policies have once again pushed the global conversation into a new realm of uncertainty. From sweeping trade tariffs and strategic technology restrictions to tightened student visa policies and aggressive immigration controls, the US seems to be deliberately moving inward, adopting protectionist policies with significant global implications. While these measures are designed to revive domestic manufacturing, secure intellectual capital, and curb illegal immigration, they are also inadvertently reshaping the geopolitical and economic architecture elsewhere. Amidst these tectonic shifts, countries like India stand to gain if they position themselves strategically and act decisively. Donald Trump Trump's economic nationalism has resulted in a revived trade war, especially with China. His administration recently increased tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars worth of Chinese goods, targeting sectors such as electric vehicles (Evs), semiconductors, and critical minerals. The intention is clear: To re-shore manufacturing back to the US and reduce dependency on Chinese supply chains. However, the consequences of such moves ripple far beyond Beijing and Washington. As global companies seek alternatives to Chinese manufacturing, other Asian economies including India, Vietnam, and Indonesia are rapidly emerging as attractive destinations for investment. For India, which has long attempted to position itself as a reliable and democratic manufacturing hub, this development presents a golden opportunity. With initiatives like Make in India and production-linked incentive schemes for electronics and semiconductors, the Indian government is laying the groundwork to attract companies looking to de-risk their global operations. In the technology sector, the Trump administration has intensified export controls, limiting China's access to advanced chip manufacturing equipment and Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. These restrictions, while intended to curtail China's technological rise, have also fragmented global innovation networks. This fragmentation could ironically catalyse a new wave of innovation across Asia and Europe, as countries accelerate efforts to develop indigenous technologies. India, which is building its semiconductor fabrication facilities and boosting AI research, can now play a more central role in global value chains. With a deep talent pool in engineering and computer science, India can absorb not only displaced global investment but also the human capital looking for new avenues beyond an increasingly closed-off America. One of the most dramatic impacts of Trump's policies is being felt in the realm of higher education. New visa regulations are deterring thousands of international students, especially from Asia. Measures include increased scrutiny of social media, more restrictive visa durations, and arbitrary rejections based on political or ideological grounds. The US, once the gold standard for international education, is rapidly losing its appeal among prospective students. Indian and Chinese students, traditionally the largest cohorts in American universities, are beginning to look elsewhere. For India, this shift opens two parallel opportunities. First, Indian universities, especially those with growing global aspirations can step in to attract not only Indian students who are reconsidering US options but also students from other countries looking for affordable, quality education. With strategic reforms, partnerships with foreign institutions, and investments in infrastructure, Indian higher education can elevate its status regionally and globally. Second, the US's more selective approach to immigration, though largely restrictive, has left some space open for high-skilled professionals. Despite tightening student visas, Trump recently expressed a surprising openness to retaining Indian and Chinese graduates in the US to start companies or work in innovation sectors. If that door remains even partially open, it could create a focused channel for Indian STEM talent to contribute to US innovation, albeit in more structured and limited ways. However, if the overall tone toward immigration continues to harden, Indian professionals and entrepreneurs may look to establish ventures at home or in other friendly jurisdictions, further strengthening domestic innovation ecosystems. The broader immigration landscape under Trump has undergone significant changes. From executive orders restricting birthright citizenship to funding cuts for sanctuary cities and the resumption of large-scale immigration raids, the administration has made its anti-immigration stance clear. Temporary pauses on enforcement due to labor shortages in sectors like agriculture and meatpacking only underscore America's underlying need for immigrant labour, even as its policies contradict that reality. As a result, countries like India can respond in two ways: By negotiating bilateral labour mobility agreements for specific sectors or by strengthening domestic industries to retain and productively employ labor that might otherwise have migrated. Additionally, the Indian diaspora, increasingly wary of the American immigration environment, may redirect its investments and entrepreneurial energy back to India, providing a subtle but powerful boost to sectors like real estate, education, and tech startups. India's service sector, particularly IT and business process outsourcing, is also poised to benefit from Trump's curbs. Restrictions on service imports and a declining inflow of foreign students and tourists are likely to dent America's $293 billion services trade surplus. Indian firms, with their long-established capabilities in remote delivery of financial, legal, health, and educational services, are in a strong position to absorb some of that demand. In a world increasingly comfortable with remote collaboration, India's time zone advantage, language skills, and scalable talent pool make it a natural alternative. However, these opportunities are not without challenges. The fluidity of American politics means that many of Trump's measures could be reversed or diluted by future administrations or court rulings. India must also contend with competition from other nations such as Vietnam, Bangladesh, and the Philippines, all of which are vying for similar trade and investment diversions. Moreover, India's infrastructure, bureaucratic complexity, and policy inconsistencies could deter investors unless urgent reforms are undertaken. Strategically, India must move swiftly. This is a moment of global realignment, and complacency could mean missing the window. The government should deepen economic diplomacy, especially with countries and companies disenchanted by US volatility. Educational reforms should be accelerated to position India as a regional hub for higher learning. Domestic innovation must be incentivised with consistent funding, stronger intellectual property protections, and smoother regulatory pathways. In trade, India should work to expand agreements with the European Union, Asean, and African nations, offering itself as both an alternative supplier and an emerging market of over a billion consumers. Trump's protectionist pivot, while destabilising for many, has inadvertently set the stage for a broader reshuffling of global economic and technological leadership. India, with its demographic advantage, growing market, and improving policy ecosystem, is well-placed to step into this evolving void. But time is of the essence. If India can act with clarity, consistency, and courage, it could emerge not just as a beneficiary of America's retreat but as one of the architects of the new global order. This article is authored by Gunwant Singh, scholar, international relations and security studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
After taking $60 billion from China, Pakistan offers critical mineral assets in Balochistan to US during Asim Munir–Trump meet
General Asim Munir's meeting with Donald Trump explored potential US access to Balochistan's mineral wealth, challenging China's dominance in the region. Discussions included trade, AI, and energy, signaling a broader strategic partnership. This move aligns with US efforts to diversify critical resource supply chains, mirroring a similar deal being discussed with Ukraine. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Balochistan: Rich in minerals, light on development Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US signals interest amid push to reduce dependence on rivals The deal with Ukraine Broader Scope of Cooperation Pakistan's Army Chief, General Asim Munir, recently held a closed-door meeting with former US President Donald Trump in Washington, where discussions reportedly included a potential offer of access to critical mineral assets in Balochistan. This comes after China has already invested an estimated $60 billion in Pakistan, much of it focused on infrastructure and mining under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor ( CPEC ).While neither side has officially confirmed the terms, reports in Pakistani media and statements in parliament suggest that Washington may now be exploring commercial entry into Balochistan's mineral-rich zones—long seen as strategically important and previously dominated by Chinese covering nearly 43 per cent of Pakistan's land area, is home to some of the world's most sought-after raw materials. These include copper, lithium, rare-earth elements, gold, coal, and chromite. Despite its natural wealth, the province remains underdeveloped and politically the centre of attention is the Reko Diq project , one of the largest undeveloped copper and gold deposits globally. Canadian mining company Barrick Gold estimates it holds 7.3 million tonnes of copper and 15 million ounces of gold, with an additional 8.4 million tonnes in inferred copper to media reports and parliamentary comments in Pakistan, the Munir–Trump meeting touched on strategic access to Balochistan's minerals. This aligns with the United States' ongoing efforts to diversify its supply chains for critical resources, reducing dependence on countries it considers adversarial.A Pakistani lawmaker also raised the issue in the National Assembly, indicating that General Munir's US visit may have included negotiations involving Balochistan's rare-earth reserves. While the US has not made any official announcements, the development hints at a potential shift in mineral diplomacy in the to its interest in Balochistan, the U.S. is also in discussions with Ukraine for a $500 billion deal focused on critical minerals. The agreement aims to secure vital resources such as lithium and rare earths, essential for U.S. defense systems, emerging technologies, and green energy solutions. Ukraine, with its vast mineral wealth, is seen as a key partner in diversifying the U.S. supply of these crucial materials. This deal is expected to provide significant economic benefits to Ukraine, attracting investment for its mineral extraction industries. Ultimately, the collaboration aligns with U.S. interests in reducing dependence on adversarial nations and enhancing global influence over critical resources essential for technological and national security has been a dominant economic player in Balochistan, investing in ports, roads, and mining projects through CPEC. China has invested nearly $60 billion in CPEC corridor in Pakistan, the majority of which lies in Balochistan. It has been involved in copper and gold mining, including earlier phases of the Reko Diq project. However, Chinese investments have faced setbacks due to rising attacks by Baloch separatist groups, who oppose foreign exploitation of local entry of the United States into the picture could complicate the geopolitical equation in the region and potentially trigger concerns in Beijing, which has committed billions in strategic Inter-Services Public Relations said Munir's discussions with Trump also 'explored collaboration in trade, artificial intelligence, energy and emerging technologies.' The statement added that both sides want broader strategic and economic ties, with Trump 'indicating a willingness' to deepen engagement across sectors.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Iran-Israel war: Tehran moves to shut Strait of Hormuz after US strikes. How will it impact India?
Iran-Israel war: Following the US strikes at Iran's three nuclear sites - Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow - the Islamic Republic's parliament has called for the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. However, its Supreme National Security Council will take the final decision. Such a move could be unprecedented as the Islamic Republic has not done it before in any war or conflict. 'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil. If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake. It's economic suicide for them if they do it,' US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, according to Fox News. The Strait of Hormuz, located between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, is the only maritime passage from the Persian Gulf to the open ocean. It is considered one of the world's most strategically vital choke points, serving as the main export route for key Gulf oil producers, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq and Kuwait. It permits nearly 20 per cent of the world's daily oil consumption, around 20 million barrels, to pass through it. At its narrowest point, the Strait is only 33 kilometres wide, with the shipping lanes in each direction measuring just 3 kilometres across. As per media reports, nearly 50 large oil tankers are currently attempting to exit the Strait of Hormuz. Iran's renewed threats in response to recent US strikes have intensified fears about the extent to which a conflict in the Gulf region could disrupt the global oil supply. US Energy Information Administration (EIA) believes 'flows through the Strait of Hormuz in 2024 and the first quarter of 2025 made up more than one-quarter of total global seaborne oil trade and about one-fifth of global oil and petroleum product consumption'. In addition, around one-fifth of global liquefied natural gas trade also transited the Strait of Hormuz in 2024, primarily from Qatar. Due to its strategic geographic location, there is no alternative sea route to the Strait of Hormuz. As a result, any disruption to shipping through the strait would have significant consequences for the global oil and LNG trade, likely causing prices to surge. Since oil prices influence a wide range of goods and commodities, such fluctuations would have a ripple effect across the global economy. '84% of the crude oil and condensate and 83% of the liquefied natural gas that moved through the Strait of Hormuz went to Asian markets in 2024. China, India, Japan and South Korea were the top destinations for crude oil moving through the Strait of Hormuz to Asia, accounting for a combined 69% of all Hormuz crude oil and condensate flows in 2024,' EIA said. More than two-thirds of India's oil imports and nearly half of its liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports pass through the Strait of Hormuz. Out of the 5.5 million barrels of oil India consumes daily, approximately 1.5 million are transported via this crucial waterway. Foreign Affairs Expert Robinder Sachdev informed news agency ANI, 'If Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, India will definitely suffer. About 20 per cent of the world's crude oil and 25 per cent of the world's natural gas flow through these.' He added that India will face challenges as rising oil prices lead to higher inflation. It is estimated that for every $10 increase in crude oil prices, India's GDP could be affected by 0.5 per cent. Meanwhile, the Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas of India, Hardeep Singh Puri, is confident that there is enough oil in the global market. 'The oil price for a long time was between 65 and 70 (USD per barrel). Then it was between 70 and 75. Today is a Sunday. When the markets open tomorrow, the consequences of the closure of the Strait of Hormuz will be factored in. But as I've been saying for a long time, enough oil is available in the global markets,' ANI quoted Puri as saying. He added, 'More and more oil is coming on the global markets, particularly from the Western Hemisphere. Even traditional suppliers would be interested in keeping the supplies because they also need revenue. So hopefully the market will factor that in.' In a statement to Madhavi Arora, Chief Economist, Emkay Global Financial Services said, 'We have $70/bbl Brent assumption for FY26 with Q1FY26 likely to average at $67-69/bbl. However, with OPEC+ announcing another higher than expected production hike in July, fundamentally oil markets remain well supplied and further Iranian supply cuts can be accommodated.' She further said, 'As of now, we are not changing our forecasts and continue to see CPI inflation undershooting RBI's estimate of 3.7% to average much lower 3.3-3.4%* in FY26. We note that every $10/bl increase in oil leads to an annualised gain of 35 bps in CPI inflation. ' 'We maintain FY26E CAD/GDP at 0.8%, at Brent 70/bbl, with every 10$/bbl leading to upside risk of 0.4-0.5%, ceteris paribus Our FY26 Growth est at 6.0% could see a downside risk of 16-20bps if oil averages $80/bl through the year vs $70/bl assumed,' Arora asserted.
