Private equity firm KKR drops out of rescue deal for British utility Thames Water
Thames Water suffered a major setback in its fight to avoid nationalization on Tuesday as it said U.S. private equity firm KKR had pulled out of a multibillion-pound rescue plan.
Britain's biggest water supplier has been pushed to the edge by its £18-billion (US$24.35-billion) debt pile, and was banking on KKR investing about £4-billion in new equity to effectively buy the company.
The government has said it is on standby in case Thames Water fails to recapitalize and needs to be temporarily nationalized in order to keep services running.
'The government is clearly keeping a very close eye on what's going on,' Environment Minister Steve Reed told LBC Radio on Tuesday, after Thames Water said KKR had pulled out.
KKR declined to comment.
Britain's Thames Water says fines need to be deferred to help company avoid state rescue
Thames Water is at the centre of a public backlash against the privatized water sector which has been blamed for polluting Britain's rivers and seas while hiking bills, and prioritizing dividend payouts over investment in infrastructure.
Public outrage over frequent sewage spills has prompted tough action from regulators, but Thames Water bosses have said punitive fines are hindering its efforts at a turnaround.
Thames Water CEO Chris Weston warned in mid-May that in order to help the company attract equity and avoid a state rescue, it would need relief from fines estimated to come in at £900-million over the next five years.
The government wants to reform the sector and has tasked former Bank of England deputy governor Jon Cunliffe with leading a commission to do so.
He said on Tuesday regulation needed to be overhauled. While water companies needed to be held to account, action should be proportional, he said.
'It means being able to help companies and support them when they need to improve so they don't wind up in this spiral going down,' he told Sky News.
KKR's withdrawal comes days after Thames was fined £123-million for sewage failures.
The announcement sent Thames' bonds to record lows. Its 2040 bond dropped 4 pence in the pound to 69 pence while its euro-denominated April 2027 bond dropped 2 euro cents to just under 68 cents.
Chairman Adrian Montague said KKR pulling out after two months of due diligence was 'disappointing.'
Without fresh funding, Thames Water could run out of money in the middle of 2026.
Montague said the company, which has 16 million customers in southern England, would talk to its senior creditors, who have presented their own plan, likely to involve some equity investment and a debt-for-equity swap.
The creditors already effectively own the company after writeoffs by the previous shareholders. A creditor spokesperson declined to provide more details on their plan.
While Environment Minister Reed acknowledged the situation was 'difficult,' he said the company was stable, adding that the government was ready to step in.
Elected last July, the Labour government had promised to clean up Britain's waterways and get on top of the sewage scandal. But in setting up Cunliffe's water commission, it ruled out renationalization as an option.
The interim report said risk in the sector needed to be reduced to attract investors willing to accept lower returns over the longer term.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
29 minutes ago
- CBC
British Parliament votes in favour of assisted dying legislation
Britain's Parliament voted on Friday in favour of a bill to legalize assisted dying. The result came after hours of emotional debate and references to personal stories in the chamber, and it followed a vote in November that approved the legislation in principle. This vote was closer: 314 lawmakers in favour with 291 against the bill, compared to a 330-275 split eight months ago. The "Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life)" law would give mentally competent, terminally ill adults in England and Wales with six months or less left to live the right to choose to end their lives with medical help. The vote puts Britain on course to follow Australia, Canada and other countries, as well as some U.S. states, in permitting assisted dying. Supporters say it will provide dignity and compassion to people suffering, but opponents worry that vulnerable people could be coerced into ending their lives. Bill moves to House of Lords The bill now proceeds to Britain's upper chamber, the House of Lords, where it will undergo months of scrutiny. While there could be further amendments, the unelected Lords will be reluctant to block legislation that has been passed by elected members of the House of Commons. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government was neutral on the legislation, meaning politicians voted according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Starmer had previously said he was in favour of allowing assisted dying. Opponents of the bill had argued that ill people may feel they should end their lives for fear of being a burden to their families and society, and some lawmakers withdrew their support after the initial vote last year, saying safeguards had been weakened. In the original plan, an assisted death would have required court approval. That has been replaced by a requirement for a judgment by a panel including a social worker, a senior legal figure and a psychiatrist, which is seen by some as a watering down. The Labour lawmaker who proposed the bill, Kim Leadbeater, said that the legislation still offered some of the most robust protections in the world against the coercion of vulnerable people. "It works and it is safe, and it provides dignity to terminally ill people," she told reporters before the vote. "This is not an either/or when it comes to palliative care or assisted dying. It is about choice for people." WATCH l Voting in November signalled likely passage: U.K. lawmakers back new bill to allow assisted dying 7 months ago Duration 4:19 Lawmakers in the United Kingdom voted in favour of a bill to allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales to end their lives with medical help, legislation that has stirred up a national debate about dignity in death and end-of-life care. Opinion polls show that a majority of Britons back assisted dying in principle. Hundreds of campaigners both in favour and against the legislation gathered outside Parliament on Friday to watch the vote on their mobile phones.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
U.K. lawmakers back bill to allow terminally ill adults to end their lives
LONDON -- U.K. lawmakers on Friday approved a bill to allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales to choose to end their lives in a historic vote in Parliament that takes it a step nearer to becoming law. Members of Parliament voted 314-291 to back the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill following an impassioned and respectful debate. The majority of 23 was less than the 55 when they last voted on the issue in November, meaning that some lawmakers changed their minds in the intervening months. Since November, the bill has been scrutinized, leading to some changes in the proposed legislation, which has been shepherded by Labour lawmaker Kim Leadbeater rather than the government It's not quite law yet as the bill now goes to the unelected House of Lords, which can amend or delay policy, though it can't overrule the lower chamber. The vote is potentially the biggest change to social policy since abortion was partially legalized in 1967. Divisive issue In opening the debate, Leadbeater relayed how she had heard hundreds of stories from people who saw their loved ones die in traumatic circumstances. 'Not supporting the bill today is not a neutral act. It is a vote for the status quo,' she said. 'And it fills me with despair to think MPs could be here in another 10 years' time hearing the same stories.' Proponents of the bill argue those with a terminal diagnosis must be given a choice at the end of their lives. However, opponents say the disabled and older people could be at risk of being coerced, directly or indirectly, into ending their lives to save money or relieve the burden on family members. Others have called for improvements in palliative care and greater investments in hospices to ease suffering as a better and more moral alternative. Diane Abbott, a veteran left-wing Labour lawmaker, urged MPs to 'speak up for the voiceless one more time, because there is no doubt that if this bill is passed in its current form, people will lose their lives who do not need to, and they will be amongst the most vulnerable and marginalized in our society.' Passions were running high outside of Parliament where hundreds of people gathered to make their voices heard. Supporters were dressed in clothing emblazoned with the phrase 'Campaign for Dignity in Dying,' while opponents held up banners urging lawmakers not to make the state-run National Health Service the 'National Suicide Service.' What lawmakers are voting on The bill would allow terminally ill adults over age 18 in England and Wales, who are deemed to have less than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death. The terminally ill person would have to be capable of taking the fatal drugs themselves. Proponents of the bill say wealthy individuals can travel to Switzerland, which allows foreigners to legally end their lives, while others have to face possible prosecution for helping their loves ones die. Timeline for the bill Friday's result isn't the end of the matter. The legislation now goes to the unelected House of Lords, which has the power to delay and amend policy, though it can't overrule the lower chamber. Since assisted dying wasn't in the governing Labour Party's election manifesto last year, the House of Lords has more room to manoeuvre. Any amendments would then go back to the House of Commons. Backers of the bill say implementation will take four years, rather than the initially suggested two. That means it could become law in 2029, around the time that the next general election must be held. Changes to the bill Plenty of revisions have been made to the measure, but not enough for some. Perhaps the most important change was to drop the requirement that a judge sign off on any decision. Many in the legal profession had objected. Now any request would be subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Changes also were made to ensure the establishment of independent advocates to support people with learning disabilities, autism or mental health conditions and the creation of a disability advisory board. It was already the case that doctors wouldn't be required to take part, but lawmakers have since voted to insert a new clause into the bill extending the provision to anyone. The wording means 'no person,' including social care workers and pharmacists, is obliged to take part in assisted dying and can therefore opt out. Government stance There is clearly no consensus in the cabinet about the measure. Prime Minister Keir Starmer backed the bill on Friday, while his health secretary, Wes Streeting, voted against it. But Streeting has said that he would respect the outcome. There are also questions about how it would impact the NHS, hospice care and the legal system. Nations where assisted dying is legal Other countries that have legalized assisted suicide include Australia, Belgium, Canada and parts of the United States, with regulations on who is eligible varying by jurisdiction. Assisted suicide is different from euthanasia, allowed in the Netherlands and Canada, which involves health-care practitioners administering a lethal injection at the patient's request in specific circumstances. By Pan Pylas
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Pro-Palestinian activists say they damaged planes on a U.K. air force base
LONDON — British police are searching for suspects after pro-Palestinian activists claimed to have broken into a Royal Air Force Base and damaged two planes with red paint, officials said Friday. The group Palestine Action said two members entered RAF Brize Norton on Wednesday and used electric scooters to approach the Voyager jets, which are used for air-to-air refueling. The duo sprayed red paint into the planes' turbine engines with repurposed fire extinguishers and caused further damage with crowbars, according to the group, which released video footage appearing to show an individual approach a jet and spray paint into the engine. The activists left the base without being detained, Palestine Action said. The group said in a statement that 'despite publicly condemning the Israeli government, Britain continues to send military cargo, fly spy planes over Gaza and refuel US/Israeli fighter jets.' It called the U.K. 'an active participant in the Gaza genocide and war crimes across the Middle East.' Britain's Ministry of Defense confirmed the incident, saying: 'We strongly condemn this vandalism of Royal Air Force assets.' Planes from Brize Norton, 70 miles (112 kilometers) northwest of London, regularly fly to RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus, Britain's main air base for operations in the Middle East. The U.K. has sent more Typhoon fighter jets and Voyager tankers to Cyprus since the Israel-Iran war started a week ago for what Prime Minister Keir Starmer called 'contingency support.' Iran has threatened to attack U.S., French and British bases in the region if those countries help Israel fend off Iranian strikes. Thames Valley Police said in a statement that it had 'received a report of people gaining access to RAF Brize Norton and causing criminal damage.' Officers were working with staff at the base and the Ministry of Defense Police to arrest the perpetrators, the department said. The Associated Press
