Why history might hold the answer for stricken Liberals
Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it, as the aphorism goes.
For the Liberal Party, the lessons to be learned after a historic election defeat eerily resemble a re-run of a schooling the party received decades earlier.
Women and young people abandoned the conservatives, multicultural communities lost faith and there was a prominent drop in support among metropolitan voters.
Those findings from a 1983 review into the blistering election defeat of then-Liberal prime minister Malcolm Fraser mirror problems raised by party members after the party's 2025 loss.
Fresh thinking was needed, the talents of women should be better utilised and there had to be better communication with young people, then-Liberal president John Valder found, noting parties that ignored change didn't survive.
One of those points has been addressed after the most recent electoral defeat with the appointment of Sussan Ley as the first female leader of the federal Liberals.
But she still faces a monumental challenge with a loss of frontbench talent and the need to re-establish what the Liberals stand for with voters, experts and party insiders say.
The wipeout under Peter Dutton on May 3 was proportionally worse than Mr Fraser's defeat, reducing the Liberals to just 30 per cent of lower house seats - its worst position in the post-war era.
In addition to their greater parliamentary presence, the 1983 Liberals also retained a lot more experience on their front bench, political historian Josh Black said.
There was "an obvious dearth of apparent talent" this time around, meaning the path forward would need to be different, he told AAP.
Outgoing Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison was criticised in the aftermath of his 2022 defeat - at that time the party's worst in 70 years - for abandoning inner-city seats that were won by teal independents and instead targeting the outer suburbs.
Mr Dutton has been accused of unsuccessfully trying the same playbook that backfired three years earlier.
But the outer suburbs targeted by the coalition were no longer the working-class areas successfully won over by former Liberal prime minister John Howard, pollster Kos Samaras said.
They were now incredibly diverse, often populated by young, immigrant families.
Liberals who thought Howard-era thinking still prevailed were "quite ignorant of the Australia they live in", Mr Samaras said.
The party needed to become more empathetic and tolerant, including by abandoning its perceived anti-immigration sentiments, he said.
Young, working-class men of Indian heritage in their 20s and 30s, who on the face of it might vote Liberal, did not rally behind the party.
When asked why, they would reply, "Oh, they don't like us", Mr Samaras added.
"(The Liberals are) going to have to grab that dog whistle, dig a big hole and bury it and never dig it up again," he said.
Some among the Liberals question how the party of Robert Menzies, which was formed in conjunction with the Australian Women's National League, also failed to appeal to the female demographic so badly.
There was no clear start to the Liberals' women problem but rather decades of incremental decisions, Dr Black said.
Challenges started emerging by the 1970s, when that generation of Liberal politicians were less comfortable sharing power with women compared to those in the Menzies era, he said.
By the 1990s, the Liberals were adamant about not moving to a quota system for pre-selecting women despite the Labor Party making the change.
Senior conservative Liberals also came out in the 2000s against issues like easier access to abortions, he said.
"There are key milestones like this that meant by the 2010s, a real women problem had emerged," Dr Black added.
Western Sydney MP Melissa McIntosh, one of the few Liberals to hold their outer-suburban seats, said her party had already heeded the message from the election by electing its first female leader.
But it still needed to do a better job communicating what it stood for, she said.
"We have beliefs that women would resonate with talking about equality for all, that's a core belief of the Liberal Party," she said.
The Liberals also face a cultural shift, with support for the party plummeting among millennial and Gen Z voters, many of whom have turned to minor parties or independents.
They included people who can't afford a house and the first generation facing a future in which they would be worse off than their parents, Mr Samaras said.
That cohort of voters did not share the same views as baby boomers had when they were younger, he said, changing the Liberals path back to government compared to the post-Fraser years.
The last time the Liberals were down as low, they were consigned to 13 years in opposition and five consecutive election defeats before Mr Howard's 1996 victory.
Ms Ley has already made history once by becoming leader and she will need to do it again if she wants to avoid a repeat of the party's last stint in the wilderness.
Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it, as the aphorism goes.
For the Liberal Party, the lessons to be learned after a historic election defeat eerily resemble a re-run of a schooling the party received decades earlier.
Women and young people abandoned the conservatives, multicultural communities lost faith and there was a prominent drop in support among metropolitan voters.
Those findings from a 1983 review into the blistering election defeat of then-Liberal prime minister Malcolm Fraser mirror problems raised by party members after the party's 2025 loss.
Fresh thinking was needed, the talents of women should be better utilised and there had to be better communication with young people, then-Liberal president John Valder found, noting parties that ignored change didn't survive.
One of those points has been addressed after the most recent electoral defeat with the appointment of Sussan Ley as the first female leader of the federal Liberals.
But she still faces a monumental challenge with a loss of frontbench talent and the need to re-establish what the Liberals stand for with voters, experts and party insiders say.
The wipeout under Peter Dutton on May 3 was proportionally worse than Mr Fraser's defeat, reducing the Liberals to just 30 per cent of lower house seats - its worst position in the post-war era.
In addition to their greater parliamentary presence, the 1983 Liberals also retained a lot more experience on their front bench, political historian Josh Black said.
There was "an obvious dearth of apparent talent" this time around, meaning the path forward would need to be different, he told AAP.
Outgoing Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison was criticised in the aftermath of his 2022 defeat - at that time the party's worst in 70 years - for abandoning inner-city seats that were won by teal independents and instead targeting the outer suburbs.
Mr Dutton has been accused of unsuccessfully trying the same playbook that backfired three years earlier.
But the outer suburbs targeted by the coalition were no longer the working-class areas successfully won over by former Liberal prime minister John Howard, pollster Kos Samaras said.
They were now incredibly diverse, often populated by young, immigrant families.
Liberals who thought Howard-era thinking still prevailed were "quite ignorant of the Australia they live in", Mr Samaras said.
The party needed to become more empathetic and tolerant, including by abandoning its perceived anti-immigration sentiments, he said.
Young, working-class men of Indian heritage in their 20s and 30s, who on the face of it might vote Liberal, did not rally behind the party.
When asked why, they would reply, "Oh, they don't like us", Mr Samaras added.
"(The Liberals are) going to have to grab that dog whistle, dig a big hole and bury it and never dig it up again," he said.
Some among the Liberals question how the party of Robert Menzies, which was formed in conjunction with the Australian Women's National League, also failed to appeal to the female demographic so badly.
There was no clear start to the Liberals' women problem but rather decades of incremental decisions, Dr Black said.
Challenges started emerging by the 1970s, when that generation of Liberal politicians were less comfortable sharing power with women compared to those in the Menzies era, he said.
By the 1990s, the Liberals were adamant about not moving to a quota system for pre-selecting women despite the Labor Party making the change.
Senior conservative Liberals also came out in the 2000s against issues like easier access to abortions, he said.
"There are key milestones like this that meant by the 2010s, a real women problem had emerged," Dr Black added.
Western Sydney MP Melissa McIntosh, one of the few Liberals to hold their outer-suburban seats, said her party had already heeded the message from the election by electing its first female leader.
But it still needed to do a better job communicating what it stood for, she said.
"We have beliefs that women would resonate with talking about equality for all, that's a core belief of the Liberal Party," she said.
The Liberals also face a cultural shift, with support for the party plummeting among millennial and Gen Z voters, many of whom have turned to minor parties or independents.
They included people who can't afford a house and the first generation facing a future in which they would be worse off than their parents, Mr Samaras said.
That cohort of voters did not share the same views as baby boomers had when they were younger, he said, changing the Liberals path back to government compared to the post-Fraser years.
The last time the Liberals were down as low, they were consigned to 13 years in opposition and five consecutive election defeats before Mr Howard's 1996 victory.
Ms Ley has already made history once by becoming leader and she will need to do it again if she wants to avoid a repeat of the party's last stint in the wilderness.
Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it, as the aphorism goes.
For the Liberal Party, the lessons to be learned after a historic election defeat eerily resemble a re-run of a schooling the party received decades earlier.
Women and young people abandoned the conservatives, multicultural communities lost faith and there was a prominent drop in support among metropolitan voters.
Those findings from a 1983 review into the blistering election defeat of then-Liberal prime minister Malcolm Fraser mirror problems raised by party members after the party's 2025 loss.
Fresh thinking was needed, the talents of women should be better utilised and there had to be better communication with young people, then-Liberal president John Valder found, noting parties that ignored change didn't survive.
One of those points has been addressed after the most recent electoral defeat with the appointment of Sussan Ley as the first female leader of the federal Liberals.
But she still faces a monumental challenge with a loss of frontbench talent and the need to re-establish what the Liberals stand for with voters, experts and party insiders say.
The wipeout under Peter Dutton on May 3 was proportionally worse than Mr Fraser's defeat, reducing the Liberals to just 30 per cent of lower house seats - its worst position in the post-war era.
In addition to their greater parliamentary presence, the 1983 Liberals also retained a lot more experience on their front bench, political historian Josh Black said.
There was "an obvious dearth of apparent talent" this time around, meaning the path forward would need to be different, he told AAP.
Outgoing Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison was criticised in the aftermath of his 2022 defeat - at that time the party's worst in 70 years - for abandoning inner-city seats that were won by teal independents and instead targeting the outer suburbs.
Mr Dutton has been accused of unsuccessfully trying the same playbook that backfired three years earlier.
But the outer suburbs targeted by the coalition were no longer the working-class areas successfully won over by former Liberal prime minister John Howard, pollster Kos Samaras said.
They were now incredibly diverse, often populated by young, immigrant families.
Liberals who thought Howard-era thinking still prevailed were "quite ignorant of the Australia they live in", Mr Samaras said.
The party needed to become more empathetic and tolerant, including by abandoning its perceived anti-immigration sentiments, he said.
Young, working-class men of Indian heritage in their 20s and 30s, who on the face of it might vote Liberal, did not rally behind the party.
When asked why, they would reply, "Oh, they don't like us", Mr Samaras added.
"(The Liberals are) going to have to grab that dog whistle, dig a big hole and bury it and never dig it up again," he said.
Some among the Liberals question how the party of Robert Menzies, which was formed in conjunction with the Australian Women's National League, also failed to appeal to the female demographic so badly.
There was no clear start to the Liberals' women problem but rather decades of incremental decisions, Dr Black said.
Challenges started emerging by the 1970s, when that generation of Liberal politicians were less comfortable sharing power with women compared to those in the Menzies era, he said.
By the 1990s, the Liberals were adamant about not moving to a quota system for pre-selecting women despite the Labor Party making the change.
Senior conservative Liberals also came out in the 2000s against issues like easier access to abortions, he said.
"There are key milestones like this that meant by the 2010s, a real women problem had emerged," Dr Black added.
Western Sydney MP Melissa McIntosh, one of the few Liberals to hold their outer-suburban seats, said her party had already heeded the message from the election by electing its first female leader.
But it still needed to do a better job communicating what it stood for, she said.
"We have beliefs that women would resonate with talking about equality for all, that's a core belief of the Liberal Party," she said.
The Liberals also face a cultural shift, with support for the party plummeting among millennial and Gen Z voters, many of whom have turned to minor parties or independents.
They included people who can't afford a house and the first generation facing a future in which they would be worse off than their parents, Mr Samaras said.
That cohort of voters did not share the same views as baby boomers had when they were younger, he said, changing the Liberals path back to government compared to the post-Fraser years.
The last time the Liberals were down as low, they were consigned to 13 years in opposition and five consecutive election defeats before Mr Howard's 1996 victory.
Ms Ley has already made history once by becoming leader and she will need to do it again if she wants to avoid a repeat of the party's last stint in the wilderness.
Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it, as the aphorism goes.
For the Liberal Party, the lessons to be learned after a historic election defeat eerily resemble a re-run of a schooling the party received decades earlier.
Women and young people abandoned the conservatives, multicultural communities lost faith and there was a prominent drop in support among metropolitan voters.
Those findings from a 1983 review into the blistering election defeat of then-Liberal prime minister Malcolm Fraser mirror problems raised by party members after the party's 2025 loss.
Fresh thinking was needed, the talents of women should be better utilised and there had to be better communication with young people, then-Liberal president John Valder found, noting parties that ignored change didn't survive.
One of those points has been addressed after the most recent electoral defeat with the appointment of Sussan Ley as the first female leader of the federal Liberals.
But she still faces a monumental challenge with a loss of frontbench talent and the need to re-establish what the Liberals stand for with voters, experts and party insiders say.
The wipeout under Peter Dutton on May 3 was proportionally worse than Mr Fraser's defeat, reducing the Liberals to just 30 per cent of lower house seats - its worst position in the post-war era.
In addition to their greater parliamentary presence, the 1983 Liberals also retained a lot more experience on their front bench, political historian Josh Black said.
There was "an obvious dearth of apparent talent" this time around, meaning the path forward would need to be different, he told AAP.
Outgoing Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison was criticised in the aftermath of his 2022 defeat - at that time the party's worst in 70 years - for abandoning inner-city seats that were won by teal independents and instead targeting the outer suburbs.
Mr Dutton has been accused of unsuccessfully trying the same playbook that backfired three years earlier.
But the outer suburbs targeted by the coalition were no longer the working-class areas successfully won over by former Liberal prime minister John Howard, pollster Kos Samaras said.
They were now incredibly diverse, often populated by young, immigrant families.
Liberals who thought Howard-era thinking still prevailed were "quite ignorant of the Australia they live in", Mr Samaras said.
The party needed to become more empathetic and tolerant, including by abandoning its perceived anti-immigration sentiments, he said.
Young, working-class men of Indian heritage in their 20s and 30s, who on the face of it might vote Liberal, did not rally behind the party.
When asked why, they would reply, "Oh, they don't like us", Mr Samaras added.
"(The Liberals are) going to have to grab that dog whistle, dig a big hole and bury it and never dig it up again," he said.
Some among the Liberals question how the party of Robert Menzies, which was formed in conjunction with the Australian Women's National League, also failed to appeal to the female demographic so badly.
There was no clear start to the Liberals' women problem but rather decades of incremental decisions, Dr Black said.
Challenges started emerging by the 1970s, when that generation of Liberal politicians were less comfortable sharing power with women compared to those in the Menzies era, he said.
By the 1990s, the Liberals were adamant about not moving to a quota system for pre-selecting women despite the Labor Party making the change.
Senior conservative Liberals also came out in the 2000s against issues like easier access to abortions, he said.
"There are key milestones like this that meant by the 2010s, a real women problem had emerged," Dr Black added.
Western Sydney MP Melissa McIntosh, one of the few Liberals to hold their outer-suburban seats, said her party had already heeded the message from the election by electing its first female leader.
But it still needed to do a better job communicating what it stood for, she said.
"We have beliefs that women would resonate with talking about equality for all, that's a core belief of the Liberal Party," she said.
The Liberals also face a cultural shift, with support for the party plummeting among millennial and Gen Z voters, many of whom have turned to minor parties or independents.
They included people who can't afford a house and the first generation facing a future in which they would be worse off than their parents, Mr Samaras said.
That cohort of voters did not share the same views as baby boomers had when they were younger, he said, changing the Liberals path back to government compared to the post-Fraser years.
The last time the Liberals were down as low, they were consigned to 13 years in opposition and five consecutive election defeats before Mr Howard's 1996 victory.
Ms Ley has already made history once by becoming leader and she will need to do it again if she wants to avoid a repeat of the party's last stint in the wilderness.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
Expert raises concerns over US-Israel actions as Iran warns of 'irreparable consequences'
People protest against the US and Israeli strikes on Iran and in support of Palestinians during a demonstration in Times Square then at The Christopher Columbus Statue in New York, NY on June 22, 2025. Few Trump and Israel pro supporters stand by Columbus Circle as well. Credits- AAP Source: ABACA / Guerin Charles/ABACA/PA/AAP Image
Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
'Big-time parliament powerhouse': The Hon Julie Bishop reveals her biggest poitical 'flex' during chat with surprising new bestie Tyra Banks
The Honourable Julie Bishop has revealed what it's like to be a "big-time parliament powerhouse" in a new interview with close friend Tyra Banks. The 68-year-old Australian politician, who was the first female Minister for Foreign Affairs from 2013 to 2018 and the first female deputy leader of the Liberal Party from 2007 to 2018, sat down for an interview with the American supermodel on Sunday. It's understood that the pair became fast friends after Banks moved to Australia with her family, including her nine-year-old son, York, and partner, Louis Bélanger-Martin, in late 2023. The unlikely duo were recently spotted dining together at Nobu in Sydney's Crown Casino, sharing happy snaps from the outing on social media. "I have a confession," the former America's Next Top Model judge told Bishop during the interview for The Daily Telegraph. "I kept forgetting you were this big-time parliament powerhouse because you were just so warm, inviting, lovely … and FUN! "It felt like girlfriends catching up – not a government icon and a retired-but-not-really-retired-now supermodel-turned-businesswoman. Ha!" When Banks asked Bishop what the most unexpected thing was in her handbag, the former MP offered a peek into her current work as the United Nations' Special Envoy to Myanmar. "My United Nations ID and the business cards of some very interesting people!" she revealed. Reflecting on her 21-year political career, the Perth-based former politician, who was MP for Curtin from 1998 to 2019, also served as Minister for Education, Science and Training, Minister for Women's Issues and Minister for Ageing. Banks asked her to recall the most unexpected "Julie Bishop flex" she'd ever pulled in a room full of "men in suits". "Sitting around a table with all men to discuss a proposal and trying unsuccessfully to get a word in," Bishop replied. "So waiting until they all agree with each other and are about to move on, then putting my hand up to say, 'There's a fundamental flaw in this. We'll need to start from the beginning, and here's why'." When asked about a time she nearly lost composure in Parliament from laughing, Bishop recounted being caught on live TV playing "rock-paper-scissors-lizard-Spock" with former Cabinet Minister Christopher Pyne while waiting for Question Time. "We then received a text from staff saying, 'You're on TV – stop it!'" she said. Banks, who recently launched her SMiZE & DREAM ice cream brand with a flagship store in Sydney's Darling Harbour, ended the chat by making plans with Bishop for their next girls' getaway. "I bonded with you in such a beautiful way when we had that first dinner at Nobu at the Crown. What should we do on our next girls' hangout?" she asked. Bishop replied: "I love that we connected so easily with lots to talk about, so I can't wait for our trip to Margaret River to explore the wine region and just hang out for a few relaxing days."
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
These parents say their crumbling state school isn't being fixed because of who they vote for
A group of Melbourne parents say their bayside state primary school is crumbling into disrepair and being neglected by the Victorian government because it sits in an affluent Liberal-held electorate. The long-running maintenance issues at the 150-year-old Brighton Primary School came to a head this year when the floors in four classrooms and a student bathroom had to be ripped out after being eaten by termites. The school's 500-plus students are learning in 50-year-old demountable classrooms just metres away from a busy train line, collapsing brick walls are creating no-go zones and the campus has been refused grant funding to replace its 30-year-old playground for three years running. The school council says parents believe the school is being overlooked by the state Labor government because it is in an affluent suburb and a Liberal political stronghold. The party's local state MP described the situation as 'reprehensible'. The Victorian Schools Building Authority (VSBA) said it responded promptly to maintenance issues at Brighton Primary and that it was supporting the school to ensure student and staff safety. But school council president Aaron Stead said maintenance has been underfunded for decades, despite it being one of just four government schools in metropolitan Melbourne to offer specialist teaching to deaf children. 'Where the school has really struggled for the last few decades in getting any funding from the government is capital infrastructure,' Stead said. 'We've got 14 demountables or portables that are up to 50 years old, they're in various states of disrepair, they're under-sized for current learning standards, the number of students you can get into them is not what's recommended by the state government.'
