Google Deepmind CEO says global AI cooperation 'difficult'
Hassabis advocated for the implementation of 'smart, adaptable regulation' because 'it needs to kind of adapt to where the technology ends up going and what the problems end up being'. — Bloomberg
LONDON: Artificial intelligence pioneer and head of Google's Deepmind, Demis Hassabis on June 2 said that greater international cooperation around AI regulation was needed but "difficult" to achieve "in today's geopolitical context".
At a time when AI is being integrated across all industries, its uses have raised major ethical questions, from the spread of misinformation to its impact on employment, or the loss of technological control.
At London's South by Southwest (SXSW) festival on Monday, Hassabis, who has won a Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his research on AI, also addressed the challenges that artificial general intelligence (AGI) – a technology that could match and even surpass human capability – would bring.
"The most important thing is it's got to be some form of international cooperation because the technology is across all borders. It's going to get applied to all countries," Hassabis said.
"Many, many countries are involved in researching or building data centres or hosting these technologies. So I think for anything to be meaningful, there has to be some sort of international cooperation or collaboration and unfortunately that's looking quite difficult in today's geopolitical context," he said.
At Paris's AI summit in February, 58 countries – including China, France, India, the European Union and the African Union Commission – called for enhanced coordination on AI governance.
But the US warned against "excessive regulation", with US Vice President JD Vance saying it could "kill a transformative sector".
Alongside the US, the UK refused to sign the summit's appeal for an "open", "inclusive" and "ethical" AI.
Hassabis on Monday advocated for the implementation of "smart, adaptable regulation" because "it needs to kind of adapt to where the technology ends up going and what the problems end up being". – AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malaysian Reserve
13 hours ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Thailand, Cambodia shut land crossings in escalating border spat
THAILAND and Cambodia shut several border crossings in tit-for-tat moves, ratcheting up tensions between the two Southeast Asian neighbors as Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra fights to save her government from a political crisis triggered by a leaked phone call over the weekslong standoff. The closure of a border crossing in northeastern Buri Ram province was effective from June 21, according to an order by the Thai army late Saturday. Cambodia then retaliated with the permanent shutdown of the same passage as well as another checkpoint, according to Cambodian leader Hun Manet, who criticized the Thai army's move. The Thai army said it was its prerogative to restrict border movements to protect the country's sovereignty for national security reasons, as it's done since June 7. Relations between the two countries were tense after troops exchanged fire on May 28 in the disputed Chong Bok border area, resulting in the death of a Cambodian soldier. Both countries have massed troops along the frontier and closed or shortened the operational hours of several land crossings that act as vital trade links. Cambodia has sought to get the International Court of Justice in The Hague to help settle land disputes in Chong Bok and three other border areas with Thailand. That's angered Bangkok, which has said it doesn't recognize the court's jurisdiction. Tensions escalated earlier this week, after former Cambodian leader Hun Sen — Hun Manet's father — leaked his phone conversation with Paetongtarn, in which she held negotiations about a bilateral reopening of borders and appeared to criticize the Thai army's role in the border standoff. The phone leak has since unleashed fresh political turmoil in Thailand and pushed Paetongtarn's government to the brink of collapse, with one coalition party leaving the bloc and saying the phone call had damaged the country. The exit left Paetongtarn with a wafer-thin majority government, while other coalition parties weighed options. Thailand has called the phone leak 'unacceptable conduct between states,' saying it's undermined the trust and respect between the two countries. There was no need for any bilateral agreement on reopening border checkpoints, Hun Manet said in a statement on Sunday. Thailand needs to lift all restrictions first and Cambodia will do the same within five hours, he said. –BLOOMBERG
Malay Mail
15 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Control in the name of distraction — Aisha Fahmy Mohd Zulhery Fahmy
JUNE 22 — People call them big companies or even giants: Google, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Meta, Netflix. These names dominate our digital world. They've become so woven into our daily lives that we often forget just how much we rely on them. At the touch of our fingertips, we send messages, stream videos, search for answers, shop, and socialise. The line 'there's an app for that' came from their inventions. In many ways, these companies built the modern digital landscape. Thanks to them, we're more connected than ever before. We can communicate across borders, access information instantly, and enjoy the kind of convenience our ancestors couldn't have imagined. But with great innovation comes great responsibility and even greater power. The question is: Where do we draw the line? Yes, we should be thankful for the tools they've created. But we should also be cautious. There's a saying: 'Don't bite the hand that feeds you,' but perhaps in this case, the real warning should be: 'Don't keep eating if the hand starts feeding you poison.' These platforms don't just connect us — they also control the flow of information we see. The news we read, the videos we watch, the ads we encounter, even the people we interact with — much of it is determined by algorithms designed by a few powerful corporations. This control over information isn't just a matter of business. It affects public opinion, political debates, and even personal beliefs. When a handful of companies can amplify some voices while silencing others, promote certain narratives while burying others, it becomes clear that they don't just participate in the media industry — they dominate it. And the content never stops. We scroll endlessly through social media, binge-watch entire series in a weekend, and click through a dozen tabs without finishing a single one. At some point, this starts to feel less like freedom and more like hypnosis. We're feeding on content voluntarily but without limits. We're consuming and consuming, but what are we really getting in return? Control of information affects public opinion, political debates, and even personal beliefs. — Picture from Unsplash/Maxim Ilyahov I believe this endless stream of media has become a distraction — a way to pull us away from the real world, from reality itself. Instead of looking out at the world and engaging with people face to face, we're staring into screens, losing ourselves in curated images and carefully calculated feeds. And while it feels like we're in control, choosing what to watch or who to follow, the truth is, much of our experience is shaped by behind-the-scenes algorithms we don't fully understand. Of course, not everything is harmful. There are many benefits to the digital world: education, community-building, activism, entertainment, even healing. But we can't ignore the other sides too. The addictive design of social media, the spread of misinformation, the invasion of privacy, the mental health challenges — it's all part of the same package. So yes, the tech giants are part of the media industry — but they're more than that. They are the media industry now. They've become the new gatekeepers of information. And while they promise freedom, access, and innovation, they also hold immense power over what we see, what we know, and how we feel. The real challenge isn't just recognising this power — it's deciding what to do with it. Should we regulate them? Should we limit our use? Should we demand more transparency? These are the questions we need to start asking, not just as consumers, but as citizens of a digital world. * Aisha Fahmy Mohd Zulhery Fahmy is an undergraduate student of Universiti Malaya, taking an elective university course entitled 'Introduction to Journalism and Storytelling in Digital Age'. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Malaysian Reserve
19 hours ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Thai premier won't quit to save government, ruling party says
THAI Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra (picture) will not resign or dissolve parliament, her party said Saturday, amid reports the leader may step down to keep the ruling coalition in power and to end a political crisis triggered by comments she had made that were critical of the army. Speculation that Paetongtarn would accept proposals from coalition parties to quit or dissolve parliament after the passage of the budget bill 'are completely untrue,' Sorawong Thienthong, secretary-general of Pheu Thai Party, said in a post on Facebook. 'The Prime Minister has firmly affirmed to us that she will continue to fully carry out her duties in addressing the crises the country is currently facing,' Sorawong said. Paetongtarn is fighting to save her less than one-year-old government after the exit of the second-largest party in her ruling alliance this week, leaving the bloc with a razor-thin majority in parliament. Her coalition now holds about 255 seats in the 495-member body and cannot afford more defections. Local media reported the ultra-conservative United Thai Nation Party, the second-largest in the coalition with 36 seats, threatened to leave the government unless Paetongtarn steps down to make way for a new prime ministerial vote. Paetongtarn has tried to ease public anger over her leaked phone call with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen by apologizing and calling for national unity, but her rivals have threatened to escalate street protests to press for her removal. On Friday, the prime minister also visited troops at a border post to show support for soldiers involved in a border standoff with Cambodia. Paetongtarn's administration is focused on resolving the Thai–Cambodian border issue, for which it's implementing strong countermeasures on both diplomatic and security fronts, and seriously pushing negotiations to resolve the US tariff threats, said Sorawong, who is also the minister for Tourism and Sports. –BLOOMBERG
