Historians alarmed as Trump seeks to rewrite US story for 250th anniversary

Donald Trump, it could be said, takes a breezy, Sam Cooke style approach to history.
Like the legendary 'king of soul' in his 1960 hit Wonderful World, the US president has admitted to not knowing much about historical events or figures of the past – even when faced with authorities on the subject.
Recalling a conversation at Mar-a-Lago shortly after Trump's 2016 election victory, the American historian Douglas Brinkley recently recounted his shock when Trump – who has mused about having his name carved on Mount Rushmore alongside the nation's most celebrated presidents – told him he had never read a book about Abraham Lincoln.
'He was thinking about what he would do for his inaugural address, and he said he knew nothing about past history,' Brinkley told a webinar organized by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
'It startled me, because when you talk to politicians, they even make up books. They pretend they read a lot. He just kind of shrugged it off and told me that he was a visual guy. That translated as his sense of history in a true sense began with John F Kennedy.'
Ignorance, however, appears to be no barrier as Trump seeks to grasp control of the US's historical narrative in the run-up to next year's landmark celebration of the 250th anniversary of the declaration of independence, also known as the semiquincentennial.
Under an executive order issued in January, the president has started to churn out his own approved version of US history that professional historians fear will resort to the tried and tested authoritarian playbook of airbrushing out inconvenient and inglorious chapters that do not align with his vision of American greatness.
'He is not now and never has been a student of history, but is basically a restorationist,' said Jonathan Alter, a historian and biographer of several US presidents, including Jimmy Carter, Barack Obama and Franklin Roosevelt. Alter described a 'restorationist' as a 'political figure who operates on the politics of nostalgia'.
'He's ignorant of economic history, he's ignorant of political history. And his idea for the 250 is to use it as a way to celebrate him,' Alter added. 'We don't know yet exactly how he'll hijack that event next year, but he will certainly try to do so.'
As a first step, Trump's order established himself chair of a White House taskforce 250 and vowed a 'grand celebration' to mark the country's 250th birthday on 4 July 2026 and 'other actions to honor the history of our great nation'.
One of those was under way last month when the first of a series of short videos, entitled 'The Story of America', was posted on the White House 250 website. The videos were produced in partnership with Hillsdale College, a conservative Christian institution in Michigan.
In the opening video, the college's president, Larry Arnn – a former research director for Winston's Churchill official biographer, Sir Martin Gilbert – drew similarities between Lincoln and Trump, citing the current president's signature slogan 'Make America Great Again'.
'He has a famous slogan that I will not repeat here, but everybody knows what it is, and it ends with the word again,' said Arnn, who did not respond to the Guardian's interview request. 'He wants to do something again, something that's already been done … And it places him somewhere near the politics of Abraham Lincoln.'
In another, perhaps unintended, parallel, Arnn, describing the text of the independence document, recounts how the founding fathers justified the declaration by asserting that King George III 'violated his rightful powers by invading the authority of the legislature, which indicates separation of powers would be right, and that he has interfered with representation, our ability to elect our government, which means consent of the governed … and … interfered with the judicial branch'.
The videos are being rolled out weeks after Trump, in another executive order, called for a radical makeover in how the country's past is presented in federally funded museums such as the Smithsonian, and national parks.
The administration has also unveiled plans for a national garden of American heroes, with the National Endowment for the Humanities offering partial funding for life-size sculptures of 250 notable figures from the country's past.
Yet with critics accusing the president of defying court orders, usurping powers normally reserved for Congress and of behaving like a despot, Arnn's narrative inadvertently exposes the political risks to Trump of trying to identify himself with America's revolutionary founders.
The problem for Trump, argued Johann Neem, a professor of US history at Western Washington University, is that the revolution was a rebellion 'against tyranny and arbitrary power' of the type that he is now trying to wield.
'Any continuity between the actual political meaning of the revolution and what Trump is doing to our constitution is false,' he said. 'Anybody who teaches about the American revolution knows that the thing the founders feared the most is someone like Donald Trump – someone who would be lawless and and have arbitrary power, that's not limited by the rule of law.'
Trump's bid to annex the historical narrative is part of a wider culture war, historians said, fueled in part by leftwing discourses on the central position of race in the national story. Those views were exemplified by the New York Times's 1619 Project, which takes a critical view of some of the most revered figures in the American revolution and their attitudes to slavery.
The Pulitzer-winning project drew a splenetic response from Trump, who attacked it as 'totally discredited' and typical of a leftwing critique that 'defiled the American story with deceptions, falsehoods and lies' at a White House history event in 2020.
'This project rewrites American history to teach our children that we were founded on the principle of oppression, not freedom,' he told the event.
In response, he commissioned a 1776 report – released in the final days of his first term – which drew up plans for a 'patriotic education' that would refute teachings on issues like systemic racism and critical race theory. Critics accused the report of distorting the country's history of racism and painting a misleadingly benign picture of some of the revolution's slave-owning founding fathers and misappropriating quotes from Martin Luther King.
Neem called Trump's perspective a 'hyper-nationalist overreaction' to what he called 'a post-American approach' adopted by some left-leaning historians who depicted racism as so central to the country's founding principle, that it left ordinary citizens feeling there was little to celebrate. The results, he warned could be a 'saccharine' and simplified version of America's often complex national story that would amount to 'an abuse of history' and serve an 'autocratic playbook.'
'He is speaking for a group of intellectuals and activists that truly believe progressives have corrupted American culture and have stolen their country,' Neem said. 'The critical turn in American history is just one piece of a larger problem and and they see historians, as well as other experts, as a kind of impurity.'
Some historians are fighting back against Trump's encroachment onto their territory.
Heather Cox Richardson, a professor of history at Boston College and a specialist in the US in the 19th century, is producing a series of 90-second videos called Journey to American Democracy she hopes will eventually be watched in school classrooms.
She predicted that Trump's efforts to control history through the taskforce 250 was doomed to fail, because other historians were seeking to project 'grassroots history' to a wider audience online.
'We are looking at the different ways in which our always multicultural society constructed a nation, and that is a story of extraordinary triumph, but also of missteps and tragedy,' said Cox Richardson. 'The idea that we had a perfect past that needs to be recovered is an ideology in service to an authoritarian, strongman, and one of the things you see with the rise of a strongman is the attempt to destroy real history.'
'But if you look around the United States now, you see that the ability to affect culture is slipping away from the president's hands. The more he talks about it being this sanitized work of a few ideologically pure white leaders in the past, the more other people will speak up and say, 'Well, no, not really.''

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mirror

an hour ago

• Daily Mirror

Iran told shutting down oil 'choke point' would be 'economic suicide'

The US has warned Iran that closing the Strait of Hormuz in response to American strikes on its nuclear sites would be 'economic suicide' as the UK is warned it could be hit hard Iran has been warned that shutting down a crucial Middle East oil "choke point" following US strikes on its nuclear facilities would be tantamount to "economic suicide", as reported by The Telegraph. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has called on Iran's allies, including China, to exert pressure on Tehran to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, stating that any closure would be a "terrible mistake". ‌ "I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil," Mr Rubio said during an interview with Fox News. ‌ "If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake. It's economic suicide for them if they do it. And we retain options to deal with that, but other countries should be looking at that as well. It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours," he continued. In retaliation for US strikes, Iranian lawmakers have voted to obstruct vital shipping routes through this key waterway after Donald Trump decided to engage in the conflict between Israel and Iran, reports the Express. However, the vote by the Iranian parliament is not definitive, and state television has emphasised that the ultimate decision lies with Iran's top security officials, Reuters reports. The narrow strait, situated within Iranian territorial waters, is considered the most critical oil transit choke point globally, with approximately one-fifth of all worldwide oil supplies and a third of liquefied natural gas passing through it. Any efforts to disrupt maritime traffic by deploying mines or missiles could trigger a global oil crisis, skyrocket inflation rates and potentially plunge the economy into a downturn. ‌ On Sunday, specialists cautioned that such a move to shut the strait might also elicit "a significant military response" from both the United States and its allies. Eurasia Group, a leading consultancy in political risk, advised clients: "The US has amassed a massive military presence in the Gulf and surrounding region, and a move by Iran against the strait would almost certainly trigger a significant military response." ‌ Ami Daniel, CEO of maritime data company Windward, noted that even the mere "perception" of an Iranian assault on shipping could reduce maritime traffic to a mere trickle. He further remarked: "People are talking about whether they block the Strait of Hormuz, but how about if they just make it very dangerous to go through?". "Commercial shipping is not the Navy. They don't have to go. So actually, even just increasing the risk to go there will gradually make a big difference versus blocking it completely." As anxieties mount regarding a fresh oil emergency, countless drivers could be hit with soaring fuel costs at the filling stations. The UK, which relies on imports for roughly half its oil supply, stands to be particularly exposed. Following President Trump's ultimatum giving Iran two weeks to start talks, crude oil settled around $77 a barrel last Friday, as market players speculated that any immediate conflict was likely to be averted. Amidst escalating tension, market analysts are bracing for a surge in prices come Monday, as the "risk barometer" skyrockets. There's chatter that we could be looking at $100 a barrel or even higher on the horizon.

The Guardian

an hour ago

• The Guardian

Europeans back higher defence spending amid Russia threat, poll finds

Faced with an unpredictable Donald Trump and an aggressive Russia, Europeans favour increased spending on defence and, in some countries, compulsory military service. A survey of 12 countries for the European Council on Foreign Relations showed majorities for increased defence spending in Poland (70%), Denmark (70%) and the UK (57%). Support was softer elsewhere, but large minorities in Germany (47%), Spain (46%) and France (45%) also backed bigger military budgets. Italy was an outlier: only 17% favoured higher spending, with 57% against. Europeans in several countries supported reintroducing mandatory military service, with the crucial exception of 18- to 29-year-olds – those most likely to be called up in any armed conflict. People in France (62%), Germany (53%) and Poland (51%) were the strongest supporters of military service. Opposition to the idea outweighed support in countries including Italy (50% against), the UK (53%), Spain (56%) and Hungary (58%). Older people were keenest on the draft. In Germany, for example, a net total of 49% of over-70s supported military service, while a net total of 46% of 18- to 29-year-olds opposed the idea. The research also found the European public divided sharply over Trump, whose return to the US presidency has scrambled traditional allegiances to Washington. Countries with traditionally strong ties with the US are becoming increasingly sceptical of the US system: in the UK and Germany, majorities of 74% and 67% think it is broken. 'EU-US relations are now increasingly ideological,' the ECFR's Ivan Krastev and Mark Leonard wrote in a paper to accompany the findings. 'In many respects the relations of the far-right parties to Trump start to resemble the relationship of former communist parties to the Soviet Union in the cold war. They feel obliged to defend Trump and to imitate him.' European far-right parties, which often took inspiration from Vladimir Putin's Russia, now look to Trump's system as a model, the authors suggest. In contrast, voters for mainstream parties are critical of Trump and the US political system. Far-right and national populist allegiance to Trump exists, despite sizeable minorities of voters for those parties seeing his re-election as bad news for Americans. For instance, 34% of AfD voters in Germany, 28% of France's National Rally supporters and 30% of Reform UK voters consider Trump's re-election as 'very bad' or 'rather bad' for Americans. The findings come on the eve of a Nato summit this week where members of the alliance will be asked to raise defence spending to at least 5% of GDP a year by 2032. Spain has already rejected the target as 'unreasonable' and 'counterproductive'. Italy wants to delay the deadline until 2035. Voters in most countries polled are sceptical that Europe can be independent of the US. Citizens in Germany, Spain, Poland and Italy were more likely to say it would be very difficult or practically impossible for the EU to become independent of the US in defence and security. Only in Denmark did a slim majority (52%) consider it was possible for the EU to achieve autonomy in defence and security. Denmark, which is directly threatened by Trump's claims over Greenland, also showed the highest antipathy towards the US president: 86% believe the US political system is broken, while 76% rated Trump's re-election as a bad thing for US citizens. Several European publics support developing an alternative national nuclear deterrent that does not rely on the US, with the strongest support in Poland (60%), Portugal (62%) and Spain (54%). In Germany, support for such an idea was only 39%. The chancellor, Friedrich Merz, has proposed that his country could share nuclear weapons with France and Britain but also said this could not replace the US's protective shield over much of Europe. Sign up to Headlines Europe A digest of the morning's main headlines from the Europe edition emailed direct to you every week day after newsletter promotion In an encouraging sign for Kyiv, most Europeans oppose following the US if Trump pushes Ukraine to cede occupied territories or lifts economic sanctions against Russia. Even in Hungary, which has a government that has consistently slowed agreement on EU sanctions, 40% oppose copying any US move to lift sanctions, while 38% were in favour. In other countries there were strong majorities against emulating any pro-Russia policy on Ukraine that may come from the US. The report's authors suggest two explanations for this support for Ukraine. 'A benevolent interpretation is that Europeans support an autonomous European policy to support Ukraine and they don't want to blindly follow Trump's lead. But another reading of that data is that Europeans want Ukrainians to continue fighting on their behalf.' Leonard said: 'Our poll shows that Europeans feel unsafe and that Trump is driving demand for increased defence spending, the reintroduction of military service and an extension of nuclear capabilities across much of Europe.' Krastev, who is chair of the Centre for Liberal Strategies, said: 'The real effect of Trump's second coming is that the United States now presents a credible model for Europe's far right. To be pro-American today mostly means to be sceptical of the EU; to be pro-European means being critical of Trump's America.' Pollsters commissioned by ECFR spoke to 16,440 adults last month.

The Guardian

2 hours ago

• The Guardian

The strait of Hormuz: what is it, and why does it matter to global trade?

President Donald Trump's unprecedented decision to bomb three Iranian nuclear sites has deepened fears of a widening conflict in the Middle East. Joining Israel in the biggest western military action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 revolution, the world is now bracing for Iran's response. One way Iran could retaliate, analysts say, is to close off the strait of Hormuz, a vital trade route, through which over a fifth of the world's oil supply, 20m barrels, and much of its liquified gas, passes each day. Iran has in the past threatened to close the strait, which would restrict trade and impact global oil prices, but has never followed through on the threat. Among the world's most important oil chokepoints, the strait of Hormuz is geo-strategically important to the United States and beyond, as the strength of the global economy is heavily dependent on the flow of oil. The strait lies between Oman and Iran and links the Gulf to the north with the Gulf of Oman to the south and the Arabian Sea beyond. It is 33km wide at its narrowest point, with the shipping lane just 3km wide. About one-fifth of the world's total oil consumption passes through the strait. Between the start of 2022 and last month, approximately 17.8 million to 20.8m barrels of crude, condensate, and fuels flowed through the strait daily, according to data from analytics firm Vortexa. Members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) – Saudi Arabia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Iraq – export most of their crude via the strait, mainly to Asia. The US Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain, is tasked with protecting commercial shipping in the area. Closing the strait has the advantage of being a means to impose a direct cost on Trump, as it would trigger an oil price spike with a near immediate inflationary effect in the US and across the globe. But it would also be an act of dramatic economic self-harm. Iranian oil uses the same gateway, and shutting Hormuz risks bringing Gulf Arab states, who have been highly critical of the Israeli attack, into the war to safeguard their own interests. In particular, closing the strait would significantly harm China. The world's second-largest economy buys almost 90% of Iran's oil exports, which are subject to international sanctions. US secretary of state Marco Rubio has called on China to help stop Iran from closing it, telling Fox news: 'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the strait of Hormuz for their oil.' 'If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake,' he added, 'It's economic suicide for them if they do it.' There are already reports that some supertankers have U-turned in the strategic waterway following the US strikes. Iran's Press TV reported at the weekend that the Iranian parliament approved a measure to close the strait of Hormuz, but ultimately the decision will come down to Iran's top leaders. On Sunday Iran's foreign minister, Seyed Abbas Araghchi, hinted at what could be an open-ended retaliation when he said that Trump's decision to bomb Iran 'will have everlasting consequences'. In his first comments since the US joined Israel's war on his country, Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said that Israel has made a 'grave mistake' and 'must be punished', but did not make any specific reference to the strait of Hormuz.