Ohio State spring game notes: Julian Sayin has QB battle edge, WR depth on full display

The last time Ohio State played in Ohio Stadium, it beat Tennessee 42-17 to start its national championship run.
Now, the Buckeyes are in the process of trying to move on and defend their title.
Saturday's spring game was the next step in that pursuit. With over 40,000 people in attendance at Ohio Stadium, the offense won 50-31, a more convincing win from the 1-point victory last season.
Advertisement
In the midst of a quarterback battle, Julian Sayin and Lincoln Kienholz continued more of what we saw throughout the spring, some highs and some lows, in a competition that will continue into the summer.
Sayin finished the day 17-of-24 with 175 yards and one touchdown. Kienholz completed 12 of 18 passes for 158 yards and two touchdowns.
Another Spring Game in the books! Nothing better than a football Saturday in the 'Shoe. 🏈🏟️ #GoBucks
📸: @OhioStAthletics, @OhioStateFB pic.twitter.com/3IhQTANvxj
— Ohio State (@OhioState) April 12, 2025
Ohio State rested most of its standout starters after the first few drives, but here are thoughts from the game.
Ohio State's quarterback battle was never going to be finished by the end of the spring, but Sayin did a nice job of positioning himself in the lead going into the summer.
This spring has had a lot of ups and downs for both quarterbacks, with Kienholz looking like the better of the two in last week's scrimmage, and even slightly better in Friday's practice. But Saturday, Sayin was definitely the better of the two.
The redshirt freshman led touchdown drives on his first three drives and threw a nice ball to tight end Max Klare, splitting the safeties in the first quarter. He didn't throw an interception, looked poised in the pocket and on time with his throws. Sayin, the No. 1 quarterback in the 2024 class, has always been praised for his quick release, but it seems like his decision making is picking up to the speed of the game, as well.
Kienholz had a fairly good day as well. He struggled early, going three-and-out on his first drive, and missing a few passes like a curl to Jeremiah Smith on the opening drive. He seemed to settle down in the second half, though, with 88 yards and two of his touchdowns coming in the second frame.
Advertisement
Neither quarterback was perfect, but that's not what the spring game is about, especially in a quarterback battle. It's about progress.
The version of Will Howard that showed up for preseason camp looked nothing like the one who finished the spring in April last year. The offseason improvement can tilt this thing one direction, but for now, the spring game has to be the best outcome for the Buckeyes when it comes to the quarterbacks.
Ohio State can go into the summer knowing that Sayin might have the lead, but Kienholz is close enough to push him throughout the offseason.
And when the team returns in preseason camp, both will have a chance to close the door and seize the job. If they can't, that's a problem for a later date, but for now, with how inconsistent the spring was, this was as good of a day as the Buckeyes could've asked for.
'We talked about this as the spring went on, we need more 11-on-11 football,' Day said. 'You saw the growth. We had the ability to watch them every day and I wish I could say we need to get better at one, two and three but we just need to play football with these guys. We're young, we have a lot to work on, but I will say there was growth today.'
One thing we definitely learned was that the Buckeyes have an abundance of playmakers that would make every coach in the country jealous.
Everybody knows about star receiver Smith, the second-team All-American as a freshman. Carnell Tate is back for a bigger role. They were both five-star recruits out of high school. Five-star junior Brandon Inniss started in the slot and tallied two catches for 35 yards in the game, but the star of the spring game was five-star Mylan Graham.
Graham wasn't on campus last spring — he arrived in the summer — but the coaching staff has raved about his growth and it was on full display Saturday. He had four catches for 104 yards, which included a 51-yard touchdown catch that came off of a slant and featured him making safety Malik Hartford miss in the open field.
Advertisement
'The biggest thing with Mylan is just finishing the catches which you saw him do some today,' Day said. 'That's his emphasis, finish contested catches, catch it clean and then put it away. He had the run after the catch, that was loose, but he has a bright future here. He has the tools it takes to be the next great one.'
Beyond the receivers, Saturday was the first chance the public got to see Klare, the transfer TE from Purdue. He has the potential to be one of the best tight ends in the country. Ohio State is already getting creative with him, as his touchdown catch came with Klare lined up in the slot as he streaked right down the middle of the defense.
The entire tight end room had a good day, too. Will Kacmarek was out on Saturday, and was seen at Friday's practice on a scooter, but he will have a full summer, Day said. Aside from him, Jelani Thurman, Nate Roberts and Bennett Christian all showed enough to Day to make him think Ohio State may need to play with two tight ends more, at times, next season.
As for the running backs, Day said it's hard to judge them until they start getting hit, but the top two guys, James Peoples and C.J. Donaldson, looked good, but the most impressive player was freshman Bo Jackson.
The Cleveland native had 13 carries for 88 yards and a touchdown, while adding another touchdown through the air. This was a big spring for him after the injury that ended his senior year early. If he can stay healthy and continue to grow this offseason, he could give the Buckeyes the depth they need.
It was hard to truly judge what new defensive coordinator Matt Patricia's plans are as the Buckeyes kept things pretty basic both up front and in the secondary, which isn't uncommon for spring games. It just makes it difficult to judge on that side of the ball.
It is obvious, though, that the Buckeyes have to get more impact from the defensive line. The pass rush was all simple one-on-one moves, so nobody really did too much. Transfer Logan George had two sacks, a decent game with limited stunts called up front.
Advertisement
The problem was in the run game, where Day said he saw more knockbacks from the offensive line.
'We have to take a hard outlook at it,' Day said. 'I don't have the answer right now. … I don't want to make any judgments until we watch the film.'
Ohio State will likely dip into the portal when it opens April 16, the question will be how many impact players go into the portal.
The Buckeyes lost five defensive linemen from last year's roster: Jack Sawyer, J.T. Tuimoloau, Ty Hamilton, Tyleik Williams and Hero Kanu, who transferred to Texas. Because of the national championship run, Ohio State didn't get into the portal much to replace all those bodies, especially Kanu.
The problem right now isn't so much the top-end talent, though. Kenyatta Jackson Jr. and Caden Curry are talented edge rushers, Eddrick Houston and Kayden McDonald are good defensive tackles, as well, but it's about the depth. Those players are stepping into starting roles for the first time, so there's a question of how much impact they can have playing 40-50 snaps, especially if the depth behind them isn't there.
Depth questions come when elite players leave and the team doesn't replace them on the back end, so expect Ohio State to be very active in the portal this time around.
For the first time in a few years, Ohio State's offensive line talent and depth look good coming out of spring practice.
Barring any crazy portal movement, the starting group when they open against Texas will likely be Austin Siereveld at right tackle, Tegra Tshabola at right guard, Carson Hinzman at center, Luke Montgomery at left guard and Ethan Onianwa at left tackle.
Behind them, though, Day feels good about his depth.
Preseason camp will still be important for the Buckeyes, as they want to go into the season with four tackles, but between last year and this offseason, their position flexibility is helping in a massive way right now.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

USA Today

an hour ago

• USA Today

The reason Ohio State chose women's volleyball as one of four sports for revenue sharing

The new House Settlement is going to be a game changer in how college athletics is managed and consumed. Name, Image and Likeness will still be a thing, but now that universities can pay athletes directly, there are some decisions to be made. What sports make up the bulk of the direct payments (roughly $20.5 Million) by each university, how do they allocate those funds, and can all of the current sports survive? Those are the same questions Ohio State Athletic Director Ross Bjork has had to wrestle with as well, and he met with the media last week to discuss the strawman plan that OSU will be operating under the new parameters. Of course, the bulk of the money left over after all of the scholarships are funded will go to football, and to no one's surprise either, some of that money will go to men's and women's basketball -- two other revenue generating sports -- but there's one other sport Ohio State decided to fund through direct payments, and that one is a little bit of a surprise to some when the roughly $18 Million allocated after funding scholarships is available to distribute. To be equitable, you had a feeling (and rightfully so) that another women's sport would be in the mix, but no, it's not softball, an extremely fast-growing sport that other colleges are sure to pour money into, but rather, women's volleyball. That might be a head scratcher for many, but according to Bjork, there is reasoning behind including women's volleyball into the model. 'We think, with the attention that our program can receive, we think the Columbus market, volleyball is a booming sport,' Bjork said. 'The Covelli Center is an amazing atmosphere, so we thought volleyball could be a sport that could drive more revenue, but also the attention that it gets within the Big Ten.' It's true that volleyball is huge in the Big Ten. Teams like Penn State and Nebraska have a rabid following, and it's clear the brass at Ohio State believe the same can be true in Columbus. Head coach Jen Flynn Oldenburg is excited to have the women's volleyball team included, saying it'll allow her staff to attract some of the better talent available to come to the banks of the Olentangy and be a part of building and maintaining something. 'To be one of four sets the tone for the conference and our program,' Oldenburg said in a press conference. 'Volleyball is big in the Big Ten, and in order to compete, you have to keep up with the big dogs. By saying we're one of the four at Ohio State to get revenue share, we're going to compete with the big dogs.' As we all know, and have seen across college athletics, though, money to bring in talent can only get you so far. You have to be able to identify the right talent, take it and build a culture, develop it into better players, and get the collection of bodies to work together to achieve a goal as a cohesive team. It'll be interesting to see where the Ohio State women's volleyball team goes from here. It's a good thing to be included in the revenue sharing, but it does put a lot of pressure on the program and staff to produce results. The clock is now ticking and eyes are watching. Contact/Follow us @BuckeyesWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Ohio State news, notes and opinion. Follow Phil Harrison on X.

Associated Press

5 hours ago

• Associated Press

CWS Most Outstanding Players

2025 — Kade Anderson, LSU, p 2024 — Dylan Dreiling, Tennessee, sophomore, of 2023 — Paul Skenes, LSU, junior, p 2022 — Dylan DeLucia, Mississippi, junior, p 2021 — Will Bednar, Mississippi State, sophomore, p 2019 — Kumar Rocker, Vanderbilt, freshman, p 2018 — Adley Rutschman, Oregon State, sophomore, c 2017 — Alex Faedo, Florida, sophomore, p 2016 — Andrew Beckwith, Coastal Carolina, junior, p 2015 — Josh Sborz, Virginia, junior, p 2014 — Dansby Swanson, Vanderbilt, sophomore, 2b 2013 — Adam Plutko, UCLA, junior, p 2012 — Rob Refsnyder, Arizona, junior, rf 2011 — Scott Wingo, South Carolina, senior, 2b 2010 — Jackie Bradley Jr., South Carolina, sophomore, of 2009 — Jared Mitchell, LSU, junior, of 2008 — Tommy Mendonca, Fresno State, sophomore, 3b 2007 — Jorge Reyes, Oregon State, freshman, p 2006 — Jonah Nickerson, Oregon State, junior, p 2005 — David Maroul, Texas, senior, 3b 2004 — Jason Windsor, Cal State Fullerton, senior, p 2003 — x-John Hudgins, Stanford, junior, p 2002 — Huston Street, Texas, freshman, p 2001 — Charlton Jimerson, Miami, senior, of 2000 — Trey Hodges, LSU, senior, p 1999 — x-Marshall McDougall, Florida State, junior, 2b 1998 — Wes Rachels, Southern California, senior, 2b 1997 — Brandon Larson, LSU, junior, ss 1996 — x-Pat Burrell, Miami, freshman, 3b 1995 — Mark Kotsay, Cal State Fullerton, sophomore, of-p 1994 — Chip Glass, Oklahoma, senior, of 1993 — Todd Walker, LSU, sophomore, 2b 1992 — x-Phil Nevin, Cal State Fullerton, junior, 3b 1991 — Gary Hymel, LSU, senior, c 1990 — Mike Rebhan, Georgia, senior, p 1989 — Greg Brummett, Wichita State, senior, p 1988 — Lee Plemel, Stanford, senior, p 1987 — Paul Carey, Stanford, freshman, of 1986 — Mike Senne, Arizona, senior, of 1985 — Greg Ellena, Miami, junior, dh 1984 — John Fishel, Cal State Fullerton, junior, of 1983 — Calvin Schiraldi, Texas, junior, p 1982 — Dan Smith, Miami, junior, p 1981 — Stan Holmes, Arizona State, senior, of 1980 — Terry Francona, Arizona, junior, of 1979 — Tony Hudson, Cal State Fullerton, sophomore, p 1978 — Rod Boxberger, Southern California, junior, p 1977 — Bob Horner, Arizona State, sophomore, 2b 1976 — Steve Powers, Arizona, senior, dh-p 1975 — Mickey Reichenbach, Texas, sophomore, 1b 1974 — George Milke, Southern California, sophomore, p 1973 — x-Dave Winfield, Minnesota, senior, of-p 1972 — Russ McQueen, Southern California, sophomore, p 1971 — x-Jerry Tabb, Tulsa, freshman, 1b 1970 — x-Gene Ammann, Florida State, junior, p 1969 — John Dolinsek, Arizona State, junior, of 1968 — Bill Seinsoth, Southern California, junior, 1b 1967 — Ron Davini, Arizona State, junior, c 1966 — Steve Arlin, Ohio State, junior, p 1965 — Sal Bando, Arizona State, senior, 3b 1964 — x-Joe Ferris, Maine, sophomore, p 1963 — Bud Hollowell, Southern California, junior, c 1962 — x-Bob Garibaldi, Santa Clara, sophomore, p 1961 — x-Littleton Fowler, Oklahoma State, sophomore, p 1960 — John Erickson, Minnesota, senior, 2b 1959 — Jim Dobson, Oklahoma, sophomore, 3b 1958 — Bill Thorn, Southern California, junior, p 1957 — x-Cal Emery, Penn State, sophomore, 1b 1956 — Jerry Thomas, Minnesota, junior, p 1955 — x-Tom Borland, Oklahoma State, senior, p 1954 — x-Tom Yewcic, Michigan State, senior, c 1953 — x-J.L. Smith, Texas, junior, p 1952 — James O'Neill, Holy Cross, senior, p 1951 — x-Sidney Hatfield, Tennessee, junior, 1b-p 1950 — x-Ray VanCleef, Rutgers, junior, of 1949 — Tom Hamilton, Texas, senior, 1b x-not on championship team

USA Today

7 hours ago

• USA Today

Ranking the top eight Big Ten football NIL Valuations for 2025

Being able to compensate college athletes over the last few years has changed the landscape of college sports, most notably the revenue behemoth that is college football. Name, Image and Likeness has helped usher in a new era of bidding wars and recruiting efforts that didn't exist just less than a decade ago. And now, with the House Settlement, things will change even more. Especially at a place like Ohio State that has a huge athletic department and a massive budget. But NIL is still in practice, and there are still athletes getting paid for the usage of their name, so it's a big deal. We always hear about the astronomical figures the top-end stars are pulling in, but there are smaller ones as well. However, the multi-million dollar contracts aren't as prevalent as one would think. In fact, we're ranking the top Big Ten NIL valuations, and there are fewer than ten that make the list worth mentioning. Here's a list of the top eight NIL valuations according to On3 in the Big Ten, ranked from least to most expensive. You may be surprised by what and who is on this list., and of course, the bigger programs with the most money like Ohio State appear on this list more than some that do not at all. No. 8 - Evan Stewart, Wide Receiver | Oregon Ducks National Rank - No. 25 Stewart had a great year last season, but played second fiddle to Tez Johnson in star power. This year, it should be him as the No. 1 threat and player personality many will follow. No. 7 - Nick Singleton, Running Back | Penn State Nittany Lions National Rank - No. 21 Singleton is entering his senior year and is part of a running back tandem that should be very dangerous this season. He's a star running back for Penn State, and that alone garners attention and a pretty significant NIL package. No. 6 - Nico Iamaleava, Quarterback | UCLA Bruins National Rank - No. 19 Nico is well-known after having a fantastic season last year with Tennessee. He is one of the most recognizable quarterbacks with all the potential he possesses with his dual-threat ability, and now he'll be doing his work out in Westwood for UCLA. No. 5 - Dylan Raiola, Quarterback | Nebraska Cornhuskers National Rank - No. 17 Raiola's commitment was highly publicized. He first committed to Ohio State, then Georgia, before finally landing at Nebraska, where he had family ties. He had a very impressive, though a bit inconsistent freshman campaign and should be poised for a continuation and further breakout in 2025. No. 4 - Caleb Downs, Safety | Ohio State Buckeyes National Rank - No. 15 Downs came to Ohio State via the transfer portal after becoming a freshman All-American at Alabama. He had a stellar sophomore campaign in Columbus and is a fan favorite. He might be the best defender in all of college football, playing for arguably the most-followed college football program. That all translates to a massive NIL package. No. 3 - Bryce Underwood, Quarterback | Michigan Wolverines National Rank - No. 10 There is a ton of hype for the No. 1 quarterback coming out of high school, and Michigan is hoping he makes good on all of it. There was a lot of buzz surrounding his recruitment, and he has many folks following what he might do at the college level, even though he has yet to do anything in Ann Arbor. No. 2 - Drew Allar, Quarterback | Penn State Nittany Lions National Rank - No. 8 Allar was a five-star quarterback coming out of Ohio before committing to play for Penn State. Though he has yet to win the biggest of games, he has a big arm and is the face of the Nittany Lions' chances at not only making the College Football Playoff, but going on a run to a national championship. No. 1 - Jeremiah Smith, Wide Receiver | Ohio State Buckeyes National Rank - No. 3 Everyone knows Smith. He was an absolute star who flashed on the scene for Ohio State as a freshman after being ranked as the top overall recruit in the 2024 class. He more than made good on all that buzz and is arguably the best player in college football returning for two more seasons, still in Columbus. He is adored in Central Ohio and feared across the rest of the country. Contact/Follow us @BuckeyesWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Ohio State news, notes and opinion. Follow Phil Harrison on X.