Do Israeli attacks on Iran risk nuclear contamination? Experts weigh in

Experts say Israel 's current strikes on Iran 's nuclear installations so far pose only limited risks of contamination, but warn any attack on the country's nuclear power station at Bushehr could cause a nuclear disaster.
Fears of a nuclear catastrophe rippled through the Gulf on Thursday after the Israeli military mistakenly announced a strike in Bushehr, home to Iran's only nuclear power station, only to say later that the announcement was a mistake.
Israel has said it is determined to destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities in its military campaign, but that it also wants to avert any nuclear disaster in a region that is home to tens of millions of people and vital for global oil production.
What has Israel hit so far?
Israel has announced attacks on nuclear sites in Natanz, Isfahan, Arak and Tehran itself. Israel says it aims to stop Iran from building an atom bomb. Iran denies ever seeking one.
The international nuclear watchdog IAEA has reported damage to the uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, to the nuclear complex at Isfahan, including the Uranium Conversion Facility, and to centrifuge production facilities in Karaj and Tehran.
Israel has also attacked Arak, also known as Khondab.
The IAEA said Israeli military strikes hit the Khondab Heavy Water Research Reactor, which was under construction and had not begun operating, and damaged the nearby plant that makes heavy water. The IAEA said that it was not operational and contained no nuclear material, so there were no radiological effects.
In an update of its assessment on Friday, the IAEA said key buildings at the site were damaged. Heavy-water reactors can be used to produce plutonium, which, like enriched uranium, can be used to make an atom bomb.
What risks do these strikes pose?
Peter Bryant, a professor at the University of Liverpool in England who specialises in radiation protection science and nuclear energy policy, said he is not too concerned about fallout risks from the strikes so far.
He noted that the Arak site was not operational while the Natanz facility was underground, and no release of radiation was reported.
"The issue is controlling what has happened inside that facility, but nuclear facilities are designed for that," he said. "Uranium is only dangerous if it gets physically inhaled or ingested or gets into the body at low enrichments," he said.
Darya Dolzikova, a senior research fellow at London think tank RUSI, said attacks on facilities at the front end of the nuclear fuel cycle - the stages where uranium is prepared for use in a reactor - pose primarily chemical, not radiological risks.
At enrichment facilities, UF6, or uranium hexafluoride, is the concern. "When UF6 interacts with water vapour in the air, it produces harmful chemicals," she said.
The extent to which any material is dispersed would depend on factors including the weather, she added. "In low winds, much of the material can be expected to settle in the vicinity of the facility; in high winds, the material will travel farther, but is also likely to disperse more widely."
The risk of dispersal is lower for underground facilities.
Simon Bennett, who leads the civil safety and security unit at the University of Leicester in the UK, said risks to the environment were minimal if Israel hits subterranean facilities because you are "burying nuclear material in possibly thousands of tonnes of concrete, earth and rock".
What about nuclear reactors?
The major concern would be a strike on Iran's nuclear reactor at Bushehr.
Richard Wakeford, Honorary Professor of Epidemiology at the University of Manchester, said that while contamination from attacks on enrichment facilities would be "mainly a chemical problem" for the surrounding areas, extensive damage to large power reactors would be 'a different story".
Radioactive elements would be released either through a plume of volatile materials or into the sea, he added.
James Acton, co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said an attack on Bushehr "could cause an absolute radiological catastrophe", but that attacks on enrichment facilities were "unlikely to cause significant off-site consequences".
Before uranium goes into a nuclear reactor, it is barely radioactive, he said. "The chemical form of uranium hexafluoride is toxic ... but it actually doesn't tend to travel large distances and it's barely radioactive. So far, the radiological consequences of Israel's attacks have been virtually nil," he added, while stating his opposition to Israel's campaign.
Bennett of the University of Leicester said it would be "foolhardy for the Israelis to attack" Bushehr because they could pierce the reactor, which would mean releasing radioactive material into the atmosphere.
Why are Gulf states especially worried?
For Gulf states, the impact of any strike on Bushehr would be worsened by the potential contamination of Gulf waters, jeopardising a critical source of desalinated potable water.
In the UAE, desalinated water accounts for more than 80 per cent of drinking water, while Bahrain became fully reliant on desalinated water in 2016, with 100 per cent of groundwater reserved for contingency plans, according to authorities.
Qatar is 100 per cent dependent on desalinated water.
In Saudi Arabia, a much larger nation with a greater reserve of natural groundwater, about 50 per cent of the water supply came from desalinated water as of 2023, according to the General Authority for Statistics.
While some Gulf states like Saudi Arabia, Oman and the United Arab Emirates have access to more than one sea to draw water from, countries like Qatar, Bahrain and Kuwait are crowded along the shoreline of the Gulf with no other coastline.
"If a natural disaster, oil spill, or even a targeted attack were to disrupt a desalination plant, hundreds of thousands could lose access to freshwater almost instantly," said Nidal Hilal, Professor of Engineering and Director of New York University Abu Dhabi's Water Research Centre.
"Coastal desalination plants are especially vulnerable to regional hazards like oil spills and potential nuclear contamination," he said.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Sky News

an hour ago

• Sky News

Israel-Iran live: Iran and Israel exchange attacks - a day after Tehran rules out nuclear negotiations

Iran and Israel have been exchanging attacks after Tehran ruled out nuclear negotiations with US while it is facing "Israeli aggression". Reports have suggested a nuclear facility site in Iran has been "targeted". Listen to our Trump 100 podcast as you scroll.

Times

an hour ago

• Times

Eight arrests as protesters ‘attacked' outside Iranian embassy in London

Eight men have been arrested after anti-regime activists were allegedly assaulted outside the Iranian embassy on Friday morning. Scores of police officers were deployed to the scene after being alerted to reports of an altercation outside the building in Knightsbridge, west London, just before 10am. Two men were treated at the scene by paramedics before being taken to hospital. Officials said their injuries are not believed to be life-threatening. • Iran's 'propagandist-in-chief' billed to speak at Scottish mosque Police imposed conditions stopping protesters from gathering in the area until 1pm on Sunday to 'prevent serious disorder', but one man was arrested for allegedly breaching the civil order. Scotland Yard said seven men were arrested on suspicion of grievous bodily harm. All suspects remained in police custody on Friday afternoon. Amir, 30, a member of a pro-Iranian monarchy group, claimed one of the two injured men suffered a 'broken leg'. The construction worker, who withheld his surname, said the activists had staged a 'peaceful protest' outside the embassy since the Israeli attacks on Iran began last week. Amir claimed the members have had 'problems' with supporters of the Islamic regime during that time. The protest was said to have been an anti-regime demonstration, amid the continuing Israel-Iran conflict. The police said the rally involved both pro and anti-regime protesters. Pro-Shah protesters were seen flying different flags supporting Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, including the national flag used before the 1979 Islamist revolution. Officers were seen on patrol in the area to monitor the situation after cordons were lifted later in the afternoon. Pro-Iranian monarchy protesters told The Times they were told to disperse and dismantle flags and banners festooned on railings opposite the embassy. The Metropolitan Police said: 'Officers are on scene in Princes Gate, SW7, following an altercation during a protest. 'They were called at 9.53am on Friday. Conditions have since been put in place to prevent serious disorder.' The police said that eight men remained in police custody and that the two men treated at the scene were in hospital. London Ambulance Service added: 'We were called at 9.56am on [Friday] to reports of an assault in Princes Gate. 'We sent a number of resources to the scene including ambulance crews, paramedics in fast response cars and our tactical response unit. We treated two patients at the scene and took one to hospital and one to a major trauma centre.' The attack unfolded as the war between Israel and Iran continued to escalate and both nations engaged in missile strikes. President Trump said that he would decide in the next fortnight whether or not the US would intervene in the conflict.

The Independent

an hour ago

• The Independent

Israel-Iran latest: Israel strikes Iran's largest nuclear research facility after huge explosion rocks Haifa

Iran and Israel launched a new round of strikes early Saturday, a day after Tehran ruled out nuclear talks while under threat and European powers continued efforts to revive diplomacy. The Israeli military said it had carried out a wave of attacks on missile storage and launch sites across Iran. Israeli defence minister Israel Katz confirmed that among those killed was Saeed Izadi, a senior commander in the Quds Force, the overseas wing of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). Iran's Fars news agency reported that Israel had targeted the Isfahan nuclear facility, one of the country's largest, but said there was no leakage of hazardous material. Iranian media also reported an Israeli strike on a building in the city of Qom, where a 16-year-old was reportedly killed and two others injured. Meanwhile, US president Donald Trump slammed the US intelligence Community's assessment of Iran's nuclear weapons program and claimed Tehran could produce a working weapon within a 'matter of weeks'. At the United Nations Security Council on Friday, Israel's envoy Danny Danon declared the country would continue its military operations 'until Iran's nuclear threat is dismantled.' Watch: Russia's defence of Iran shows need to tighten sanctions, says Zelensky 21 June 2025 07:20 Experts say Israel's current strikes on Iran's nuclear installations so far pose only limited risks of contamination, but warn any attack on the country's nuclear power station at Bushehr could cause a nuclear disaster. Fears of a nuclear catastrophe rippled through the Gulf on Thursday after the Israeli military mistakenly announced a strike in Bushehr, home to Iran's only nuclear power station, only to say later that the announcement was a mistake. Do Israeli attacks on Iran risk nuclear contamination? Israel has said it is determined to destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities, while avoiding any nuclear disaster in the region Shahana Yasmin21 June 2025 07:10 UN nuclear watchdog urges restraint as Israel strikes nuclear-linked sites in Iran The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog has warned against any military action targeting Iran's nuclear reactors. At an emergency UN Security Council meeting, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said: 'I want to make it absolutely and completely clear: In case of an attack on the Bushehr nuclear power plant, a direct hit would result in a very high release of radioactivity to the environment. This is the nuclear site in Iran where the consequences could be most serious.' So far, Israel has avoided targeting nuclear reactors, focusing instead on Iran's Natanz enrichment site, centrifuge workshops near Tehran, and the Arak heavy water facility. While initial reports indicated no damage at Arak, the IAEA later confirmed 'key buildings at the facility were damaged,' though no radioactive material was present. Shahana Yasmin21 June 2025 07:00 Israel says it killed Quds Force commander leading Palestine Corps Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said on Saturday that the military had killed Saeed Izadi, a senior commander in Iran's Quds Force, during a strike on an apartment in the city of Qom, according to Reuters. Izadi, who led the Palestine Corps within the Quds Force, the overseas arm of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), was described as a veteran figure in Iran's regional operations. Shahana Yasmin21 June 2025 06:47 Who's who in the secret group advising Trump on Iran - who has been left out of the planning? President Donald Trump let it be known on Thursday that he will make a decision on whether to involve the U.S. in Israel's war with Iran within the next two weeks, as tensions over the question continue to divide conservatives. The president, who signed off on attack plans on Tuesday but resisted giving the go-ahead, is reportedly taking soundings from a small coterie of trusted advisers while also throwing the conversation open to fellow world leaders, as well as allies such as the hawkish Republican senators Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Tom Cotton of Arkansas. Keep reading: Who's who in the secret group advising Trump on Iran President Donald Trump is huddling with small circle of trusted advisers about whether to join Israeli military offensive Joe Sommerlad21 June 2025 06:30 Israel vows to continue strikes until Iran's nuclear programme is dismantled Israel pledged on Friday to keep up its military offensive against Iran until Tehran's nuclear capabilities are fully dismantled, Reuters reported. 'Though our homes, our families and our children are under threat, we will not stop,' Israeli UN Ambassador Danny Danon told the United Nations Security Council. 'Not until Iran's nuclear threat is dismantled. Not until its war machine is disarmed. Not until our people and yours are safe.' In response, Iran's ambassador to the UN, Amir Saeid Iravani, called on the Security Council to intervene to halt Israel's attacks. 'Israel apparently declared that it will continue this strike for as many days as it takes,' he said. 'We are alarmed by credible reports that the United States... may be joining this war.' Shahana Yasmin21 June 2025 06:20 Iran faces near-total internet blackout amid conflict with Israel As the war between Iran and Israel enters its second week, much of Iran remains in a near-total communication blackout, leaving millions unable to connect with the outside world or even with friends and family across the country. According to internet monitoring group NetBlocks, Iran has been largely cut off from global internet access for more than 60 hours. 'The internet shutdown continues to severely limit the public's ability to express political viewpoints, communicate freely, and follow safety alerts amid ongoing conflict with Israel,' it said on X, formerly Twitter. Shahana Yasmin21 June 2025 06:10 Do Israeli attacks on Iran risk nuclear contamination? Do Israeli attacks on Iran risk nuclear contamination? Israel has said it is determined to destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities, while avoiding any nuclear disaster in the region Reuters21 June 2025 06:00 Ex-CIA chief warns US would trigger regional war by striking Iran Former CIA director and defence secretary Leon Panetta has warned that any US military strike on Iran would almost certainly plunge the country into a wider regional war. Panetta said the US made a 'terrible mistake' by invading Iraq two decades ago and urged US president Trump to heed the lessons of the past. 'It's a lesson that the president needs to learn, because if he goes in and attacks Iran, then there's no question that the United States would be in a regional war at that point,' Panetta told CNN, adding that Iran would inevitably retaliate. 'So make no mistake about it. It may be an airstrike, but it would definitely involve the United States in a war.' Shahana Yasmin21 June 2025 05:50 Iran signals openness to diplomacy, but only if Israel halts attacks Iran has said it is open to pursuing diplomatic talks with European nations, but only on the condition that Israel ends its military operations and those responsible are held to account. Following a meeting in Geneva with European diplomats, foreign minister Abbas Araghchi expressed 'serious concern' over the failure of France, Germany, the UK, and the EU to condemn what he described as Israel's surprise strike and ongoing aggression against Iran. He warned that any assault on Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities would represent a severe violation of international law. 'I explicitly and clearly stated that Iran's defensive capabilities are not negotiable,' the minister said, reported the Associated Press. However, he added that Iran is ready to keep talking with the Europeans 'in the near future'. His comments came as Israel's top military commander said the country was preparing for a potentially prolonged conflict.