Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi meets Saudi Crown Prince on sidelines of Gulf–US Summit in Riyadh

H.H. Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, has met, today, His Royal Highness Prince Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, Crown Prince and Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, on the sidelines of the Gulf–US Summit held in Riyadh.
The meeting focused on the longstanding bonds between the United Arab Emirates and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and explored ways to further strengthen bilateral cooperation across various fields, supporting the mutual interests of both nations and their people.
The Abu Dhabi Crown Prince and Saudi Crown Prince also exchanged views on several regional and international affairs and underscored the importance of consolidating Gulf efforts to address challenges to enhance regional stability and support continued development and prosperity.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The National

30 minutes ago

• The National

IAEA warns of 'serious consequences' if Israel attacks Iran's Bushehr nuclear plant

An Israeli strike on Iran's Bushehr nuclear plant could have 'most serious' consequences, the head of the UN's atomic watchdog warned on Friday, raising concern over possible regional escalation. 'It is an operating nuclear power plant and as such it hosts thousands of kilograms of nuclear material,' International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi told the UN Security Council. 'Countries of the region have reached out directly to me to express their concerns. I want to make it absolutely and completely clear: In case of an attack on the Bushehr nuclear power plant, a direct hit could result in a very high release of radioactivity to the environment.' Mr Grossi warned that, should Israel target the power lines supplying electricity to the plant, the consequences could be 'severe' within and beyond the boundaries of Iran. Residents may be required to take iodine tablets and could face food and water shortages. He spoke a day after an Israeli military official said a representative's statement saying a strike had been carried out on Bushehr, Iran's only nuclear power plant, was a 'mistake'. He said he could neither confirm nor deny that the Russian-built Bushehr plant, located on the Gulf coast, had been hit. Iran's UN ambassador Amir Iravani accused Israel of attacking civilians and urged the Security Council to respond. 'If the Council fails to act now, it will send a message that international law and resolution apply selectively,' he said. He also voiced concern over 'credible reports that the United States … may be joining this war ', warning that such involvement would violate the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and threaten global security. UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres called on Iran to uphold and 'respect' its commitments under the NPT and reiterated Tehran's previous statements that it is not seeking nuclear weapons. Israel's ambassador lashed out at Iran's envoy for requesting an emergency Security Council session. 'How dare you? How dare you write five letters in the last week? Come before this council demand the session and ask the international community for sympathy?' Danny Danon said. 'How dare you ask the international community to protect you from the consequences of your own genocidal agenda? Have you no shame? 'Iran has already enriched uranium to near weapons-grade levels. It cannot be denied. We saw the reports. It has built deep underground facilities designed to survive bunker-busting bombs. It has advanced missile delivery systems, and it has lied to the IAEA and the world at every step.' He described Israel as 'holding the line between civilisation and genocidal jihadist imperialism'. 'Iran doesn't just want to destroy Israel, it wants to remake the world order, one missile, one terror proxy, one destroyed hospital at a time,' Mr Danon said. Russia, which has citizens working at Bushehr, said the internationalisation of the Israel-Iran conflict should be avoided. Vasily Nebenzya, Russia's UN envoy, called for immediate de-escalation and urged the council to avoid 'another devastating' war that would have unpredictable repercussions for the entire region and world. 'Not a single of the member states of this body is under more stringent oversight and scrutiny. Iran has been strictly complying with its obligations under the NPT,' he said. 'Today, the US, yet again, together with the UK, France and Germany, is attempting to persuade all parties to believe the groundless fabrications about plans allegedly harboured by Tehran to gain possession of nuclear weapons.' The US has long believed that Iran has been working on developing a nuclear weapon – something Tehran denies. US President Donald Trump has reiterated that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Concern is high that the US will soon join the conflict and strike Iran. But the US ambassador said it is 'not too late' for Iran 'to do the right thing'. 'President Trump has been clear in recent days that Iran's leadership must completely abandon its nuclear enrichment programme and all aspirations of acquiring a nuclear weapon,' said acting US ambassador Dorothy Shea. 'We can no longer ignore that Iran has all that it needs to achieve a nuclear weapon. All it needs is a decision from their supreme leader [ Ayatollah Ali Khamenei ].' China, meanwhile, called for an immediate ceasefire, saying Israel's actions violate international law and international norms, threaten Iran's sovereignty and security, and undermine regional peace. China's UN Ambassador Fu Cong warned that the situation must not be allowed to spiral into an 'unknown abyss'. Kuwait, speaking on behalf of the Gulf Cooperation Council condemned Israeli attacks on Iran and its nuclear facilities, warning they posed 'dangerous repercussions' for regional security and stability. 'They are a blatant violation of the principles of international law and the UN Charter, and they thwart international efforts to achieve peace and de-escalation,' Faisal Al Enezi, charge d'affaires at Kuwait's mission to the UN told the Council. He added that the GCC is intensifying diplomatic efforts at the highest levels to prevent further escalation, emphasising that diplomacy and dialogue remain the 'only choice and alternative' to confrontation and escalation. Mr Al Enezi warned that continued deterioration of the situation could have 'catastrophic consequences', fuelling broader regional tensions and closing the door on a peaceful resolution.

The National

an hour ago

• The National

Iran's history points to the direction the country could take

Israel's attacks on Iran last week sent the two countries to war, marking a turning point in each of their histories. It is Iran's first major war since 1988, when its eight-year-long conflict with Iraq came to an end. Israel's shock-and-awe campaign has targeted not just Iran's nuclear programme, the main casus belli, but also the political and military leadership of the Islamic Republic. Israeli and American leaders, meanwhile, have engaged in doublespeak on the question of whether they seek regime change. Regardless of their war aims, the possibility of a seismic political shift has been starkly posed in Iran. This is particular so because of the many years of economic hardship and social upheaval that have exerted tremendous pressures on the current establishment. Many are now wondering about the political consequences of the war for the Islamic Republic and the rule of its 86-year-old leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. In trying to understand the present moment, historians inevitably turn to the past. Iran's centuries-long history provides many examples of upheavals and regime change. Which historical moments are most suitable to give us a sense of where the country is at today? One inescapable point of comparison is the 1979 revolution, which replaced Mohammad Reza Pahlavi – known more widely then as the Shah of Iran – with the current establishment. But as the Islamic Republic faces one of the biggest challenges in its 46-year history, what is the likelihood that Iranians will once again rise up for the reasons noted above? Any comparison between 2025 and 1979 quickly shows why a similar revolution is much less likely to happen today. In 1979, the Shah's opponents had an overarching leader to rally behind. Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini pulled together a diverse coalition of nationalists, Marxists and Islamists to support him as an alternative. Although he was a dyed-in-wool Islamist, Khomeini was careful not to dispel other groups, particularly in the early days. Any comparison between 2025 and 1979 quickly shows why a radical change in the country's power structure is much less likely today He had in his team more veterans from within Iran's nationalist movement than fellow clerics. Khomeini also used the broad network of mosques inside the country to organise. Other opposition groups also had extensive and disciplined networks across Iran. By contrast, the opponents of the Islamic Republic today are bitterly divided, lack networks inside the country and don't have any credible organisations either inside or abroad. Reza Pahlavi, the 64-year-old son of the Shah who is currently living in exile, has attempted to pitch himself as the singular leader of the opposition. But he lacks broad-based support or organisation, without either of which it is impossible to stage an uprising that seriously challenges the Islamic Republic. Even a spontaneous movement – such as the ones in 2017-19 and 2022-23 – is unlikely to go far without organised leadership. Rather than change being imposed from the outside, it is much likelier to happen from within the establishment. Again, Iranian history has a number of examples of military figures taking up the reins of their country during moments of acute crises. The best-known example in modern times is the one mounted by Mr Pahlavi's eponymous grandfather – and the father of the deposed Shah – who rose from a lowly military position to lead a British-backed coup in 1921. Reza Pahlavi appointed himself prime minister and, after considering the idea of establishing a republic, abolished the Qajar dynasty in 1925 and created a new monarchical dynasty. The Qajars, who had run Iran since the late 1700s, had become enfeebled by the early 20th century creating the conditions necessary for change. It is conceivable that figures from inside the Islamic Republic's establishment will similarly rise to assume power. It is also possible that instead of a typical military coup, a broadly representative committee consisting of politicians and military figures takes over. Iran also experienced regime change in 1941 and 1953, both of which took place with extensive support from foreign powers. In 1941, the Soviet Union and Britain invaded the country during the Second World War before deposing Reza Pahlavi and replacing him with his son, the Shah. Twelve years later, the CIA and MI6 helped bring down the democratically elected government of Mohammad Mosaddegh and reinstated the Shah, who had been reduced to a mere figurehead, as the country's ruler. It's worth pointing out that, while the British aided Reza Pahlavi during the 1921 coup, the support had been limited and the operation very much led from within. By contrast, the 1953 coup was planned and carried out by Washington and London, albeit with local support from Iran's armed forces. It's extremely unlikely that the US and its allies can carry out a similar operation today, since they lack the level of political penetration the West had in 1953. The US remains the only foreign power capable of mounting a ground invasion of Iran, but the American public has little appetite for such an intervention – particularly after the misguided invasion and occupation of Iraq two decades earlier. While it is possible for some to imagine the US and Israel deposing Mr Khamenei, this scenario also remains unlikely. For without boots on the ground, any transition process will be chaotic, unwieldy and perhaps even met with resistance from several quarters. There is also little guarantee that a more friendly government will emerge from this process. By comparing the current moment to what happened in 1921, 1941, 1953 and 1979, we can conclude that, if there was to be a change, something akin to the 1921 coup is perhaps the most relevant model. A primarily Iranian-led power usurpation is more likely than a popular revolution (1979), a foreign-organised coup (1953) or change as a consequence of foreign occupation (1941). It remains to be seen whether there are elements inside Iran's armed forces or political establishment who would make such an ambitious dash for power, given all the risks that it will involve. It certainly appears that the Islamic Republic is on the cusp of change, given the many pressures emanating from within and beyond Iran's boundaries today. Time will tell what that change actually entails.

Arabian Business

an hour ago

• Arabian Business

UAE announces major government changes

The UAE has announced major government changes, including the introduction of a new ministry. Following consultations and approval of President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice President, Prime Minister, and Ruler of Dubai, announced the changes to the UAE government. A new Ministry of Foreign trade will be established and the Ministry of Economy will be renamed as part of the update. UAE Government changes Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid said: 'Following consultations with my brother, His Highness the President, and with his approval, we announce today changes to the UAE government as follows: Establishment of a Ministry of Foreign Trade in the UAE government and appointment of Dr. Thani Al Zeyoudi as Minister of Foreign Trade Renaming the Ministry of Economy to Ministry of Economy and Tourism led by Abdullah bin Touq Al Marri 'We also announce that the National Artificial Intelligence System will be adopted as an advisory member in the Council of Ministers, the Ministerial Development Council, and all boards of federal entities and government companies starting from January 2026 to support decision-making in these councils, conduct real-time analyses of their decisions, provide technical advice, and enhance the efficiency of government policies adopted by these councils across all sectors'. Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid added: 'The world is undergoing a comprehensive transformation phase… scientifically… economically… and socially… our goal is to prepare today for the coming decades… our goal is to ensure continued prosperity and dignified life for future generations.' الإخوة والأخوات .. بعد التشاور مع أخي رئيس الدولة حفظه الله واعتماده .. نعلن اليوم عن بعض التغييرات في حكومة دولة الإمارات كالتالي : إنشاء وزارة للتجارة الخارجية في حكومة الإمارات وتعيين الدكتور ثاني الزيودي وزيراً للتجارة الخارجية، وتغيير اسم وزارة الاقتصاد لتكون وزارة… — HH Sheikh Mohammed (@HHShkMohd) June 20, 2025