Israeli Attacks On Gaza Schools Could Be Crimes Against Humanity: UN Probe
10 June 2025
The UN Human Rights Council-mandated Independent International Commission of Inquiry (COI) report found that Israeli forces have used airstrikes, shelling, burning, and controlled demolitions to damage or destroy more than 90 per cent of schools and university buildings across Gaza.
This destruction in the wake of the 7 October 2023 Hamas-led terror attacks on Israel has made education impossible for over 658,000 children, many of whom have been out of school for nearly two years.
'We are seeing more and more indications that Israel is carrying out a concerted campaign to obliterate Palestinian life in Gaza,' said Navi Pillay, Chair of the Commission.
'Israel's targeting of the educational, cultural and religious life of the Palestinian people will harm the present generations and generations to come, hindering their right to self-determination.'
Classroom-turned military base
The COI documented cases where Israeli forces seized and used educational institutions as military bases, including the conversion of part of Al-Azhar University's Al-Mughraqa campus into a synagogue for troops.
The report also noted one instance where Hamas militants used a school for military purposes. Such conduct is a breach of international humanitarian law, which mandates the distinction between civilian objects and military targets.
Targeting of religious sites
More than half of Gaza's religious and cultural sites have been damaged or destroyed, including places serving as refuges for civilians – killing hundreds, including women and children.
The Commission stated that Israeli forces knew or should have known the cultural significance of these sites and failed to prevent harm.
In the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, Israeli authorities appropriated, developed and profited from cultural heritage sites representing Palestinian, Jewish and other cultures, while displacing Palestinian residents.
They have also blocked or severely restricted Palestinians from accessing the sites.
'Attacks on cultural and religious sites have deeply impacted intangible culture, such as religious and cultural practices, memories and history,' said Ms. Pillay.
'The targeting and destruction of heritage sites, the limiting of access to those sites in the West Bank and the erasure of their heterogenic history erode Palestinians' historical ties to the land and weaken their collective identity.'
Recommendations
The Commission called on Israel to immediately cease attacks on cultural, religious, and educational institutions and to end the seizure and military use of such facilities. It urged Israel to end its occupation and settlement activities, especially near religious and cultural sites, and to comply fully with International Court of Justice (ICJ) orders.
Investigators also urged Palestinian authorities to protect and preserve cultural heritage sites, including those of diverse origins, calling on de facto authorities in Gaza to stop using civilian objects for military purposes.
Humanitarian crisis spiralling
UN agencies continue to warn of a worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
The UN Children's Fund (UNICEF) highlighted the case of a five-year-old malnourished child whose recovery depends on adequate food and sustained care.
' Aid at scale must be allowed into Gaza for children's health and survival,' the agency urged.
'Another day of death traps'
Philippe Lazzarini, head of the UN agency assisting Palestine refugees, expressed deep concern over delays and obstacles in aid delivery, urging Israel to allow the UN safe and unhindered access to bring in supplies and distribute it safely.
'This is the only way to avert mass starvation including among one million children,' he said.
Mr. Lazzarini warned that casualties and injuries continue to be reported daily at US-backed distribution points managed by Israeli and private security forces – creating in effect, daily death traps.
He described the system as humiliating, forcing thousands of hungry and desperate people to walk tens of miles, while excluding the most vulnerable and those living too far from aid centres.
Food aid disrupted
The UN World Food Programme (WFP) reported that 59 trucks carrying essential wheat flour to northern Gaza were intercepted and offloaded by starving civilians desperate to feed their families.
A second convoy of 21 trucks bound for southern Gaza faced a 36-hour delay awaiting clearances.
As of 10 June – nearly three weeks after the limited resumption of aid – WFP transported over 700 trucks to the Kerem Shalom crossing, compared to 600-700 trucks of aid transported per day during the ceasefire earlier this year.
' To stave off starvation, stabilize markets and calm desperation, we need to consistently support the entire population with basic food requirements every month,' WFP said.
Insecurity and lawlessness in Gaza have also led to trucks being looted, injuring drivers and damaging trucks.
WFP called for faster approvals, safe routes and open crossings, as well as an urgent ceasefire, to allow it to reach those in need.
'The food aid brought into Gaza during the ceasefire helped to push back the tide of hunger. We can do this again.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
37 minutes ago
- Scoop
Explainer: Local Elections - What They Are, When They Are And How They Work
Explainer - Fiery debates, sensational promises and an onslaught of grinning politicians. It's time again for local elections. Nominations open on 4 July, but there's already dozens of people putting their hands up for councils across Aotearoa. So what do you need to know ahead of the 11 October local election? It's only the local elections, do they even matter? Well, from playgrounds to cycle lanes, roaming pets to stinky rubbish, local authorities are responsible for planning and managing your city, town or district. Councillors decide on rates and spending priorities, including funds for libraries, local roads, recycling, pest control and events. Councils can also set rules, from inner-city booze bans to dog control. The elections are your chance to vote for the people who make decisions affecting your back yard. Elections are held for the regional, city and district councils. You can also vote for the mayor while some residents vote for local and community boards. Who gets to vote? You must be 18 years or older, a New Zealand citizen or permanent resident, and have lived in Aotearoa continuously for 12 months or more at some time in your life. If you're overseas, homeless or in prison, you may still be able to vote. Check all the criteria here. But I don't think I'm enrolled If you are registered to vote in Parliamentary elections, you are automatically enrolled. To enrol or check your details, visit the Votelocal website. You can change your details here too. If you enrol after 1 August, you will need to cast a "special vote". General or Māori roll? If you're of Māori descent, you can decide which electoral roll you want to be on. If you're on the Māori Roll and your local authority has a Māori ward or constituency, you'll vote for a candidate in the Māori ward. You can change your roll type at any time except in the three months before local elections. How to vote You will receive a voting document in the mail so that you can vote by post. Some regions will also have orange boxes set up in public places to cast your vote. Councils will release these details closer to the election. Local elections are on Saturday, 11 October, but you don't have to wait until then to vote. Voting papers need to be posted back by 7 October or an orange ballot box by midday, 11 October. Some people also get two votes, such as those who pay rates on two properties. You'll need to check with your council. Are all regions voting? Tauranga City Council won't hold an election. The city returned to democratic elections last year after farewelling its Commission. The council will have an unusual four-year term, with the next local election in 2028. But Tauranga residents can still vote for their regional council. What if I want to run for council? Unhappy with the current bunch running your region? You could try for a seat at the council or local board table. Candidate nominations are open from 4 July until 1 August . You must have nominations from two people - and you can't nominate yourself. People who nominate candidates must be over 18 years old and enrolled to vote in the area the candidate is planning to stand. Candidates must be New Zealand citizens who are over 18 years old and enrolled to vote. How do I know who is running? Councils run the local elections and will provide information on the candidates. Typically councils are legally obliged to publish their candidate lists after nominations close. Look out for local debates, news stories and pamphlet drops. Once the election draws closer, the billboards and door knocks will begin. It's worth doing your research on candidates as disinformation can be circulated during election times. When will we know the results? Progress results will start coming in from noon on 11 October. Declaration of results will be released from 16-22 October. Election timeline 4 July: Candidate nominations open and roll opens 1 August, midday: Candidate nominations close and roll closes 6 August: Public notice of candidates' names 9-22 September: Voting documents delivered 7 October: Last day for posting vote by mail. After this date votes must be returned to council's ballot boxes. 11 October: Election day - voting closes midday, followed by progress results 16-22 October: Declaration of results October/November 2025: Elected members' sworn in
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Protest Tuesday In Wellington : Stop US Aggression Against Iran
Wellington peace group Just Defence has teamed with Justice for Palestine to organise a 'snap action' demonstration on the Defence HQ lawn on Bowen Street on Tuesday June 24 from 12.30pm to 1.30pm. Similar protests are happening around the world as the U.S. launches yet another war of aggression, this time against Iran. As with all their previous wars, there is a narrative that does not stand up to scrutiny. For the past 20 years the collective agencies who comprise the U.S. intelligence community have said Iran does not have an active nuclear weapons programme. So does the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the IAEA. Iran was not on the brink of attacking anyone. Negotiations were ongoing. This moment was seized on to attempt regime change. This nuclear issue is being used as a pretext, just as fake narratives about Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction were used by the U.S. and its allies to wreck Iraq following its invasion in 2003. We must not let another country be destroyed by the U.S. and Israel. We urge our government to distance itself from these violent, irresponsible states which are simultaneously committing genocide against the people of Palestine. This is a war of opportunity – the U.S. and Israel are trying to topple the government of Iran to advance their own regional and geopolitical objectives. They should be viewed as rogue states. Aotearoa New Zealand should reject this US-Israeli militarism that includes: The surprise attack on Iran The genocide in Gaza The relentless attacks and land thieving on the West Bank Assassinations across the region Bombings in Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, and Iraq. Aotearoa needs to stand for peace, justice and an end to wars of aggression.
Scoop
7 hours ago
- Scoop
Directive To Iran: Retaliation Bad; De-Escalation Good
De-escalation has become one of those coarse words in severe need of banishment, best kept in an index used by unredeemable hypocrites. It is used by the living dead in human resources, management worthies and war criminals. It's almost always used to target the person or entity that exerts retribution or seeks to avenge (dramatic) or merely overcome (mildly) a state of affairs imposed upon them. You might be bullied in the workplace for being fastidious and conscientious, showing up your daft colleagues, or reputationally attacked by a member of the establishment keen to conceal his corrupt practices. When contemplating retaliation, the self-appointed middle ground types will call upon you to 'de-escalate' the situation, insisting that you appeal to the better side of your bruised nature. After all, you know it was your fault. The joining of the United States in the war against Iran made Washington a co-conspirator to soiling international law and profaning its salient provisions. The US was in no immediate danger, nor was there any imminent threat, existential or otherwise, to its interests vis-à-vis Tehran. Yet President Donald Trump, having had the poison of persuasion poured into his ear by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, had succumbed. His will annexed to that of the Israeli premier, Trump ordered the US Air Force on June 22 to conduct bombing raids on three Iranian nuclear facilities: Isfahan, Natanz and Fordow. They were recipients of that hefty example of phallocratic lethality known as the bunker buster, the GBU-57A Massive Ordnance Penetrator. With his usual unwavering confidence, Trump declared in an address to the nation that all the country's 'nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.' In violating international law and desecrating that important canon injuncting states from committing crimes against peace, Israel and the United States are not the ones being told to restrain their violence and acknowledge breaching the United Nations Charter, risking yet another conflagration in the Middle East. It is their targeted state, the Republic of Iran, whose officials must 'de-escalate' and play nice before the diplomatic table, abandoning a nuclear program, civil or military. 'Iran, the bully of the Middle East,' Trump directs, 'must now make peace.' With suddenness, the advocates and publicists for international law vanished across the broadly described West. In Europe, Canada, the US and Australia, the mores and customs observed by states could be conveniently forgotten and retired. In its place reigned the logic of brute force and unquestioned violence. Provided such violence is exercised by that rogue combine of Amerisrael, deference and dispensation will be afforded. The same could never be said for such countries as China and Russia, abominated for not accepting the 'rules-based order' imposed by Western weaponry and force. The lamentable, plaintiff responses from Brussels to Canberra tell a sorry tale: pre-emptive war waged against a country's nuclear and oil facilities is just the sort of thing that one is allowed to do, since the rotter in question is a theocratic state of haughty disposition and regional ambition. You can get away with murdering scientists in their sleep, along with their families, liquidating the upper echelons of their military leadership and killing journalists along the way. The approved formula behind these responses is as follows. From the outset, mention that Iran must never acquire a nuclear weapon. If possible, underline any relevant qualities that render it ineligible to any other state that has nuclear weapons. Instruct Tehran that diplomacy is imperative, and retaliation terrible. Behave and exercise restraint. Here is Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer of the UK, speaking from his Chequers country retreat: it was 'clear Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon', which was 'why our focus has been on de-escalating, getting people back around to negotiate what is a very real threat in relation to the nuclear program.' If one was left in any doubt who the guilty party was, UK Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds helped dispel it, calling Iran 'a threat to this country, not in an abstract way, not in a speculative way'. The German Chancellor, Friedrich Merz, after convening his security cabinet on the morning of June 22, conveyed his views through German government spokesperson Stefan Kornelius: 'Friedrich Merz reiterated his call for Iran to immediately begin negotiations with the US and Israel and to find a diplomatic solution to the conflict.' French President Emmanuel Macron similarly got on the de-escalation bandwagon with gusto, giving a teacherly warning to Iran to 'exercise the greatest restraint' and dedicate itself to renouncing nuclear weapons. It was the only credible path to peace and security for all. The president conveniently skipped past the huge elephant in the room: Israel's illicit possession of nuclear weapons, undeclared, unmonitored and extra-legal, as a factor that severely compromises the issue of stability in the Middle East. From the European Union, the attackers and the attacked were given equal billing. 'I urge all sides to step back, return to the negotiating table and prevent further escalation,' urged Kaja Kallas, Vice-President of the European Commission. The obligatory 'Iran must never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon, as it would be a threat to international security' followed. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also thought it perfectly sensible to matronly instruct the Iranians on the next step: 'Now is the moment for Iran to engage in a credible diplomatic solution. The negotiating table is the only way to end this crisis.' All these comments are deliciously rich given that Israel has never entertained negotiations on any level with Iran, dismissive of its nuclear energy needs, while the first Trump administration sabotaged the diplomatically brokered Joint Plan of Comprehensive Action that successfully diverted Tehran away from a military nuclear program in favour of a lifting of sanctions. Talk from Amerisrael and their allies would seem to be heavily discounted, if not counterfeit. The glaring, coruscating message to Iran: retaliation bad; de-escalation good.
