Rare earths and magnets minerals elements: Why are these giving China edge in trade war with USA?
Live Events
FAQs
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
US-China trade deal has finally been chalked out, according to President Donald Trump. Analysts have claimed that China was counting on one crucial advantage as it strived to grind out a deal to ease its high-stakes trade war with the United States -- dominance in rare earths. Now question arises how rare earths have become a key sticking point in talks between the US and China.Used in electric vehicles, hard drives, wind turbines and missiles, rare earth elements are essential to the modern economy and national defence, AFP reported."The Middle East has oil. China has rare earths," Deng Xiaoping, the late Chinese leader whose pro-market reforms set the country on its path to becoming an economic powerhouse, said in 1992. Since then, Beijing's heavy investment in state-owned mining firms and lax environmental regulations compared to other industry players have turned China into the world's top supplier, as per AFP report.China now accounts for 92 percent of global refined output, according to the International Energy Agency.But the flow of rare earths from China to manufacturers around the world has slowed after Beijing in early April began requiring domestic exporters to apply for a licence -- widely seen as a response to US tariffs.Under the new requirements -- which industry groups have said are complex and slow-moving -- seven key elements and related magnets require Beijing's approval to be shipped to foreign buyers.Ensuring access to the vital elements became a top priority for US officials in talks with Chinese counterparts."The rare earth issue has clearly... overpowered the other parts of the trade negotiations because of stoppages at plants in the United States," said Paul Triolo, a technology expert at the Asia Society Policy Institute's Center for China Analysis, in an online seminar on Monday.That disruption, which forced US car giant Ford to temporarily halt production of its Explorer SUV, "really got the attention of the White House", said Triolo.Washington reportedly rely on Chinese rare earths for producing its defence equipment even as trade and geopolitical tensions deepen.An F-35 fighter jet contains over 900 pounds (more than 400 kilograms) of rare earth elements, noted a recent analysis by Gracelin Baskaran and Meredith Schwartz of the Critical Minerals Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.Pentagon is trying to catch up, with its "mine-to-magnet" strategy aiming to ensure an all-domestic supply chain for the key components by 2027. The challenge facing Washington to compete with Beijing in rare earths is compounded by sheer luck: China sits on the world's largest reserves.A1. President of USA is Donald Trump.A2. Used in electric vehicles, hard drives, wind turbines and missiles, rare earth elements are essential to the modern economy and national defence, AFP reported.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
B-2 bombers on route to Guam just before Trump's D.C. arrival — signals mount ahead of U.S strikes on Iran
B-2 stealth bombers are on their way to Guam , just as President Donald Trump prepares for his return to Washington, D.C. The timing of this deployment is raising questions about a possible U.S. military strike on Iran , especially amid growing tensions in the Middle East. The timing couldn't be more critical. As fighting intensifies between Iran and Israel, the U.S. appears to be gearing up for possible direct involvement. Multiple military sources confirmed that six B-2 Spirit bombers, capable of carrying the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), are being moved to Andersen Air Force Base in Guam—a key U.S. outpost in the Pacific. According to flight data reviewed by Fox News, six B-2 Spirit bombers left Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri this week, heading toward Andersen Air Force Base in Guam. These bombers were joined by multiple KC-46 Pegasus tankers , which help them refuel mid-air—extending their global reach. The deployment has sparked serious speculation about U.S. plans, especially since B-2s are the only aircraft that can carry the GBU-57 bunker buster , a 30,000-pound bomb built to destroy deeply buried targets like Iran's Fordow nuclear facility . Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Only 2% Traders Know this Powerful Intraday Strategy thefutureuniversity Learn More Undo Why are B-2 stealth bombers being moved to Guam now? This deployment isn't routine. The B-2 bomber is one of America's most advanced long-range weapons. It's the only aircraft designed to carry the 30,000-pound GBU-57 bunker buster, which can strike deeply buried targets like Iran's Fordow nuclear facility—one of Tehran's most fortified sites. The flight path and tanker support, including KC-46 Pegasus aerial refueling aircraft, suggest these B-2s are being prepared for missions far beyond Guam. Analysts say the bombers could soon reposition to Diego Garcia, a remote Indian Ocean island base with a clear path toward Iranian targets. Live Events A senior U.S. defense official told Fox News that these bombers are 'positioned to rapidly respond if the President gives the order.' Is the U.S. preparing for direct strikes on Iran? It certainly looks that way. Since the Iran–Israel war broke out earlier this month, U.S. forces in the Middle East have been mobilizing quickly. Fighter jets, missile defense systems, and naval assets have been moved across strategic locations including the Persian Gulf, Red Sea, and Eastern Mediterranean. Now, the focus has shifted to the skies. The B-2 deployment to Guam brings America's most precise and deadly airstrike capability closer to the conflict zone. Trump, who resumed presidential duties in January 2025, has made it clear in recent statements that Iran's nuclear escalation 'will not be tolerated.' While Washington has publicly called for a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, behind the scenes, military options are being actively reviewed. A source close to U.S. Central Command said, 'The window is narrowing. If Iran crosses the uranium enrichment threshold or hits Israeli civilian targets again, we expect a green light for strikes within days.' Could Diego Garcia be a launch point for Iran strikes? Diego Garcia is often used when the U.S. wants to strike in the Middle East without relying on regional allies' airspace. The island is British territory but leased to the U.S. military and has been a base for bomber operations in previous wars, including the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts. If B-2s are shifted from Guam to Diego Garcia, it could be the clearest sign yet that a U.S. strike on Iran's nuclear program is imminent. The Fordow facility is buried under a mountain and would require a powerful weapon like the GBU-57, launched from a stealth platform, to destroy it. That's what makes the B-2 bomber deployment so significant at this moment. Is the U.S. preparing for a strike on Iran's nuclear sites? The signs are pointing that way. The deployment of stealth bombers , along with movements of U.S. Navy carrier strike groups like the USS Nimitz and USS Carl Vinson , show a growing military buildup. Fighter jets like the F-22 Raptor , F-16 , and F-35 have also been repositioned, along with refueling tankers and missile defense systems across key U.S. bases in the Gulf and Middle East. According to The Times, intelligence sources believe Trump could approve limited airstrikes targeting Iran's nuclear infrastructure within the next two weeks. The goal would be to weaken Iran's ability to enrich uranium without starting a full-scale war. Iran has recently warned the U.S. and Israel of 'consequences' if attacks continue. Tensions spiked after Israel reportedly struck several missile sites in Iran, with Tehran promising retaliation. With so many moving parts, Washington appears to be preparing for a worst-case scenario. What next in the Iran–Israel war? The Iran–Israel conflict has already left over 4,000 people dead on both sides, according to regional reports. Missile strikes, drone attacks, and cyber warfare have intensified in recent days. Israel reportedly targeted Iranian missile sites and IRGC positions near Isfahan and Shiraz this week, escalating Tehran's threats of retaliation. With Trump back in D.C. and briefed by top Pentagon officials, decisions are expected quickly. The President may opt for targeted airstrikes on Iran's nuclear infrastructure or command centers if Tehran crosses certain 'red lines.' While no U.S. attack has been announced officially, the presence of stealth bombers in Guam , the potential use of Diego Garcia , and the broader U.S. military mobilization all point to a readiness posture—not just a show of force. FAQs: Q1: Why are B-2 stealth bombers moving to Guam now? To prepare for possible strikes on Iran amid rising tensions. Q2: Could Diego Garcia be used for Iran airstrikes? Yes, it's a key U.S. base for long-range missions near the Middle East.
Indian Express
44 minutes ago
- Indian Express
World's biggest banks increased fossil fuel financing by $162 billion in 2024: Report
The world's largest 65 banks committed $869 billion in 2024 to companies in the fossil fuels sector, up from $707 billion in 2023, with State Bank of India (SBI) one of nearly 50 large banks that increased their financing for the same compared to the previous year. 'This growth in fossil fuel finance is troubling because new fossil fuel infrastructure locks in more decades of fossil fuel dependence. As the IEA's (International Energy Agency) 2024 Energy Investment Outlook report states, '(a)chieving net zero emissions globally by 2050 would mean annual investment in oil, gas, and coal falls by more than half' by 2030,' said the Fossil Fuel Finance Report 2025 by a group of eight environment organisations together called Banking on Climate Chaos Coalition. To be sure, SBI accounted for only a fraction of the total fossil fuel financing in 2024 and only saw a small increase last year compared to other lenders. As per the report, SBI was the only Indian bank in the top 65 with a $65 million increase in fossil fuel financing in 2024 from 2023 to $2.62 billion, putting it at the 47th spot out of the 65 banks, up from 49 in 2023. In comparison, JPMorgan Chase retained its top spot in the list as it gave $53.5 billion to fossil fuel companies last year, $15 billion more than it did in 2023. This is more than SBI's total fossil fuel financing of $10.6 billion from 2021 to 2024. Earlier this year in February, SBI Chairman CS Setty said the bank is targeting to be net zero in terms of emissions by 2055. Before that, the bank is aiming to have at least 7.5 per cent of its domestic gross advances to be green advances by 2030. As at the end of the quarter ended March, SBI's domestic advances stood at Rs 36.02 lakh crore. It had sanctioned a combined fund and non-fund-based limit of Rs 20,558 crore for sustainable finance activities. According to Bengaluru-based think-tank Climate Risk Horizons, coal financing is a 'huge blind spot' for Indian banks. 'Among the top 1000 BSE-listed banks as of March 2024, only Federal Bank and RBL Bank have adopted explicit coal exclusion or phase-out policies… The economics are clear: coal is no longer the cheap energy source it once was. Renewable energy and storage can now provide electricity at or below the cost of coal, with continued cost declines likely,' the think-tank's analysts said in a post in March 2025 warning that Indian banks were falling behind in the sustainable finance race. The report found that fossil fuel financing by the world's largest banks rose in 2024 after declining in 2023 came amid watering down of exclusion policies and policy rollbacks. '…what was once largely a North American trend is now going global. European banks –often seen as more progressive on climate due to the quality of their sector policies – also began backtracking,' it said. In March, American lender Wells Fargo scrapped plans to become net zero by 2050, weeks after US President Donald Trump signed an executive order announcing the country's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. The US' withdrawal — which will take effect in early 2026 and see the world's largest economy join Iran, Libya, and Yemen as those not party to the Paris Agreement — has been part of a series of steps taken by the Trump administration to promote fossil fuels even in the face of 2024 being the hottest year ever recorded. In January, the US Treasury Department withdrew its membership of the Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System —a voluntary global coalition that looks to mobilise green finance and develop recommendations for climate-risk management in the financial sector — as part of the aforementioned executive order signed by Trump. And ahead of Trump's inauguration, the US' six largest banks left the UN-sponsored Net Zero Banking Alliance. A committee of the US Senate also approved draft legislation this week that would hit key tax incentives for clean energy. The increase in fossil fuel financing by banks in 2024 marked a reversal of decreasing lending to the segment. While nearly $3.3 trillion has been made available to fossil fuel businesses since 2021, the 65 banks in the 2025 report have committed $7.9 trillion in fossil fuel financing since the Paris Agreement came into force in 2016. In 2024, financing for acquisitions increased by $19.2 billion to $82.9 billion. While mergers and acquisitions don't directly create new infrastructure, 'this consolidation — for which bank financing is critical — is often an attempt to grow the power and competitiveness of fossil fuel companies, at a time when the world actually needs to phase out fossil fuels', the report said. Siddharth Upasani is a Deputy Associate Editor with The Indian Express. He reports primarily on data and the economy, looking for trends and changes in the former which paint a picture of the latter. Before The Indian Express, he worked at Moneycontrol and financial newswire Informist (previously called Cogencis). Outside of work, sports, fantasy football, and graphic novels keep him busy. ... Read More
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Federal judge blocks Trump's move to bar international students from Harvard in major US education ruling
US court halts Trump's visa crackdown on Harvard's international students A federal judge in Boston has temporarily blocked President Donald Trump's latest attempt to prevent Harvard University from enrolling international students, marking a significant moment in the ongoing legal standoff between one of the world's most prestigious universities and the current US administration. The ruling, handed down by US District Judge Allison Burroughs, ensures that Harvard can continue to host its nearly 7,000 international students — about one-quarter of its total enrollment — while broader legal proceedings continue. The decision represents a critical win for the Ivy League school, which has been in legal conflict with the federal government over multiple policy decisions impacting academic freedom, international student mobility, and the university's operational autonomy. While the ruling does not offer a permanent solution, it reinforces Harvard's position against what it claims are politically motivated efforts by the Trump administration to penalize the institution. Court decision halts a second attempt by the administration The legal battle intensified after the Department of Homeland Security revoked Harvard's certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program in May. This would have forced thousands of students to either leave the country or transfer, severely disrupting their education. Harvard responded by suing the agency, alleging that the action was taken without proper procedure and in retaliation for the university's refusal to comply with the White House's demands on issues including campus protests, admissions, and hiring practices. Just weeks later, President Trump issued a new proclamation attempting to bypass the court's temporary block, again aiming to prevent foreign students from attending Harvard. Judge Burroughs intervened once more, temporarily blocking this second action as well, according to reporting by the Associated Press. Her latest ruling maintains that block, though she emphasized that the federal government still retains the authority to conduct normal reviews of international student programs. Impact on students and institutional reputation Harvard argued in court filings that the federal actions had created an atmosphere of 'profound fear, concern, and confusion' for international students, many of whom were left in limbo about their academic futures. As reported by the Associated Press, Maureen Martin, director of Harvard's immigration services, said that many students had considered transferring due to uncertainty over their visa status. The sanctions also harmed Harvard's global reputation, the university claimed, jeopardizing its ability to attract top talent. 'Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard,' the lawsuit stated, highlighting how crucial foreign scholars are to its academic mission. Broader political tensions continue This legal conflict is part of a broader dispute between Harvard and the Trump administration. As reported by the Associated Press, the government has already cut over $2.6 billion in research funding, canceled contracts, and even threatened the university's tax-exempt status. The administration demanded access to extensive records related to international students, claiming concerns about national security. While Trump said in a Truth Social post that negotiations with Harvard were ongoing and that the university had been acting 'appropriately,' Harvard has held firm, with President Alan Garber stating that the university would not abandon its 'core, legally-protected principles,' as quoted by the Associated Press. As the legal fight continues, Harvard says it is making contingency plans to support its international students, ensuring their education remains uninterrupted despite the political challenges. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
