Kuwait cracks down on cryptocurrency mining amid power crisis
KUWAIT, May 1 (Reuters) - Kuwait has launched a crackdown on cryptocurrency miners it accuses of being a "major" cause of a power crisis that has led to blackouts, as authorities seek to ease pressure on the grid before the start of a sweltering summer.
Authorities started a "wide-ranging" security operation last week, the interior ministry said in a statement, targeting homes used for cryptocurrency mining, an activity it said was illegal.
Crypto mining activities "constitute an unlawful exploitation of electrical power … and may cause outages affecting residential, commercial and service areas, posing a direct threat to public safety", the ministry said.
Kuwait has banned cryptocurrency trading but has no laws specifically addressing mining.
OPEC member Kuwait is grappling with a severe power crisis driven by population growth, urban expansion, rising temperatures and delayed maintenance at some plants.
Electricity in the country is extremely cheap and the government has urged residents not to waste it as the need to keep cool amid sweltering summer temperatures heaps pressure on a strained electrical grid.
Cryptocurrency mining, although a major cause of the power crisis, is not the only factor, a source at the electricity ministry told Reuters.
Mining for crypto uses vast amounts of computing power and has prompted authorities from Kosovo to Russia to curb its use to prevent electricity shortages. The miners tend to base themselves where power is cheap, and often in colder climes where it is easier to cool their servers.
Researchers at the University of Cambridge estimated that in 2022, Kuwait was responsible for just 0.05% of the world's bitcoin mining at the time.
While there is no good data on how much power crypto miners use in Kuwait, "it only takes a very small share of the total bitcoin mining network to have significant impact on the relatively small total electricity consumption of Kuwait," said Alex de Vries-Gao, founder of Digiconomist, a research project tracking crypto's energy use.
Kuwait's crackdown has targeted homes in Al-Wafrah, Kuwait's southernmost area, where the electricity ministry has previously said around 100 homes were used for mining, some of them consuming up to 20 times normal electricity levels. Energy consumption in Al-Wafrah fell by 55% following last week's operation, the electricity ministry said in a statement on Saturday.
"They saw government subsidies, saw the absence of oversight, and saw no laws in place, so they exploited the situation to their benefit," said Saud Al-Zaid, who formerly served as executive board member of the Communications and Information Technology Regulatory Authority in Kuwait.
Kuwait's central bank has warned against investing in crypto. The country's approach to the sector differs to that of some of its neighbours which have embraced the industry.
Dubai this week is playing host to a large crypto event, with Eric Trump, U.S. President Donald Trump's son, among those in attendance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Oil to open higher as US strikes on Iran boost supply risk premium
LONDON, June 22 (Reuters) - Oil is likely to rise by $3-5 per barrel when trading resumes on Sunday evening after the U.S. attacked Iran at the weekend, market analysts said, with gains expected to accelerate only if Iran retaliates hard and causes a major oil supply disruption. U.S. President Donald Trump said he had "obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes overnight, joining an Israeli assault in an escalation of conflict in the Middle East as Tehran vowed to defend itself. Iran is OPEC's third-largest crude producer. Global oil benchmark Brent crude could gain $3 to $5 per barrel when markets open, SEB analyst Ole Hvalbye said in a note. Brent settled at $77.01 a barrel on Friday and U.S. West Texas Intermediate at $73.84. "An oil price jump is expected," said Jorge Leon, head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad and a former OPEC official. "Even in the absence of immediate retaliation, markets are likely to price in a higher geopolitical risk premium." Crude had settled down on Friday after the U.S. imposed fresh Iran-related sanctions, including on two entities based in Hong Kong, and counter-terrorism-related sanctions, according to a notice posted to the U.S. Treasury Department website. Brent has risen 11% while WTI has gained around 10% since the conflict began on June 13 with Israel targeting Iran's nuclear sites and Iranian missiles hitting buildings in Tel Aviv. Currently stable supply conditions and the availability of spare production capacity among other OPEC members have limited oil's gains. Risk premiums have typically faded when no supply disruptions occurred, said Giovanni Staunovo, analyst at UBS. "The direction of oil prices from here will depend on whether there are supply disruptions - which would likely result in higher prices - or if there is a de-escalation in the conflict, resulting in a fading risk premium," he said. A senior Iranian lawmaker on June 19 said that the country could shut the Strait of Hormuz as a way of hitting back against its enemies, though a second member of parliament said this would only happen if Tehran's vital interests were endangered. About a fifth of the world's total oil consumption passes through the strait. SEB said that any closure of the strait or spillover into other regional producers would "significantly lift" oil prices, but said they saw this scenario as a tail risk rather than a base case given China's reliance on Gulf crude. Ajay Parmar, oil and energy transition analytics director at consultancy ICIS, said it was unlikely Iran would be able to enforce a blockage of the strait for too long. "Most of Iran's oil exports to China pass through this strait and Trump is unlikely to tolerate the inevitable subsequent oil price spike for too long - the diplomatic pressure from the world's two largest economies would also be significant," he said.
Scottish Sun
6 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Wounded Iran immediately lashes out at Israel launching volleys of ballistic missiles causing ‘large-scale destruction'
The regime wasted no time in hitting back IRAN STRIKES BACK Wounded Iran immediately lashes out at Israel launching volleys of ballistic missiles causing 'large-scale destruction' IRAN has launched fresh waves of missiles into Israel just hours after the US blitzed its key nuclear sites, injuring at least 23 people. Tehran, reeling from the unprecedented airstrikes, has warned of "everlasting consequences" after the US got involved. 3 A house in Tel Aviv reduced to rubble Credit: Reuters 3 An Iranian missile sailing towards Israel Credit: Getty 3 A row of houses and an apartment block were heavily damaged by the ballistic missiles Credit: AFP Two waves of around 20 and 10 missiles were fired at targets across Israel, according to the IDF. The weapons penetrated air defences and caused damage in four civilian locations, including Tel Aviv. Thirteen people were wounded in the Tel Aviv area, six in Nes Tziona, three in Haifa, and one on a highway near Beer Yaakov. The person injured on the road was in "moderate" condition, whilst the other victims were all "lightly" wounded. Sirens failed to sound in Haifa, and the IDF said it was investigating a possible malfunction with the "interceptor". Iranian state media claimed that a Khyber missile was deployed for the first time in the conflict. Announcing the fresh attack, the Mehr news agency said: The twentieth wave of large-scale missile-drone operations by the Islamic Republic of Iran's armed forces was carried out against the military targets of the Zionist regime." More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos. Like us on Facebook at TheSunUS and follow us on X at @TheUSSun
Telegraph
7 hours ago
- Telegraph
The Iranian threat to oil supplies is overblown
Oil and gas still matter. For all the talk of net zero and the growing share of renewables in electricity generation, hydrocarbons remain crucial to the global economy. Back in 2005, oil accounted for 37pc of the world's primary energy consumption, with gas generating 23pc. The same numbers are now 31pc and 24pc respectively – still hugely significant, with the world's reliance on natural gas as an energy source actually up over the last 20 years. Oil remains vital across numerous sectors, not least transportation – think trucks, aviation and shipping – and the manufacturing of industrial chemicals, plastics and asphalt among vital materials. Gas still generates around a quarter of the world's electricity and is used to make fertiliser – sorely needed to grow enough to feed a fast-expanding global population. We're often told – usually with an eye on geopolitical realities, because hydrocarbons are predominantly found in 'awkward countries' – that the world is less dependent on oil than at the time of, say, the 1973 oil price shock. Back then, the crude price spiked four-fold in under a year after the Arab world embargoed energy exports from the Gulf during the Israel-Egypt Yom Kippur war. The world used 55m barrels a day in the early 1970s but over 100m now, with demand set to rise significantly into the 2030s and beyond. Oil – and gas – remain absolute necessities to any form of modern life, across a fast-industrialising world. Yes, the UK used 2.2m barrels daily half a century ago, and that's fallen to 1.4m now – in part due to efficiencies and renewable energy, but mainly because our manufacturing sector has shrunk from over a fifth to less than a tenth of our economy. Moreover, North Sea operations are now much diminished, not least because of punitive taxation and endless net zero regulation – so Britain is a net oil and gas importer. With both these vital hydrocarbons trading on global markets, we're particularly vulnerable to price spikes, losing out twice – paying more for our supplies without gaining the profits and extra taxation reaped by energy exporters when prices are high. I mention all this, of course, because the escalation of military hostilities between Israel and Iran, while causing yet more death, displacement and destruction across the Middle East, poses economic dangers too. Amidst the terrible human fallout, a spiking oil price threatens to reverse a fragile global recovery. From mid-January to early May, Brent crude fell from $81 (£60) a barrel to $61 – a 25pc drop – as a sluggish global economic outlook slowed projected energy demand. That combined with concerns that Donald Trump's tariff onslaught from early April would further stymie global trade. Over recent weeks, though, as this Israeli-Iranian conflict has intensified, Brent crude has spiked back up to $75, largely due to fears of turmoil engulfing the Middle East Tehran, specifically, has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, at the mouth of the Persian Gulf, a critical route for 25pc of global oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) flows daily. Were that to happen, oil would soar above $100 a barrel and way beyond – doing serious damage to oil importing nations, not least the UK. Even if that doesn't happen, the International Monetary Fund reckons a 10pc rise in oil prices raises inflation in advanced economies by about 0.4 percentage points – and we've seen a 20pc-plus rise over the last month. UK inflation, 3.4pc in May, could easily soar above 4pc and beyond – twice the Bank of England's target. Stand by for higher UK petrol and diesel prices, along with domestic gas price rises too, especially if the conflict disrupts LNG exports from Qatar and elsewhere in the Gulf. That will push up household and industrial bills, with knock-on effects on food prices too – with food price inflation already jumping from 3.4pc in April to 4.4pc in May. Such inflationary pressures would rule out any more cuts in the Bank of England's policy rates for the foreseeable future. Bond yields would also rise – not least on UK sovereign debt – compounding the difficulties of this big-spending Labour government to stabilise the public finances. Renewed cost of living crisis headlines would also increase risks of a damaging wage-price spiral, with the UK's public sector unions already squaring up for more conflict this autumn. And these trends would intensify, of course, if Hormuz closes – which Iran could do by using its submarine fleet to lay deep sea mines between its southern coast and Oman, a distance of 25 miles at the Strait's narrowest point. Other oil producers (not least US frackers) can offset the disruption of Iranian supplies – the country pumps 4pc of global production – but not supplies from the Gulf as a whole. The reality is, though, that Iran relies heavily on oil exports – and closing the Strait would starve an unpopular government of the revenues needed to keep a lid on domestic discontent. And with 85pc of the energy leaving Hormuz consumed on Asian markets, thwarting those flows would alienate neutral powers such as China and India. Iran would think hard before alienating these two in particular, which would rally international support against Tehran, strengthening regional rival Saudi Arabia. Attempting to close the Strait would also risk devastating military and potentially civilian losses for Iran, including its naval and coastal assets, if the US and powerful Gulf states engaged in sustained retaliation. But the main reason I don't think Iran will disrupt Hormuz is that Tehran gains more by threatening to close the Strait than by actually doing so. The mere threat of action can drive up oil prices, benefiting Iran's economy and strengthening Tehran's negotiating position, without risking the consequences of action.
