Justice At Stake As Generative AI Enters The Courtroom
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is making its way into courts despite early stumbles, raising questions about how it will influence the legal system and justice itself.
Judges use the technology for research, lawyers utilize it for appeals and parties involved in cases have relied on GenAI to help express themselves in court.
"It's probably used more than people expect," said Daniel Linna, a professor at the Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, about GenAI in the US legal system.
"Judges don't necessarily raise their hand and talk about this to a whole room of judges, but I have people who come to me afterward and say they are experimenting with it."
In one prominent instance, GenAI enabled murder victim Chris Pelkey to address an Arizona courtroom -- in the form of a video avatar -- at the sentencing of the man convicted of shooting him dead in 2021 during a clash between motorists.
"I believe in forgiveness," said a digital proxy of Pelkey created by his sister, Stacey Wales.
The judge voiced appreciation for the avatar, saying it seemed authentic.
"I knew it would be powerful," Wales told AFP, "that that it would humanize Chris in the eyes of the judge."
The AI testimony, a first of its kind, ended the sentencing hearing at which Wales and other members of the slain man's family spoke about the impact of the loss.
Since the hearing, examples of GenAI being used in US legal cases have multiplied.
"It is a helpful tool and it is time-saving, as long as the accuracy is confirmed," said attorney Stephen Schwartz, who practices in the northeastern state of Maine.
"Overall, it's a positive development in jurisprudence."
Schwartz described using ChatGPT as well as GenAI legal assistants, such as LexisNexis Protege and CoCounsel from Thomson Reuters, for researching case law and other tasks.
"You can't completely rely on it," Schwartz cautioned, recommending that cases proffered by GenAI be read to ensure accuracy.
"We are all aware of a horror story where AI comes up with mixed-up case things."
The technology has been the culprit behind false legal citations, far-fetched case precedents, and flat-out fabrications.
In early May, a federal judge in Los Angeles imposed $31,100 in fines and damages on two law firms for an error-riddled petition drafted with the help of GenAI, blasting it as a "collective debacle."
The tech is also being relied on by some who skip lawyers and represent themselves in court, often causing legal errors.
And as GenAI makes it easier and cheaper to draft legal complaints, courts already overburdened by caseloads could see them climb higher, said Shay Cleary of the National Center for State Courts.
"Courts need to be prepared to handle that," Cleary said.
Law professor Linna sees the potential for GenAI to be part of the solution though, giving more people the ability to seek justice in courts made more efficient.
"We have a huge number of people who don't have access to legal services," Linna said.
"These tools can be transformative; of course we need to be thoughtful about how we integrate them."
Federal judges in the US capitol have written decisions noting their use of ChatGPT in laying out their opinions.
"Judges need to be technologically up-to-date and trained in AI," Linna said.
GenAI assistants already have the potential to influence the outcome of cases the same way a human law clerk might, reasoned the professor.
Facts or case law pointed out by GenAI might sway a judge's decision, and could be different than what a legal clerk would have come up with.
But if GenAI lives up to its potential and excels at finding the best information for judges to consider, that could make for well-grounded rulings less likely to be overturned on appeal, according to Linna.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
5 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Europe's Lithium Quest Hampered By China And Lack Of Cash
Europe's ambition to be a world player in decarbonised transportation arguably depends on sourcing lithium abroad, especially in South America. Even the bloc's broader energy security and climate goals could depend on securing a steady supply of the key mineral, used in batteries and other clean energy supply chains. But Europe has run into a trio of obstacles: lack of money, double-edged regulations and competition from China, analysts told AFP. China has a major head start. It currently produces more than three-quarters of batteries sold worldwide, refines 70 percent of raw lithium and is the world's third-largest extractor behind Australia and Chile, according to 2024 data from the United States Geological Survey. To gain a foothold, Europe has developed a regulatory framework that emphasises environmental preservation, quality job creation and cooperation with local communities. It has also signed bilateral agreements with about 15 countries, including Chile and Argentina, the world's fifth-largest lithium producer. But too often it fails to deliver when it comes to investment, say experts. "I see a lot of memoranda of understanding, but there is a lack of action," Julia Poliscanova, director of electric vehicles at the Transport and Environment (T&E) think tank, told AFP. "More than once, on the day that we signed another MoU, the Chinese were buying an entire mine in the same country." The investment gap is huge: China spent $6 billion on lithium projects abroad from 2020 to 2023, while Europe barely coughed up a billion dollars over the same period, according to data compiled by T&E. At the same time, the bottleneck in supply has tightened: last year saw a 30 percent increase in global demand for lithium, according to a recent report from the International Energy Agency (IEA). "To secure the supply of raw materials, China is actively investing in mines abroad through state-owned companies with political support from the government," the IEA noted. China's Belt and Road Initiative funnelled $21.4 billion into mining beyond its shores in 2024, according to the report. Europe, meanwhile, is "lagging behind in investment levels in these areas", said Sebastian Galarza, founder of the Centre for Sustainable Mobility in Santiago, Chile. "The lack of a clear path for developing Europe's battery and mining industries means that gap will be filled by other actors." In Africa, for example, Chinese demand has propelled Zimbabwe to become the fourth-largest lithium producer in the world. "The Chinese let their money do the talking," said Theo Acheampong, an analyst at the European Council on Foreign Relations. By 2035, all new cars and vans sold in the European Union must produce zero carbon emissions, and EU leaders and industry would like as much as possible of that market share to be sourced locally. Last year, just over 20 percent of new vehicles sold in the bloc were electric. "Currently, only four percent of Chile's lithium goes to Europe," noted Stefan Debruyne, director of external affairs at Chilean private mining company SQM. "The EU has every opportunity to increase its share of the battery industry." But Europe's plans to build dozens of battery factories have been hampered by fluctuating consumer demand and competition from Japan (Panasonic), South Korea (LG Energy Solution, Samsung) and, above all, China (CATL, BYD). The key to locking down long-term lithium supply is closer ties in the so-called "lithium triangle" formed by Chile, Argentina and Bolivia, which account for nearly half of the world's reserves, analysts say. To encourage cooperation with these countries, European actors have proposed development pathways that would help establish electric battery production in Latin America. Draft EU regulations would allow Latin America to "reconcile local development with the export of these raw materials, and not fall into a purely extractive cycle", said Juan Vazquez, deputy head for Latin America and the Caribbean at the OECD Development Centre. But it is still unclear whether helping exporting countries develop complete supply chains makes economic sense, or will ultimately tilt in Europe's favour. "What interest do you have as a company in setting up in Chile to produce cathodes, batteries or more sophisticated materials if you don't have a local or regional market to supply?" said Galarza. "Why not just take the lithium, refine it and do everything in China and send the battery back to us?" Pointing to the automotive tradition in Mexico, Brazil and Argentina, Galarza suggested an answer. "We must push quickly towards the electrification of transport in the region so we can share in the benefits of the energy transition," he argued. But the road ahead looks long. Electric vehicles were only two percent of new car sales in Mexico and Chile last year, six percent in Brazil and seven percent in Colombia, according to the IEA. The small nation of Costa Rica stood out as the only nation in the region where EVs hit double digits, at 15 percent of new car sales. Lithium is a key ingredient in the production of electric batteries AFP A geothermal power plant for lithium extraction in eastern France AFP
Int'l Business Times
10 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Critic Of Nicaragua's Ortega Shot Dead In Exile In Costa Rica
A retired Nicaraguan army officer in exile who fiercely criticized authoritarian President Daniel Ortega was shot dead Thursday in neighboring Costa Rica, his family and officials said. Major Roberto Samcam, 66, was gunned down at his apartment building in San Jose, reportedly by men pretending to deliver a package. "It was something we did not expect, we could not have imagined it," Samantha Jiron, Samcam's adoptive daughter, told AFP from her home in Madrid. Nicaraguan rights groups and exiled dissidents immediately blamed the government of Ortega and his co-president wife Rosario Murillo. "Roberto was a powerful voice" who "directly denounced the dictatorship" of Ortega, Samcam's wife Claudia Vargas told reporters in San Jose as she fought back tears. His job, she said, was to "expose human rights violations" in his homeland. The head of Costa Rica's judicial police, Randall Zuniga, said that the attackers took advantage of the fact that Samcam's apartment building was unguarded in the mornings. The gunman "called out to... Roberto," who "approached without knowing" the danger, Zuniga said. "When he was within striking range, the individual began shooting at him and hit him at least eight times," he told reporters. The Nicaraguan news site Confidencial reported that the killers fled the scene by motorbike. The US State Department's Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs said on X that it was "shocked" by Samcam's murder and offered Costa Rica help in "holding the assassins and those behind them accountable." Nicaragua's former ambassador to the Organization of American States, Arturo McFields, who lives in exile in the United States, called the killing "an act of cowardice and criminal political revenge by the dictatorship of Nicaragua." "The manner of the crime indicates political motives. This is very serious," Nicaraguan writer Gioconda Belli, exiled in Spain, stated on X. Neither Ortega nor his government commented on the case. Samcam, who was a political analyst, had spoken out frequently against the government in Managua, which he fled in 2018 to live with his wife in Costa Rica. That year, protests against Ortega's government were violently repressed, resulting in more than 300 deaths, according to the UN. In January last year, another Nicaraguan opposition activist living in Costa Rica, Joao Maldonado, was shot while driving with his girlfriend in San Jose. Both were seriously wounded. While the motive of that attack was the object of much speculation, Samcam's killing fueled suspicion among Nicaraguans that it may also have been linked to his political activities. Former Costa Rican president Luis Guillermo Solis called Samcam's murder "for his frontal opposition to the Ortega and Murillo dictatorship" an "outrageous and extremely serious act." "I feel that Daniel Ortega and Rosario Murillo are initiating a 'Night of the Long Knives'... due to the regime's weakening," Dora Maria Tellez, a former associate of Ortega turned critic, said from Spain, where she too is in exile. The "Night of the Long Knives" was a bloody purge of rivals ordered by Nazi leader Adolf Hitler in 1934. "They resort to the execution of a retired ex-military officer, whom they believe has a voice that resonates within the ranks of the army," Tellez told the Nicaraguan news outlet 100% Noticias. Ortega, now 79, first served as president from 1985 to 1990 as a former guerrilla hero who had helped oust a brutal US-backed regime. Returning to power in 2007, he became ever more authoritarian, according to observers, jailing hundreds of opponents, real and perceived, in recent years. Ortega's government has shut down more than 5,000 non-governmental organizations since the 2018 mass protests that he considered a US-backed coup attempt. Thousands of Nicaraguans have fled into exile, and the regime is under US and EU sanctions. Most independent and opposition media operate from abroad. Pro-government media in Nicaragua did not report on Samcam's killing.
Int'l Business Times
19 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
AI Is Rewriting Your Email Habits—One Auto-Suggest at a Time
Welcome to Tech Times' AI EXPLAINED, where we look at the tech of today and tomorrow. Brought to you by Human hands on deck: AI tools may handle the output, but real people are still behind the keyboards training and correcting the systems that power them. Even when we think we're in control, AI is often guiding what we type—and sometimes finishing our sentences for us. Your inbox is changing, and not just because there's a new Gmail theme. AI is working in the background and nudging you to send "quick replies," summarizing long email conversations, and deciding which email should show up at the top of your list. This goes beyond simply managing your email and is now more about shaping how you deal with it. This stuff isn't limited to chatbots or photo apps anymore. AI is baked right into your everyday tools—offering replies in Gmail, pulling key points out of Outlook threads, and surfacing messages in Slack before you even search. It's doing more than we realize, and sometimes it's even talking for us. So what happens when your inbox starts running itself—and you barely notice? The Silent Invasion AI has been in your inbox longer than you probably realize. At first, it was spam filters, defending you from the endless come-on of advertisers. Then came Smart Replies, then Smart Compose, and now there are a ton of background processes to help us manage the firehose of email we get on a daily basis. They're quiet, not loud and flashy, and they offer us a gentle, time-saving nudge that most of us are all too happy to take advantage of. And that's really the point: AI has gotten really good at blending in. Most of us don't even notice it's there at this point. You think you're managing your inbox on your own, but, honestly, a lot of the sorting, responding, and prioritizing happens before you even put your hands on the keyboard. It's invisible, and that's by design. Who's Doing the Talking? AI is becoming a visible presence in our communication tools—bridging human intention and machine suggestion. When was the last time you typed out a full email reply instead of just hitting one of those suggested buttons. I'll bet it's been a while for all of us but the most directly AI-averse of us. It's tempting to lean on AI-generated resopnses. They're quick, clean, and get the tone close enough to right not to matter. Unfortunately, these words we send aren't really ours. AI shapes the way we communicate, too, with autocomplete suggestions and full-blown thread summaries. It's not just Google, either. Even Outlook offers writing help (as does Apple's Mail apps), and even Slack uses AI to surface what it thinks is important. All these little direction shifts add up to a larger one: you're still hitting the Send button, but AI is the one steering the tone, structure, and maybe even the intent. It might not be a bad thing, but it does make us wonder who's really driving this bus. Gmail: The Friendly Ghostwriter Gmail offers Smart Compose, one of the most visible examples of AI guiding our email behaviors. It's still easy to ignore, but it does offer real-time sentence suggestions while you type. It will finish phrases, add little pleasantries, and keep you on track for a professional, clean tone in your final product. Type "I hope y..." and it will likely finish with "...you're doing well." You can start with "Let me know..." and you'll probably get something like "...if you have any questions." It might be the most likely set of words that follow your initial typing (LLMs work with statistical models), but it ends up subtly shaping how we communicate. It's polite, neutral, corporate, and more than a little bland. Of course, there's also Smart Reply, which hangs out at the bottom of messages from your Inbox with single-click responses like "Sounds good," "Thanks for the update," or "Will do!" It's a bit better than LinkedIn's vapid auto-replies, but not by much. Google says that these types of AI-generated replies make up a large portion of email responses on mobile. They sure save time, which makes them irresistible, but they do standardize our tone and responses. The more we use them, the more we're letting Gmail do the talking. It's likely you wouldn't have responded to your best friend from high school that way, but it's just easier to hit the Reply button. Sure, that's way better than attending the meeting, but who is creating your professional voice? Outlook: Your AI Meeting Translator Now that Microsoft's Copilot is literally everywhere in their operating systems and PCs, it's no surprise that Outlook, the ubiquitous email program, uses AI to manage your tone. It takes it even further, though, and even manages your content. Thread summarization will come into play when you open a long email chain, generating a short summary of all the key decisions, deadlines, and action items from within the chain. It's super great for time management, but it's also a sort of filter. You're relying on what the AI believes are the key takeaways, a summary that can strip away more subtle context and softer verbal cues like parentheticals. Copilot even drafts full replies and meeting recaps based on your own calendar or email history. If you miss a meeting, for example, Copilot can just create a follow-up email that summarizes what was discussed based on transcripts and notes. Sure, that's way better than attending the meeting, but who is creating your professional voice? You or AI? Behavioral Shifts AI makes inbox management easier, but at what cost to human attention, tone, and authenticity? What's changing isn't just how we write, but how we think about email at all. The more we use the replies and summaries that sand off the rough edges of true human communication, the more everything starts to sound the same. If you're relying on quick replies and other AI-generated responses, so is everyone else, making it less likely to produce real progress or work product. We're all writing fewer full replies, reading less of the full threads, and probably feeling less urgent to respond at all. AI makes writing emails easier, but it also flattens it all out into something that would feel right at home in a tech support ticket. What Now? Of course, the big question is now what do we do with all this AI in our inboxes? You don't have to swear it off completely to have a little more control. First, just notice when AI steps in - are you clicking "sounds good" out of habit, or is that really what you want to say? Try something a little quirkier, just for the heck of it. Maybe a, "If you say so, my lord" if it's someone you know and like. If you get summaries, try reading the whole thread. It might take a few extra minutes, but seeing the subtleties of human communication (assuming the emails weren't also written by AI) can help you really understand what people are trying to say, beyond the circling back and action items. If your email lets you tweak the amount of AI in your settings, do it. Turn off Smart Compose for a week and see how it feels to just write stuff on your own and in your own voice. You don't have to ditch the tools completely, but it's good to stay aware of how they're subtly changing the way communicate. Then you can decide for yourself how much or little of that you want. Because let's face it, not every email from your boss warrants much more than a "sounds good." Originally published on Tech Times
