Drogheda United out of Europe after losing appeal to Court of Arbitration for Sport
FAI Cup winners Drogheda United will not compete in the 2025/26 UEFA Conference League after losing their case at the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne today.
United, owned by the Trivela Group, qualified for the competition by winning last year's FAI Cup.
However, Danish side Silkeborg, which came under the Trivela umbrella shortly after the Drogs' triumph, also secured a place in the Conference League through their league position two weeks ago.
Under UEFA's multi-club-ownership rules, two sides with the same majority owner cannot enter the same European competition.
Silkeborg take priority due to their higher league position, under UEFA guidelines, and Drogheda were therefore excluded from tomorrow's first-round draw, the first club to suffer that fate.
It is a significant blow to the Boynesiders, with over €500,000 in prize money for reaching the Conference League on offer.
No other League of Ireland side can take their place due to UEFA licensing deadlines having passed.
Clubs in England have been attempting to get around the ownership rules by placing their ownership in a blind trust.
However, a CAS panel found that a change of deadline for blind-trust ownership from 3 June 2025 to 1 March 2025 had been properly communicated by UEFA and that Drogheda knew or ought to have known about this change.
A majority of the panel also rejected DUFC's submissions on alleged unequal treatment by UEFA.
A statement from Drogheda United said: "It is with great heartbreak and disbelief that we inform you we have lost our appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. We strongly disagree with this decision, and had hoped and believed that the principles of fairness and common sense would prevail.
"After months of engagement, constructive dialogue, countless hours of legal preparation, and multiple proposals based on frameworks that have been accepted in the past, we have come up short. Despite genuine and vocal support across the football world, the ruling did not fall in our favour. We are heartbroken by the outcome.
"We know that this decision will cause hurt and frustration across our entire community. Not just because of the decision itself, but because we know how much this meant to everyone associated with Drogheda United. We know how hard this team fought to earn a place in European competition. We know how transformational that opportunity would have been, not just financially, but emotionally for our players, our staff, and our community.
"We disagree with this decision. We believe it is unjust. Rules should protect opportunity, not prevent it. Especially for community-driven clubs like ours who fight every day to punch above their weight.
"Nevertheless, we accept responsibility. And we're sorry. But while we are saddened, we are also emboldened. We will not let this setback define us. Instead, we will use it as fuel. Our club has never been handed anything and we've earned every inch through grit, resilience, and unity. And we will continue to do so.
"We will push for reform so that no other community club finds itself in this position again. All parties can do better. And we will do our part to make sure we all do. We will share more in the coming days.
"But for now, our focus turns back to what we can control: the ongoing LOI campaign and our FAI Cup title defense (sic), beginning in July against Crumlin. There is work to be done, on the pitch and off it. We are here. And we are not going anywhere. We will continue to invest in all areas of the club, including plans for a new stadium. We want to be regulars in Europe.
"This club is on the rise. Our league is on the rise. And no single outcome will change that."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
3 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Michael Duffy produces exquisite finish to hand Derry City three points as champions Shelbourne remain off the pace
That's why Tiernan Lynch will take a lot of satisfaction from this win at the home of the champions, a first successful foray to the capital under his watch. Philip O'Doherty, Derry City's chairman and financial backer, spoke earlier this week about how Lynch had been given the biggest budget in the club's history. This important victory brings the Candystripes into the top half of the table, above a Shels side that might just need to spend a few quid when the window reopens if they are to make the most of their European campaign. On the first league Friday of February, the idea that Shels would be 15 points off the pace at this juncture would have been unthinkable for Damien Duff and his staff. They overperformed dramatically to win the title last year, but they are failing to meet expectations this term. Duff will say that the league is the bread and butter, but the Reds investors will know that the best way to salvage their season is to find a way past Linfield in the Champions League qualifiers. A defeat to a team from Derry is a blow. They'll need to be sharper than a Belfast opponent rolls into town on July 9. After an unremarkable first half, this game was decided in a dramatic 54th minute. As Shelbourne digested a near miss, when Sam Todd cleared an Evan Caffrey chip off the line with Brian Maher exposed, the Candystripes responded by going straight up the other end and scoring. Michael Duffy still had plenty to do when he breached a Shels offside trap to collect a pass from Carl Winchester, but Derry's leading local light showed his quality by dribbling infield and keeping Kameron Ledwidge at the right distance before producing a superb left footer into the top corner that gave Conor Kearns zero chance. It was a goal Derry deserved on the overall balance of play to that point. They came with a Shamrock Rovers style box midfield with Winchester and Sadou Diallo in front of the back three and Duffy and Gavin Whyte roaming behind lone striker Liam Boyce. It was Boyce who threatened early, with a speculative attempt from distance that dropped onto the net with Kearns followed by a much better opportunity when a neat passage culminated with the winter arrival from Hearts dinking the ball wide of the post. Duff was animated and frustrated. Yes, there were spells where they seemed happy for the guests to have the ball. In truth, they didn't create a huge amount else prior to the interval. But he was clearly vexed by the lack of tempo in some of Shelbourne's play when they had the ball. ADVERTISEMENT In saying that, they did have the best first half chance with John Martin unable to accurately anticipate a Sean Boyd flick when Brian Maher seemed to be in bother. Martin – who was on a yellow – didn't return for the second half and Kerr McInroy, who replaced Mark Coyle after the skipper was struck down in the warm-up, departed after a quiet contribution. But it was Derry that seized the lead, with Shels back chasing the game on home soil again. Scoring first and holding onto it was the hallmark of their title charge. Too often, it's been a different story. A reaction did follow with Duff going for movement off the bench with Ali Coote and Daniel Kelly tasked with supporting Mipo Odubeko. Coote was busy and the energy levels increased but the end product was poor as Derry trusted their experienced rearguard to see it out. They ran the clock and committed fouls when necessary, all the things you need to do to win ugly. On the sideline, Duff could have no complaints. Shelbourne: Kearns, Bone, Barrett, Ledwidge; Caffrey, Lunney, McInroy (Chapman 45), Norris (Coote 62); Wood (O'Sullivan 77); Boyd (Kelly 62), Martin (Odubeko 45). Derry City: Maher, Boyce, Cann, Connolly, Holt, Todd; Diallo (Benson 62), Winchester (Hoban 89); Whyte (McMullan 62), Duffy; Boyce (Mullen 62).
Irish Independent
3 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Drogheda United end difficult week with narrow victory over Sligo Rovers
The result sees United climb back into second place. Their quest for European qualification via the league route takes on a whole different dimension now in light of their expulsion from the Uefa Conference League this summer. While a good display against Shamrock Rovers on Monday did not deliver a positive result, they displayed a determination and rigour against Sligo that will likely form the backbone of the remainder of their season. Douglas-James Taylor, in what may be one of his last games for the club, scored the winner. His 12-month loan spell expires in 10 days' time and supporters eagerly await news of his future. Kevin Doherty certainly looked in a happier state of mind, smiling and joking pre-match in what was a significant change of mood to four days earlier. That might have had something to do with his team's recent record against the Bit O'Red. Drogheda had won their last three home matches against John Russell's team by an aggregate score of 13-1. James-Taylor's fourth-minute goal added further gloss to that statistic. It owed a lot to Warren Davis winning the ball in midfield. On another evening, this game could have been a high-scoring encounter. Davis, James-Taylor, Andy Quinn and Shane Farrell all went close to extending Drogheda's lead. Sligo, for their part, were wasteful. Misfortune and misfire were their downfall. Jad Hakiki and Cian Kavanagh were the main culprits but Drogs goalkeeper Luke Dennison was a hard man to beat. Drogheda United: Dennison; Cooper, Keeley, Quinn; Cruise (Markey, 46), Heeney, Farrell, Kane; Brennan; James-Taylor, Davis (Oluwa, 79). Sligo Rovers: Sargeant; Reynolds, McElroy (McDonagh, 35), Mahon, Hutchinson; Doyle-Hayes, Mallon (Van Hattum, 69); Elding, Hakiki (Lomboto, 83), Fitzgerald; Waweru (Kavanagh, 69).
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Séamas O'Reilly: Trump is trying to bait minorities with the beautiful game — with FIFA's help
You likely don't read this column for football news. You read this column because someone in my family sent it to you once and giving up reading it now would seem rude. It's true, however, that I'd rather eat glass than wade into 99% of footballing discourse. And then, alas, there comes an omnishambles of such magnificent proportions that it is not merely a duty but a pleasure for me to pipe up. I speak, of course, of the 2025 FIFA Club World Cup, relaunched and revamped in a massively expanded format and currently broadcasting its feast of the global game to, oh, tens of people in its host nation of the US. Where do we even start? Perhaps it makes sense to begin with the tournament's, frankly, massive roster of 32 teams. Each gained entry via rules that make the UEFA Nations League seem positively streamlined. Describing even their broadest outline causes me great pain, so I apologise in advance for sounding like the Architect from the Matrix as I do just that. So. Deep breath. IT'S EASY, REALLY Twelve of the 32 teams are from Europe and six are from South America, with the remaining 14 teams coming from the rest of the world. Some teams from Europe, the Americas, Africa, and Asia qualify by winning their respective continental championships over the past four years, with one additional spot given to a single team from the Oceania region, and another for the host nation. If you think this sounds a bit fiddly but broadly sensible, consider that further spots for European and South American teams are allocated on the basis of co-efficient rankings for teams who haven't won their Champions League equivalent, which is how Red Bull Salzburg gained a place via the fact they were judged, to quote FIFA's wording, 'ninth-best ranked eligible team in the Uefa four-year ranking'. Liverpool, despite being judged the fifth-best team in Europe in the same period, do not qualify because Man City and Chelsea have already qualified and no more than two European sides can be from the same country. The same rule does not apply to South American sides, however, which is why there are four Brazilian teams in the competition and, dear God, there's foam coming out of your mouth, so I will end things there. The upshot is that this tournament is vastly overstuffed — very much the 'meeting that could have been an email' of football competitions. More teams obviously means more games, which means more revenue, but also more wear and tear. At the end of a packed season, in an era where everyone in football can't help groaning about how exhausted footballers — and punters — are by the number of games played, this already seems like a risky proposition to the world's footballing giants. The answer, I suppose, is to give them more money than any such competition has ever done before, with a reported $1bn prize pot spread across those taking part. Inter Miami co-owner David Beckham gives an interview prior to the Club World Cup group A soccer match between Al Ahly and Inter Miami in Miami, Fla. HOCKEY SCORES The wildly variable quality of the teams admitted, however, represents an unavoidable issue. These match-ups aren't great. Much has been made of the fact that Bayern Munich beat Auckland 10-0 in their first game. It's true that other hockey scores might arise as the tournament progresses but the main problem is that even the closer, more combative games lack stakes. This is because, as anyone who loves football can tell you, we do not watch for the quality of a team, but for the quality of the contest. It's why watching Derry play Shamrock Rovers is 10 times more thrilling than watching Real Madrid play a pre-season tour of Indonesia. It's why if England were playing Andorra in your next-door neighbour's garden, you wouldn't even look over the fence. All that being said, the colossal failure of the competition still needs further explaining. Many news organs have reported — it must be said, quite gleefully — that ticket sales have gone from bad to worse to truly abysmal. This was particularly clear during the match between Lionel Messi's Miami and Egyptian side Al Ahly, which took place in a Hard Rock Stadium that looked like it had been evacuated due to a gas leak. The Athletic reported that tickets for that game had plunged from $349 to $4 and drew a logical link between this and poor organising on FIFA's part but also its craven acquiescence with the Trump administration's increasingly draconian border policies. Here, things get altogether less funny. A general view before the start of the Club World Cup group A soccer match between Al Ahly and Inter Miami in Miami, Fla., Saturday, June 14, 2025. SETTING A SNARE A few days before kick-off, both ICE and US Border Patrol were announced as providing 'security' for the tournament. Given that these are not first-response security agencies, this made little sense from a logistical or safety perspective. It did, however, make abundant sense from an 'arresting the sorts of people in America who might be overwhelmingly interested in watching football, specifically featuring foreign teams' perspective. As such, a massive swathe of America's most ardent soccer fans are staying home because they see this for what it is: Trump turning the entire tournament into a cardboard box propped up with a stick to ensnare migrants, and FIFA eagerly abetting him in this endeavour. Perhaps its willingness to do so shouldn't be a surprise, given FIFA's track record of kowtowing to dictators and despots, from Russia to Qatar and incoming hosts Saudi Arabia, or its ancillary decisions at this very tournament, including removing all branding related to its anti-racism initiatives for fear it might stoke anti-DEI backlash from the hosts. Which is why, despite the delicious schadenfreude of seeing FIFA landing on its arse like this, the Club World Cup is not really a laughing matter. It's a bloated mess and the worst conceivable advert for the game, one that no participating team can possibly enjoy and which no punters can show up to attend for fear they'll be arrested and sent to a Salvadoran super-prison. All this, so FIFA's amoral profiteers can make a few more quid, makes for a sad, disgusting spectacle. We should pity all 312 people still watching.
