British prime minister condemns protest by pro-Palestinian activists
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has condemend a break-in at RAF Brize Norton, where pro-Palestinian activists reportedly vandalised two military aircraft.
In a post on X, Starmer called the incident 'disgraceful,' saying: 'The act of vandalism committed at RAF Brize Norton is disgraceful. Our Armed Forces represent the very best of Britain and put their lives on the line for us every day. It is our responsibility to support those who defend us.'
The airbase, located in central England, serves as a key hub for UK military operations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Judge orders immediate release of Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil
A US federal judge has ordered the release of Mahmoud Khalil from immigration custody as his legal fight continues to play out. The Trump administration's deportation case against the Palestinian activist and US green card holder is not over yet, but now that he will be out on bail, Khalil will be able to hold his newborn son for the very first time. The decision is a landmark victory for rights organisations that said Khalil's constitutionally protected freedom of speech was not just trampled upon, but he was "punished". Judge Michael Farbiarz said on Friday that the Trump administration was unable to make its case that Khalil would be a danger to the public or a flight risk if released from an immigration detention facility in Jena, Louisiana, where he was secretly transferred after his arrest. Farbiarz, a New Jersey district court judge who is overseeing Khalil's case, last week ruled it was unconstitutional to detain and deport Khalil, a lawful permanent resident, for supporting Palestinian human rights, and that he should be released from detention. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The court gave the government until Friday morning to appeal. The government then told the court on Friday that it would continue to detain Khalil in Louisiana, saying that Khalil had omitted information on his green card application. "There is at least something to the underlying claim that there is an effort to use the immigration charge here to punish the petitioner (Khalil)," Farbiarz said, adding that punishing someone over a civil immigration matter is unconstitutional. While Farbiarz acknowledged that the government virtually never detains anyone on 'misrepresentation' charges, he said he would uphold their appeal, and did not grant Khalil's release. The government will continue to try to deport Khalil as the case continues. Who is Mahmoud Khalil? When the student protests began at Columbia University following the 7 October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel and the subsequent war on Gaza, Khalil functioned as an intermediary between students and university administrators over the student movement's demands for university divestment from weapons companies profiting from Israel's war on Gaza. Khalil did not participate in the encampments himself, opting instead to negotiate with administrators and offer guidance to the students. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents detained Khalil on 8 March. His wife, Nour Abdalla, was eight months pregnant. He became the first of a string of international student arrests outside their homes, often by plainclothes masked agents who would not tell them why they were being taken away, or to what location. The one thing they all had in common, despite not knowing one another, is that they opposed the war in Gaza in a public forum or had significant ties to someone who did. Khalil has been held at an ICE prison facility in Jena, Louisiana, since early March. His lawyers believe the Trump administration finds immigration judges in the south to be more favourable to the US government. In April, one of those judges said that Khalil could be deported even though he was a permanent US resident through his wife, an American citizen. According to the Associated Press, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio had insisted that Khalil's "presence or activities would compromise a compelling US foreign policy interest'. Marc Van der Hout, one of Khalil's lawyers, said in a statement issued after that ruling that Khalil had been 'subject to a charade of due process', adding his deportation order was 'a flagrant violation of his right to a fair hearing, and a weaponisation of immigration law to suppress dissent'. Van der Hout then turned to Farbiarz to put a stop to that order. The immigration court's refusal to allow Khalil to attend the birth of his son was a double blow to his family.
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
UK could ban Palestinian Action group following RAF air base break in
The Palestinian Action group, a pro-Palestinian protest group, could be banned in the UK and be defined as a "terrorist" organisation, according to the BBC. The move comes shortly after the group said on Friday that two of its members broke into a UK RAF air base on scooters, and defaced two military aircraft with red spray paint, in a breach of security in a location used to park transport planes of the king and the prime minister. The individuals fled the RAF's Brize Norton air base in Oxfordshire without being arrested. According to the BBC, the UK home secretary, Yvette Cooper, plans to bring forward a statement to Parliament on Monday. If passed, the group will be illegal in Britain. Earlier, British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer denounced the incident, describing it as "disgraceful and an act of vandalism".
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Israeli official wanted by ICC sparks outrage online after column in major British paper
A recent column published by The Times newspaper, co-authored by right-wing British historian Niall Ferguson and Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, titled, Israel Has Done Most of the Job, Now Trump Can Finish It, has ignited widespread outrage across social media platforms. The article, originally published in one of Britain's oldest newspapers, calls for US President Donald Trump to escalate military action against Iran in the wake of Israel's recent operations. The decision to platform Gallant, who is currently wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza, has drawn sharp criticism. The Times of London publish an op-Ed by Yoav Gallant and Niall Ferguson. For context the ICC has issued an arrest warrant for Gallant alleging that he used 'starvation as a method of warfare; and the crimes against humanity, persecution, and other inhumane acts…' — Tam Hussein (@tamhussein) June 20, 2025 People on the social media platform X termed The Times' editorial choice as 'sickening' and 'shameful', highlighting the ethical and legal implications of amplifying a figure wanted under an active ICC arrest warrant. Many saw the column as yet another stark example of the double standards in western media's coverage of the Middle East, particularly in relation to Palestine and the application of international law. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Investigative journalist John McEvoy described the move as 'a new low for the British media', while others questioned whether the newspaper acknowledged Gallant's ICC status in his bio. "I wonder if The Times put wanted war criminal in Gallant's bio... yet another example of how our western media is failing the public every single day," wrote another. One person said mainstream media had 'lost credibility to the point of no return,' accusing it of publishing the warmongering of a wanted war criminal as journalism, calling it 'propaganda and disinformation in the service of war crimes'. The UK, as a signatory to the Rome Statute, is legally obligated to arrest Gallant should he enter the country, further fuelling accusations of editorial negligence. The UK has a legal obligation to arrest Yoav Gallant if he visit the country, it's really a terrible decision by @thetimes to publish an article of a wanted war criminal. — Beatrice Fihn (@BeaFihn) June 20, 2025 Outrage also focused on the article's underlying message, which many viewed as a blatant call for further regional escalation. For some, it echoed the same narratives used to justify the 2003 invasion of Iraq, a case of history repeating itself. "Niall Ferguson and Yoav Gallant writing an article together in the Murdoch zionist rag urging war on Iran. Of course they are, Iraq 2.0 with the same cliched reasoning of Western superiority justifying it, oblivious to 2 years of slaughter of civilians, particularly children." "A new low. The Times publishes an article urging an illegal war on Iran, in which a deluded right-wing British historian has teamed up with Yoav Gallant, an actual war criminal wanted by the ICC for war crimes & crimes against humanity," another social media user added. The Times really did just publish this. Ferguson supported the Iraq war in 2003, describing himself as "a fully paid-up member of the neo-imperialist gang". Gallant is the ex Defence Minister of Israel - and has an ICC arrest warrant out for him (the UK subscribes to the ICC). — Mike Galsworthy (@mikegalsworthy) June 20, 2025 The co-authorship with Orientalist scholar Ferguson, known for his strong support of the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, has further amplified the backlash. "A new low. The Times publishes an article urging an illegal war on Iran, in which a deluded right-wing British historian has teamed up with Yoav Gallant, an actual war criminal wanted by the ICC for war crimes & crimes against humanity." Gallant, notably, is one of three Israeli leaders facing an active International Criminal Court arrest warrant for alleged war crimes in Gaza, making his participation in a British publication's advocacy for war not just unprecedented, but deeply alarming to many online.
