Growing concern about fate of Iranian political prisoners during conflict with Israel
A Dublin-based Iranian woman has called for increased attention to be focused on
Iran
's political prisoners, after her brother was removed from the area of the Tehran prison where he was being held and taken to an unknown location.
Aida Younesi (31), a software engineer, said her brother Ali (25), was taken from the infamous Evin Prison on Wednesday by men who reportedly said they were bringing him for questioning. Since then, her family has no idea of his whereabouts.
Ali Younesi was a university student when he and his friend, Amirhossein Moradi, were arrested in 2020. They were sentenced to 16 years in prison in 2022 for charges that Amnesty International listed as 'gathering and colluding to commit crimes against national security', 'spreading propaganda against the system' and 'destruction of public property', as well as their families' 'real or perceived ties' to the People's Mojahedin Organisation of Iran (PMOI), an opposition group based outside Iran.
Amnesty International has said trials in Iran are 'systematically unfair, resulting in arbitrary detentions. Due process violations included denial of the right to a lawyer from the time of arrest, admission of torture-tainted 'confessions' as evidence and summary trials.'
READ MORE
Aida said she believed that Ali was involved in peaceful student protests – which broke out after Iranian authorities admitted that
Iran's Revolutionary Guards fired missiles at a Ukraine International Airlines passenger plane, killing 176 people
– and was arrested to be made an 'example' of.
Ali was a gold medal recipient in both Iran's National Astronomy Olympiad in 2017 and the International Astronomy and Astrophysics Olympiad held in China in 2018.
Amnesty International said Ali and Moradi were beaten by ministry of intelligence agents and held in prolonged solitary confinement in harsh conditions to extract forced confessions.
The human rights organisation has
called
Ali a 'prisoner of conscience'.
Ali Younesi and his father, Mir-Yousef
Younesi's father, Mir-Yousef, was later arrested in 2022 – she believes this was to put pressure on Ali and the rest of the family not to be vocal. Mir-Yousef (71) remains in Evin prison, to the family's knowledge. Younesi said he is suffering from various health problems, including diabetes, and that he lost hearing in one ear after he was imprisoned.
She became emotional as she described her father. 'I might be biased but I think he's the kindest, best dad I could have got. You can imagine growing up in Iran ... as a woman it has complications, but when I had my dad as my supporter in every matter it felt really good, it felt safe. He's really kind, he's reliable ... He has a big heart.'
She said Ali was constantly curious, with 'a good reputation for nice humour and a smiley, kind face.'
Israel has been bombarding Iran for a week
, with Iran retaliating using drones and ballistic missiles. On Monday, US president
Donald Trump
urged people in Tehran – a city of 10 million people – to evacuate.
But prisoners have no way of doing that, Younesi said. 'As far as I know ... there is no shelter ... I want my dad, my brother and all political prisoners to be free. I wanted it every day. But nowadays, I want it even more ... seeing the danger that they are in.'
There are no official numbers stating how many political prisoners Iran holds, though they are believed to include about 20 European nationals: foreign and dual nationals can be held by the Iranian regime as bargaining chips, rights groups say. Many political prisoners were arrested during and following the 2022 Woman, Life, Freedom protests that emerged after the death in police custody of
Mahsa Amini
, who was arrested for allegedly violating a headscarf law.
In 2023 Iranian human-rights activist
Narges Mohammadi
was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize while locked up in Evin Prison. She was released on medical grounds at the end of last year. 'The Middle East is in fire and blood. [Iranian supreme leader] Ali Khamenei took us to hell promising us heaven. [Israeli prime minister Binyamin] Netanyahu is doing the same – promising freedom and democracy, delivering destruction,' she said this week.
On Thursday the New York-based Centre for Human Rights in Iran
said
'there is growing fear that Iranian authorities may use the cover of war to carry out ... executions [of political prisoners], using them as tools of reprisal and intimidation to further silence dissent and instil fear across the population.'
A
report
by the UN's Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights, Nada Al-Nashif, found that at least 975 people were executed in Iran last year, including about 31 women and one child.
In a
statement
, the Dublin-based organisation Front Line Defenders said that the day after
Israel attacked Iran
, a female human rights defender, Motahareh Gounei, was arrested in Tehran following a social-media post in which she criticised the Iranian leadership.
'As the war escalates and international actors remain silent, detained human rights defenders are at high risk,' the organisation said. Since June 13th, it said those in Evin Prison had reported limited access to calls and had 'expressed the feeling of being held in limbo while exposed to air strikes, fearing for their families and having their lives in the hands of warmongers, who have no respect for human life and rights.'
It called for the immediate release of human rights defenders, naming 15, including Golrokh Iranee, Nasrin Javadi, Reza Khandan and Zia Nabavi.
For Younesi, attention on this issue is urgent, particularly during a war. 'Any political, any human-rights organisation should increase their voice and their concern about political prisoners in Iran,' she said. 'Iran's regime has a really bad history of tightening control and using more force when international attention shifts away from human rights.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
If Netanyahu wants regime change in Iran, it is unlikely to end well
It is not yet certain whether Donald Trump will approve US involvement in Israel 's assault on Iran which began last week. While Israel has inflicted severe losses on Iran and appears to have disabled its air defences, there is a broad consensus that, without US intervention, the goal of disabling Iran's nuclear programme will be unachievable. To this end, a great deal of attention has been paid to the Fordow nuclear facility , close to the city of Qom, which is at the heart of the programme of uranium enrichment and much of which is located 80-90m underground. In 2009, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that the facility held about 3,000 centrifuges which are central to the enrichment process. Under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the deal which Iran signed in 2015, uranium enrichment ceased at Fordow. But, when the US pulled out of that agreement under the first Trump administration, production restarted. Now the assumption is that only the so-called 'bunker buster' bombs possessed by the US are capable of destroying the facility at Fordow. However, the US president's announcement of a two-week deadline to decide if his country will join Israel's attack speaks to uncertainty regarding its likely success and divisions within his support base. Either way, the one-sided nature of the conflict so far – which has seen Israel inflict far more significant losses on Iran, both in terms of military leadership and civilian casualties, than it has sustained – raises the question of whether regime-change in Tehran is on the agenda. From the outset, Israeli leaders have expressly stated that this is not a key objective. However, they have made it equally clear that they would welcome the fall of the Islamic Republic should it happen. Indeed, Binyamin Netanyahu has called on Iranians to 'stand up for their freedom'. As for Trump, his rhetoric has shifted dramatically over the course of the past several weeks, from an initial position which saw him urge restraint on Netanyahu, and talk up the prospect of success in negotiations with Iran on its nuclear programme, to his more recent darker utterances regarding the prospect of direct US involvement to put an end to Iran's nuclear ambitions. All of this, in turn, suggests Trump has been bounced into supporting Israel's assault on Iran through Netanyahu's pre-emptive actions last Thursday. READ MORE Israel needs Trump's 'bunker buster' but will US enter the war? Listen | 31:22 Since Israel launched air strikes on Iran last Friday, the two states have traded missiles with mounting casualties on both military leaders have been killed as have some of its nuclear scientists but the country's citizens have borne the brunt of the air has said its rationale for the middle-of-the-night attack that sparked the war was its need to ensure, for its own protection, that Iran's nuclear programme is close Iran is to actually having a nuclear bomb is unclear but for Israel to obliterate entirely the nuclear threat it needs the US to join the war, to send its 'bunker buster' mega bomb to destroy the Fordo uranium enrichment facility buried deep in the by Bernice Harrison. Produced by Declan Conlon. While the likely course of US action on Iran remains unpredictable, it is clear that neither Israel nor the United States has a plan for – or indeed any coherent understanding of – what might follow from the fall of the regime in Tehran, beyond wilfully optimistic assumptions regarding its positive impact on the country and the region. However, history teaches us that such optimistic assumptions are rarely well placed. The reality is that when we have seen external involvement in the affairs of Iran and the Middle East more generally, the results have never been straightforward and rarely positive. [ Could Israel's attacks on Iran create a nuclear contamination risk? Opens in new window ] In Iran in 1953, the country's democratically elected prime minister, Mohammed Mossadeq, was overthrown in a coup orchestrated by the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Mossadeq's government nationalised the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (which was a forerunner to BP), a move that was widely popular in the country but alarming to the UK and the US. As events unfolded, the Shah of Iran, fearing the worst, left the country. However, Mossadeq was removed from power in August 1953 and the Shah returned to preside over an increasingly repressive regime, until his removal during the revolution of 1979. As is so often the case with external interventions of this nature, Mossadeq's removal had unintended consequences. The events of 1953 dealt a severe blow to liberal and democratic politics in Iran while the Shah was seen as little more than an American puppet – factors contributing to the revolution which ended his rule in 1979 and inaugurated the Islamic Republic of Iran. More recently, the ill-conceived US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 brought years of violent conflict to the country, led to the sectarianisation of its politics and helped pave the way for the emergence of the so-called Islamic State , while strengthening the position of the Iranian regime in the region, along the way. Likewise, western intervention in Libya in 2011 did nothing to contribute to peace and stability in that country. This is not to say that Iranians cannot mobilise in the face of a repressive regime; Iran has a long history of such mobilisation. As far back as the early 20th century, the 'constitutional revolution' of the period from 1906 to 1911 saw mass demonstrations that forced the Shah to agree to a written constitution and the establishment of an elected parliament. That mobilisation was motivated by a number of grievances, including disillusionment with the ruling elite, as well as resentment at foreign influence and interference in the affairs of the country. While many of the gains of this period were subsequently reversed, the constitution remained in place until the revolution of 1979. Decades later, mass mobilisation led to the end of the Pahlavi dynasty, which had ruled Iran since 1925 with significant western support. However, the post-1979 period has also witnessed expressions of dissent from the governing orthodoxy in the country. In 2009, mass protests broke out when the hardline Mahmoud Ahmadinejad claimed victory in the presidential election of June 12th that year, despite widespread electoral irregularities and claims by opposition candidates that the vote was rigged. After the announcement of the results, supporters of opposition candidates took to the streets in protest. By June 15th, as many as two million people were on the streets of Tehran. The protests were ultimately suppressed with the deaths of dozens of protesters and the arrests of thousands. Thirteen years later, unrest and protests broke out again on a mass scale following the death in police custody of Mahsa Amini, whose 'crime' was the violation of Iran's mandatory hijab law by wearing hers 'improperly'. The protest movement that followed adopted the slogan 'Women, Life, Freedom' but subsequently grew into open calls for the removal of the Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei. Once more the protests were violently suppressed, and 500 people lost their lives. Popular mobilisation in Iran for more than 100 years has been driven by domestic actors in pursuit of domestic agendas and never by external forces. It is unlikely that Netanyahu's call on the Iranian people to rise up and overthrow their government will alter that record. Dr Vincent Durac lectures in Middle East politics in the UCD school of politics and international relations
Irish Independent
3 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Markets continue to tread water as crisis in Middle East hangs in the balance
Oil prices dipped on Friday after US president Donald Trump held off on a decision over involving the US military in the Israel-Iran conflict. Oil prices are up on the week, though nowhere near as dramatically as might have been expected. On Friday Brent crude fell 2.9pc to $76.56 per barrel.
Irish Times
14 hours ago
- Irish Times
Irish embassy in Tehran closed due to ‘deteriorating situation'
The Irish embassy in Tehran, Iran has been temporarily closed with staff being relocated to Ireland amid a 'deteriorating situation'. Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris said he had become 'increasingly concerned' about environment in which the embassy was functioning and the ability of diplomatic staff to work safely. 'It is in light of the deteriorating situation, following consultation with my officials and in very close consultation and co-ordination with EU partners, I have now decided to temporarily relocate our personnel from Tehran,' he said. Mr Harris said the relocation of staff was 'not a decision that I have taken lightly.' READ MORE 'Arrangements have been made for the embassy to continue its operations from our Dublin headquarters. Staff at my department's headquarters have now assumed the embassy's consular functions, and they remain in contact with the small number of Irish citizens remaining in Iran,' he said. The arrangements will continue until it is possible and safe for personnel to return to Iran, he said, and thanked ambassador to Iran, Laoise Moore and her staff for operating under 'very, very challenging circumstances.' Mr Harris reiterated advice that Irish citizens should not to travel to Iran or Israel. 'Citizens who live there and who wish to leave might consider departing through one of the land borders that is open as long as it is safe to do so,' he said. Mr Harris said he will continue to monitor the situation in the region and will be engaging with EU counterparts. 'My hope is that a diplomatic solution can be found to resolve this very dangerous conflict without further escalation or further loss of life in Iran or Israel,' he added.
