logo
Bright Scholar Announces Formation of Special Committee

Bright Scholar Announces Formation of Special Committee

CAMBRIDGE, England and FOSHAN, China, June 4, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Bright Scholar Education Holdings Limited ('Bright Scholar' or the 'Company') (NYSE: BEDU), a global premier education service company, today announced that its board of directors (the 'Board') has formed a special committee consisting of two independent directors, Mr. Jun Zhao and Mr. Meng Rui, who are unaffiliated with the Proposal, to evaluate and consider the previously announced preliminary non-binding proposal letter dated May 26, 2025 (the 'Proposal'). Mr. Jun Zhao chairs the special committee.
The Board cautions the Company's shareholders and others considering trading the Company's securities that no decisions have been made with respect to the Proposal. There can be no assurance that any definitive offer will be received, that any definitive agreement will be executed relating to the transaction contemplated by the Proposal, or that the transaction contemplated by the Proposal or any other similar transaction will be approved or consummated. The Company does not undertake any obligation to provide any updates with respect to any transaction, except as required under applicable law.
About Bright Scholar Education Holdings Limited
Bright Scholar is a premier global education service Group. The Company primarily provides quality international education to global students and equips them with the critical academic foundation and skillsets necessary to succeed in the pursuit of higher education.
For more information, please visit: https://ir.brightscholar.com/.
Safe Harbor Statement
This announcement contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as defined in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, the Company's business plans and development, which can be identified by terminology such as 'may,' 'will,' 'expect,' 'anticipate,' 'aim,' 'estimate,' 'intend,' 'plan,' 'believe,' 'potential,' 'continue,' 'is/are likely to' or other similar expressions. Such statements are based upon management's current expectations and current market and operating conditions and relate to events that involve known or unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the Company's control, which may cause the Company's actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Further information regarding these and other risks, uncertainties or factors is included in the Company's filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required under law.
IR Contact:
Email: [email protected]
Phone: +86 (10) 6508-0677/ +1-212-481-2050
Media Contact:
Email: [email protected]
View original content: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/bright-scholar-announces-formation-of-special-committee-302473109.html
SOURCE Bright Scholar Education Holdings Ltd.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Climate Lawsuits Are Weakening America And Strengthening China
Climate Lawsuits Are Weakening America And Strengthening China

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Climate Lawsuits Are Weakening America And Strengthening China

A Chinese flag flies in front of a coal fired power plant in Tianjin. China has been building new ... More coal-fired power plants, with construction starts reaching a ten-year high in 2024. (Photo by) Sen. Ted Cruz deserves credit for saying what too many in Washington are unwilling to admit. American energy security is under coordinated attack, and it is not just coming from progressive environmental activists. It's being encouraged and in some cases funded by our top geopolitical rival. On Wednesday, Sen. Cruz's Judiciary oversight subcommittee will hold a hearing to examine how China and America's climate litigation movement are working in parallel to undermine U.S. energy dominance. These efforts are being carried out under the banner of environmental protection and the clean energy transition, but the real goal is to weaken America's energy sector and give the advantage to China in global energy and manufacturing markets. Climate cases brought by plaintiff firms like Sher Edling are supported by a network of well-funded foundations and nonprofits that are unwittingly advancing the strategic interests of America's adversaries by weakening domestic energy production and increasing our dependence on foreign-controlled supply chains—particularly those dominated by China. There is growing recognition that this is a national security problem. The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission has warned that the Chinese Communist Party is actively working to 'directly and malignly influence state and local leaders to promote China's global agenda.' A recent report by national security nonprofit State Armor outlines how China has co-opted elements of the U.S. climate lobby to drive a transition away from fossil fuels. The result is greater U.S. reliance on Chinese-controlled technologies, minerals, and supply chains. China dominates the global markets for lithium, cobalt, solar panels, and battery components. It stands to gain enormously from U.S. policies that force a premature shift away from traditional energy sources. The report spotlights Energy Foundation China (EFC) which claims to be a nonprofit headquartered in San Francisco. In reality, its staff are mostly based in Beijing, and its operations align closely with the Chinese Communist Party's interests. EFC has spent millions supporting anti-fossil fuel groups in the United States, including the Rocky Mountain Institute and the Natural Resources Defense Council. NRDC was the subject of a 2018 congressional inquiry over whether it should register as a foreign agent due to its ties to China. House Energy and Commerce Committee leaders last year warned that 'China has already attempted to influence United States policy and opinion through covert influence and by exploiting perceived societal divisions.' Their letter raised concerns about China-affiliated organizations influencing U.S. energy policy. A number of foundations have played a role in financing climate litigation efforts nationwide. A decade of litigation that most likely would not have happened without their financial backing. Major donors to this network include some of the largest philanthropic institutions in the country, including the Children's Investment Fund, MacArthur, Rockefeller, and Hewlett foundations. Yet few of these donors have accounted for the risk of foreign manipulation embedded in the organizations they fund. The influence campaign also extends into U.S. academic institutions. The National Natural Science Foundation of China, a government-run research entity, has published articles in American journals criticizing fossil fuels and accusing U.S. companies of deceptive practices. One of EFC's top communications directors previously held a position at that same Chinese foundation. At the same time, the revolving door between activist nonprofits and government agencies is raising serious ethical and legal questions. Ann Carlson, a senior official in the Biden administration, previously sat on the board of the Environmental Law Institute while also consulting for Sher Edling. This institute has hosted multiple educational events with Chinese organizations on 'climate litigation capacity building' aimed at influencing judges and shaping the legal landscape in both countries. Sen. Cruz is right to shine a spotlight on these connections. There is no shortage of outside forces fueling this wave of litigation, and his subcommittee is well positioned to expose them. The American people deserve transparency about who is bankrolling the litigation assault on domestic energy and to what end. This is not simply the work of environmentalists who believe they are saving the planet. It includes adversarial foreign actors with a vested interest in weakening U.S. energy leadership and shifting global influence away from the United States. President Trump's energy dominance agenda is helping restore American strength by unleashing domestic production and lowering energy prices. But the progress made is at risk. Foreign interference, opaque litigation funding, and activist-driven policy by lawsuit are undermining U.S. energy security. Prior administrations allowed this framework to take hold by ceding policymaking authority to the courts. China is more than happy to watch us tie our economy in regulatory knots while it builds new coal-fired power plants, locks in oil and gas contracts with OPEC+ members, and consolidates control over clean energy technologies. If we let this trend continue, we are handing Beijing exactly what it wants. We need stronger congressional oversight, new transparency requirements for nonprofits that receive foreign-linked funding, and a renewed national focus on producing energy here at home. That starts by recognizing that this is not just a political disagreement. It's a strategic threat to our country's future.

Wall Street Watches As Money Flows Out Of US Markets — Is The 'Great Rotation' Here?
Wall Street Watches As Money Flows Out Of US Markets — Is The 'Great Rotation' Here?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Wall Street Watches As Money Flows Out Of US Markets — Is The 'Great Rotation' Here?

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. The global market is witnessing a significant shift in investor sentiment, with a notable move away from U.S. assets. This trend, a phenomenon that cannot be solely attributed to a weakening dollar, as per a report by Société Générale. What Happened: The shift in market leadership, with international stocks outperforming their U.S. counterparts, has sparked a debate on Wall Street. Some are wondering if this is a temporary phase or a sign of a longer-term trend, reported MarketWatch Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Arthur van Slooten, a strategist at Société Générale who monitors fund flows, believes that the current shift could be the start of a significant rotation, which is in its early stages. '..clear confirmation that the great rotation has started,' he shared with the publication. van Slooten's analysis of recent fund flows from ETFs and mutual funds revealed five key observations. Europe has emerged as the preferred destination for investors, with equity inflows nearly double that of the U.S. Global developed-market funds have also seen nearly twice the level of inflows compared to U.S. direct funds. Emerging markets are making a strong recovery, with China-focused funds attracting $11 billion in inflows. Although the weakening U.S. dollar has played a role in this resurgence, van Slooten emphasizes that it's not the only factor driving the shift. Meanwhile, despite the U.S. having a larger credit market, investors have recently shown a preference for European credit funds. van Slooten further noted that rising geopolitical tensions could mean that this shift away from U.S. assets is just It Matters: The shift away from U.S. assets has been observed for some time now. In March 2025, data showed that the European stock market outperformed, hence there was a flow of money out of the U.S. stock market and into Europe. This was seen as a period of 'transition,' as per President Donald Trump, with investors seeking opportunities in European markets. In April 2025, foreign investors dumped $6.5 billion worth of U.S. equities in a week, marking the second-largest amount on record. This was attributed to the turmoil in U.S. equity markets and tariff-related uncertainties. Read Next: Invest early in CancerVax's breakthrough tech aiming to disrupt a $231B market. Back a bold new approach to cancer treatment with high-growth potential. Arrived Home's Private Credit Fund's has historically paid an annualized dividend yield of 8.1%*, which provides access to a pool of short-term loans backed by residential real estate with just a $100 minimum. Image via Shutterstock This article Wall Street Watches As Money Flows Out Of US Markets — Is The 'Great Rotation' Here? originally appeared on Sign in to access your portfolio

3 No-Brainer EV Stocks to Buy Right Now
3 No-Brainer EV Stocks to Buy Right Now

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

3 No-Brainer EV Stocks to Buy Right Now

China's EV powerhouse, Nio, is in the right place(s) at the right time with the right vehicles at the right price points. Navitas Semiconductor provides power-efficient solutions that the EV industry didn't even know it would eventually need. The EV business's success or failure is ultimately rooted in the lithium batteries all EVs need. QuantumScape stands ready to deliver next-gen battery solutions. 10 stocks we like better than Nio › There's no denying that President Donald Trump isn't as supportive of electric vehicles (EVs) as his recent predecessors were. Then again, U.S. consumers' interest in EVs hasn't exactly remained robust either. Domestic sales of electric vehicles fell 4.4% in April, according to S&P Global Mobility, ending a 14-month growth streak. Separately, AAA (which you know as the travel and road service company "Triple A") reports that the likelihood of an American purchasing an EV has now fallen (for a third consecutive year) to only 16% of the country's car owners. Be careful of jumping to sweeping long-term conclusions based on short-term data, however, or information that only applies within the United States. The EV business is a global one and isn't going away. It's going to continue evolving until electric vehicles become an irresistible choice. With that as the backdrop, here's a rundown of three EV stocks anyone anywhere in the world can get excited about buying. American drivers have never seen an electric vehicle manufactured by Nio (NYSE: NIO) on U.S. roads. That doesn't mean they aren't out there, though. The Chinese company delivered 221,970 cars last year alone. It just delivered most of them within China, with a handful being sold in select parts of Europe. It's looking to establish sales channels in the Middle East soon as well. These are all markets that are not only more supportive of the alternative but also where consumers are increasingly interested. The International Energy Agency expects 80% of China's vehicle sales to be all-electric or plug-in hybrids by 2030, for instance, with Europe not far behind at 57% of its automobile market by then. Globally, that translates into an average annualized growth pace of 11%, led by the Asia-Pacific market through 2034, according to an outlook from Precedence Research. Nio's wide selection of practical sedans, SUVs, and wagons at a range of affordable prices positions it to win at least its fair share of this growth. Nio isn't yet profitable, to be clear. It's making consistent progress to that end, though, and will likely ease out of the red and into the black within the next few years. While that's far from being ideal for interested investors, just bear in mind that Tesla shares also made tremendous gains well before the company was consistently profitable. Sometimes, progress is enough. The analyst community thinks so anyway. Most of them rate this stock as a strong buy right now and support a consensus price target of $4.78 -- that's 40% above the stock's current price. Navitas Semiconductor (NASDAQ: NVTS) isn't an EV "pure play," for the record. Just as the name suggests, it makes semiconductors that are used in a number of applications, including mobile phones, solar power systems, medical equipment, and more. Its core technological know-how, however, is arguably the most game-changing for electric vehicles. Whereas most semiconductors are ultimately made of simple silicon, Navitas has perfected and patented the science of silicon carbide and gallium nitride integrated circuits. That won't mean much to most people, but this will: These solutions allow for smaller and higher-capacity electrical devices while also consuming less electricity than similarly sized silicon circuitry. In a world where energy-intensive applications like onboard AI and power-hungry data centers are running up the proverbial (and literal) electric bills, even the smallest of efficiency improvements are a pretty big deal. As for its place within the electric vehicle arena, Navitas Semiconductor's gallium nitride semiconductors are well suited for 400-volt EV battery systems, while its silicon carbide semiconductors are aimed at bigger 800-volt vehicles. Its tech can improve an EV battery's range by 5%, but more than that, it can charge an EV battery three times faster with 70% less energy than most charging systems already in use. Those are specs that could help get EVs over the proverbial hump. And it's doing just that. With a market cap of only $1.3 billion, this fairly small company's top line still ebbs and flows from one quarter to the next. However, it reported $450 million worth of new design wins in 2024 and nearly doubled the size of its customer pipeline to $2.4 billion during this same stretch. The business is out there. Investors will just need to be patient while waiting for Navitas to turn it into profitable revenue. Finally, add QuantumScape (NYSE: QS) to your list of no-brainer EV stocks to buy while it's still on sale at a steep discount. It's not a household name. It's also not yet profitable. Indeed, it's not even producing any commercial revenue yet. Give it time, though. It's coming, probably starting sometime in 2026. QuantumScape solves one of the biggest problems holding the electric vehicle industry back -- the lithium-based batteries used in almost every single EV being manufactured at this time. They're good, but not good enough. They're expensive, they lack the range capacity most car owners want, and perhaps worst of all, they're not all that durable given their steep price. You'd be lucky to get 10 years out of one before its performance starts to noticeably suffer. Most EV batteries are only warranted for 10 years or fewer, if that tells you anything. QuantumScape has a simple solution -- make electric vehicle batteries better by making them out of better materials. And that's what it does. Its solid-state lithium batteries can add on the order of 25% more driving range on a single charge and, better still, can go through more than 1,000 charging cycles with only a 5% degradation in their energy-storage capacity. That should make it good for roughly 300,000 miles worth of driving, which is likely longer than the EV it powers will actually remain on the road. They're not cheap, mind you. But neither were the more conventional lithium batteries when the EV industry was in its infancy. The price dropped as production scaled up. So, too, will the cost of solid-state lithium battery packs. For what it's worth, major automaker Volkswagen's battery company, PowerCo, has already partnered with QuantumScape to develop batteries for its aggressive electric vehicle ambitions. In the meantime, although it's not working with QuantumScape, Toyota is now developing its own solid-state lithium batteries, underscoring the technology's potential. This might help make the point: Straits Research believes the world's solid-state lithium battery market is poised to grow from last year's $2 billion to $33.4 billion by 2033. That's an average annualized growth rate of more than 36%. There's no denying that QuantumScape is the riskiest stock of the three EV names here to step into. If you can stomach the risk, though, the potential upside may well be worth it. Before you buy stock in Nio, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nio wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 James Brumley has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends Volkswagen Ag. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 3 No-Brainer EV Stocks to Buy Right Now was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store