Trump Is Building a Global Gulag for Immigrants Captured by ICE
Support Us
© THE INTERCEPT
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Photo collage: Fei Liu / Photo by Alex Pena/Anadolu; JAWASHI/AFP via Getty Images
The Trump administration appears to be laying the groundwork for a global gulag for expelled immigrants.
In addition to using longtime U.S. detention facilities at Guantánamo Bay in Cuba, the Trump administration is seeking more far-flung locales to hold deported people, regardless of their countries of origin.
The U.S. is already using the notorious Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT, in Tecoluca, El Salvador, and has its sights set on numerous other countries, including many that the State Department has excoriated for human rights abuses. The U.S. has reportedly explored, sought, or struck deals with at least 19 countries: Angola, Benin, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Eswatini, Equatorial Guinea, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Kosovo, Libya, Mexico, Moldova, Mongolia, Panama, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan.
'These are the plans of an authoritarian regime. They want to spend likely billions of taxpayer dollars to send asylum-seekers into war zones or to countries rife with human rights abuses,' Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., told The Intercept.
'It's truly alarming that this administration doesn't view people fleeing persecution or torture as human and that the United States government is even discussing this obviously illegal proposal. It's deeply un-American, will make all Americans less safe, and will, without a doubt, result in the loss of human life,' Murphy said.
'It's deeply un-American, will make all Americans less safe, and will, without a doubt, result in the loss of human life,'
The State Department refused to provide a complete list of countries with which the U.S. has made agreements to accept deportees from other countries — often referred to as third-country nationals — citing the sensitivity of diplomatic communications. But the Trump administration is planning a major increase in deportation flights in coming weeks to destinations across the globe, according to a government official who spoke on the condition of anonymity, as well as published reports.
In remarks outside the White House on Friday, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller offered a glimpse of the global scope of deportations. 'We send planes to Iraq. We send planes to Yemen. We send planes to Haiti. We send planes to Angola,' he said. 'I mean, ICE is sending planes all over the world all the time. Anyone who came here illegally, we're finding them and we're getting them out.'
The White House did not respond to a request for clarification about which countries are receiving third-country nationals. White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller speaks to press outside of the White House on April 14, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Photo:In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, the George W. Bush administration created a worldwide network of secret prisons and torture sites as part of its global war on terror. Its crown jewel, the Guantánamo Bay detention center, was established in January 2002 as a place for the United States to hold so-called enemy combatants.
The U.S. government chose the U.S. Naval Station Guantánamo Bay because it was seeking a site where neither U.S. nor international law applied — a legal black hole where they could disappear people indefinitely. Over time, Guantánamo became emblematic of gross human rights abuses. 'Forever prisoners' of the war on terror are still being held there today. Others caught up in America's counterterrorism dragnet were detained at torture prisons in Afghanistan and Iraq or kidnapped and 'rendered' to CIA black sites — secret prisons in at least eight countries around the world.
As the Trump administration has expanded the Bush and Obama-era terrorism paradigm to cast immigrants and refugees as terrorists and gang members, it has reconceptualized rendition and even pressed Guantánamo Bay into service as a way station for Venezuelan men expelled to El Salvador.
Read our complete coverage
'In many ways, this is a retread of some of the practices of the second Bush administration in terms of extraordinary rendition abroad; the RDI program, rendition, detention, and interrogation — the formal name for their torture program,' said Brian Finucane, who worked for a decade in the Office of the Legal Adviser at the Department of State where he advised the U.S. government on counterterrorism and other military matters. 'Using the counterterrorism model, the Trump administration believes it provides it with broad authority to ride roughshod over civil rights.'
In March, the Trump administration used the Alien Enemies Act to deny due process to more than 250 Venezuelan and Salvadoran men, transferring them to El Salvador despite the objections of a federal judge. El Salvador's president, Nayib Bukele, disappeared the men into the country's shadowy prison system, which is rife with abuse, torture, and other human rights violations, according to human rights groups. The Trump administration's suspension of rights mirrors Bukele's own violation of democratic norms. Since 2022, the country has been under a state of emergency where most civil rights have been suspended to conduct mass arrests to crack down on the country's gangs. The dragnet has led to the arbitrary imprisonment of thousands of people wrongfully accused of being gang members.
In similar fashion, the Trump administration accused the expelled Venezuelan men of being members of a gang called Tren de Aragua with little to no evidence. Even Bukele had reason to doubt the evidence provided by the Trump administration, according to a New York Times investigation. Other media investigations have also revealed the vast majority of the men did not have criminal records.
The Supreme Court has already ruled unanimously that it was illegal for the Trump administration to send one of the men, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, to CECOT, and ordered his release and return to the U.S. The Trump and Bukele administrations have ignored this decision. Garcia is now being held at another facility in El Salvador. Prison officers check belongings at the maximum security penitentiary CECOT on April 4, 2025 in Tecoluca, El Salvador. Photo:In addition to imprisoning third-country nationals in El Salvador, the U.S. has also expelled hundreds of African and Asian immigrants to Costa Rica and Panama, including people from Afghanistan, Cameroon, China, India, Iran, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Turkey, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam.
Uzbekistan, for its part, received more than 100 deportees from the United States, including not only Uzbeks but citizens of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, according to a statement by the Department of Homeland Security released late last month.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum also said her government had accepted roughly 6,000 non-Mexicans from the U.S., since Trump took office again, for 'humanitarian reasons.' Unlike in El Salvador, people expelled to these countries are likely not being held indefinitely in detention centers, but details on the fate of many are scant.
The Trump administration is currently seeking more countries in Asia to accept expelled immigrants from elsewhere in the world, according to Sean O'Neill, the senior bureau official for East Asian and Pacific Affairs at the Department of State. 'We do have discussions with other countries who agree to take third country national deportees,' he said at a press briefing last week, noting that the U.S. is 'working closely with countries in the region who are willing to accept third-country nationals with final orders of removal — in other words, folks who are not actually from that country.'
A State Department spokesperson also told The Intercept that 'U.S. partners and regional leaders are working closely with us to end the crisis of illegal and mass migration.' One area of collaboration seems to be finding dangerous places to send vulnerable people.
Last week, the Trump administration was poised to send immigrants from the Philippines, Vietnam, Laos, and Mexico, among other countries. to Libya and possibly Saudi Arabia. Experts say that the plan to deport immigrants to Libya – a war-ravaged nation that descended into violence after the U.S. helped to overthrow its government in 2011 and is known for widespread mistreatment of migrants and refugees — would represent not only a gross human rights violation but also a brazen act of defiance toward the federal judiciary.
'It seems like they're actually removing them to a country with the intent of causing harm.'
'There are provisions in immigration law to send somebody to a third country. We've done that in the past. We've made arrangements with Ecuador, for example, to take Palestinian nationals who we can't send back because they're stateless, with assurances that they are not in danger in that third country,' said Michelle Brané, the former Immigration Detention Ombudsman at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 'But not only do these current cases fall outside of that category, but it seems like they're actually removing them to a country with the intent of causing harm.' Immigrant detainees form an SOS in the courtyard at the Bluebonnet Detention Center on May 12, 2025 in Anson, Texas. Photo:Libya operates numerous detention facilities for immigrants on behalf of European nations. Amnesty International called these prisons a 'hellscape' in a 2021 report, saying it had found evidence that adults and children were subjected to 'arbitrary detention and systematically subjected to torture, sexual violence, forced labour and other exploitation with total impunity.' The most recent State Department report on human rights in Libya criticized its 'harsh and life-threatening prison conditions' and cited numerous analyses which found 'migrants routinely experienced unlawful killings, arbitrary detention, torture, sexual exploitation, and other abuses'; that perpetrators included 'state officials'; and that 'various U.N. entities documented human rights abuses committed against migrants in detention centers throughout the year.'
The European Union, and member states like Italy and France, have long provided assistance to Libya to thwart immigration to Europe, including support for its network of brutal immigrant prisons.
'Libya has served as a detention center for countries in Europe, Italy in particular. So the U.S. may be looking at that for a model,' said Finucane, who worked on U.S.-Libyan security cooperation for the State Department and is now the senior adviser for the U.S. program at the International Crisis Group. 'It has, of course, a terrible reputation in terms of human rights treatment of immigrants, and there's been reporting on this from the U.N. and many others. But based on this administration's use of CECOT in El Salvador, brutal prison conditions may be the point.'
Last month, U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy (no relation to the senator) issued a preliminary injunction barring the Trump administration from deporting noncitizens to third countries without due process and without allowing them to demonstrate whether they are in danger of persecution, bodily harm, or death if they are sent.
In the face of reports of impending expulsions to Libya, Murphy followed up last Wednesday with an order clarifying that 'the allegedly imminent removals, as reported by news agencies and as plaintiffs seek to corroborate with class-member accounts and public information, would clearly violate this court's order.'
'The Trump Administration's plan to send migrants to Libya is unconscionable, cruel, and blatantly illegal. This decision flies in the face of basic morality. Sending migrants to a country that they didn't come from and where they could face torture and inhumane treatment is appalling and criminal,' said Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn. 'No human being should be subjected to these horrific conditions. There is no doubt that these migrants will have their lives put at severe risk.'
During a Senate subcommittee meeting with DHS Secretary Kristi Noem last week, Sen. Murphy tore into the reported Libya deportation plans. The country is considered too dangerous even for U.S. diplomats, he observed, and American citizens are advised not to travel there. 'Libya is in the middle of a civil war,' he said. 'Sending migrants with pending asylum claims into a war zone just because it's cruel is so deeply disturbing.'
President Donald Trump claimed not to know whether he planned to deport hundreds of immigrants to Libya, amid reports that his administration was poised to do so. When asked whether the administration was sending migrants to Libya last week, Trump said, 'I don't know,' then instructed reporters to ask the Department of Homeland Security.
Multiple requests for comment by The Intercept to DHS, citing Trump's advice, went unanswered.
Libya is not the only war zone that the Trump administration has eyed as a suitable site for immigrant expulsion. Earlier this year, the administration asked Ukraine to accept third-country nationals, according to reporting by the Washington Post. There is no indication that Ukraine agreed to this extraordinary request, however. The State Department refused to offer clarification, claiming — falsely — that they do not discuss diplomatic communications with other governments.
The Trump administration is also combing Africa for nations that will accept third-country nationals, including Benin, a West African nation that is increasingly beset by Islamist militant violence, and Equatorial Guinea, a notorious kleptocracy led by a brutal tyrant.
Read Our Complete Coverage
Further east, the U.S. is courting another government led by a strongman. Rwanda's foreign minister, Olivier J.P. Nduhungirehe, recently disclosed that his country was in 'early stage' talks with the Trump administration to accept expelled immigrants from America. 'These talks are still ongoing,' he told Rwanda TV, the state broadcaster.
The U.S. made a one-time payment of $100,000 to the Rwandan government last month to accept an Iraqi national with the proviso that the African nation would admit 10 more third-country nationals as part of a 'durable program' for accepting other expelled immigrants, according to reporting by the Washington Post.
Rwanda has a long history of taking in refugees from Africa and elsewhere and striking deals with European nations, like Denmark and the United Kingdom, to accept deported asylum-seekers and immigrants. While Rwanda frames the policy as altruistic, many experts say it is rooted in efforts to profit financially and geopolitically and induce Western governments to ignore Rwanda's antidemocratic government, its support for a brutal rebel group and illegal mining in the neighboring Democratic Republic of Congo, and the nation's woeful human rights record.
The most recent State Department report on human rights in Rwanda details significant issues including 'extrajudicial killings; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrest or detention; [and] political prisoners or detainees,' among many other violations.
The State Department refused to comment on ongoing negotiations with Rwanda. 'We do not discuss the details of our diplomatic communications with other governments,' a spokesperson told The Intercept.
'Ongoing engagement with foreign governments is vital to deterring illegal and mass migration and securing our borders, which are top Trump Administration priorities,' a State Department spokesperson told The Intercept by email. This engagement increasingly looks like an effort to frighten immigrants with the prospect of exile in far-off, and sometimes exceptionally dangerous, countries.
Brané, the former Immigration Detention Ombudsman, says that the Trump administration is weaponizing the deportation process, wielding it as a cudgel as it also pushes a self-deportation scheme. In March, the Department of Homeland Security announced a program to induce undocumented immigrants to turn themselves in through an app and 'self-deport' in exchange for travel assistance and a stipend of $1,000, paid after their return to their home country.
'Transfers to third countries are not intended to be a punishment or a deterrent. But I think they're looking at it as a punishment, like retribution — punishing people, without having gone through due process. They're saying, 'You violate our rules, we're going to really make you suffer,'' Brané told The Intercept, referring to the Trump administration. 'They see these removals as a way to scare people, to deter them from coming, but also to move them toward self-removal or self-deportation. It's not a coincidence that they are pairing it with this campaign of 'Leave now or we'll come after you.'' Join The Conversation
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
13 minutes ago
Mahmoud Khalil released from Louisiana jail after 3+ months in ICE custody
A federal judge granted his release on bail, ruling the Trump administration was punishing him over his pro-Palestinian speech.
Hamilton Spectator
15 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
US evacuates 79 staff and family from embassy in Israel as more Americans ask how to leave
WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. evacuated 79 staff and families from the U.S. Embassy in Israel on Friday as the conflict between Israel and Iran intensifies and growing numbers of private American citizens seek information on how to leave Israel and Iran. An internal State Department memo says the military flight, the second known to have occurred this week, left Tel Aviv for Sofia, Bulgaria, where some or all of the passengers were to get a connecting charter flight to Washington. The document, which was obtained by The Associated Press, also said that more than 6,400 U.S. citizens in Israel had filled out an online form on Friday alone asking for information about when and if the U.S. government would organize evacuation flights. An additional 3,265 people, some of whom may also have competed the form, called an emergency number seeking assistance. The document estimated that between 300 and 500 people per day could need evacuation assistance should the U.S. decide to offer flights or ships to get Americans out, as the U.S. ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, has said is being considered. There are some 700,000 Americans in Israel, many of them dual nationals, according to estimates, although the exact number at any given time is unclear because U.S. citizens are not required to notify the embassy if they are there or when they might leave. Earlier Friday, before the memo was distributed, State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce told reporters that more than 25,000 Americans had reached out for information on leaving Israel, the West Bank and Iran. She told reporters that those people had sought 'information and support' and were 'seeking guidance' on departing. She would not give a breakdown of where the queries had come from and would not comment on embassy evacuations. In Iran, the document said that at least 84 U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents, or Green Card holders, had crossed into neighboring Azerbaijan by land since the conflict began and that an additional 774 had been granted permission to enter as of Friday. Nearly 200 American citizens and Green Card holders are awaiting permission to travel overland from Iran to neighboring Turkmenistan, it said. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Where US troops in Mideast are most at risk of Iran strike
The Big Story Tens of thousands of U.S. troops are within Iran's striking distance should President Trump decide to wade into Israel's conflict with Tehran and directly attack the country. © Alex Brandon, Associated Press More than 40,000 American service members and civilians — as well as billions of dollars in military equipment — are in the Middle East, spread out across bases in Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. Those working in countries closest to Iran, including Iraq and Kuwait, would conceivably have only minutes to prepare for an incoming Iranian strike, a likely outcome should Trump order the U.S. military to join Israel's bombing campaign, experts say. 'If [Iran] had the ballistic missiles ready to go, those strikes could happen in under 15 minutes. Launched to target,' retired Col. Seth Krummrich, vice president at security consultancy firm Global Guardian, told The Hill. 'They move very quickly.' Israel last week unleashed a barrage of airstrikes on Iran that set off the largest conflict ever between the two regional adversaries, with Tehran responding with its own attacks. The war has threatened to pull in the U.S., which says it supports Israel's right to defend itself but has not directly involved itself in the bombing. Trump has not yet decided on possible American military action against Iran, telling reporters through his top spokesperson that he would make his decision within two weeks. But Iran has already threatened to directly attack U.S. forces should they enter Israel's war campaign, with the country's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warning Wednesday that 'Americans should know that any U.S. military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage.' Tehran's threats aren't idle, as the country has retaliated against Washington in the past, most notably in January 2020, when Trump in his first term ordered an airstrike that killed Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani, the head of Iran's elite Quds Force. The strike, which happened as Soleimani traveled to Baghdad, prompted a swift response from Iran, which days later hammered Al-Asad Air Base in Iraq and another U.S. base in Erbil with 13 ballistic missiles. While no Americans were killed in the largest ballistic missile attack ever against U.S. forces abroad, more than 100 were later diagnosed and treated for traumatic brain injuries. Now, with Trump reportedly considering using the GBU-57 — known as the Massive Ordnance Penetrator or so-called bunker buster bomb — to damage Iran's Fordow nuclear enrichment facility, a similar attack from Tehran could soon be at hand. Read the full report at Welcome to The Hill's Defense & National Security newsletter, I'm Ellen Mitchell — your guide to the latest developments at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and beyond. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect defense and national security now and inthe future: Trump: 'Hard' for Israel to stop strikes now President Trump said Friday it would be difficult for Israel to stop strikes on Iran at this point, a week into the intense conflict between the two nations and two weeks out from the president's decision on U.S. involvement. 'I think it's very hard to make that request right now,' he said when pressed about the Iranian foreign minister saying that the U.S. would call on Israel to stop airstrikes if Trump is serious about … Democrat: Trump 2-week Iran deadline 'not a bad thing' Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) tepidly praised President Trump on his handling of the ongoing military conflict between Israel and Iran, after the president said he would wait two weeks to decide whether to take direct action against Iran. 'The fact that we're not reading about a U.S. attack on Iran right now actually gives me a little bit of comfort,' the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee told independent … Israel, Iran trade strikes as Trump weighs US military involvement Israel and Iran traded strikes on Friday as President Trump weighs the possibility of U.S. involvement and European officials seek to revive nuclear negotiations with Tehran. Israel said it hit 60 Iranian aircrafts early Friday morning along with the headquarters of the Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research, which carries out nuclear weapons research, according to the Associated Press. Iranian media said Israel's … On Our Radar Upcoming things we're watching on our beat: In Other News Branch out with a different read from The Hill: DHS places new limits on lawmakers visiting ICE facilities The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is placing new limitations on lawmakers seeking to visit detention facilities, releasing guidelines in the wake of visits from Democrats that have turned confrontational. Members of Congress have the legal right to make unannounced visits to U.S. Immigration … On Tap Monday Events in and around the defense world: What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets: Trending Today Two key stories on The Hill right now: Senate parliamentarian knocks pieces out of Trump's megabill Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough has ruled that several key pieces of the massive bill to implement President Trump's agenda run afoul of … Read more Supreme Court rules against FDA, EPA 12:30 Report is The Hill's midday newsletter. Subscribe here or using the box below: Close Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters … Read more Opinions in The Hill Op-eds related to defense & national security submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you next week! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here
