MPs' shock as former Reform UK MP Rupert Lowe reveals he had pet labrador put down with a shotgun

He has been no stranger to controversy since becoming a Reform MP last year – and now Rupert Lowe has sparked fury after having his pet labrador put down with a shotgun.
Colleagues were shocked after it emerged Mr Lowe – now sitting as an independent – asked his gamekeeper to shoot 17-year-old Cromwell in the back of the head at his Gloucestershire estate.
The dog had been unwell and lost the use of his back legs. Mr Lowe said he took decisive action after realising Cromwell's suffering was extreme and that waiting overnight to take him to the vet would be 'cruel'.
He made the admission openly to colleagues in Westminster, triggering fierce debate about whether it was a kind choice.
A parliamentary source said: 'For weeks, it was going around the Commons like wildfire that Rupert had shot his dog. Colleagues were appalled and upset, with most thinking it was a cruel way to behave.'
Some MPs see a town-versus-country element to this method of putting animals down. Those in rural areas, including landowners, are seen as being less sentimental.
One MP said: 'It's an 'old money' thing to do. That may have been acceptable 100 years ago but it's not now.'
Mr Lowe told The Mail on Sunday last night that he believes it is more humane to have a dog put down at home because animals can sense something is amiss at the vet and tend to panic.
The Great Yarmouth MP said: 'My keeper shot our dog the other day. He was a labrador of 17.
'Dogs do go through ups and downs for a bit, but in the end Cromwell's back legs went and our keeper Kevin very kindly did the job.
'Cromwell didn't go anywhere, he wasn't away from home and he wouldn't have known anything about it. So much kinder.
'They are not driven to the vet, they don't smell the vet, it's just all over very quickly.'
Mr Lowe said that while he gave the instruction to shoot Cromwell, he couldn't stomach doing it himself.
He added: 'I would find it difficult, which is why my keeper did it. So you can call me a coward on that basis, if you want.
'I've got friends who can shoot their dogs. [They] just take them on a walk, put a shooting rifle at the back of their head and bang, done.
'They don't feel anything. I would have found it hard. He was 17 and had been with us that long.
'I would be proud to tell you it was me who did it, [but] I can't claim that credit.'
Mr Lowe had Cromwell buried by his tennis court, with his previous pets, and raised a toast to him.
Elizabeth Davenport, campaign manager at Animal Aid, said: 'It highlights a serious failing of animal protection in the UK.
'There is currently no legislation that protects dogs from this kind of 'at home' euthanasia – or indeed many other concerning practices.
'Legislation that does exist, such as the Animal Welfare Act 2006, only protects animals from 'unnecessary' harm but allows individuals – who may have no prior knowledge or experience of animal health and welfare – to decide what is or is not necessary.'
In December, Reform Chief Whip Lee Anderson posted on social media about having his West Highland terrier Alfie, also 17, put down by a vet.
Mr Anderson wrote: 'This morning Alfie went to sleep for the last time. All his pain has gone. He has left a massive hole.'
Meanwhile, US Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem's chances of being Donald Trump's vice-presidential running mate evaporated last year after she wrote about shooting dead her 14-month-old wirehair pointer Cricket, who she deemed 'untrainable', and a troublesome goat.
FOR: Going to the vet is so distressing for them
by Jamie Blackett
Putting an animal to sleep is not as easy as the euphemism sounds. My dog Pippin can smell a vet at 50 paces, so going to the surgery is a rather distressing ordeal.
Once there, a vet has to shave a patch of fur on the scruff before finding a vein to slide the needle into. While a dog doesn't understand euthanasia, it can sense something nasty coming – even if the vet carries out the procedure at home.
I've been through this a number of times with past dogs and, though I have never been able to bring myself to shoot one, I suspect it would be much kinder.
I've certainly shot dozens of cattle over the years, as I run a farm in Dumfriesshire. If one is beyond help, the vet shakes her head and says: 'Will you deal with it?'
So, as the cow has its head in delicious cattle cake feed, I take aim and she is gone before she even hears the shot.
Similarly, Rupert Lowe's dog will have woken up in the happy hunting ground in the sky without knowing anything.
What is wrong with that? We owe it to our animals to make their end as quick and painless as possible.
Jamie is the author of Land Of Milk And Honey: Digressions Of A Rural Dissident
AGAINST: What if one bullet wasn't enough?
by Beverley Cuddy
For many people, dogs are cherished as members of the family, which is why they deserve the same dignity at the end of their lives as our two-legged relatives. After all, we often love them even more.
In the 35 years I've been editing Dogs Today magazine and campaigning for higher animal welfare standards, I've seen dogs' quality of life improve dramatically. But, equally, we must ensure the quality of their death is never scrimped on.
My dogs have all had planned and idyllic endings. Take my bearded collie, Sally. She chewed on the best steak and some very crispy bacon while I cradled her in my arms and told her what a perfect dog she'd been as our vet expertly sent her on her next adventure.
Even Oscar, my latest dog to pass – who had an emergency mercy killing at a late-night veterinary chain – was given a gentle death.
I could never have my dogs shot, however infirm. For one, it prevents you from comforting them in their last moments.
And what if one shot wasn't enough? What if your last memory of them was of cleaning up the splatter from a violent, messy death? Much better to be nightmare-free.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mail​

24 minutes ago

• Daily Mail​

Keir Starmer backs strike by Trump's US on Iran saying its nuclear weapons are 'a grave threat to international security'

Keir Starmer this morning gave British backing to strikes on Iran 's nuclear capabilities by Donald Trump 's America. The Prime Minister said that Tehran's atomic programme was 'a grave threat to international security' after bombers dropped 30,000-pound 'bunker buster' bombs on the Fordow nuclear facility. Sir Keir added that the US had taken action to 'alleviate that threat', having previously urged Trump to use diplomacy instead, warning that military action could cause wider ramifications. Trump last night claimed the attack using B2 steal bombers had been 'a spectacular military success,' something Tehran denied. Reports from the US suggested that the bombers flew direct from the US rather than using the joint UK/US base at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean. In a statement this morning Sir Keir said: 'Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. 'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat. 'The situation in the Middle East remains volatile and stability in the region is a priority. 'We call on Iran to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis.'

Telegraph

29 minutes ago

• Telegraph

Britain's defeatist attitude ‘has led to reliance on foreign labour'

A 'defeatist' attitude to getting young people into work has left Britain over-reliant on foreign labour, the Business Secretary has said. Jonathan Reynolds hits out at the 'casual' approach taken to packing key sectors such as healthcare, construction and manufacturing with imported workers. In an interview with The Telegraph, he says the UK is 'vulnerable' to global events because 'tremendous skills gaps' have opened up in the domestic workforce. His intervention comes as Labour prepares to publish plans on Monday on how to boost the number of young Britons taking up jobs in areas like defence. Mr Reynolds will publish a 10-year blueprint to train up thousands more school leavers and 'end the over-reliance on foreign labour' in the economy. It comes after new analysis from Oxford University's Migration Observatory showed the proportion of migrant employees in the UK has risen from 12 per cent a decade ago to just under one in five now. At the same time, the number of young Britons who are not in employment, education or training (Neet) has risen sharply to one in seven. The Business Secretary said that the Neet statistic was 'appalling' and that people too often felt that skilled jobs had 'not been available to them and their children'. 'If on key areas the argument is 'we just have to import talent in that sector, we can't train people, we haven't got the money, we haven't got the capacity', I think that's too defeatist and we've got to address that,' he said. 'We cannot have a vibrant, diverse economy, we cannot have a very strong manufacturing base, unless we've got the skills for it and that's why we can't be casual about just importing that.' Monday's industrial strategy announcement will include plans to open a new generation of technical colleges and fund 'cutting-edge' courses in defence and engineering. It will also set out how the Government plans to be more interventionist, 'rather than leaving industry to fend for itself and let the markets decide'. Mr Reynolds said it will help 'ensure British workers can secure good, well-paid jobs in the industries of tomorrow'. He acknowledged that the historically high level of net migration over recent years 'doesn't have public consent' and has created a 'lot of anger'. It was important to remain 'very pro talent coming to the UK' but also ensure migration was 'not the only way we're meeting those skills needs', he added. 'If you think about the tremendous gaps we've got in the skills pipeline in construction, in engineering, defence, that's the reason why the wider sectors that we've picked for the strategy have these packages in there. 'We are vulnerable when the whole world wants these things. I feel previous governments have assumed it doesn't matter if we make anything in the UK – I think that's wrong.' Mr Reynolds said that 'the country has failed' the almost one million 16 to 24-year-olds who are currently classed as Neet. There is 'not just an economic argument' but 'a moral one as well', he said, adding that 'it's a tragedy' if people aren't getting the right opportunities. He backed the proposed £5 billion cuts to benefits, over which No 10 is facing a big Labour rebellion, arguing that 'we've got to be addressing these issues'. 'No young person, unless they obviously have a significant disability or are genuinely not in a position to work, should be choosing or [be] in a position where they're not going into employment or education or training,' he said. 'I go around, it doesn't matter whether it's creative industries, advanced manufacturing, services, energy, and think I'd love my kids to work in any of these sectors. 'I think the number of young people who are Neet is appalling. I don't know how we've allowed that to happen.' Mr Reynolds said the industrial strategy should be judged on whether it helps school leavers 'understand that there are major careers, good jobs for British people'. 'The skills are about new careers for thousands of British people. Business needs that, I think the country needs that,' he said. 'Part of the conversation this week has been about the number of people on disability benefits in the UK, some of whom are in work, I do recognise that. 'But we've we've got to be addressing these issues for business, and we've got to be addressing them for people's lives themselves.' He also insisted that, whilst defending UK industry, the strategy will not represent 'nostalgia for the past' or a 'protectionist and 1970s orientated' approach. The Business Secretary, who has recently struck landmark trade deals with the US and India, said he would take a more cautious approach with China. He said that he has repeatedly brought up the dumping of steel on the global market at below production value in 'candid' discussions with Beijing. 'Whatever people think of the US administration, they have a point on the reciprocity of trade, if one part of the world is producing a lot of what the world makes and doesn't consume itself a reflective share of that,' he said. 'These big global imbalances, this isn't really how the global economy is supposed to function. 'So an obvious thing for us would be, is a country like China willing to let our brilliant service industries operate freely as we allow some countries to operate in the UK? That's a question for China.'

BBC News

an hour ago

• BBC News

Housing bill "catastrophic for wildlife"

A new bill which the government says aims to speed up housebuilding has been described as "catastrophic for wildlife" by a nature Wildlife Trust's chief executive Nick Bruce-White has said it will give developers an open door to pay "cash to trash" the environment. Labour says it wants to build 1.5 million homes during this parliament and 150 large infrastructure projects. The government says the new Planning and Infrastructure Bill will deliver a "win-win" for the economy and nature by ensuring builders can meet their environmental obligations faster. Devon Wildlife Trust has said it wants part three of the bill, entitled Nature Restoration Fund, Bruce-White said it would be "catastrophic for wildlife by effectively giving developers licence to trash wildlife habitats". He said it "represents one of the most significant threats to nature that we've faced in decades"."We've worked really hard with government to try and make sure environmental protections are kept within the planning system, so we can both grow the economy and restore nature at the same time. "All our work behind closed doors has been met with platitudes and false reassurances and we feel like we are being completely ignored," he added. 'Environmental improvements' The government says the Nature Restoration Fund "will ensure there is a win-win for both the economy and nature by ensuring builders can meet their environmental obligations faster.""These changes will remove time intensive and costly processes, with payments into the fund allowing building to proceed while wider action is taken to secure the environmental improvements we need."At the bill's third reading, the Minister for Housing and Planning, Matthew Pennycook said: "To those who believe this government might buckle and scrap part three of the bill entirely, I simply say, "You have underestimated the resolve of this government and this minister." "The case for moving to a more strategic approach that will allow us to use funding from development to deliver environmental improvements at a scale that will have the greatest impact in driving the recovery of protected sites and species, is compelling." Devon Wildlife Trust says often great crested newts and bats are blamed for delaying planning developments, but its own research shows they represent just 3% of planning application appeals. The charity says sensitive and protected nature sites could be at high risk of damage or destruction under the new planning framework, with species like curlews, water voles, and the High Brown Fritillary butterfly at risk. Members of the House of Lords will now debate the bill.