Here's how much it cost to repair SA driver's licence card printing machine over three years
The machine was out of service for nearly 130 days.
Over the past three and a half years, R12 million has been spent to repair and maintain South Africa's only driver's licence card printing machine, which has suffered frequent breakdowns.
This information was disclosed by Transport Minister Barbara Creecy in a written parliamentary reply.
Songezo Zibi, leader of Rise Mzansi, quizzed the minister regarding the 26-year-old machine, which had been out of operation for much of this year, resulting in a significant backlog of driver's licence cards.
Zibi asked how many times the machine had broken down over the past three financial years, including the current 2025/2026 financial year, and the total cost of those repairs.
He also sought details on how much overtime pay had been made to employees due to printing delays, as well as the number of staff required to operate the machine effectively.
The machine, which produces around 300 000 cards per month, resumed production in early May.
Driver's licence card printing machine repair costs
In her response, Creecy revealed that the machine was non-operational for 26 working days during the 2022/2023 financial year, with repair and maintenance costs amounting to R9 267 862.33.
In the 2023/2024 financial year, it was down for 48 days, incurring costs of R1 651 772.57.
The following year, the machine was out of commission for 17 days, with R544 747.64 spent on repairs.
The machine has been out of operation for 38 days in the current financial year, with R624 988.10 spent on repairs and maintenance.
ALSO READ: The driver's licence machine is fixed, but another problem remains
Over the entire period, the machine was offline for a total of 129 days, with total maintenance costs adding up to R12 089 370.57.
Creecy also said overtime payments over the three years amounted to R4.4 million.
The overtime breakdown was R1 435 376.79 in 2022/2023, R1 608 102.52 in 2023/2024, and R1 351 473.78 in 2024/2025.
No overtime payments have been made so far in the current financial year.
She added that four operators are needed to operate the printing machine effectively.
As of 15 May, the backlog in driver's licence cards stood at 733 000.
Red flags over new machine tender
In response to a question about the acquisition of a new machine, Creecy said: 'The minister has directed that a declaratory order be sought from a competent court on the tender to acquire a new machine, in order to ensure that no further irregular expenditure occurs.'
In March, Creecy instructed the Department of Transport to seek a High Court declaratory order regarding the tender.
This decision followed findings by the Auditor-General that the procurement process for the R898 million contract awarded to the South African subsidiary of French multinational technology company, Idemia, in August 2024 was irregular.
The bidding process began in April and concluded in May 2023.
According to the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa), the Driving Licence Card Account had budgeted just over R486 million for the new machine, while Idemia's bid was reportedly either R762 million or R898 million.
Other companies that submitted bids included Ren-Form Corporate Print Media, Nec Xon Systems, Muehlbauer ID Services, and Gemalto Altron Fintech Southern Africa.
NOW READ: Why has the questionable driving licence card tender not been overturned?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
18 hours ago
- IOL News
Crypto traders, pay attention: legal changes are coming
South Africa's exchange control rules are laws that decide how money can move in and out of the country. They affect how much forex you can buy, how you invest overseas, and how businesses move funds across borders, says Davron Chanderdeo. A RECENT High Court ruling just confirmed something many of us in the crypto world have known for a while. South Africa's laws around money, especially when it comes to crypto, are completely outdated. Judge Mandlenkosi Motha ruled that the country's exchange control regulations, which were written way back in 1961, don't apply to cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. That's a big deal, because up until now, traders and investors have been operating in a confusing space, unsure what the rules really are. So, what does this mean if you're trading crypto on Luno, VALR, or Binance? Whether you're an investor, casual buyer or someone who trades daily, here's how this decision affects you and what you should do next. Why this ruling matters South Africa's exchange control rules are laws that decide how money can move in and out of the country. They affect how much forex you can buy, how you invest overseas, and how businesses move funds across borders. Until now, there's been no clear rule about where crypto fits. Is it like rand? Is it a foreign investment? Or is it something totally new? Someone can transfer Bitcoin from Cape Town to a family member in Hong Kong in a matter of minutes and that transaction, under current law, isn't clearly defined as foreign or local. The court said: crypto is not covered by the old rules. It's time for new laws made just for digital currencies. So what changes for traders or the everyday South African? Let's break it down with a few real-life examples. You're trading from your couch: You buy Bitcoin on Luno, then move it to Binance for better trading options. Under the old rules, it was unclear whether that was considered 'sending money offshore'. Now? The court says crypto isn't covered, so you're technically not breaking exchange control laws. But this may change once new rules come in. You work for a financial firm or are an avid investor: Let's say your firm wants to launch a crypto ETF or offer Bitcoin as one of the assets in a pension fund. Right now, that's risky, because crypto isn't clearly identified as an onshore or offshore asset. Furthermore, Regulation 28 of the Pension Funds Act allows limited exposure to crypto assets (up to 10%), but asset managers remain cautious due to FSCA guidance and ongoing market volatility. This ruling could pave the way for investment houses to get involved which means more opportunities and better products for everyday investors. The bigger picture: why regulation is good for you Let's face it, most South Africans don't like the idea of more rules. But in the crypto world, the right regulation doesn't mean more red tape, it means more protection, less risk, and real growth. According to the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA), crypto-related scams are on the rise in South Africa, particularly across social media platforms like WhatsApp, Facebook, and Instagram. Fraudsters often impersonate legitimate traders or companies, promising unrealistic returns and then vanishing once funds are transferred via Bitcoin or other crypto. These scams exploit crypto's semi-anonymous nature, making it harder to trace transactions and recover funds. A 2023 FSCA report warned that South Africans lost over R500 million to crypto scams in just one year, with most scams originating via social media or messaging platforms. So why would these scammers ever stop? While there's currently no formal government-mandated transaction declaration process between crypto wallets, increased regulation may soon require verified identification through Know-Your-Customer (KYC) processes at local and international exchanges. This would make it harder for criminals to use crypto anonymously and easier for authorities to trace illicit activity. Implementing regulation will: - Help prevent scams by setting minimum standards for exchanges and wallet providers. - Make tax reporting easier, so you know what you owe and can plan properly. - Encourage large institutional investors (like pension funds and asset managers) to enter the market, bringing stability and liquidity. - Create a legal path for innovation, like launching crypto linked debit cards, savings products, or smart investment platforms. My final thoughts are that this ruling is a win for the crypto community, but it's also a wake-up call: the wild west era of trading is ending. That's not a bad thing, it means South Africa is taking crypto seriously. And when the law takes something seriously, so does the market. Traders who stay informed, track their gains, and keep things clean will benefit the most. Crypto is here to stay. With the right legal framework, it can shift from the margins to the mainstream, unlocking innovation, securing investor trust, and contributing meaningfully to South Africa's financial ecosystem.
IOL News
19 hours ago
- IOL News
Cape Town father challenges R172,000 maintenance order, citing financial strain despite over R1 million bonus
A Cape Town father who receives over R1 million in bonuses challenged a ruling which ordered him to pay over R172,000 maintenance. Image: Pexels A Cape Town father who reportedly receives over R1 million in annual bonuses, has challenged the mother of his children and refused to produce his proof of income. The parents, who divorced in August 2010, have been at odds over financial responsibilities, as the mother continues to care for their children, aged 15 and 19. In February 2025, the maintenance court ordered the father to pay R172,188.63, which, amongst other things, will go towards the tuition cost of their older child. The money had to be paid before the end of March 2025. He was further ordered to pay over R20,000 towards the annual school fees of their second child. The total amount he had to pay was over R222,000. However, following the court's ruling, the father swiftly filed an urgent application in the Western Cape High Court to suspend the maintenance order. He argued that the amount was nearly double his net salary, asserting his financial inability to honour such payments. The high court granted a temporary suspension of the order, while simultaneously requiring the mother to demonstrate why this suspension should not become permanent pending the appeal hearing. The mother took further legal action, serving both the father and his employer with a subpoena duces tecum. A subpoena duces tecum is a court order requiring a person to appear in court and produce specific documents or other physical evidence relevant to a legal case. According to the mother, the father misled the court in his application to suspend the maintenance order. She argued that the maintenance court granted the order in line with what was provided by the father in terms of his monthly salary as well as his annual bonus which amounts to over R1 million. She further argued that the father did not provide proof to support his claim that he cannot afford to pay maintenance. He also didn't provide any evidence to support that his financial position had changed for the worse since the order was made. Furthermore, she said the father lied in his affidavit as his IRP5 showed that he had received more than R1 million in March 2025. With this information, she sought to have the interim order suspending the maintenance order to be dismissed. Furthermore, the mother highlighted discrepancies in the father's affidavit, alleging that his IRP5 tax document, which revealed earnings exceeding R1 million as of March 2025, illustrates his capacity to pay the mandated maintenance while still maintaining a comfortable lifestyle. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading In response, the father approached the high court again, seeking to have the subpoena set aside. He claimed the documents requested by the mother were irrelevant and warned that such disclosures would cause irreparable harm. Presiding over the matter, Judge James Lekhuleni said the previous maintenance court order revealed that the mother battled to coerce the father to honour his maintenance obligations. He only provided financial support to the children when it suited him. He commented on the mother's diligent efforts, recognising that she was an unrepresented litigant trying to safeguard her children's welfare. The judge made it clear that the mother's attempts to compel the father to meet his obligations should not be viewed as an abuse of the legal system. Moreover, judge Lekhuleni emphasised that denying the subpoena would unduly harm the mother and the children, while the father would not suffer significant prejudice from its continuation. "As I see it, there is no prejudice that the applicant (father) will suffer if the subpoena is not set aside. While on the other hand, setting aside the subpoena will have deleterious effects on the first respondent (mother) and the children," he said. The father's application was dismissed. IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
TimesLIVE
20 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Honda-backed Helm.ai unveils vision system for self-driving cars
Honda Motor-backed on Thursday unveiled its camera-based system to interpret urban environments, dubbed Vision, and said it was in talks with other carmakers to deploy its self-driving technology in mass market vehicles. is working with the Japanese carmaker to integrate its technology in the upcoming 2026 Honda Zero electric vehicles, which will allow users to drive hands-free and take their eyes off the road. "We're definitely in talks with many OEMs and we're on track for deploying our technology in production," CEO and founder Vladislav Voroninski told Reuters. "Our business model is essentially licensing this kind of software and also foundation model software to the carmakers." The California-based startup's vision-first approach aligns with Elon Musk's Tesla, which also relies on camera-based systems as alternate sensors such as lidar and radar can increase costs. However, Voroninski said while has foundation models that work with other sensors, its primary offering remains vision-focused. Industry experts said other sensors are critical to safety as they can act as backup for cameras, which are known to underperform in low-visibility conditions. Robotaxi companies such as Alphabet's Waymo and May Mobility use a combination of radar, lidar and cameras to perceive their surroundings. has raised $102m (R1,839,466,847) to date and counts Goodyear Ventures, Korean car parts maker Sungwoo HiTech and Amplo among its investors. Vision combines images from many cameras to create a bird's-eye view map, which helps improve the vehicle's planning and control systems, the company said. The system is optimised for several hardware platforms made by Nvidia and Qualcomm. This enables carmakers to incorporate Vision into their existing vehicle systems, which include their own technologies for predicting and planning vehicle movements.
