Beneath the Iron Dome, Iran tests Israel's deterrence
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The intensifying conflict between Iran and Israel has exposed both the strengths and vulnerabilities of Israel's military posture, particularly its dependence on air defense systems to shield its territory from a sustained ballistic missile campaign. While Israel's technologically advanced missile defence architecture has proven capable of intercepting the vast majority of Iranian missiles so far, it faces a reckoning now: Can Israel maintain its missile shield in a long-term war of attrition?Since Iran initiated missile attacks last week, Israel's multi-layered air defense system -- a complex integration of Iron Dome (short-range), David's Sling (medium-range), and the Arrow system (long-range) -- has been operating at near-full capacity. The Arrow system, in particular, designed to intercept high-altitude ballistic missiles outside the atmosphere, has become the lynchpin of Israel's strategic defense against Iran's increasingly precise, long-range threats.The performance of these systems has been stellar. According to various media reports quoting Israeli authorities, most of the incoming missiles have been successfully intercepted, preventing significant infrastructure damage or civilian casualties. However, success comes at a cost, and that cost is becoming a pressing concern in military and political circles in Israel.Reports from The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal indicate a growing concern among Israeli defence officials about the pace at which interceptors are being used. A senior US official confirmed that Israel's supply of Arrow interceptors, costing roughly $3 million each, is running low. If Iran maintains its current tempo of missile launches, Israel may only have enough interceptors left for 10 to 12 more days, according to intelligence sources quoted by the WSJ. Moreover, Israeli financial daily The Marker estimates that nightly missile defense operations could cost as much as 1 billion shekels (approximately $285 million). This extraordinary financial burden is compounded by the logistical limits of replenishing high-tech interceptors that require months to manufacture and assemble.In the context of attritional warfare , where endurance and resupply become as important as battlefield success, Israel's heavy reliance on missile defence may become a strategic liability. Iran's ballistic missile arsenal, one of the largest in the world, allows it to absorb higher losses and maintain pressure without necessarily achieving direct military victories. For Iran, the cost of launching a missile is significantly lower than the cost for Israel to intercept one. This imbalance introduces a dangerous asymmetry. Even if each Iranian missile is intercepted, the financial and logistical strain on Israel could grow unsustainable over time. Attrition, in this case, becomes a tool of strategic leverage for Iran, by forcing Israel into a prolonged and expensive defence.Given this vulnerability, Israel's ability to sustain its current operational tempo may hinge not only on its domestic industrial capacity but also on rapid US resupply. The US has historically supported Israel with missile defence funding and technological cooperation. US strategic planners are reportedly considering ways to boost production and provide emergency shipments, but even under optimal conditions, these efforts may not keep pace with operational demands if the war drags on for weeks or months. The chance of a missile shortage, especially for critical systems like Arrow, raises the possibility that Israel may have to prioritise targets, ration interceptors or rely more heavily on offensive operations to degrade Iran's launch capabilities.Facing an attritional scenario, Israel may be compelled to shift its operational doctrine. Rather than absorb waves of missile attacks, Israeli forces could increase the scale and intensity of air strikes inside Iran in an attempt to preempt or degrade its missile capabilities at the source. This shift would, however, raise the stakes dramatically and could lead to a broader regional escalation involving Iranian proxies in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen. This would also carry political and humanitarian costs, particularly if Iranian counterstrikes increase civilian casualties.Israel's air defense system has performed with impressive precision and effectiveness, maintaining the country's security during the initial days of conflict. However, the sustainability of this defence is now in question. US President Donald Trump has given a two-week deadline for making a decision whether to enter conflict. With missile interceptor supplies dwindling and resupply timelines uncertain, Israel faces a narrowing window in which to recalibrate its strategy.If the war continues at its current pace, Israel will soon be forced to decide between escalating offensively to reduce the missile threat or adjusting its defense doctrine to prioritize critical assets. Either choice will pose significant risks. Israel, a country renowned for its military innovation, may now face its most severe test -- not in defeating its enemies outright, but in sustaining its defence long enough to shape the endgame.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Operation Sindhu: India to evacuate all nationals from Iran; embassy shares emergency numbers
NEW DELHI: India is evacuating all its citizens from Iran due to the ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel, the Indian Embassy in Tehran said on Saturday. In a post on X, the Embassy shared emergency contact numbers and a link to a Telegram channel for assistance. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "The Indian Embassy in Iran is evacuating all Indian Nationals in Iran. The Embassy may be contacted either on the Telegram channel or over the emergency contact numbers. +989010144557, +989128109115 +989128109109," it said. In another post, the Embassy said that evacuation efforts would also include citizens of Nepal and Sri Lanka. "On request of the Governments of Nepal and Sri Lanka, the Indian Embassy's evacuation efforts in Iran will also cover Citizens of Nepal and Sri Lanka," it said. "The citizens of Nepal and Sri Lanka may urgently reach out to the Embassy, either on the Telegram channel or over the emergency contact numbers. +989010144557; +989128109115; +989128109109," it added. India had announced "Operation Sindhu" on Wednesday to bring back its nationals from Iran as the conflict continued into its second week. Earlier in the day, the ministry of external affairs said that more than 500 Indian citizens have returned from Iran under Operation Sindhu so far. The conflict between Israel and Iran entered its ninth day on Saturday. The conflict started after Israel, on June 13, launched a massive airstrike on Iranian military and nuclear sites, dubbed "Operation Rising Lion". In response, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launched a large-scale drone and missile operation, 'Operation True Promise 3', targeting Israeli fighter jet fuel production facilities and energy supply centres.
India.com
35 minutes ago
- India.com
Spending Rs 63000000000 per day in Israel-Iran war, this country spent its emergency fund over…, now facing massive shortage of…, the country is…
Spending Rs 63000000000 crore per day in Israel-Iran war, this country spent its emergency fund due to..., now facing massive shortage of..., the country is... The war between Israel and Iran is turning out to be extremely costly for both countries. But Israel, in particular, is spending money like water. The biggest share of the war expenses is coming from Israel's side, and it is starting to hurt the country's economy. According to Brigadier General (Res.) Reem Aminach, who once served as the financial advisor to the Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF), said that Israel is now spending nearly USD 725 million (around Rs. 6,300 crore) every single day just on military operations. Over Rs. 12,000 crore spent in the first two days As per a report by Ynet News, Aminach shared that in the first two days of the war alone, Israel spent around USD 1.45 billion, which is more than Rs. 12,000 crore. This includes the cost of both attacks and defense efforts. Out of this, more than USD 500 million was used for carrying out airstrikes, buying jet fuel, and similar operations. The remaining amount was spent on missile interceptors, mobilizing soldiers, and other defense preparations. War expenses could go even higher In Israel's first major attack on Iran, just the cost of aircraft and weapons used came to about USD 593 million. On top of that, money was also spent on calling up reserve forces and running defense systems like the Iron Dome that intercepts enemy missiles. Aminach explained that this is only the direct cost of war. There are indirect costs too, like the impact on the economy and national productivity which cannot be fully calculated right now. He said the real financial damage will only be known later, when losses to civilian property, disruptions in business, and declines in GDP are also taken into account. Economic growth takes a hit Due to the war, Israel's Finance Ministry has lowered its expectations for the country's economic growth. Earlier, the ministry had set a target for a 4.9 per cent fiscal deficit this year which is roughly USD 27.6 billion. While some money was kept aside for emergencies, most of it was already spent during the war in Gaza. Now, with the added cost of the Iran conflict, there is no separate fund in place to handle the new wave of expenses. For 2025, the ministry has cut down its GDP growth forecast from 4.3 per cent to 3.6 per cent. Defence systems under pressure According to a report by the Washington Post, Israel is also facing a shortage of missile interceptors, the weapons used to shoot down enemy missiles. Experts say that if the U.S. doesn't step in to help soon, Israel may only have enough supply to keep its defense system running for another 10 to 12 days. That's a worrying situation for a country that is heavily relying on technology and air defense to protect its citizens and infrastructure. The ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran is now affecting global markets, especially the price of crude oil. As tensions between the two nations rose after June 13, oil prices saw a sharp increase. According to rating agency ICRA, crude oil prices jumped from USD 64–USD 65 per barrel to around USD 74–USD 75 per barrel. What it means for India India imports most of its oil from abroad. So, even a small rise in prices can lead to big expenses for the country. If the average crude oil price increases by just USD 10 per barrel, India's oil import bill could go up by around USD 13–14 billion. That's a massive burden on the economy. This could also increase India's Current Account Deficit (CAD) -the gap between what we spend and earn from foreign trade – by 0.3 per cent of GDP.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Disturbing departure from moral and diplomatic traditions': Sonia Gandhi slams governments' silence on Gaza and Iran conflict; calls it ‘surrender of values'
File photo: Congress Parliamentary Party chairperson Sonia Gandhi (Picture credit: PTI) NEW DELHI: Congress Parliamentary Party chairperson Sonia Gandhi on Saturday launched a strong attack on the Modi government over its silence on Israel's ongoing actions in Gaza and its recent strike on Iran, calling it a 'disturbing departure from India's moral and diplomatic traditions'. In an opinion piece published in a newspaper titled 'It is still not too late for India's voice to be heard', Gandhi accused the government of abandoning India's long-standing commitment to a peaceful two-state solution, and of failing to speak out against 'unlawful escalation' by Israel. 'New Delhi's silence on the devastation in Gaza and now on the unprovoked escalation against Iran reflects not just a loss of voice but also a surrender of values,' she wrote. Referring to the Israeli airstrike on June 13, which targeted Iranian territory, Gandhi said the 'deeply troubling' move represented 'dangerous consequences of unilateral militarism.' She added that such actions had 'grave regional and global consequences' and had been carried out 'with utter disregard for civilian lives and regional stability.' Gandhi also criticised the role of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, saying he had a record of 'undermining peace and nurturing extremism,' and added that it was unsurprising he would 'choose escalation over engagement.' While she reiterated the Congress party 's condemnation of Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, she stressed that 'we cannot remain silent in the face of Israel's catastrophic and disproportionate response.' According to her, over 55,000 Palestinians have died, hospitals and entire neighbourhoods have been destroyed, and Gaza 'stands on the brink of famine.' She also took aim at US President Donald Trump's recent statement claiming Iran was 'very close' to acquiring nuclear weapons, dismissing it as 'deeply disappointing'. 'The world expects and needs leadership that is grounded in facts and driven by diplomacy, not force or falsehoods,' she said. Calling Iran a 'long-standing friend' of India, Gandhi highlighted Tehran's past support to New Delhi, especially during the 1994 UN Human Rights Commission session on Kashmir. 'Indeed, the Islamic Republic of Iran has been much more cooperative with India than its predecessor, the Imperial State of Iran,' she wrote. She urged the Modi government to use India's unique diplomatic leverage, given its ties with both Israel and Palestine, to act as a bridge for de-escalation in West Asia. 'It is still not too late. India must speak clearly, act responsibly, and use every diplomatic channel available to defuse tensions and promote a return to dialogue,' she concluded. The comments come days after India abstained from voting on a UN General Assembly resolution calling for an unconditional ceasefire in Gaza, despite key allies like the UK, Japan and Australia voting in favour. India had previously supported similar resolutions in December 2023 and 2024 but explained its latest abstention by stressing the need for dialogue, diplomacy, and a negotiated two-state solution.
