
‘My wife wants a fixed mortgage. Should she pay for our overspend if rates drop?'
If you have a conundrum that you want answered in a future column, email moralmoney@telegraph.co.uk. All our letters are genuine, but writers are anonymous.
Dear Sam,
My wife and I are arguing about whether we should get a fixed rate or variable rate – we have a joint mortgage and we can't agree.
Should I be able to insist that I am compensated when I am proved right and we end up overpaying our mortgage because she is too scared to track the Bank of England Bank rate?
I believe (and so does every other expert on the subject) that interest rates will fall over the next two years, but my wife would prefer to lock us into a fixed rate for two years, so we know what to budget for. I strongly believe this will end up costing us hundreds of pounds that we could avoid by tracking the headline interest rate as it falls.
Even if it did rise, we can afford our repayments. If she insists, I feel she should have to compensate me for the over payment of interest – that way her over-cautious nature doesn't rob me and she will have consequences for playing it too safe.
– Anonymous
Dear reader,
You're not the first couple to fall out over money and you certainly won't be the last. It's completely understandable to feel frustrated when you believe logic, data and expert opinion are on your side, but your partner doesn't share your outlook.
Financial decisions, especially big ones such as choosing a mortgage, often tap into deep-seated emotions like risk tolerance, fear of the unknown, a need for control. No economic forecast can completely override those very human instincts.
You clearly feel confident about the future of interest rates and your ability to weather short-term fluctuations. Your wife, on the other hand, prioritises predictability and peace of mind.
Neither position is inherently wrong, just different. What's becoming dangerous is the idea that one of you must 'win', and that the 'loser' should pay a price for their view.
My personal interest in how men and women often think and behave differently around finance leads me to mention the gendered dimension here. This is a typical husband/wife dynamic you are displaying, and taking a moment to acknowledge that and respect the 'why' of your gendered positions may be useful.
In general, women tend to value security and predictability in financial decisions, especially where household stability is concerned. Men, on the other hand, are often more comfortable with calculated risk and can lean toward competitiveness – wanting to be proven right, to optimise every opportunity, or to beat the system.
These traits aren't universal, but they do reflect broad tendencies that might help explain the emotional weight behind each of your positions.
Marriage is not a zero-sum game and framing your disagreement in terms of compensation risks damaging the emotional partnership that sits behind the financial one.
You're not business partners striking a deal. You are life partners navigating uncertainty.
If your wife chose a fixed rate and interest rates did fall, she'd already carry the emotional burden of seeing that her cautious approach came at a financial cost. Adding financial penalties would turn a shared decision into a battleground of blame.
Instead, I encourage you to take a step back and reconsider the purpose of the conversation. Is it about being right, or is it about feeling safe and secure as a couple?
You say you can afford repayments even if rates rise, which suggests your argument isn't about financial survival, but about principle. That's valid, but it's also an invitation to find common ground, not a chance to 'win'.
You could propose a compromise product: some lenders offer 'tracker with a cap' deals, which follow the base rate but protect against extreme rises. Alternatively, you could consider splitting the mortgage into two parts (some lenders allow this) where one part is fixed and the other tracks.
This way you each have a stake in the outcome and no one is left feeling overridden. Even if that's not possible with your lender, the exercise of seeking middle ground may be more valuable than the marginal gain of saving a few hundred pounds.
What's really at play here is fear, not just fear of rising interest rates, but fear of being dismissed or not heard in the relationship.
You're both trying to protect your future just through different means. So rather than seeking compensation, seek understanding.
Ask your wife what she needs to feel secure. Share what you need to feel respected and listened to. And remember, it's often the conversations behind financial choices, not the choices themselves, that shape the long-term health of a relationship.
In the end, if you can come to an agreement that reflects both your risk profile and her desire for certainty, you'll not only save yourselves some money – you'll save yourselves a lot of emotional interest too.
Good luck,
– Sam
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
36 minutes ago
- The Sun
My fiance lost six stone on fat jabs but secret sex side effect forced me to take drastic action in the bedroom
CRAIG Cooper's relentless advances are met with an exhausted sigh from his fiancee Kayla Goodearl as she nestles deeper into the sofa cushions. 'Not tonight, please,' the mum-of-six groans, dodging his eager attempts. 5 5 But social media manager Craig's newfound ' Mounjaro Mojo ' — a turbocharged libido sparked by his astonishing six-stone weight loss — is relentless. The bedroom has become a battleground of desire versus exhaustion, where a temporary sex ban — initiated by stay-at-home mum Kayla, 35 — was the only thing standing between them and chaos. 'It had to be done, it was driving me crazy,' says Kayla, from Rochester, Kent. 'The weight-loss jabs had got him pumped up and he now has a superman libido. 'It was like he was taking daily doses of Viagra, so I had to put him on a sex ban so I could catch up with him. 'His new mojo was initially fun. 'But having to be a full-time mum to six kids, while having a super-active sex life became exhausting.' Before Craig, 42, started taking the Mounjaro jabs, the couple's sex life had dipped dramatically due to having two babies under two. 'Our youngest child is 14 months, and we also have a two-year-old daughter, so we're constantly running around, plus they are co-sleeping with us,' says Kayla, who also has four children of her own. 'They want mine and Craig's attention at all times, so our sex life took a nose dive. Weight Loss Jabs - Pros vs Cons 'We would have high hopes at the beginning of the day, but as the hours passed sex became the last thing on my mind.' When the pair first met back in January 2022, they enjoyed regular sex — but that soon felt like a long distance memory. She says: 'Before our two kids, I would say we had a healthy sex life and did it around once a week, maybe twice. "But having such young kids kept us busy, while also taking up most of our energy. 'Of course at the time, I would wish for it to be better as we would go weeks — sometimes even two months — without doing the deed, and that thought would always be at the back of my mind. 'I didn't want things to fizzle out, but naturally the kids took all my time up.' But when Craig began taking Mounjaro in December last year things quickly changed. The decision to start the jabs came after he reached 20st and, at 5ft 2in, had a BMI of 51.4, making him morbidly obese and at risk of type two diabetes and heart disease. 'I soon realised I needed to be careful of what I wished for,' she says. 'Since he has taken on Mounjaro, Craig's libido has the activation button on at all times. 'I COULDN'T KEEP UP' 'He asks for it morning, noon and night. But I've got six kids. 'Where does he think I find the time? "'At first I didn't think much of it, I thought it was more that he had this new-found confidence. 'It was exhilarating and it really did reignite the spark between us — it was like we were teenagers all over again. 'It could be anywhere in the house. 'In the laundry room, the bathroom or even the kitchen, you name it, he wanted it there. 'Sometimes we have guests over, or the kids are in the house and he wants a quickie. 'Don't get me wrong, I love his new body — and the attraction is certainly there but I couldn't keep up. 'I would never get anything done if I hadn't put the sex ban in place. 'Four months down the line, in March, I had no other option but to ban Craig from the bedroom and make him sleep on the sofa. 'I also felt that soon enough we were going to get caught by one of the kids.' 'Initially he was gobsmacked. 'Then he groaned that I didn't understand. His increased libido combined with his body going completely 'off script' put me off sex even more Kayla Goodearl 'I stood my ground and, he realised: happy wife, happy life. And I needed space.' A new study from Lloyds Pharmacy reveals that over three-quarters of people say their body image affects their sex drive, rising to 82 per cent for women. Interestingly, 30 per cent of respondents discussed how weight loss improved their libido, with an equal amount commenting on their improved confidence and self-esteem, as well as increased energy levels, and improved relationship dynamics. Dr Tom Curtis, Clinical Head of Obesity at weight-loss programme Voy, says that it's not uncommon for patients taking weight-loss medications such as Mounjaro to report an increase in their sex drive. 'It's usually as a result of the weight loss itself rather than a direct effect of the medication,' he explains. 'Significant weight loss can have a powerful effect on confidence, self-image, and energy levels, all of which can reignite desire and intimacy. 'Biologically, there are also benefits. 'In men, weight loss can improve testosterone levels and blood flow. 'In women, it can help rebalance hormones such as oestrogen and insulin, which may improve mood and sexual responsiveness.' More typical side effects include nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhoea, stomach upset, heartburn and even hair loss. 'Craig had a tsunami of side effects, from Mounjaro moodiness, to constipation, farting, diarrhoea and bad breath,' Kayla explains. 'His increased libido combined with his body going completely 'off script' put me off sex even more. 5 Craig says: 'The jab has the same effect on me as taking Viagra - I used it once as a laugh and it was great. 'Imagine wanting sex constantly but everything is preventing it. 'At times I wanted to cry but I just had to laugh. 'I couldn't even get a snog from the missus. 'The jabs got me all pumped up and Kayla had had enough, so I understand it can get tiring for her. 'No one tells you about the secret Viagra-like effect of the jabs. 'I was hot to trot but Kayla was not.' A new study published in Andrologia, a research journal focusing on male infertility and sexual disorders, has confirmed that weight loss, particularly in obese or overweight individuals using weight-loss jabs, leads to improved erectile function. This is attributed to better cardiovascular health, reduced inflammation, and increased testosterone levels. This finding comes despite some men reporting erectile dysfunction while using these jabs. Craig pays £160 a month for his private prescription, and noticed changes in his weight in the first week, he lost five inches around his belly. Now, six months in, he has lost more than a third of his body weight and tips the scales at 14st 8lb. As well as a change to their sex life, Kayla has also noticed the family's food bill halved to £100 a week and Craig seems more focused. She says: 'That is also another plus from the jabs. 'I used to send Craig to the shops for milk, eggs and nappies and he'd come back with chocolate, crisps and unhealthy snacks and forget the milk and nappies. 'Now his memory is amazing, and he only eats salads and healthy lean meats.' He says: 'I feel amazing having lost more than a third of my body weight. 'I have more energy, I am no longer vague, and feel sexier than I ever have.' Craig isn't sure how long his 'Mounjaro Mojo' side effect will last for, but the pair are now learning to live with it — and last month, the sex ban was lifted. Kayla felt energised enough to get back into the bedroom, and the bonking had begun again — up to six times a week. She says: 'I have gone from zero to a hero between the sheets.' 'I did miss sleeping with him,' Kayla says. 'I fancy my new-look Craig more than ever. 'It's tiring, but it's been a huge reboot to our sex life and who would want to let that go? 'If I am in the mood, five to six times a week is great. 'But half a dozen kids at home means we have to plan when to have sex. 'So, when the school run is over and the little ones are napping, we enjoy a quickie.' Craig adds: 'The best thing is I have my mojo back. 'Our sex life is better than ever. 'From no sex to sex six times a week. 'It's so great I may need a lie down.'


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Reform unveils plan to top up poorest workers from £250,000 fee on rich UK newcomers
Reform UK are to offer wealthy foreigners and returning British expats a bespoke tax regime in exchange for a one-off payment of £250,000 with all funds collected redistributed, the party claims, to Britain's lowest-paid workers. The proposal, dubbed the Britannia Card, is due to be unveiled by party leader Nigel Farage later this week. It promises a 10-year residence permit and a return to the controversial 'remittance basis' of taxation, allowing cardholders to shield overseas income from UK tax and avoid inheritance tax entirely. In return, high-net-worth applicants would pay an upfront 'entry contribution' of £250,000, which Reform UK said will be distributed in full to the bottom 10% of UK earners. Reform estimates this 'Britannia workers' dividend' could provide a tax-free annual payout of £600-£1,000 to roughly 2.5 million low-paid full-time workers, depending on uptake. The money would be delivered directly by HMRC at the end of each tax year. Under the plan, foreign nationals and wealthy British returnees would gain access to the UK through a tax-light regime that exempts all overseas income and assets from UK taxation for a decade. Inheritance tax is also scrapped entirely. In effect, Reform is proposing to sell exemption from the UK tax system – reinstating the abolished non-dom privileges in a simplified form but with a cash price attached. The party insists the fee is not a 'golden visa' but a way of ensuring wealthy newcomers 'immediately contribute to British society'. Unlike Labour's 2024 abolition of non-dom status, the main change the former Tory chancellor Jeremy Hunt pointed to in his last budget, which placed all new arrivals onto a residence-based tax system, Reform's approach would reintroduce tax advantages for the globally mobile – while simultaneously claiming to deliver for the British working class. Critics are likely to seize on what amounts to a structural loophole: the ability for millionaires to buy their way out of full UK tax liability, while ordinary residents remain subject to standard tax rules. Reform claims the policy will channel billions directly into the bank accounts of Britain's poorest workers. Under its lowest-uptake scenario (6,000 Britannia Cards issued a year), the scheme would generate £1.5bn – enough to fund a £600 tax-free bonus to 2.5 million workers. A high-uptake scenario (10,000 cards) would raise £2.5bn, delivering £1,000 per worker. Only full-time workers in the bottom 10% of the income distribution would qualify, with payments issued automatically via HMRC. Reform said the boost would disproportionately benefit workers in Wales, Scotland and the north-east of England – regions where a greater share of jobs sit in the bottom pay decile. The party has yet to publish a clear threshold for who qualifies as a 'high-net-worth newcomer' nor how the policy would be enforced or integrated into HMRC's current tax framework. No legislative draft has been released. Since sweeping to power in more than 670 council seats in May and taking control of 10 councils and two mayoralties, Reform has emerged as a serious national contender. The party now leads in multiple polls: a recent Sky/YouGov tracker shows Reform on 34%, with Labour trailing at 25% and the Conservatives at just 15%. The move is part of Farage's latest attempt to position Reform as the party of working people, not through traditional wage policies or trade unionism, but via direct wealth transfers and blunt fiscal symbolism. The Britannia Card is his clearest move yet to dominate the 'red wall' on economic terms. However the policy is likely to raise questions over who would be eligible with no confirmed income or asset threshold for applicants. It is also unclear whether HMRC could legally define and enforce the £250,000 fee. There are also concerns over it creating a two-tier tax system with British workers still paying full tax on global income while wealthy newcomers will not, and that it consists of a one-off fee and is not a recurring tax yet grants up to 10 years of preferential status. A Reform spokesperson said: 'We are serious about repairing the social contract. It's time workers feel the benefit of high-net-worth individuals entering the country. 'We are taking policy formulation very serious internally, as can be seen by today's announcement.' Responding to the trail of Reform's non-dom policy, a Labour spokesperson said: 'Nigel Farage can brand this whatever he wants - the reality is his first proper policy is a golden ticket for foreign billionaires to avoid the tax they owe in this country. 'As ever with Reform, the devil is in the detail. This giveaway would reduce revenues raised from the rich that would have to be made up elsewhere - through tax hikes on working families or through Farage's promise to charge them to use the NHS.'


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Farage: ‘I will charge non-doms £250k and give it to the poor'
Nigel Farage will vow to reinstate non-dom status for wealthy entrepreneurs if they pay a £250,000 fee which will be handed to Britain's poorest workers. On Monday, the Reform UK leader will use a press conference to unveil plans to impose a Robin Hood-style levy on new or returning 'high net worth' individuals. The revenue generated would then be redistributed to pay cash bonuses of £600 a year to low-paid workers. Writing for The Telegraph, Mr Farage said the policy would encourage the return of wealthy and talented entrepreneurs to the UK while also providing benefits to British workers. The policy will be seen as a further attempt to win over Labour voters after Reform's commitment last month to restore the winter fuel payment to all pensioners and scrap the two-child benefit cap. It also creates a clear dividing line with the Tories and Labour on wealth generation after both parties ordered crackdowns on non-doms. 'Success must be celebrated' The announcement comes a day after a poll showed that Reform was on course to win an outright majority at the next general election. Mr Farage said: 'Our policy is simple – Britain must be a place where success is celebrated, not punished with excessive taxes, crippling energy costs, or punitive inheritance levies. 'We will actively encourage the return of wealth and talent to the United Kingdom, on the clear condition that those who come here deliver immediate, visible benefits to our workers.' Rachel Reeves scrapped non-dom status in April, ending wealthy individuals' right to avoid full UK tax on their overseas earnings. The Chancellor also made worldwide assets of all UK residents subject to inheritance tax at 40 per cent. The moves have been blamed for driving some of Britain's richest people abroad. Those affected by the scrapping of the status include people such as the South African national Richard Gnodde, Goldman Sachs's best-paid banker outside the US, Nassef Sawiris, the Aston Villa FC co-owner, and the steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal. Mr Farage wrote: 'Over the last 10 years, UK policy toward non-domiciled taxpayers has lurched from piecemeal tightening under successive Conservative chancellors to outright abolition under the current Labour Government. 'The result? A record-breaking and alarming exodus of high-spending, high-tax-paying residents, leaving an estimated £7 billion yearly hole in public finances and inflicting huge collateral damage on London's position as Europe's financial centre.' Mr Farage claimed Reform's approach would be 'different, transparent, and designed to directly benefit the hard-working backbone of this nation'. 'Every high net worth newcomer [or returning leaver] will pay a £250,000 one-off entry contribution in return for a stable, indefinite remittance-style regime on offshore income and a 20-year inheritance-tax shield,' he added. The new non-doms would have to renew their status with a £250,000 payment every subsequent decade, which would renew their 20-year inheritance tax exemption. They would have to pay UK taxes on their UK earnings including income tax, NI, VAT and stamp duty. Anyone who had remained in the UK and wanted to renew their non-dom status would also be eligible under the plans, to be set out in a 12-page document on Monday. 'Crucially, 100 per cent of this contribution is hypothecated to Britain's lowest-paid full-time workers, delivered automatically by HMRC as a tax-free cash dividend,' said Mr Farage. 'This means roughly 2.5 million hard-working Britons – the grafters who keep this country running – will receive an annual cash bonus, sent directly to their bank accounts at the end of the financial year. 'Thanks to this policy, in a low-uptake scenario with 6,000 cards issued annually, we'll generate a £1.5 billion fund, resulting in a tax-free annual dividend of £600 per worker. In a high-uptake scenario with 10,000 cards, this could deliver a £2.5-billion fund, providing £1,000 per worker. 'This isn't just a number. It's money in the pockets of those who need it most, from cleaners to nurses to small business owners.' By Nigel Farage It should come as no surprise that, over the past few decades, many of the UK's most successful and influential business minds have left the country in droves – a clear and troubling sign of national decline. Over the past 10 years, UK policy toward non-domiciled taxpayers ('non-doms') has lurched from piecemeal tightening under successive Conservative chancellors to outright abolition under the current Labour Government. The result? A record-breaking and alarming exodus of high-spending, high-tax-paying residents, leaving an estimated £7 billion yearly hole in public finances and inflicting huge collateral damage on London's position as Europe's financial centre. The social contract between the rich and the poor is at an all-time low. Public trust in the tax system has been eroded by perceptions that elites play by a different set of rules. In the past, your average Briton saw little to no benefit from the wealthy in their midst. If anything, it created greater division and hostility. Reform UK is determined to change this. We are the party of working people – the party of those with alarm clocks who get up in the morning and work hard, whether they're at the higher end of the financial scale or the lower end. Our approach is different, transparent, and designed to directly benefit the hard-working backbone of this nation. Unlike the opaque financial mechanisms of the past, where wealth seemed to vanish into hidden pots of money that ordinary people could not see, Reform UK is committed to doing things differently. We will rebuild the social contract by ensuring that every wealthy individual who wishes to move here makes a tangible contribution to Britain's lowest earners. Our policy is simple: Britain must be a place where success is celebrated, not punished with excessive taxes, crippling energy costs, or punitive inheritance levies. We will actively encourage the return of wealth and talent to the United Kingdom – on the clear condition that those who come here deliver immediate, visible benefits to our workers. Here's how it works: every high-net-worth newcomer (or returning leaver) will pay a £250,000 one-off entry contribution in return for a stable, indefinite remittance-style regime on offshore income and a 20-year inheritance-tax shield. Crucially, 100 per cent of this contribution is hypothecated to Britain's lowest-paid full-time workers, delivered automatically by HMRC as a tax-free cash dividend. This means roughly 2.5 million hard-working Britons – the grafters who keep this country running – will receive an annual cash bonus, sent directly to their bank accounts at the end of the financial year. Thanks to this policy, in a low-uptake scenario with 6,000 cards issued annually, we'll generate a £1.5 billion fund, resulting in a tax-free annual dividend of £600 per worker. In a high-uptake scenario with 10,000 cards, this could deliver a £2.5 billion fund, providing £1,000 per worker. This isn't just a number. It's money in the pockets of those who need it most, from cleaners to nurses to small-business owners. Our policy is not a 'golden visa' or a backdoor to citizenship. It is a one-time flat tax paid by newcomers in exchange for the certainty of a favourable tax status. Individuals will still be liable for all standard UK taxes on UK-sourced income, property, and spending. But they won't be taxed on offshore income and gains for the duration of their agreed status. Pay your quarter million pounds upfront, and enjoy UK residency without worldwide taxation hassles. After all, this is still the best country in the world, and many of the world's wealthy want to move here but are deterred by the economic downsides. Unlike the old, indefinite non-dom arrangement under the Tories, which lacked transparency and failed to benefit ordinary people, our solution is immediate, visible, and mutually beneficial for both newcomers and the hard-working British worker struggling to make ends meet. Unlike Labour's punitive approach, which drives wealth away, we incentivise the rich to return to Britain. Over the past decade, the number of non-dom taxpayers has plummeted from over 120,000 to fewer than 80,000. The failed approaches of both Labour and the Conservatives have cost this country billions annually. Reform UK's plan will reverse this trend, capturing revenue from global wealth, channelling funds to support the working class, and restoring London as a global powerhouse for business, finance, and investment. The driving ambition of Reform UK is to put the lives of everyday British citizens first – and this policy does exactly that. We are the party of working people, and we are building a Britain where wealth and opportunity are shared, not hoarded. By ensuring that every pound contributed by the wealthy goes directly to those who get up early and work hard, we are creating a fairer, stronger, and more prosperous nation for all.