RBI to harmonise loan income recognition rules and review lending practices
Reserve Bank of India will harmonize loan regulations. This will bring uniformity across lenders. RBI plans a review of non-fund based facilities. Liquidity stress testing will be enhanced. New guidelines will cover climate-related financial risks. A data repository for climate risk information will be launched. Draft guidelines on Expected Credit Loss are expected soon.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) announced on Thursday that it is working to harmonize regulations on how banks recognize income and set aside provisions for loans. The central bank is also planning a review of non-fund based contingent facilities provided by lenders.The RBI noted that interest rate regulations vary across lenders and is conducting a comprehensive review of these instructions to bring uniformity.To strengthen banking resilience, the regulator is enhancing liquidity stress testing by developing a cash flow analysis framework . This will help assess the impact of extreme but plausible scenarios on banks' liquidity positions, ensuring they can meet obligations even during crises. The new approach aims to offer a forward-looking perspective on banks' liquidity stability under adverse conditions.Highlighting the growing focus on climate risks, the RBI said it will issue prudential guidelines for banks, covering climate-related financial risk disclosures, climate scenario analysis, and stress testing. The guidelines will also include principles for effective management and supervision of climate risks, a review of green deposit frameworks, and rules for sustainability-linked loans The RBI will soon launch the Reserve Bank Climate Risk Information System (RB-CRIS), a dedicated data repository for climate risk information.Additionally, draft guidelines on the Expected Credit Loss (ECL) framework are expected shortly. The regulator also plans to strengthen supervisory frameworks for payment banks and small finance banks and move forward with implementing the final phase of Basel III norms.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Developments since June 6 decision show why we need to be cautious: MPC's Nagesh Kumar
The Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) decision earlier this month to tighten its stance to 'netrual' from 'accommodative' even as it cut the policy repo rate by a larger-than-expected 50 basis points (bps) to 5.50 per cent caught markets off-guard. However, according to Nagesh Kumar, one of the three external members on the central bank's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC), developments since the June 6 rate cut show why policymakers need to be cautious. 'Although the inflation numbers up to May are looking very good, with oil prices shooting up due to the Israel-Iran conflict, you never know what is in store. So, a neutral stance allows you freedom to adjust your actions. Since the MPC's decision on June 6, a lot has changed. We live in a very dynamic world, and that is why we need to be cautious,' Kumar said. Global crude oil prices rose to around $75 per barrel after Israel attacked Iran on June 13. Investors are now anticipating another sharp increase in oil prices after the US said on June 21 it had bombed three Iranian nuclear facilities. Speculation is rife if Iran – which has called the US attack outrageous and said it reserves all options to defend its sovereignty – will look to retaliate by blocking the Strait of Hormuz, a key waterway which handles almost a quarter of the global oil trade. In an interview with Siddharth Upasani, Kumar – Director and Chief Executive of New Delhi-based think-tank Institute for Studies in Industrial Development – also discussed how a consensus was finally achieved on his calls for a 50 bps rate cut and why growth numbers are not showing a broad-based revival, among other subjects. Edited excerpts: In the last meeting (in April) itself I had started making a case for a 50 bps cut. But at that time, trends were not very clear. There was uncertainty about the inflation number – it had begun to come down, but the drop was not significant enough. However, in June, we had numbers before us like 3.2 per cent in April. It has gone down even further in May. Looking ahead, the outlook seemed to be quite comfortable and benign because of the expectation of a better-than-normal monsoon, the declining prices of crude oil, and the softening of the US dollar. It was in that context and keeping in mind the continued concern about tariff-related uncertainties –the external economic environment had become very uncertain and volatile, with International Monetary Funds and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development downgrading the outlook very significantly, and World Trade Organization (WTO) projecting -1.5 per cent growth in world trade – and the need to support growth and the continued concerns about urban consumption and private investment not picking up that we cut the repo rate by 50 bps. In my view – and I articulated this in the April meeting – compared to two cuts of 25 bps each, one larger cut of 50 bps would be more effective. My reason was very common-sensical: if it is a quarter percentage point reduction, the banker might absorb a part of it as it is such a small change. But if it is 50 bps, the banker will have to pass it on with lower lending and deposit rates. We have seen the transmission of the 25 bps cuts being a bit slow. Of course, there will be a lag. But the stickiness of the deposit and lending rates was there. But 50 bps would be large enough to push the banks to take it into account. And if we feel confident that we will need another cut of 25 bps two months down the line, why not frontload it? That's why I made a case for a 50 bps cut. And this time, compared to April, the reason and policy space were much more solid. Seeing that, the consensus between us was easier to achieve. Well, at that time, inflation was high. And inflation targeting requires action when inflation is high. Even till October 2024, when the MPC was reconstituted, inflation was quite high around 6 per cent. The RBI's action also needs to be seen in the context of growth. We ended 2023-24 with a very robust 9.2 per cent growth. Growth was much less of a worry at that time. Yes, 7.4 per cent was a pleasant surprise and showed some kind of revival. However, it was not a broad-based revival; it was driven by rural consumption and government capex towards the end of the financial year. Because it was not broad-based and the external environment is becoming more challenging and uncertain – Liberation Day was in April – this is the time when you need to build policy actions which will protect the growth sentiment and build momentum. The change in the stance to neutral caught everyone off-guard, with the MPC saying there is very limited space to support growth going forward. Should we rule out rate cuts now? The way inflation outlook is shaping will determine the future course of action. The RBI Governor, in a recent interview, has clarified that. It depends upon what kind of inflation you have because you need to have a certain real rate of interest. If that becomes negative, then savings will not be incentivised. Assuming that 1.5 per cent is the real rate of interest you want to preserve, then the floor (for repo rate) with inflation rate would be 5.5 per cent. However, if inflation goes to 3 per cent, then you have additional room to manoeuvre. Therefore, it really depends on the dynamics of the inflation and growth numbers. I wouldn't say that. Strictly speaking, the stance is not within the purview of the MPC. But we, of course, make some observations. I think it was purely the fact that with the 50 bps rate cut, the room (to cut further) going forward is limited. In view of that, it was a step to manage expectations. The uncertainty surrounding us is another factor to keep the stance neutral, which gives you more freedom to go either way. Although the inflation numbers up to May are looking very good, with oil prices shooting up due to the Israel-Iran conflict, you never know what is in store. So, a neutral stance allows you freedom to adjust your actions. Since the MPC's decision on June 6, a lot has changed. We live in a very dynamic world, and that is why we need to be cautious. When circumstances are uncertain and you want to promote growth, you try to reduce the cost of capital to make it easier for the entrepreneur who is sitting on the fence on whether to invest or not. That is what it does at the margin. Ultimately, investment decisions are a very complex process. But the cost of capital is one of the factors which is weighed by the entrepreneur, and policymakers try to assist the process. By lowering the cost of capital and trying to push demand, you are creating more favourable conditions for an investment decision than before. As I said, making an investment decision is a very complex process and cost of capital is only one of the factors. You can only exercise the levers which are within your control. You can't really do much about global uncertainty. What Mr Trump does on a day-to-day basis is something you have no control over. But holding other things constant, these (such as lowering the cost of capital) are some of the things which we can do something about. The other could be a fiscal stimulus which may be helpful to revive demand. The government has budgeted for a very substantial capex. So, frontloading the capex to keep the momentum up while things settle down in the international market could be another thing that could be done. Well, they are reacting to the changed times. We are now in a situation where the multilateral framework for trade has been completely put aside. MFN (Most Favoured Nation) – which has been the bedrock of multilateralism – has also been thrown out the window because Mr. Trump has X rate for China, Y rate for India, Z rate for Europe. The dispute settlement mechanism of WTO has been abandoned for some time because the Appellate Body was not renewed. In normal times, you don't have that urgency and you negotiate in a very relaxed manner. But when you need to, you find ways to expedite the process. That is what is happening. There is a realisation that we need to seize the moment and close these deals quickly before the damage is done, to protect and preserve our economic interests in the best possible manner. Sooner we do that, the better it is. Then the uncertainty that is prevailing is cleared. Yes, some of these are the early harvest type of arrangements, and they will continue to be negotiated. But normally in trade negotiations, you know what you can do for a large part of the agenda and only a small part, maybe 10-20 per cent, holds up progress. So, the best way forward is to move ahead with the part of the agenda on which you have no issues and find ways to address the red lines. Siddharth Upasani is a Deputy Associate Editor with The Indian Express. He reports primarily on data and the economy, looking for trends and changes in the former which paint a picture of the latter. Before The Indian Express, he worked at Moneycontrol and financial newswire Informist (previously called Cogencis). Outside of work, sports, fantasy football, and graphic novels keep him busy. ... Read More
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Sensex, Nifty outlook for June 23–27: Bullish breakout ahead?
The Indian stock market wrapped up a bullish week (June 16–20), with the Sensex closing at 82,408.17 and the Nifty 50 ending at 25,112.40 — both comfortably above key pivot levels. The rally was powered by strong FII inflows, easing RBI provisioning norms for infrastructure loans, declining bond yields, and a dip in volatility and gold prices. Market sentiment got a further boost as the Reserve Bank of India relaxed its earlier draft rule, now requiring just 1% provisioning for under-construction infra loans versus the proposed 5%. This move notably lifted banking and financial stocks. Additionally, easing tensions in the Middle East added to optimism. While geopolitical concerns remain, the US President's statement to delay military involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict hinted at potential diplomatic engagement. Market Performance Recap: Sensex rose 1.5% this week. Nifty 50 added 1.3%. FIIs invested ₹8,709 crore; DIIs added ₹12,635 crore. Global indices, however, underperformed, with the Dow down 1% and the Nasdaq flat. Key Drivers for Next Week (June 23–27): US Economic Data: Focus on GDP and PCE inflation. Geopolitical Developments: Monitoring Middle East tensions and the US-China 90-day truce deadline. Monsoon Progress in India FII/DII Activity and Crude Oil Prices Monthly Derivatives Expiry Volatility Technical Outlook: Resistance: 25,250. A breakout may lead to 25,600–25,800. Support: 24,850–24,800 zone. Breakdown below 24,600 may trigger further correction. Indicators: Nifty is trading above both 21-day and 55-day EMAs, signaling strong momentum. Investor Strategy: Experts advise a stock-specific approach. Look for strength in banking, auto, realty, and IT sectors. Avoid heavy exposure to FMCG, energy, and mid/small caps until clearer signals emerge. Traders are also urged to be cautious of false breakouts near 25,200, especially ahead of monthly expiry. Monitor both global developments and technical resistance levels closely.
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Centre links part of state capex loans to new reforms in land, and digitization
New Delhi: The Centre has drawn up a new set of reform-linked conditions for states to access a portion of the ₹ 1.5 trillion interest-free capex loan for FY26, two people aware of the matter said, with a focus on digitization, governance, land reforms and urban planning. 'States will now be required to implement targeted reforms in key areas including digital public infrastructure (DPI) for agriculture, improvements in financial management systems, better urban planning, and streamlined land-related processes," said the first person mentioned above, speaking under the condition of anonymity. Of the ₹ 1.5 trillion earmarked for FY26, around 60% will be unconditional or linked to infrastructure spending, while the remaining 40% will be tied to reforms that states and Union Territories must undertake to access the funds, the person mentioned above added. Interest-free loans with a tenure of 50 years have played a vital role in stimulating capital spending by states and catalyzing the economy since the pandemic. As things stand, states account for 20–25% of India's total infrastructure spending, a critical priority for the government. 'This year's reform agenda puts a sharp focus on accelerating digital transformation in agriculture through federated farmer databases, digitized land records, and digital crop surveys,' the second person mentioned above said, requesting anonymity. Meanwhile, the central government has made Aadhaar-based Direct benefit transfer (DBT) integration with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) mandatory across all state-run schemes. "Land and regulatory reforms remain a key thrust as states are expected to enable flexible mixed-use development, digitize land use change approvals, rationalize industrial road width norms, and amend building rules to minimize land loss. These are critical steps to boost manufacturing, agriculture, and ease of doing business," the second person mentioned above said. 'The goal is to ensure that capital investment is not just about creating assets, but about improving the way states govern and deliver,' the person added. Launched in FY21, the Centre's 50-year interest-free capex loan scheme has played a key role in driving state-led capital spending and reviving the post-pandemic economy. For FY26, ₹ 1.5 trillion has been earmarked to accelerate infrastructure development and support state-level projects. Of this, about 60% will be either unconditional or tied to infrastructure spending, while the remaining 40% will be linked to specific reforms. The conditions states had to meet in the past two years to avail of the central loans included reforms in the housing sector, providing incentives for scrapping old government vehicles and ambulances, reforms in urban planning and urban finance, increasing housing stock for police personnel, and setting up libraries with digital infrastructure at panchayat and ward levels for children and young adults. Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman ramped up allocations to ₹ 1.5 trillion each for FY25 and FY26—up from ₹ 1.10 trillion in FY24. However, the FY25 outlay was later revised to ₹ 1.25 trillion due to slower-than-expected spending in the first half of the fiscal, which was largely due to elections. A spokesperson of the Ministry of Finance didn't respond to emailed queries.
