
USNS Harvey Milk renaming: Who was Harvey Milk and why does the US Navy want a new name?
Why Now?
Live Events
Who Was Harvey Milk?
A Ship Named for Equality
Why the Renaming Is Controversial
What Happens Next?
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
In a highly controversial move, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has directed the Navy to rename the USNS Harvey Milk—a decision that comes during Pride Month and is already drawing fierce backlash.According to U.S. officials, Navy Secretary John Phelan has formed a small team tasked with selecting a new name for the John Lewis-class replenishment oiler. While no replacement name has been confirmed, an official announcement is expected on June 13 aboard the historic USS Constitution.A memo from the Secretary of the Navy's office outlines that the renaming is part of a broader effort to 'reestablish the warrior culture' within the military. The directive aligns with the priorities of President Donald Trump, Defense Secretary Hegseth, and Navy Secretary Phelan—signaling a departure from past efforts to honor civil rights leaders through military naming conventions.Critics have pointed to the timing—during Pride Month—as a symbolic rollback of the military's recognition of LGBTQ+ contributions.Harvey Milk was a groundbreaking civil rights leader and the first openly gay elected official in California. Born in 1930 in Woodmere, New York, Milk served in the U.S. Navy during the Korean War. Despite his honorable service, he was discharged due to his sexual orientation, reflecting the era's discriminatory policies.After moving to San Francisco in 1972, Milk became a central figure in the city's LGBTQ+ movement. He was elected to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 1977, becoming one of the first openly gay officials in U.S. history. Milk co-sponsored pioneering legislation banning discrimination based on sexual orientation and led the successful fight against Proposition 6, which aimed to bar gay individuals from teaching in public schools.Milk was tragically assassinated in 1978 alongside Mayor George Moscone. His legacy has since been celebrated nationwide: he received the Presidential Medal of Freedom posthumously in 2009, and California observes May 22 as Harvey Milk Day.In 2016, the U.S. Navy announced it would honor Milk by naming a ship after him—the USNS Harvey Milk (T-AO 206). Part of the John Lewis class of ships named after civil rights icons, the decision aimed to acknowledge Milk's legacy and promote inclusivity within the armed forces. The vessel was christened in 2021 and became the first Navy ship named after an openly gay person.Hegseth's decision to strip the ship of Milk's name has sparked widespread criticism. Political leaders such as House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Governor Gavin Newsom, and Senator Scott Wiener have condemned the move as an erasure of LGBTQ+ history and a regressive step for civil rights.Many view the renaming as emblematic of broader efforts under the Trump administration to roll back LGBTQ+ rights. From banning transgender individuals from serving in the military to reversing protections in healthcare, housing, and education, the administration has faced repeated criticism from advocacy groups for targeting marginalized communities.Labor and LGBTQ+ organizations argue that the Navy's decision sends a chilling message—particularly during a month meant to celebrate inclusion and equality. By removing Milk's name from the ship, critics say the Pentagon is prioritizing ideology over historical recognition and symbolic justice.As of now, the Navy has not released the new name for the vessel. The final decision is expected to be announced in mid-June. Until then, the debate surrounding the renaming of the USNS Harvey Milk continues to reflect the broader cultural and political divide over how the military honors its past—and who it chooses to remember.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Nine perform yoga underwater in Mahanadi
Cuttack: Nine individuals, including two aged 9, performed aquatic yoga in the Mahanadi river in Cuttack on the occasion of on Saturday. The event, organised by the Odisha Yachting Association (OYA), aimed to promote holistic wellness and showcase Odisha's cultural strength on a global stage. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Participants included defence veterans, adventurers and politicians. Among them were Sabir Bux, a scuba diver; Pitavas Sasmal, a former Navy officer, Captain Saroj Kumar Pradhan, Nivedita Acharya, a sailor and Biju Patnaik Bravery Award recipient, Lalatendu Badu, BJP's Cuttack in-charge, and Swadhin Panda, an officer of OYA. Two children, Prasant Behera and Abha, also participated in the event. "The site was surveyed in advance to assess water current, depth and safety. Rescue divers, medical staff and safety boats were stationed nearby. All participants were trained beforehand in basic aquatic yoga postures and water safety protocols," said Sanjay Kar, secretary of OYA. "This is not just a yoga demonstration — it's a message to the world. Performing yoga in flowing river water requires not just physical strength but intense mental focus," said Bux, organiser of the yoga session in the Mahanadi. Abha said, "It's a unique and new experience for me to perform aquatic yoga — and that too in the Mahanadi. I'm delighted."


Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Trump sparks panic as he questions White House workers on immigration status in surprise move
Why did Trump quiz construction workers about their immigration status? "Do we have anybody here who's a member of—no, I don't think so. You've known these people for a long time? Any illegal immigrants?" "If there were, we'll find out. Your whole life will be destroyed because of this press conference." Live Events What did Trump say about his deportation plans? 'We're taking them out by the thousands. Murderers, drug dealers, people that are mentally insane, from insane asylums.' How did social media and the public respond to Trump's remarks? "He said this…to the people…putting up his flagpoles?!?" 'Cruelty is fun for him.' 'He. Is. Insane.' 'He's a cruel, demented man. Some people with dementia become very mean-spirited.' What was Trump's message about the flagpoles? 'It is my Great Honor to announce that I will be putting up two beautiful Flag Poles on both sides of the White House, North and South Lawns. It is a GIFT from me of something which was always missing from this magnificent place.' Tall and tapered Rust-proof Featuring internal ropes Built to last for years Is this part of a larger Trump immigration crackdown? Deport thousands of undocumented immigrants Potentially send detainees to Guantanamo Bay Increase pressure on law enforcement to root out undocumented laborers What's next amid Trump's Israel-Iran decision? FAQs: (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel President Donald Trump sparked intense backlash after making a controversial joke about immigration status while standing alongside construction workers at the White House, who had just completed the installation of two new 88-foot flagpoles. The remarks, made during a press appearance on Wednesday, left many questioning the President's intentions and tone as the world watched for updates on U.S. involvement in the escalating Israel-Iran president used the event to highlight his aggressive crackdown on illegal immigration, but the way he addressed the workers—asking if any were "illegal immigrants"—was widely criticized as "cruel" and "demented" by social media users and political the public address on the White House lawn, Trump turned toward the group of hard-hat-wearing workers who helped install the flagpoles. Gesturing to them, he asked:The workers, standing silently behind Trump, shook their heads. The President followed up with an unsettling warning:He added, in a sarcastic reassurance, 'Don't worry, I think you're gonna be OK,' which only fueled criticism that the remarks were unnecessarily intimidating and insensitive—especially toward individuals simply doing their used the opportunity to reinforce his aggressive immigration policies, stating:These remarks come on the heels of reports suggesting that undocumented immigrants could be detained at Guantanamo Bay, an unprecedented escalation in Trump's second-term immigration agenda. This controversial idea has raised both legal and ethical backlash online was swift and intense. One X (formerly Twitter) user posted:Others echoed the outrage, with comments like:Some users even questioned whether Trump's behavior indicated a decline in cognitive health, while others simply labeled it 'deranged' and 'mean-spirited.' Many called on the workers to walk off the job in Trump had described the 88-foot flagpoles as a personal gift to the White House. On Tuesday, he posted on Truth Social:He emphasized the quality of the poles, describing them as:The flagpoles, standing on both the North and South Lawns, are meant to symbolize American strength and pride—but the tone of the ceremony overshadowed their Trump's joke wasn't made in isolation. It fits into a broader agenda he's aggressively pushing in his second term. With renewed plans to:This all signals a more hardline immigration approach than during his first presidency. The language used, especially phrases like 'from insane asylums,' has also drawn criticism for being stigmatizing and the immigration comments played out, attention was also on Trump's upcoming decision regarding U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. While the administration has not yet officially confirmed the course of action, the timing of Wednesday's flagpole event led many to question if the president was trying to distract from a larger foreign policy decision with a more domestic and symbolic Donald Trump's flagpole event was supposed to highlight patriotism, but it quickly turned into a controversy over immigration, tone, and leadership. His remarks about the construction workers—made during a critical geopolitical moment—have once again placed his rhetoric under the microscope, reigniting debates about dignity, policy, and presidential asked if any were illegal immigrants, sparking joke was seen as cruel and insensitive during a press event.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Congress MP Randhawa slams J&K CM Omar Abdullah over remarks on Indus waters
Congress MP Sukhjinder Singh Randhawa strongly rebuked Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah for his opposition to a proposed 113-km canal to divert surplus water from the Indus river system to Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan, emphasising Punjab's historical and agricultural significance. He recalled the challenges Punjab faced during Operation Sindoor , asserting that there wasn't as much "Pakistattack in J&K as there was in Punjab." Speaking in to ANI, Randhawa said, "One should not make statements that cast doubt on patriotism. Punjabis have never done that. And even during Operation Sindoor, there wasn't as much Pakistani attack in J&K as there was in Punjab. Punjab was turned into a battlefield. The patriotism of Punjab, the strength of Punjab, and the strength of its agriculture -- as long as Punjab remains strong, India remains strong." Randhawa said he was "sad" and "hurt" by the Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister's recent comments. "I don't know in what context Mr. Abdullah made his statement, but I'm sad. Considering the relationships his grandfather, father, and himself have had with Punjabis and with Punjab, and the faith his father and grandfather had in Darbar Sahib (Golden Temple), I am hurt by his statement." Live Events He directly replied to CM Abdullah's remarks: "Punjab should be given water because when India gained Independence, we used to beg to the world for (food) grain." The Congress MP underscored the historic significance of Punjab's irrigation system, recalling the legacy of Maharaja Ranjit Singh. "It is because of this water, and the three dams built there, and if they have even a little knowledge of history, they would know that the best canal system existed during Maharaja Ranjit Singh's time. From Khyber Pass, where the Mughals used to enter and loot India, Maharaja Ranjit Singh blocked that route and stopped the Mughals from entering, turning the country into a capable and independent state. He ruled over Jammu & Kashmir for over 40 years." He stated that Punjab's border regions, including areas right up to the no-man's-land where farming continues today, are not only symbols of the state's resilience but crucial contributors to national food supplies. "That water is Punjab's lifeline," he said. Randhawa's remarks come in response to CM Abdullah's June 20 statement in Jammu, where he rejected the canal, citing Jammu's drought-like conditions and questioning Punjab's past support asking "Did they give us water when we needed it?" Economic Times WhatsApp channel )