Will new US curbs on China's tech tests raise electronic prices for American consumers?
Washington's recent ban on Chinese labs deemed security risks over their testing of consumer electronics bound for the US has observers wondering about law enforcement while saying the ban may leave American consumers with fewer, more expensive choices.
Analysts also say the impact on Chinese makers of phones, PCs and the like could be limited, even though Washington appears to be trying to curtail China, a country the US Federal Communications Commission calls an adversary.
'It is hard to determine where each component is tested, when so many things make up a smartphone,' said Chen Zhiwu, chair professor of finance at the University of Hong Kong.
'Some of them are designed and tested in South Korea, some in Japan, some in the US ... I don't know how you can enforce it.'
With a unanimous 4-0 vote, the FCC
finalised its new rules on May 22. In justifying the move, the government agency said it had found that Chinese labs – those recognised as having tested American-bound devices over the years – retain deep connections with the Communist Party and military.
'These labs provide a gateway into the US telecommunications infrastructure,' FCC chairman Brendan Carr said in a May 22 statement. 'It is not hard to imagine that an unreliable lab – one beholden to a foreign adversary – could sign off on insecure gear entering the US.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
27 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
US attacks on Iran stoke debate over Trump's presidential power: ‘this is not our fight'
US President Donald Trump's bombardment of three sites in Iran quickly sparked debate in Congress over his authority to launch the strikes, with Republicans praising Trump for decisive action even as many Democrats warned he should have sought congressional approval. Advertisement 'Well done, President Trump,' Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina posted on social media. Alabama Senator Katie Britt called the bombings 'strong and surgical'. The Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, Roger Wicker of Mississippi, said Trump 'has made a deliberate – and correct – decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime'. The instant divisions in the US Congress reflected an already swirling debate over the president's ability to conduct such a consequential action without authorisation from the House and Senate on the use of military force. While Trump is hardly the first US president to go it alone, his expansive use of presidential power raised immediate questions about what comes next, and whether he is exceeding the limits of his authority. 'This was a massive gamble by President Trump, and nobody knows yet whether it will pay off,' said Rhode Island Senator Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee. Advertisement Democrats and a few Republicans said the strikes were unconstitutional and demanded more information in a classified setting. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said that he received only a 'perfunctory notification' without any details, according to a spokesperson.
The Standard
an hour ago
- The Standard
Iran's Atomic Energy Organization says it will not allow nuclear development to stop
Iranian flags are displayed on the National Mall near the U.S. Capitol as part of a demonstration organized by activists who support regime change by the people of Iran, in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 20, 2025. (Reuters)
The Standard
2 hours ago
- The Standard
Quotes: World leaders react to US attack on Iran
A television screem displays news after the address to the nation by U.S. President Donald Trump in which he said that a "very successful attack" on three nuclear sites had been carried out in Iran, in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 21, 2025. (Reuters)
