They were meant for each other, but Trump and Musk were always going to blow up like a SpaceX rocket
Elon Musk exploded like a SpaceX rocket. The debris rained down across Washington.
Everyone has been awaiting the breakup of the most public bromance between the most powerful man in the world and the richest man in the world.
What could go wrong? Too much power and too much ego. President Donald Trump has exerted executive authority to rule by command. And no one has seen anything like Musk's wealth. Will Musk become the world's first trillionaire – before any landing on Mars? What he gave to Trump's campaign was obscene, over $US230 million ($353 million) – more than enough to help Trump finance winning a second term.
Trump is cunning as hell. He had his blueprint for what he would do from the moment he was inaugurated president to dominate and control the executive branch of the government: Project 2025. As Carlos Lozada wrote, what is so compelling is 'how far the authors are willing to go in pursuit of that agenda and how reckless their assumptions are about law, power and public service'.
Cabinet secretaries and senior officials were to march into their departments and ensure that all the woke culture values of the radical left extremist Marxist monsters were eradicated. Anything having to do with promoting women and people of colour was suspect. Anything honoured in historical reference – such as Black soldiers and airmen who were heroes in World War II – was to be expunged. Anything trans was to be exterminated. The Department of Education and US foreign aid programs were cancelled. Everyone coming into the country was to be scrutinised, down to their social media history. There would be a slashing of programs and government employees.
Loading
The shocker was bringing in Musk to turbocharge Project 2025. What was unprecedented was the ability of a private citizen to seize control and decapitate the leadership of government agencies, scrub spending and cancel contracts, all while ordering the remaining employees to tell Musk, if they wanted to keep their jobs, what they had done over the past five days.
By bringing in one of the most formidable wielders of digital technology in the universe, Musk and the 'department of government efficiency' had access to the databases of virtually all the government – even the most sensitive servers in the Treasury, the Internal Revenue Service and the Social Security Administration. DOGE was looking for 'waste, fraud and abuse', but they were also able to see the personal e-files of tens of millions of users and recipients in the systems.
Why did it have to end this badly? In his formal farewell to Musk, Trump consistently praised Musk for his dedication to the task, notwithstanding the risk to his businesses from his enforced absences. Musk was 'tirelessly helping lead the most sweeping and consequential government reform program in generations'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
33 minutes ago
- The Age
Master stroke or mistake? Trump defies his base in seizing the moment to strike Iran
Washington: Five months after the starter's gun fired on Donald Trump's second presidency, he has made his most consequential decision. Perhaps not just the most consequential decision of just his presidency, but of several, given the decision to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities had been one faced by many of his predecessors, who ultimately opted against the idea. The merits of this cannot and will not be known today, not until the damage to the three Iranian sites has been assessed and the regime's retaliation, whatever that may be, has taken place. But politically, this move fundamentally changes the shape of the Trump presidency. The accusation of timidity and indecision – Trump Always Chickens Out (TACO) – that has so irritated him in recent months can no longer be credibly levelled against him. Did that irksome critique contribute to his resolve? We don't know. But it is becoming clearer that Trump has followed a predetermined path, or at the very least, seized on an opportunity with relish – and along the way, he has obscured his intentions to America and the world. Loading It was not true on Thursday, when Trump told Iran he would decide within two weeks whether to intervene. It is looking increasingly untrue that Israel, when it kicked off this offensive nine days ago, acted unilaterally and without US involvement, as we were told at the time. 'We worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before,' Trump said on Sunday (AEST) of the US and Israel. Of Iran's state-sponsored terrorism, he said: 'I decided a long time ago that I would not let this happen.'
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Diplomacy can't deliver the quick wins Trump craves. But neither can war
The tumultuous '20s get ever more tumultuous. After the pandemic in 2020, the storming of the US Capitol in 2021, Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Hamas's attacks on Israel in 2023 and the re-election of Donald Trump in 2024, now, at the midpoint of 2025, comes the US entry into the war against Iran. Wearing a crimson 'Make America Great Again' cap in the Situation Room of the White House, the US commander-in-chief oversaw his country's most significant military intervention in more than 20 years. Not since George W. Bush gave the go-ahead in 2003 for US forces to invade Iraq has a president made such a potentially consequential decision. The chaos of what happened after the fall of Saddam Hussein – which the brutal theocracy in Tehran revelled in fomenting – now hangs over America's latest Middle East adventure. But there is also the possibility that Trump could achieve a feat that eluded his predecessors: elimination of Iran's nuclear threat without heavy American loss of life. With so many unknown unknowns, it is too early to say. Already, the crisis has put on display so many hallmarks of Trump's leadership. The utter unpredictability of a president who signalled last week that a window had opened up for diplomacy. His readiness to gamble. His impatience with the slow pace of negotiated solutions – it took the Obama administration and its European Union, Chinese and Russian partners two years to conclude the 2015 Iranian nuclear deal which Trump withdrew from in his first term. There was the ritualistic trashing of European allies, who conducted talks with the Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, in Geneva on Friday. 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us,' he said as those talks came to an inconclusive end, even though the UK foreign secretary David Lammy had flown direct from Washington to Geneva carrying a message from the Trump administration to Iran's leadership. Lengthy diplomacy seems to bore this fabled dealmaker who boasted of ending the Ukraine war in a single day. Loading The crisis has demonstrated Trump's penchant for the dramatisation of world affairs. Always, he is centre stage. Each unfolding day is vested with the suspense of an episodic cliffhanger. Even when blood is about to be shed, a factor in his decision-making seems to be the sheer entertainment value of his actions. The flourishes he used in his speech to the nation following the B2 stealth bomber mission was classic Trump. 'We worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before,' he boasted of his collaboration with the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The 'great American patriots who flew those magnificent machines' had carried out 'an operation the likes of which the world has not seen in many, many decades', he added, using the patois of a carnival barker rather than a statesman. Ahead of the US strikes, we were also reminded of his fixation with winning a Nobel Peace Prize, something his nemesis, Barack Obama, achieved, rather undeservedly, early on in his first term. 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between India and Pakistan,' he moaned on Truth Social, as he cited five conflicts in which his administration had purportedly played a mediating role. In full victim mode, Trump complained he would be overlooked for the prize 'no matter what' he accomplished. Hours after this self-pitying diatribe, he took America to war. Winning is so central to his thinking. Israel, after days of strikes on Tehran and the nuclear sites, clearly had the upper hand. In joining Netanyahu – who stroked Trump's ego afterwards by praising him for 'courageously leading the free world' – he felt he was joining the winning side.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Diplomacy can't deliver the quick wins Trump craves. But neither can war
The tumultuous '20s get ever more tumultuous. After the pandemic in 2020, the storming of the US Capitol in 2021, Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Hamas's attacks on Israel in 2023 and the re-election of Donald Trump in 2024, now, at the midpoint of 2025, comes the US entry into the war against Iran. Wearing a crimson 'Make America Great Again' cap in the Situation Room of the White House, the US commander-in-chief oversaw his country's most significant military intervention in more than 20 years. Not since George W. Bush gave the go-ahead in 2003 for US forces to invade Iraq has a president made such a potentially consequential decision. The chaos of what happened after the fall of Saddam Hussein – which the brutal theocracy in Tehran revelled in fomenting – now hangs over America's latest Middle East adventure. But there is also the possibility that Trump could achieve a feat that eluded his predecessors: elimination of Iran's nuclear threat without heavy American loss of life. With so many unknown unknowns, it is too early to say. Already, the crisis has put on display so many hallmarks of Trump's leadership. The utter unpredictability of a president who signalled last week that a window had opened up for diplomacy. His readiness to gamble. His impatience with the slow pace of negotiated solutions – it took the Obama administration and its European Union, Chinese and Russian partners two years to conclude the 2015 Iranian nuclear deal which Trump withdrew from in his first term. There was the ritualistic trashing of European allies, who conducted talks with the Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, in Geneva on Friday. 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us,' he said as those talks came to an inconclusive end, even though the UK foreign secretary David Lammy had flown direct from Washington to Geneva carrying a message from the Trump administration to Iran's leadership. Lengthy diplomacy seems to bore this fabled dealmaker who boasted of ending the Ukraine war in a single day. Loading The crisis has demonstrated Trump's penchant for the dramatisation of world affairs. Always, he is centre stage. Each unfolding day is vested with the suspense of an episodic cliffhanger. Even when blood is about to be shed, a factor in his decision-making seems to be the sheer entertainment value of his actions. The flourishes he used in his speech to the nation following the B2 stealth bomber mission was classic Trump. 'We worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before,' he boasted of his collaboration with the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The 'great American patriots who flew those magnificent machines' had carried out 'an operation the likes of which the world has not seen in many, many decades', he added, using the patois of a carnival barker rather than a statesman. Ahead of the US strikes, we were also reminded of his fixation with winning a Nobel Peace Prize, something his nemesis, Barack Obama, achieved, rather undeservedly, early on in his first term. 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between India and Pakistan,' he moaned on Truth Social, as he cited five conflicts in which his administration had purportedly played a mediating role. In full victim mode, Trump complained he would be overlooked for the prize 'no matter what' he accomplished. Hours after this self-pitying diatribe, he took America to war. Winning is so central to his thinking. Israel, after days of strikes on Tehran and the nuclear sites, clearly had the upper hand. In joining Netanyahu – who stroked Trump's ego afterwards by praising him for 'courageously leading the free world' – he felt he was joining the winning side.
