VPNs with Chinese military links still available on Google Play and Apple App Store 2 months after being discovered
Back in April, an investigation found several potentially dangerous VPNs listed on the Apple App Store and Google Play Store.
The discovery didn't concern any of the best VPNs – these providers are reputable and safe – but over 20 VPNs were found to have links to the Chinese military and posed a risk to anyone who downloaded them.
The Tech Transparency Project (TPP) was behind the investigation, with the Financial Times also contributing to the report.
Two months later, the TPP has found that many of these dangerous VPN apps remain on app stores – and Apple and Google may even be profiting from these apps that put the data of Americans, and national security, at risk.
The true ownership of these VPNs is deliberately confusing. Layers of offshore shell companies obscure the actual owners and hide their Chinese links.
The company Qihoo 360 was revealed as the owner of at least five apps. Qihoo 360 has previously been declared a "Chinese Military Company" and was sanctioned by the US in 2020.
Turbo VPN, VPN Proxy Master, Thunder VPN, Snap VPN, and Signal Secure VPN were at least five of the VPNs that were connected to Qihoo 360.
Qihoo 360 is not listed as the app's developer, but the TPP's earlier investigation traced app ownership back to the company.
The TPP reported that Thunder VPN and Snap VPN had been removed from the US Apple App Store, but Tom's Guide saw Thunder VPN listed.
In its new update, the TPP reported that Thunder VPN had now been removed, along with Signal Secure VPN.
However, at the time of writing, Tom's Guide found that Thunder VPN was still present on both the UK and US Apple App Store, along with Turbo VPN and VPN Proxy Master.
The TPP reported that 11 other Chinese-linked VPNs also remained on the Apple App Store.
These VPNs were: X-VPN, Ostrich VPN, VPNIFY, VPN Proxy OvpnSpider, WireVPN, Now VPN, Speedy Quark VPN, Best VPN Proxy AppVPN, HulaVPN, Wirevpn, and Pearl VPN.
The TPP reported that Turbo VPN, VPN Proxy Master, Snap VPN, and Signal Secure VPN were all found on the US Google Play Store, as well as seven other Chinese-linked VPNs.
These were: X-VPN, Speedy Quark VPN, vpnify, Ostrich VPN, VPN Proxy OvpnSpider, HulaVPN, and VPN Proxy AppVPN.
Tom's Guide also confirmed that at the time of writing Turbo VPN, Thunder VPN, VPN Proxy Master, Signal Secure VPN were all present on the US Google Play Store. But it also confirmed that Snap VPN was present, contrary to what the TPP found.
Chinese data laws mean the government can demand companies share data with them. The absence of a verified no-logs policy results in copious amounts of user data being collected and stored by these VPNs.
Data can include IP addresses, browsing activity, device identifiers, and location. The sharing of this data with the Chinese government can pose a serious risk to Americans and, in the worst case, a US national security risk.
Currently there is no evidence to suggest a serious threat, but how much American data has been accessed is unknown. The fact collection can take place, and potentially be exploited, is a cause for concern.
It isn't just Chinese-owned VPNs that are a threat. There are numerous dangerous and fake VPNs out there – owned and operated by countries all over the world.
US-based big tech giants, such as Apple and Google, have equally poor privacy credentials. They collect data from millions of Americans and are more than happy to pass it on to governments.
All the VPNs discussed are free to download, but many offer in-app purchases and provide the option to upgrade to premium plans.
Subscriptions can be taken out by the user and this means Apple and Google could be taking a cut of any in-app purchases made.
Apple states that it takes a 30% cut of in-app purchases (15% for those enrolled in its small business program). Google charges 15% for sales up to $1 million and 30% for anything above that.
Apple's App Review Guidelines say "apps offering VPN services may not sell, use, or disclose to third parties any data for any purpose, and must commit to this in their privacy policy."
Google Play also has a VPN app policy which states a VPN service cannot be used to "collect personal and sensitive user data without prominent disclosure and consent."
Tom's Guide approached both Apple and Google for comment.
A Google spokesperson said: "Google is committed to compliance with applicable sanctions and trade compliance laws."
"When we locate accounts that may violate these laws, our related policies or Terms of Service, we take appropriate action."
"Google Play is committed to protecting user privacy and providing a safe and secure environment for our users."
"Apps that are deceptive, malicious, or intended to abuse or misuse any network, device, or personal data are strictly prohibited."
Apple told us it doesn't limit an app's ownership and it has strict guidelines for VPN app developers. It said VPN apps must clearly state what user data is collected, if any, and how it will be used.
No data must be disclosed to third parties, and developers must commit to this in their privacy policies.
Apple said that it is in full compliance with regulations and the law. If it finds a developer breaking any rules, action will be taken against them.
Two months after first highlighting the dangers of these apps, we can continue to advise you to stay away from them. Despite being popular, these VPNs should not be downloaded or used.
Every VPN we recommend on Tom's Guide is reputable, safe, and won't put your data at risk. We look for, and analyze, no-logs policies to ensure they don't collect, store, and share your data.
Verified no-logs policies are a must-have for the leading and most secure VPNs, and Windscribe's recent court case showed just how important they are.
You shouldn't always trust the number of app store downloads or reviews a VPN app has and our range of guides can help you make an informed VPN decision.
Not all free VPNs are dangerous. The best free VPNs will protect your data with the same level of encryption as their paid counterparts and are covered by the same no-logs policies.
We'd also recommend a paid VPN over a free one. But if a free VPN is all you can manage, the providers we recommend will protect you and your online activity.
We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
14 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
ROSEN, LEADING INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Reddit, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action
NEW YORK, June 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Reddit, Inc. (NYSE: RDDT) between October 29, 2024 and May 20, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 18, 2025. SO WHAT: If you purchased Reddit securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Reddit class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 18, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) changes in Google Search's algorithm and features like AI Overview were causing users to stop their query on Google search; (2) these algorithm changes were materially different than prior instances of reduced traffic to the Reddit website; (3) defendants were aware that the increase in the query term 'Reddit' on search engines was because users were getting the sought after answer from Google Search without having to go to Reddit, and not because they intended to visit Reddit; (4) this zero-click search reality was dramatically reducing traffic to Reddit in a manner Reddit was unable to overcome in the short term; and (5) defendants, therefore, lacked a reasonable basis for its outlook on user rates and advertising revenues. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the Reddit class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ——————————- Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected]
Miami Herald
7 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Tesla signs deal for $556 million grid-scale battery storage station in China
Tesla Friday signed a $556.8 million agreement to build a grid-scale battery storage station in China. The deal is with China Kangfu International Leasing Co., as well as the Shanghai local government. It's the first Tesla large-scale battery storage facility in China. In a statement on Chinese social media site Weibo, Tesla said, 'Tesla's first grid-side energy storage power station project in mainland China has been officially grid-side energy storage power station is a 'smart regulator' for urban electricity, which can flexibly adjust grid resources.' Tesla said that, when complete, this project is expected to become the largest grid-side energy storage project in China. Utility-scale battery energy storage assists energy grid management by keeping supply and demand in balance. More is being built worldwide. Tesla competed against two Chinese companies that offer similar products. CATL and automaker BYD have significant global market share in these battery storage products. China plans to add nearly 5 gigawatts of electricity supply powered by batteries by the end of 2025, which would bring the total capacity to 40 gigawatts. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
CNBC
10 hours ago
- CNBC
China's property sector has been in an extended slump. Shrinking population is making it worse
China's real estate sector has grappled with a deepening downturn for years. Now a shrinking population is casting another shadow over the stagnant property market. Goldman Sachs estimates that demand for new homes in Chinese urban cities will remain suppressed at under 5 million units per year in the coming years — one fourth of the peak of 20 million units in 2017. "Falling population and slowing urbanization suggest decreasing demographic demand for housing" in the coming years, Goldman Sachs economists said in a note Monday. The country's population is estimated to fall to below 1.39 billion by 2035 from 1.41 billion, according to World Bank's latest data, said Tianchen Xu, senior economist at Economist Intelligence Unit, citing a combination of fewer newborns and more deaths from an ageing population. Shrinking population will cripple home demand by 0.5 million units every year in the 2020s and a lead to a bigger dent of 1.4 million units annually in the 2030s, Goldman Sachs estimates, compared to the positive contribution of 1.5 million units in the 2010s when population was on a steady rise. Fertility rate in the country has continued to fall even after Beijing relaxed its one-child policy in 2016, and despite Beijing's efforts to incentivize child-bearing via cash incentives. Stagnant incomes, instability over job prospects and a poor social security system have dissuaded Chinese young people from having more babies. Beijing's pronatalist policies will likely have "limited effect" as they do not address the deep-rooted issues, Xu said, such as high economic costs for child-bearing and people's tendency to postpone marriage for career progression and "an embrace of individuality." Underscoring the declining birth rates, nearly 36,000 kindergartens across the country closed down over the past two years, with the number of students in preschools falling by over 10 million. That's according to CNBC's calculation of the official data released the Ministry of Education. Similarly, the number of elementary schools dropped by nearly 13,000 between 2022 and 2024. That is rippling through school-adjacent housing markets that once saw inflated prices on the back of strong demand for better public schools. The once-sizable premium was fueled by access to elite schools and expectations of rising property values. But with a shrinking population and local governments scaling back district-based enrollment policies, the added value of these homes has started diminishing, according to William Wu, China property analyst at Daiwa Capital Markets. A mother of a 7-year-old boy in Beijing told CNBC that the price of her apartment had fallen by about 20% from over two years ago when she bought it. It cost her roughly twice the average price for an apartment in the city, so that her son could attend a good elementary school. The number of children entering primary school in 2023 reached the highest level in over two decades, according to Wind Information, before dropping in 2024, the year her son enrolled. That demographic shift is an additional overhang to the property market, which has struggled to emerge from a painful downturn since late 2020. Despite a raft of central and local government measures since last September, the real estate slump has shown little sign of abating. New home prices fell at their fastest pace in seven months in May, according to Larry Hu, chief China economist at Macquarie, extending a two-year stagnation, despite the government efforts aimed at arresting the decline. New home sales in 30 major cities fell by 11% year on year in the first half of this month, worsening from the 3% drop in May, Hu said. "Holders of investment properties are likely to be net sellers (to owner-occupiers) for the foreseeable future," over expectations that home prices will continue to fall, Goldman Sachs estimates. While Goldman expects the rise in China's urbanization rate to temper in the coming years, hurting urban housing demand, Wu said demographic drag on the property market was not yet "imminent" and may take decades to play out. In the nearer term, "some of this decline will be offset by continued urbanization, and housing upgrade demand," Wu said, as the latter would account for an increasing share of China's total housing demand.
