Summer holiday strike chaos threat as unions warn airport staff could walk out over pay
Holidaymakers face weeks of travel misery at Scotland's two biggest airports this summer as staff look set to walk out in a dispute over pay.
Around 600 ground crew workers at Edinburgh and Glasgow international terminals could bring operations to near standstill after 'emphatically' rejecting two separate pay offers.
Now union leaders are warning that strike action is 'looming' unless their employer Menzies Aviation puts an improved deal on the table.
Unite the Union, which represents the workers, branded the basic pay offer of around 4 per cent at Edinburgh and 4.25 per cent at Glasgow as 'unacceptable' after the company announced a 'record-breaking performance' last year.
And it said if improved offers are not made it will have 'no option' but to ballot members on industrial action during the peak season.
This could lead to delays and cancellations affecting major airlines including British Airways, Loganair, Emirates, Lufthansa and AIR Transat, all of which are supported by Menzies ground handling and passenger services workers.
Menzies staff are also used by Aer Lingus, American Airlines and United Airlines, with strike action likely to spell misery for tens of thousands of holidaymakers hoping to jet off to popular destinations such as Spain and the US.
Unite industrial officer Carrie Binnie said: 'Summer strike action looms over Edinburgh and Glasgow airports because the pay offers on the table from Menzies Aviation aren't good enough.
'Menzies Aviation has the ability to improve its offers and they can easily resolve this pay dispute without any disruption to the travelling public. If the company fail to table a better offer to our members, Unite will have no option but to ballot our members for strikes over the summer holidays.'
A total of 97 per cent of the estimated 300 workers balloted in Glasgow voted against the latest pay offer of 4.25 per cent, while all 300 staff based at Edinburgh turned down an offer worth around 4 per cent.
It comes just two months after Menzies, which has ground handling staff at around 300 airports in 65 countries, announced it had achieved its fourth consecutive year of double-digit growth after global revenue reached £1.9billion [$2.6bn (USD)] - up 20 per cent over the year.
The company also reported global earnings before tax of £282million [$382m] last year.
Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said in the wake of this members 'emphatically rejected unacceptable pay offers'.
She added: 'The Menzies group is posting sky-high profits and our members who contribute towards this success deserve far better from the company.'
On its website Menzies put its success down to its staff and 'non more so than ground services', which includes flight dispatchers, airside agents and controllers.
It states that they 'always do our best to deliver safe and trusted service and a world-class passenger experience for every customer, every time', adding: 'None more so than ground services, where our dedicated teams make sure that more than 250m passengers every year are ready for take-off through the delivery of a portfolio of supportive services.'
But if strike action goes ahead it could impact on a number of flights in and out of the two airports.
Last year during the peak summer months Glasgow saw on average 30,000 passengers a day go through the terminal on 240 flights.
Edinburgh, meanwhile, reported a record 15 million passengers in 2024, which it hailed as 'a milestone achieved for the first time ever at a Scottish airport'.
It announced new destinations of New York, Dubai, and Toronto, with even more routes on the timetables for this year including to Boston and Vienna.
Neither Edinburgh nor Glasgow airports were willing to comment on the latest pay dispute. But a spokesman for Edinburgh Airport stressed that Menzies was just 'one of a number' of providers of ground handing staff at Scotland's largest airport.
The latest threat of industrial actions comes a week after Unite announced wage wins for 100 North Air workers across Scottish airports, and over 140 ABM cleaners and OCS workers who assist passengers with mobility issues based at Glasgow Airport.
Last year, planned strikes at Glasgow and Aberdeen airports were also called off after workers accepted a new pay deal by employers ICTS in July.
Around 300 workers voted overwhelmingly to walk out over the busy summer months if the offer of a basic pay increase of 4 per cent, back dated to January, and a £500 one off payment was not improved.
But Unite confirmed the dispute came to an end after a pay deal worth up to 12.8 per cent was agreed.
Menzies Aviation said last night it was 'committed' to finding a solution to avoid disruption during the busiest time of the year.
Phil Lloyd, Senior Vice President UK, Menzies Aviation, said: 'Following the rejection of recent pay award proposals, we remain committed to seeking a resolution.
'We have invited Unite to return to the table to continue discussions this week and hope to reach an agreement which is workable for both the business and our employees at both Edinburgh and Glasgow. We will continue to work to pursue an agreeable solution to protect services for our airline and airport partners and their customers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Scottish Labour MSPs missing more Holyrood votes than Tories and SNP
In recent weeks, the number of Labour MSPs failing to vote on motions in the Scottish Parliament has increased, leading to concerns that their absence could be "changing the result of the votes". Last Wednesday for example – the most recent day of voting at the time of writing – 39% of Labour MSPs (nine members) did not vote in the chamber, compared with 6.7% of Tory MSPs (two members) and 1.6% of SNP (one member). The National analysed all the main votes which have taken place so far in June, excluding amendments, and found that among the three main parties, Labour consistently had the highest percentage of absent MSPs, with the Tories following not far behind, while the SNP had the highest turnout. READ MORE: Labour blasted as 'deeply authoritarian' over plans to proscribe Palestine Action Between June 1 and 19, an average of 20.1% of Labour MSPs failed to vote in motions, compared to 14% Tory and 6.6% SNP. Of the 10 votes that took place in that time, there were only four instances where turnout for both Labour and the Tories was higher than 90%. Meanwhile, the SNP turnout was above 90% in all of these votes. Scottish Labour had a higher turnout when it came to their own motions, such as their Planning motion on June 11, which was missed by one MSP, and their motion on Scotland's medical and nursing workforce crisis also on June 11, which all Labour MSPs voted on. More Labour MSPs tended to turn up when it came to voting on bills. At the Scottish Languages Bill debate on June 17, 17.4% of Labour MSPs did not vote, compared with 20% Tory and 8.2% SNP. And at the Care Reform (Scotland) Bill on June 10, 8.7% of Labour MSPs were absent, while the Tories had double, at 16.67%, and the SNP had 6.6%. But when these figures are compared with the start of the year, it shows a significant drop in attendance from Labour MSPs. READ MORE: Presiding Officer to step down at Holyrood election The National found that in January, an average of 7.9% of Labour MSPs failed to vote, compared with 9.1% Tory and 6.6% SNP. And in February, the average number of MSPs missing votes stood at 15% Labour, 10.1% Tory and 6.2% SNP. When looking at the smaller parties, the Greens and LibDems – which have seven and five MSPs respectively – were much more likely to show up to votes. In fact, since the beginning of this year, the Scottish Greens have had a full turnout at 86.9% of votes (53 out of 61 votes), while the LibDems had 65.6% (40 votes). In the instances where full turnout was not recorded, this was down to a maximum of two MSPs not voting. READ MORE: Scottish civil service reaches 'record' size, figures show There is one Alba MSP (Ash Regan) and one Independent MSP (John Mason), who turned up to 75.4% (46 votes) and 100% of votes respectively. For parties with higher numbers of MSPs, it is more difficult to achieve a full turnout. The SNP, which have 60 MSPs, recorded a full turnout at just two votes (3.3%) – the Assisted Dying Bill on May 13 and an SNP motion on Scotland's Hydrogen Future on May 1. The only instance where every single Tory MSP (of which there are 30) took part in a vote was for the Assisted Dying Bill (1.6% of the total number of votes), while Labour (which have 23 MSPs) saw a full turnout at four votes (6.6%) – but three of those were motions submitted by Labour, while the fourth was for the Assisted Dying Bill. While it is expected that MSPs will not be able to make every single vote, such as due to illness or maternity leave, there are proxy voting arrangements in place which mean that the absence would not affect the overall result of a vote. Commenting on the figures, Greens MSP Ross Greer – who has voted in every motion analysed by The National – said that "if Labour MSPs don't want to do the jobs they were elected to, they should resign". He added that the proxy voting arrangements mean "there is no excuse for almost half of the Labour group casting no vote at all" in some cases. Ross Greer MSP"That is bad enough on ordinary motions, but it is totally unacceptable when we are deciding on the laws of this country," he said. Greer added that "it is a privilege to serve Scotland in Parliament", and that turning up to vote is "the bare minimum" that voters expect of those they elect. READ MORE: SNP the only pro-indy party not to sign pledge condemning Gaza genocide He continued: "This isn't a one off. The attendance of Labour and Tory MSPs has been shocking for years. "It has absolutely changed the result of votes and therefore meant that Scotland's laws are different than they otherwise would have been if everyone elected by the public had actually turned up to do their job." Commenting, SNP MSP Kenneth Gibson said: "The fact Labour and Tory MSPs are increasingly failing to turn up to Parliament shows that Scotland is always an afterthought for the unionist parties. "SNP MSPs have the best attendance rate of any party – we are in Parliament every day, standing up for our constituents – while Labour and the Tories are nowhere to be seen when it matters most." Scottish Labour did not respond when approached for comment.
South Wales Guardian
4 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Flights from London to Doha and Dubai cancelled after US strikes Iran
It comes after a British Airways (BA) flight from London Heathrow to Dubai was diverted to Zurich on Saturday night. The BA109 flight departed from the UK at 9.53pm on Saturday and reached Saudi Arabia before the Boeing 787 Dreamliner changed its course, landing in Switzerland, according to flight-tracking website Flightradar24. All of the airline's flights to Dubai and Doha that were scheduled to depart from Heathrow on Sunday have been cancelled, including return flights, the company said. Israel announced on Sunday that it had closed its airspace to both inbound and outbound flights in the wake of the US attacks. The US struck three nuclear sites in Iran overnight prompting Tehran to launch a retaliatory ballistic missile barrage against Israel. In a statement, British Airways said: 'As a result of recent events, we have adjusted our flight schedule to ensure the safety of our customers and crew, which is always our top priority. 'We are contacting our customers to advise them of their options while we work through this developing situation.' BA is offering a flexible booking policy for customers already booked onto flights to Dubai and Doha between Sunday and Tuesday who wish to change their dates of travel. According to Gatwick's website, flights to and from the airport to Doha and Dubai are continuing as scheduled.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
KEMI BADENOCH: Labour's new equality law is a bureaucratic nightmare dressed up as progress
You've probably never heard of the so-called 'socio-economic duty', and nor should you have. It's a left-over clause from the Equality Act passed by Labour in 2010, which was so obviously misguided that we Conservatives blocked it from being enacted for 14 years. The clause demands that when local and public bodies make a decision, they must assess whether it increases or decreases inequality resulting from socio-economic disadvantage. It is ideological dross. Worse than that, it threatens to submerge the nation in a bureaucratic nightmare dressed up as progress. How so? It means your council obsessing over 'impact assessments' while local roads decay, schools spending money on 'equality training' instead of textbooks, government departments taking more time analysing postcodes than fixing real problems. When Labour came up with 'socio-economic duty' during its last period in government, its own ministers called it 'socialism in one clause'. They weren't joking. We know it's bad policy because it's already been enacted in Scotland and Wales. The results were exactly what you'd expect: More red tape and no constructive results. The Equality and Human Rights Commission reviewed its effectiveness north of the border and couldn't find a single tangible benefit. But this Labour government doesn't care. Looking busy matters more to it than being effective. The 'socio-economic duty' clause ticks all the boxes – literally! It gives civil servants and consultants endless forms to fill in, reports to write and new jobs in such voguish fields as 'class-equity strategy'. Your taxes will fund more consultants, more HR seminars, more circular discussions about 'lived experience' – all while frontline services are stretched to the limit. When I was Equalities Minister, I fought this sort of nonsense every day. When I tried to protect women's spaces by legislating to enforce female-only toilets, I was told by civil servants that doing so might be 'hostile' to other groups. Time and again, I found common-sense decisions were being held up by an impact assessment drawn up by a diversity officer who'd never set foot in a women's shelter. The 'socio-economic duty' is more of the same. It will paralyse our public services and hand more power to unaccountable quangos. The state needs to do less, and do it better. We need schools pushing children to achieve, not consulting on how 'class background' affects their homework. We need doctors focused on saving lives, not paperwork. We need police stopping criminals, not second-guessing who might be offended. But this government is bereft of ideas. With the economy nose-diving due to a toxic cocktail of tax rises and billions in bungs to the public sector, it is busying itself with ideological rubbish nobody asked for. Giving away British territory in the Chagos Islands while paying £30billion for the privilege. Decriminalising abortion and euthanasia. And changing its mind about how many pensioners to deprive of their winter fuel allowance. Labour has four more years to dig up every bad idea it has had and force it through Parliament. I will keep calling it out. Loudly, clearly, and without apology – because Britain deserves better than this.
