'The Phoenician Scheme' Review - Wes Anderson Reckons With Legacy In Zany, Charming Globe Trot
Now is a pretty good time to talk about legacy.
Consider today's political landscape, especially in the United States. There seems to be a competition amongst policymakers and heads of state to see who can stay in power the longest, even as their physical, intellectual, and empathetic faculties gradually diminish. Concurrently, the world's richest, and therefore most powerful, people are certainly aware of the perils of the future, but seem focused on shoring up their present-day bona fides, leveraging their fortunes for the betterment of themselves at the expense of society. With such a relentless tunnel vision on the present, the richest and most ruthless among us are less interested in the world they leave behind, even though legacy was one of their common languages and most pressing pursuits. (It isn't a coincidence that most New York landmarks are named after America's wealthiest families: Rockefeller, Vanderbilt, Helmsley, Astor, and yes, even Trump.)
So, in this day and age, what value does legacy hold?
I'm not sure I would've initially thought of Wes Anderson as the filmmaker to examine the crumbling institution of legacy, but he does so with The Phoenician Scheme . The film follows Anatole Korda (Benicio del Toro), a Rockefeller-esque industrialist who has a tendency to survive assassination attempts. After a particularly brutal one involving his private jet, he sends for his estranged daughter, Sister Liesl (Mia Threapleton), and installs her as the head of his sweeping organization, 'on a trial basis.' As part of this trial, he drags her along on the titular 'scheme': to seek the funds to complete a sweeping infrastructural project in the country of Phoenicia. They and Korda's insect tutor-turned-administrative assistant, Bjørn (Michael Cera), travel through Korda's network of financial acquaintances to convince them to support him by filling the project's funding gap so he can achieve his life's work. (L to R) Benicio Del Toro as Zsa-Zsa Korda, Michael Cera as Bjorn and Mia Threapleton as Liesl in director Wes Anderson's THE PHOENICIAN SCHEME, a Focus Features release.
Credit: Courtesy of TPS Productions/Focus Features © 2025 All Rights Reserved.
If you're familiar with Wes Anderson's work, then the shape of The Phoenician Scheme should come as no surprise. The production design is still striking, with a muted, pastel color palette that reinforces the fantastical artifice of Korda's world. Anderson's camerawork is still uniquely austere, yielding striking individual frames that brim with whimsy and intrigue. His script is packed to the gills with dry sarcasm and witty wordplay as Korda tries to weasel his way in and out of shoddy business deals that sit pretty high on the absurdist scale. (Korda also has to convince Sister Liesl and the audience that he didn't have her mother killed, which, well, let's say his methods of persuasion need work.)
Anderson also assembles a typically crackerjack ensemble for his story. Benicio del Toro appears to be having a blast as the relentless capitalist Korda. He makes a meal of the bone-dry dialogue and gives us hints through his delivery that there are more dimensions of the character to explore. Mia Threapleton also slots nicely into Anderson's unique rhythms, knowing how and when to modulate her expressions and diction to retain Sister Liesl's cynicism while tracking her shifting relationships with Korda and Bjørn. Michael Cera feels like an actor who should already be part of Anderson's repertoire, and his performance here reinforces that assumption. He is delightful as the in-over-his-head entomologist Bjørn, with a charming accent and a consistent but surprisingly complex look of bewilderment. The rest of the Phoenician players are also great, with Riz Ahmed, Jeffrey Wright, and Benedict Cumberbatch standing out the most.
By all metrics, Anderson is firing on all cylinders, deploying the heights of his vision to tell this story. But to what end? (L to R) Michael Cera as Bjorn, Benicio Del Toro as Zsa-Zsa Korda and Mia Threapleton as Liesl in director Wes Anderson's THE PHOENICIAN SCHEME, a Focus Features release.
Credit: Courtesy of TPS Productions/Focus Features © 2025 All Rights Reserved.
Two years ago, Anderson examined humanity's stagnation and crippling ennui under the guise of an alien invasion in Asteroid City . The Phoenician Scheme , for all its globe-trotting, financial backdealing, and pickup basketball games, aims for something less existential and more tangible. Korda claims throughout the film that his primary concern, and the film's ultimate goal, is to fill the funding gap for his Phoenicia infrastructure project. However, it becomes clear early on that his excursions are part of his desire to reconnect with his daughter. As his eldest child, Sister Liesl is central to his legacy, as she would be the only person who could carry the mantle for him if one of his many assassination attempts succeeds. (His other heirs are children, whose ages render them useless.)
Of course, ensuring his legacy's fidelity requires him to show her the expanse of his power and influence. What better way to do that than whisk her around the world to participate in increasingly zany negotiations? If there is one, it would still pale in comparison to what Anderson achieves here. Even amidst the chaos, he keeps the fragile parental bond between Korda and Sister Liesl at the same narrative level. Whether Korda will close the financial gap matters as much as whether Sister Liesl will find something salvageable in the toxic myth of a man who happens to be her father. While not an especially deep well of dramatic tension, it does ground the film as the scheme becomes delightfully more convoluted and loses a bit of force (specifically with the Cousin Hilda chapter). (L to R) Benicio Del Toro as Zsa-Zsa Korda, Bryan Cranston as Reagan, Tom Hanks as Leland, and Mia Threapleton as Liesl in director Wes Anderson's THE PHOENICIAN SCHEME, a Focus Features release.
Credit: Courtesy of TPS Productions/Focus Features © 2025 All Rights Reserved.
Through Korda and SIster Liesl's relationship, Anderson offers his take on the value of legacy, specifically for the wealthiest among us. Korda's assessment of his legacy is grounded in what he has created and amassed, and whether he has the commitment and brass tacks to retain it, even after he's gone. His time with Liesl, however, leads to subtle shifts in that way of thinking that profoundly affect where the characters land. While he is still concerned with what he leaves behind, the 'what' is centered around his family, leading him to ultimately shift his approach to his scheme. Another part of that realization comes from Anderson's celestial court case against Korda, where God (played by Bill Murray) and his angels seek answers about his trespasses on Earth. It operates similarly to Asteroid City's play-within-a-play framing device, although this stream fits more neatly into the film's operating goal.
There's a charming irony surrounding The Phoenician Scheme . Most people will never know Korda's wealth, power, and influence. They won't know what it's like to experience multiple assassination attempts, or to play basketball with Tom Hanks and Bryan Cranston in a bet to fund a nation's infrastructure project. However, Korda's journey frames one of Anderson's most accessible and culturally relevant films. While none of us will ever engage in a fight with Benedict Cumberbatch using obscenely expensive pottery as weapons, we can all understand the desire to leave the world better than we entered it. We also understand how little that matters if we don't have loved ones we can trust to support us through that work. It would be lovely if today's robber barons received that message instead of engaging in a race to the cultural bottom, but I appreciate Wes Anderson for trying to advance the conversation through his distinct, and perhaps impactful, voice.
The Phoenician Scheme is currently playing in limited release courtesy of Focus Features. The film will expand wide on June 6, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Mahmoud Khalil describes ICE detention, decries Columbia 'hypocrisy'
Mahmoud Khalil, recently released from immigration custody, on Sunday described the conditions of his detention and decried the "hypocrisy" of Columbia University, where he is a graduate student. 'Who is Mahmoud Khalil?' he asked as he spoke to the media and supporters on the steps of the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in New York City, just a few blocks from Columbia. 'Mahmoud Khalil is a human rights defender. Mahmoud Khalil is a freedom fighter. Mahmoud Khalil is a refugee. Mahmoud Khalil is a father and husband. And, above all, Mahmoud Khalil is Palestinian,' he said. Khalil flew back to the New York area Saturday after having spent 104 days in an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Louisiana. He said Columbia University denied his request to host the news conference there. Surrounded by his wife, his legal team and supporters, Khalil said that no one had privacy at the detention center and that it was common to hear emotional stories from other men. 'It's often hard to find patience in ICE detention. The center is crowded with hundreds of people who are told that their existence is illegal, and not one of us knows when we can go free,' he said. On the steps of the cathedral were hundreds of supporters joining in chants with Khalil, mainly repeating a sentence that he said kept him motivated in detention: 'I believe that we will win.' 'I found myself literally scratching this into my bunk bed and looking at it as I fell asleep and as I woke up. I find myself repeating, repeating it even now, knowing that I have won in a small way by being free — by being free today,' he said. The case of Khalil, a legal resident of the United States, drew national attention as the Trump administration began targeting pro-Palestinian student protesters following Hamas' deadly terrorist attacks in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. The attack killed 1,200 people in Israel, according to Israeli tallies, and hundreds more were taken hostage. It also triggered a war in Gaza that has killed more than 55,000 people, many of them women and children, according to the health ministry in the enclave, which is run by Hamas. The World Health Organization considers the numbers credible. Khalil was one of the student leaders at Columbia who was integral in the campus protests against the war. 'I must call the hypocrisy of Columbia University, a university that just two weeks ago said that they want to protect their international students. Why? While over 100 [days] later, I haven't received a single call from this university,' he said. Columbia University did not immediately respond to a call seeking comment about Khalil's remarks Sunday night. Khalil's detainment caused him to miss the birth of his son. 'You may have taken time from us, but you did not take our spirit,' his wife, Noor Abdalla, said Sunday. 'One day, our son will know his father did not bow to fear,' she added. On Friday, a federal judge ordered Khalil released and said he was not a threat to foreign policy or a flight risk, as the Trump administration argued. Less than 10 minutes later, the White House appealed the decision. 'While I'm grateful to be here with you all, I must say that this is only the beginning of a longer fight towards justice. I want everyone to understand that my being here today is sweet, but it's not a victory,' Khalil said Sunday. 'The wave of repression that the Trump administration initiated with my detention was intended to silence the movement for Palestinian liberation. It was intended to scare people into silence,' he said. The government is appealing the order granting Khalil's release, as well as a previous ruling that had preliminarily barred his detention and deportation. Khalil said Sunday that his legal team is prepared to continue to fight. Asked by NBC News what his message is to students who might be fearful of protesting based on what happened to him, Khalil replied: 'Students across the country have always led toward what's right. They are our moral compass." 'This happened during the Vietnam war, during apartheid South Africa. ... That's why the administration is doing everything in its power to suppress us — because we are literally winning,' he added. After the news conference, he joined hundreds of supporters on a short march escorted by New York police. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
New York on alert after U.S. launched strikes on Iran
The Brief The NYPD has deployed additional resources to religious, cultural and diplomatic sites across New York City after the U.S. military struck three Iranian nuclear sites. New York City Mayor Eric Adams and New York City Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch met with international liaisons to discuss how the situation could have repercussions on the city. New York Governor Kathy Hochul wrote in a post on X that the "New York State Police are working to protect at-risk sites and fight cyberattacks." NEW YORK CITY - United States military forces launched strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites – New York City is on full alert as a response. What they're saying The New York Police Department (NYPD) has deployed additional resources to religious, cultural and diplomatic sites across New York City after the U.S. military struck three sites in Iran. The NYPD is also coordinating with its federal partners to monitor for any potential local impacts the situation could lead to. New York City Mayor Eric Adams and New York City Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch met with international liaisons to discuss how the situation in the Middle East could have repercussions on the city. Adams confirmed the NYPD's initial response statement, reiterating that police presence has been increased at religious, cultural and diplomatic sites "throughout the five boroughs." New York Governor Kathy Hochul wrote in a post on X that the "New York State Police are working to protect at-risk sites and fight cyberattacks." What we know President Donald Trump said yesterday, June 21, that the U.S. military struck three sites in Iran, directly joining Israel's effort to decapitate the country's nuclear program. The U.S. attacks came after a week of open conflict between Israel and Iran, sparked by Israel's sudden barrage of attacks against Iran's nuclear and military structure. Trump addressed the United States last night, saying the sites were "completely and fully obliterated" and warned Tehran against retaliation. The Source This article includes information from social media posts made by several government officials and the New York Police Department, and reporting from the Associated Press.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What would you need to earn to feel financially secure? A quarter of Americans say $150,000 or more
Almost half of Americans (45%) think they would need to make $100,000 or more a year to 'feel financially secure' or 'comfortable,' according to a new survey from Bankrate. Breaking that down further, a quarter of respondents in total (26%) put the number at $150,000 or more. Among them, 8% said they would need to earn between $200,000 and $499,999, while another 8% said $500,000 or more. On the flip side, nearly half of respondents (45%) said they would feel financially secure making less than six figures, with 34% saying they would feel comfortable making between $50,00 and $99,999. The online survey, conducted by YouGov and taken by 2,260 US adults in mid-May, also asked 'What annual income would you need to feel rich/attain financial freedom?' More than half (55%) put the number at $200,000 or more. Among them, a quarter (26%) said it would take at least $1 million a year, while 13% said they would need to earn somewhere between $500,000 and $999,999. More than half of respondents (56%) said they needed to earn more than they are currently making to feel secure. So what do Americans make in reality? Based on the latest Census data, median US household income in 2023 was $80,610. That's the mid-point on incomes, meaning half of US households made less. But that median is across all households regardless of size. In family households specifically — where two or more people live — the median was $102,800. Within that group, the highest median ($119,400) reported was among married couples. In terms of individual incomes in 2023, the median income of a full-time worker with earnings working year round was $60,070. Neither the Bankrate survey nor the respondents specified what was meant by the terms 'financially secure' or 'rich,' nor what financial freedom meant to them. The answer, of course, will always be highly subjective. How much you personally think you need is going to be influenced by many factors, including: Your current income, your age, whether you have children, where you live, how much debt you have and what your monthly expenses are. (Not to mention assets that contribute to your net worth, such as a 401(k) or brokerage account, a home or a business. But the survey didn't address that issue.) Among Bankrate survey respondents, 54% of those who already made $100,000 or more said they'd need to make at least $150,000 to feel financially secure. Gen Xers (ages 45 to 60) were most likely (35%) to say they'd need to earn $150,000 or more to live comfortably, compared to 26% of millennials (ages 29 to 44) and 20% of Gen Zers (ages 18 to 28). Among parents with children under 18, 35% indicated earning $150,000 or more a year would make them feel financially secure. And those most likely to say they'd need to earn $1 million or more to feel financially free were parents whose children were 18 or older (33%). Bankrate asked respondents how they would describe their current level of financial security. Overall, most (77%) said they did not feel 'completely financially secure,' including 32% who said they didn't think they ever would. Those most likely to say they did feel 'completely financially secure' were people making at least $100,000. Within that income group, 42% of respondents said they considered themselves secure. Only a quarter of those in the $50,000 to $79,999 income group and 12% of those making less than $50,000 said the same. In terms of life stages, large majorities of each generation said they don't feel financially secure, including 84% of Gen Xers; 80% of Gen Zers; 79% of millennials and 69% of Baby Boomers. 'Getting rich may have once been what many Americans fantasized about, but now, simply living comfortably feels like the new aspiration, as economic challenges make financial stability a rare luxury,' said Bankrate economic analyst Sarah Foster. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
