logo

Readout - Prime Minister Carney meets with President of France Emmanuel Macron Français

Cision Canada3 days ago

KANANASKIS, AB, June 16, 2025 /CNW/ - Today, the Prime Minister, Mark Carney, met with the President of France, Emmanuel Macron, at the 2025 G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis, Alberta.
Canada and France have a long shared history and a commitment to protecting common bonds in our culture and the French language.
Building on Prime Minister Carney's visit to France earlier this year, the two leaders discussed their ongoing work to strengthen trade and commercial ties and deliver prosperity for Canada and France alike.
Prime Minister Carney and President Macron discussed bolstering co-operation on shared priorities such as critical minerals, energy security, bilateral investment, artificial intelligence, and quantum technology.
The leaders welcome the announcement today of a deal between LOT Polish Airlines and Airbus, which includes the purchase of 20 A220-100 and 20 A220-300 aircraft. The aircraft are designed and developed in Canada, and manufactured in Mirabel, Quebec, by Airbus, working with Canadian supply chain partners. This deal will support thousands of good-paying jobs in Canada and France.
Prime Minister Carney and President Macron also emphasized the growing partnership between Canada and France on cybersecurity and intelligence sharing. They welcome the new memorandum of understanding signed on June 13 to increase exchanges related to intelligence between our two countries.
The leaders discussed their support for Ukraine's sovereignty, the imperative of an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, and the situation in Haiti. They agreed to remain in close contact.
This document is also available at https://pm.gc.ca

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Opposition parties curtail some special powers in Carney's Bill C-5
Opposition parties curtail some special powers in Carney's Bill C-5

National Observer

time39 minutes ago

  • National Observer

Opposition parties curtail some special powers in Carney's Bill C-5

A controversial bill that would give the federal government the ability to override laws and regulations and fast-track projects is one step closer to becoming law. The federal Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities passed 23 amendments to Bill C-5 and wrapped up after midnight following a marathon Wednesday session. The Carney government used a special order to limit debate and study to try to get the bill through Parliament before MPs leave for summer recess this Friday. Along with removing federal barriers to internal trade, Bill C-5 would allow the federal cabinet to conditionally approve projects it deems 'in the national interest' before regulatory processes take place and enable cabinet to exempt those projects from many laws and regulations. If passed in its original form, the bill would also empower cabinet to override any laws passed by Parliament, like the Criminal Code or Species at Risk Act, for example. Some of that power has been curtailed after opposition MPs carved out some exclusions and checks on the powers it would afford the federal government, but Bloc Québécois MP Xavier Barsalou-Duval is not satisfied. 'The bill is less problematic than it was, but it's still not a good bill for sure,' Barsalou-Duval said in an interview early Thursday morning with Canada's National Observer. 'It's not a good deal for the environment and Canada.' The Bloc and Conservatives amended the bill to curtail cabinet's power, naming 16 laws the federal government could not override, including the Criminal Code, Indian Act, Lobbying Act, Conflict of Interest Act, Trade Unions Act and Hazardous Products Act, and others. A controversial bill that would give the federal government the ability to override laws and regulations and fast-track projects is one step closer to becoming law. A federal committee passed 23 amendments in a marathon session. The NDP and Green Party also oppose Bill C-5, but only the Bloc Québécois gets a vote at committee meetings. That didn't stop Green Party Leader Elizabeth May from attending virtually to speak to her amendments. No NDP MP was present for the clause-by-clause debate and votes. Another amendment passed by the Bloc Québécois and Conservatives prevents the government from designating projects for fast-tracking when Parliament is prorogued or dissolved. Environmental lawyers, including West Coast Environmental Law's Anna Johnston, criticized the bill for lacking transparency. Opposition MPs made some gains on this with a series of amendments that will require more information about listed projects to be made public in a timely manner. Many of these amendments, particularly those that increase transparency, are a step in the right direction and could 'go a long way towards improving government accountability to voters,' Johnston told Canada's National Observer in an emailed statement. However, cabinet would still get sweeping powers to declare when and for whom laws apply, which is troubling, she said. Additionally, now, if a project has not been substantially started within five years of being listed, the document expires, according to a Bloc amendment. Prime Minister Mark Carney has said no project will be imposed on a province, but this is not spelled out in the bill and the Bloc Québécois are not willing to take Carney at his word. The party tried — and failed — many times to change the bill's language to explicitly require Quebec's consent for any project within its jurisdiction. 'The thing that was the most important for us is not in the bill,' Barsalou-Duval said after the meeting concluded. The Liberal committee members opposed these changes and the Conservatives abstained. Liberal MP Will Greaves told Canada's National Observer the amendment is unnecessary because provincial jurisdiction is in the Constitution. 'Any law that we pass is subject to the Constitution, and the provinces' jurisdictions are the starting point; they don't need to be written into the bill expressly.' The Bloc did manage to pass an amendment that would require the federal government to give 30 days' notice before a project is listed in the national interest, consult with the province where it will be carried out and 'obtain its written consent if the project falls within areas of exclusive provincial jurisdiction.' The eight-hour committee meeting on Wednesday evening was marked by friendly exchanges, jokes and laughter between Liberal, Bloc Québécois and Conservative MPs, despite the BQ's vehement opposition to the proposed legislation. The rare instances of unanimity resulted in smatterings of applause and cheers, with Conservative MP Shannon Stubbs exclaiming: 'I'm so used to fighting and losing!' But there were tense exchanges as well, particularly between BQ MP Xavier Barsalou-Duval and Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc, who testified for two hours alongside Transport and Internal Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland and newly elected Liberal MP and minister of Crown–Indigenous relations, Rebecca Alty. Barsalou-Duval compared the sweeping powers in Bill C-5 to a 'disguised' version of the Emergencies Act, and suggested the federal government is taking advantage of the trade war with US President Donald Trump to grant itself extreme powers. LeBlanc balked at the comparison to the Emergencies Act, and said the current situation is urgent from an economic standpoint. Through much interruption and back-and-forth, Barsalou-Duval fired back: 'We don't know that you will act in our best interest.' The CPC and BQ voted in favour of an NDP amendment to add language about good-paying, unionized jobs to the preamble.

New Purdue opioid crisis settlement builds ‘momentum' for Canada: B.C. AG
New Purdue opioid crisis settlement builds ‘momentum' for Canada: B.C. AG

Global News

timean hour ago

  • Global News

New Purdue opioid crisis settlement builds ‘momentum' for Canada: B.C. AG

Recent settlements in U.S. government lawsuits against opioid manufacturer Purdue Pharma and the firm that allegedly consulted on boosting its sales have B.C.'s attorney general feeling 'heartened' as she pursues similar lawsuits in Canada. Monday saw 55 U.S. states and territories reach a US$7.5-billion settlement with Purdue, the maker of OxyContin, and members of the Sackler family that sought to hold them accountable for contributing to the opioid overdose crisis. As part of the settlement, the Sacklers will give up their control of the bankrupt company and will be barred from selling prescription opioids in the future. A federal judge said Wednesday that he will rule Friday on a plan for local governments and individual victims, who would also be entitled to compensation, to vote on approving the settlement by September, allowing it to proceed. Story continues below advertisement The announcement of the U.S. settlement came after the B.C. Supreme Court on Friday certified a class-action lawsuit by the province against McKinsey & Company, which is accused of advising Purdue and other drugmakers on how to market their opioid products in Canada. McKinsey has already had to pay over US$1 billion in penalties to settle similar lawsuits in the U.S., which also led to jail time for a McKinsey executive. 'I'm really pleased with the momentum,' B.C. Attorney General Niki Sharma told Global News in an interview. 'My job as attorney general is to make sure we pursue it very aggressively and as quickly as we can, so I am heartened by the success in the States and will keep on leading the charge here in Canada.' The B.C. lawsuit against McKinsey is separate from a larger class action against dozens of opioid manufacturers and distributors on allegations they downplayed the risk their products posed in order to rake in profits. That lawsuit was allowed to go ahead last fall and was certified in January. 2:00 Supreme Court upholds B.C. opioid lawsuit B.C. is leading both lawsuits on behalf of the other Canadian provinces and territories and the federal government, with the goal of recovering health-care costs that went toward responding to the overdose crisis, Sharma said. Story continues below advertisement 'We think it's unfair that companies that profited so much, knowing that their product was so harmful and that would cause this level of addiction, aren't paying for the costs of health care,' she said. A spokesperson for McKinsey told Global News it intends to defend itself against the lawsuit, which the company says is without merit. 'McKinsey did not undertake any work in Canada to enhance the sale or marketing of opioids,' the spokesperson said in an email. Alleged tactics to 'turbocharge' opioid sales B.C.'s lawsuit against McKinsey alleges the Canadian subsidiaries of Purdue, as well as Johnson & Johnson, Janssen and other drugmakers, employed many of the same tactics used by U.S. parent companies to boost their sales. Get weekly health news Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday. Sign up for weekly health newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The B.C. Supreme Court, in certifying the lawsuit, noted in its decision that multinational companies often apply business and marketing strategies 'universally.' Story continues below advertisement Last December, McKinsey agreed to pay U$650 million to resolve a U.S. Justice Department lawsuit that focused on the firm's work with Purdue, including allegations that McKinsey advised on steps to 'turbocharge' sales of OxyContin. Martin Elling, a former McKinsey senior partner who worked on Purdue matters, was sentenced to six months in prison after pleading guilty to obstruction of justice related to that case. 2:42 Conservatives grill Trudeau on former McKinsey head connection ahead of committee appearance The federal settlement was on top of a combined US$641 million McKinsey agreed to pay in 2021 to resolve similar claims brought by U.S. state attorneys general. In total, federal and state lawsuits related to the opioid crisis have resulted in roughly US$50 billion in settlements, according to researchers from Johns Hopkins University who track such claims. Long-term heavy use of prescription painkillers like OxyContin due to dependence contributed to a majority of opioid-related hospitalizations and overdoses in the early 2000s across North America. In recent years, illicit opioids like fentanyl have overtaken prescription opioids as the primary driver of the opioid crisis. Story continues below advertisement Between 2016 and last September, nearly 51,000 Canadians have died of an opioid-related overdose, according to federal data. B.C., which declared a public health emergency in 2016, saw the most fatal overdoses of any other province during that time, with more than 16,000 deaths. 'I think like many provinces across this country, we've really seen the toll of the opioid crisis on people not only with long-lasting addictions and impacts there, but loss of life and a lot of people that are mourning the loss of their loved ones,' Sharma said. A spokesperson for Health Canada said the federal government 'believes companies should be held accountable for their role in the overdose crisis' and will continue to work with provinces and territories on B.C.'s legal actions. 'The overdose crisis continues to be one of Canada's most pressing public health challenges,' the spokesperson said in an email to Global News. Health Canada is reviewing and 'considering' developments from the recent Purdue settlement in the U.S., the statement added. Where should the money go? In 2022, B.C. secured a $150-million settlement on behalf of Canadian governments in a class action against Purdue. The settlement was finalized in early 2023, allowing individuals to submit claims from a $20-million portion set aside for victims and their families, a process that remains ongoing. Story continues below advertisement The pending lawsuit against opioid manufacturers and distributors names Purdue and its various subsidiaries, as well as Johnson & Johnson, Janssen and Canadian companies like Loblaw and its subsidiary Shoppers Drug Mart. It remains in litigation. 5:09 B.C. government steps up legal action against opioid drug makers Researchers writing in the International Journal of Drug Policy earlier this year urged Canadian governments to ensure funds recovered from opioid lawsuit settlements go directly toward combating the drug crisis, rather than unrelated government expenses. Those measures should include funding harm reduction services like overdose prevention centres and safe drug supplies, as well as community organizations that work directly with people suffering from addiction, the paper says. Efforts to track how U.S. state and local governments are spending their opioid settlement money have uncovered several examples of funds not being used to directly respond to the opioid crisis. Story continues below advertisement Canada is being urged to avoid similar 'pitfalls' by mandating that at least 85 per cent of recovered funds be allocated to 'opioid remediation efforts,' and working directly with community organizations and members affected by addiction. Proposed guidelines by researchers at Johns Hopkins University for how U.S. opioid settlement funds should be spent have been adopted in over 25 states, according to the university. Sharma said B.C.'s lawsuits are structured so that any funds recovered by the province will be mandated to go to the health-care system, but that could evolve depending on how settlements are structured. 'It may be that as this develops, and the opioid cases develop, it will be tied to organizations that do addictions treatment, or there could be a whole range of things that go directly towards this crisis,' she said. She pointed to the record $32.5-billion settlement B.C. won in March on behalf of Canadian governments in its lawsuit against the tobacco industry as a model both of the province's health-related legal advocacy and the results it can achieve. 'We are really focused on eliminating the bad actors,' she said. 'It's really important to make sure that we set a line in the sand about what's right and what isn't right with the conduct of all companies out there.'

China Mobile and ZTE win the Asia Mobile Award 2025 with AI-driven 5G cloudified core network
China Mobile and ZTE win the Asia Mobile Award 2025 with AI-driven 5G cloudified core network

Cision Canada

timean hour ago

  • Cision Canada

China Mobile and ZTE win the Asia Mobile Award 2025 with AI-driven 5G cloudified core network

China Mobile and ZTE have developed the innovative AI-driven green and energy-saving 5G cloudified core network project to reduce the energy consumption and improve the network performance and operation efficiency The AI-driven green and energy-saving 5G cloudified core network innovative and replicable solution helps operators reduce OPEX and CAPEX while achieving significant energy saving effect SHANGHAI, June 20, 2025 /CNW/ -- ZTE Corporation ( / a global leading provider of integrated information and communication technology solutions, in partnership with China Mobile, has earned "Best Mobile Innovation for Climate Action in Asia" award for their AI-driven green and energy-saving 5G cloudified core network innovation project at the Asia Mobile Awards(AMOs) during MWC Shanghai 2025. Energy conservation, emission reduction and green transformation in the communications industry are key issues in the global shift towards green and sustainable development. The innovative AI-driven green and energy-saving 5G cloudified core network project aims to significantly reduce the energy consumption of the 5G core network while enhancing network performance and operation efficiency through the innovative cloud-native architecture and intelligent energy-saving technology. Leveraging ZTE's leading Intelligent 5G core network solutions and China Mobile's extensive experience in green communications, this project successfully achieves energy efficiency optimization and carbon emission reduction of 5G core network, providing operators with efficient and environmentally-friendly 5G core network deployment solutions. The AI-driven green and energy-saving 5G cloudified core network innovation project not only helps operators reduce OPEX and CAPEX, but also provides replicable solutions for the sustainable development of global 5G core networks. To date, this project has been deployed across multiple provinces of China, achieving significant energy savings. Moving forward, ZTE will further its collaboration with China Mobile to promote the application of green and energy-saving technologies in a wider range of network systems. Both parties will work together with global partners to advance the green and intelligent development of 5G networks, with great commitment to the sustainable development of the global communications industry. ABOUT ZTE: ZTE connects the world with continuous innovation for a better future. The company provides innovative technologies and integrated solutions, and its portfolio spans communication networks, computing infrastructure, industry digital solutions, and personal and home smart terminals. Serving over a quarter of the world's population, ZTE is dedicated to leading globally in connectivity and intelligent computing, enabling communication and trust everywhere. ZTE is listed on both the Hong Kong and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store