logo
Movie Review: In '28 Years Later,' a zombie pandemic rages on

Movie Review: In '28 Years Later,' a zombie pandemic rages on

Hindustan Times2 days ago

Most movies are lucky to predict one thing. Danny Boyle's 2002 dystopian thriller '28 Days Later' managed to be on the cutting edge of two trends, albeit rather disparate ones: global pandemic and fleet-footed zombies.
Add in Cillian Murphy, who had his breakout role in that film, and '28 Days Later' was unusually prognostic. While many of us were following the beginnings of the Afghanistan War and 'American Idol,' Boyle and screenwriter Alex Garland were probing the the fragile fabric of society, and the potentially very quick way, indeed, horror might come our way.
Boyle always maintained that his undead — a far speedier variety of the slow-stepping monsters of George A. Romero's 'The Night of Living Dad' — weren't zombies, at all, but were simply the infected. In that film, and its 2007 sequel '28 Weeks Later' , the filmmakers have followed the fallout of the so-called rage virus, which emptied London in the first film and brought soon-dashed hopes of the virus' eradication in the second movie.
Like the virus, the '28 Days Later' franchise has proven tough to beat back. In the new '28 Years Later,' Boyle and Garland return to their apocalyptic pandemic with the benefit of now having lived through one. But recent history plays a surprisingly minor role in this far-from-typical, willfully shambolic, intensely scattershot part three.
The usual trend of franchises is to progressively add gloss and scale. But where other franchises might have gone global, '28 Years Later' has remained in the U.K., now a quarantine region where the infected roam free and survivors — or at least the ones we follow — cluster on an island off the northeast of Britain, connected to mainland by only a stone causeway that dips below the water at high tide.
Boyle and cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle, who innovatively employed digital video in '28 Days Later,' have also turned to iPhones to shoot the majority of the film. Boyle, the 'Slumdog Millionaire,' 'Trainspotting' filmmaker, is an especially frenetic director to begin with, but '28 Years Later' is frequently gratingly disjointed.
It's a visual approach that, taken with the story's tonal extremes, makes '28 Years Later' an often bumpy ride. But even when Boyle's film struggles to put the pieces together, there's an admirable resistance to being anything like a cardboard cutout summer movie.
The recent event that hovers over '28 Years Later' is less the COVID-19 pandemic than Brexit. With the virus quarantined on Britain, the country has been severed from the European continent. On the secluded Holy Island, 12-year-old Spike lives with his hunter father, Jamie , and bedridden mother, Isla .
The scene, with makeshift watchtowers and bows and arrows for weapons, is almost medieval. Jamie, too, feels almost like a knight eager to induct his son into the village's ways of survival. On Spike's first trip out off the island, his father — nauseatingly jocular — helps him kill his first infected. Back inside the village walls, Jamie celebrates their near scrapes and exaggerates his son's coolness under pressure. Other developments cause Spike to question the macho world he's being raised in.
'They're all lyin', mum,' he says to his mother.
After hearing of a far-off, supposedly deranged doctor whose constant fires mystify the townspeople, Spike resolves to take his mother to him in hopes of healing her unknown illness. Their encounters along the way are colorful. Ralph Fiennes plays the doctor, orange-colored when they encounter him; Edvin Ryding plays a Swedish NATO soldier whose patrol boat crashed offshore. Meanwhile, Comer is almost comically delusional, frequently calling her son 'Daddy.'
And the infected? One development here is that, while some remain Olympic-worthy sprinters, other slothful ones nicknamed 'Slow-Lows' crawl around on the ground, rummaging for worms.
Buried in here are some tender reflections on mortality and misguided exceptionalism, and even the hint of those ideas make '28 Years Later' a more thoughtful movie than you're likely to find at the multiplex this time of year. This is an unusually soulful coming-of-age movie considering the number of spinal cords that get ripped right of bodies.
It's enough to make you admire the stubborn persistence of Boyle in these films, which he's already extending. The already-shot '28 Days Later: The Bone Temple' is coming next near, from director Nia DaCosta, while Boyle hopes '28 Years Later' is the start of trilogy. Infection and rage, it turns out, are just too well suited to our times to stop now.
'28 Years Later,' a Sony Pictures release, is rated R by the Motion Picture Association for strong bloody violence, grisly images, graphic nudity, language and brief sexuality. Running time: 115 minutes. Two stars out of four.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

28 Years Later ends, sequel The Bone Temple officially announced
28 Years Later ends, sequel The Bone Temple officially announced

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

28 Years Later ends, sequel The Bone Temple officially announced

So, 28 Years Later dropped like a cinematic grenade—and if you thought the carnage, grief, and gore were intense, buckle in. This film is just the first beat in what is shaping up to be an unhinged trilogy revival, with The Bone Temple already waiting in the wings to blow minds (and potentially guts). From family feels to full-blown cult vibes: The saga isn't over Set 28 years after the original nightmare, the UK is now a no-go zone, abandoned and sealed off like a plague-ridden time capsule. Amid this horror, Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), Isla (Jodie Comer), and their son Spike (Alfie Williams) are vibing on a tidal island, until a cheeky trip to the mainland leads to infected chaos, a raging Alpha zombie, and some truly devastating consequences. But the real twist? It is not just about survival. It is about legacy, grief, and how a child tries to save his mother in a world where science has long given up. Enter: The Bone Temple. Yes, it is exactly what it sounds like. A temple made of skulls, a cult leader in velvet & a baby named Isla The Bone Temple, where Spike ends up with his dying mother, is not some twisted death cult lair—it is a beautiful, horrific shrine where remains are honoured. Dr. Ian Kelson (played by Ralph Fiennes in full sorrow-core) helps Spike say goodbye to his mum in the most haunting way: by placing her skull in the temple's most sacred spot. And just when you think it is over, Spike leaves baby Isla behind, grabs his gear, and heads out to find himself. Then boom, cult leader energy crashes in. A bleach-blond Jack O'Connell struts in as 'Sir Jimmy Crystal,' dripping in bling and chaos. He and his savage gang murder zombies like they are playing a video game, all while rocking purple velour fits. Iconic. Turns out, Jimmy watched his dad get eaten during the OG outbreak. His origin story? Dark. His future? Front and centre in The Bone Temple, where Spike and his grief-stricken dad are set for one hell of a showdown. Filmmaker Nia DaCosta described the trilogy's themes like this: film one is about family, film two is evil, and film three? Redemption. Oh, we are ready.

28 Years Later & Slumdog Millionaire director Danny Boyle reveals why the latter can't be made now
28 Years Later & Slumdog Millionaire director Danny Boyle reveals why the latter can't be made now

First Post

time2 hours ago

  • First Post

28 Years Later & Slumdog Millionaire director Danny Boyle reveals why the latter can't be made now

Boyle's directorial Slumdog Millionaire released in 2008 and went on to receive 8 Academy Awards at the 81st edition of the festival in 2009. read more Oscar winner Danny Boyle says it's not possible to make 'Slumdog Millionaire' now and believes 'that's how it should be'. Boyle's directorial 'Slumdog Millionaire' released in 2008 and went on to receive 8 Academy Awards at the 81st edition of the festival in 2009. 'We wouldn't be able to make that now. And that's how it should be. It's time to reflect on all that. We have to look at the cultural baggage we carry and the mark that we've left on the world,' Boyle told The Guardian in an interview. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Starring Dev Patel and Freida Pinto in the lead roles, the British drama film followed the story of Jamal Malik (Patel), a young man from the slums of Mumbai who appears on a reality game show 'Who Wants To Be A Millionaire'. Asked if the film was a form of colonialism, the filmmaker said, 'No, no… Well, only in the sense that everything is. At the time it felt radical. We made the decision that only a handful of us would go to Mumbai. We'd work with a big Indian crew and try to make a film within the culture. But you're still an outsider. It's still a flawed method.' Boyle added he wouldn't even get the film financed if he were to make it in present. 'That kind of cultural appropriation might be sanctioned at certain times. But at other times it cannot be. I mean, I'm proud of the film, but you wouldn't even contemplate doing something like that today. It wouldn't even get financed. Even if I was involved, I'd be looking for a young Indian filmmaker to shoot it.' 'Slumdog Millionaire' also featured Rubina Ali, Anil Kapoor and late actor Irrfan Khan in pivotal roles.28

We wouldnt be able to make Slumdog Millionaire: Danny Boyle
We wouldnt be able to make Slumdog Millionaire: Danny Boyle

Mint

time3 hours ago

  • Mint

We wouldnt be able to make Slumdog Millionaire: Danny Boyle

Los Angeles, Jun 21 (PTI) Oscar winner Danny Boyle says it's not possible to make "Slumdog Millionaire" now and believes "that's how it should be". Boyle's directorial "Slumdog Millionaire" released in 2008 and went on to receive 8 Academy Awards at the 81st edition of the festival in 2009. "We wouldn't be able to make that now. And that's how it should be. It's time to reflect on all that. We have to look at the cultural baggage we carry and the mark that we've left on the world," Boyle told The Guardian in an interview. Starring Dev Patel and Freida Pinto in the lead roles, the British drama film followed the story of Jamal Malik (Patel), a young man from the slums of Mumbai who appears on a reality game show "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire". Asked if the film was a form of colonialism, the filmmaker said, "No, no… Well, only in the sense that everything is. At the time it felt radical. We made the decision that only a handful of us would go to Mumbai. We'd work with a big Indian crew and try to make a film within the culture. But you're still an outsider. It's still a flawed method." Boyle added he wouldn't even get the film financed if he were to make it in present. "That kind of cultural appropriation might be sanctioned at certain times. But at other times it cannot be. I mean, I'm proud of the film, but you wouldn't even contemplate doing something like that today. It wouldn't even get financed. Even if I was involved, I'd be looking for a young Indian filmmaker to shoot it." "Slumdog Millionaire" also featured Rubina Ali, Anil Kapoor and late actor Irrfan Khan in pivotal roles.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store