Idle No More 2.0 will be ‘fierce' if Doug Ford moves ahead with Bill 5
First Nations leaders in northern Ontario are vowing an 'Idle No More 2.0' if the province passes Bill 5, legislation designed to speed up development without clear rules on Indigenous consultation and accommodation.
'If and when this becomes law, say next week or after that, there will be fierce resistance from our side,' Nishnawbe Aski Nation Grand Chief Alvin Fiddler said on Thursday, representing the chiefs of 49 communities in the province's far north. 'I know my dear friend Anishinabek Nation Grand Council Chief Linda Debassige has said the same thing.
'This is what we're looking at: Idle No More 2.0.'
Debassige referenced the 2012 movement that asserted Indigenous rights and sovereignty across Canada in response to federal omnibus legislation in a statement Anishinabek Nation issued on Tuesday. She urged Premier Doug Ford to immediately withdraw the controversial Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act, saying, 'we caution the provincial government that should Bill 5 proceed in its current form, we will be idle no more.'
That statement followed two days of deputations that chiefs and grand chiefs across the province made to the Standing Committee on the Interior over the past week. All of those deputations called for the government to scrap the bill and start again with consultation, while deputations referenced the possibility of demonstrations or direct action if the bill passes.
First Nations argue the series of laws that Bill 5 amends, such as the Mining Act and the Endangered Species Act, comprise a legal regime on free, prior and informed consultation and accommodation. The bill proposes new 'special economic zones' the minister can designate without size or impact limitation, that would exempt developers from following defined regulations and protocols on Indigenous engagement.
'They need to provide more details, procedures and protocols with this duty to consult,' said Nibinamik (Summer Beaver First Nation) Chief Michael Sugarhead. 'When other development comes, such as mining engagement, that we've been having recently, our rights aren't really considered.'
Nibinamik is located about 100 kilometres west of the 5,000-square-kilometre Ring of Fire mineral deposit, which Ford has said he will name as the first special economic zone. Twenty years after prospectors found the deposit, Sugarhead said Ontario still refuses to recognize nearby First Nations as full partners and he's concerned this legislation will deeply impact the land while leaving future generations in poverty.'How is this going to help our community? We live in third-world conditions and it's like that because of the government,' he said.
Sugarhead said the residual effects of this are poor health, poor education, and poor standards of living. 'Reconciliation is imperative in this case, to have that meaningful partnership and participation in this type of development. If it's not there, I don't think that the people of the land will give their free, prior and informed consent.'
Facing mounting opposition, Progressive Conservative committee members introduced 23 amendments to Bill 5 on Wednesday, including one that made explicit the government's commitment to abide by its constitutional responsibility to consult and 'affirmation of existing Aboriginal and treaty rights.'
Nibinamik's lawyer, Zachary Davis, accused the Doug Ford Conservatives of committing 'lip service' to Indigenous rights, insisting the amendment is legally empty.
'The government's just admitting what is already true,' Davis said. 'These are constitutional obligations. It provides no certainty.'
Sol Mamakwa
, Kiiwetinoong NDP MPP and the only First Nations member of the Legislature, called the PC's amendments 'meaningless, unserious, and worse than useless,' while he accused the government of 'placing itself above and beyond the law.'
Mamakwa introduced two separate motions in committee that would have seen hearings on Bill 5 take place in Thunder Bay and other parts of northern Ontario. PC committee members defeated them both.
Indigenous minister Greg Rickford said during question period on Wednesday that consultation with First Nations will begin after the bill is passed. To that end, his government will introduce, 'Indigenous-led economic zones.' Rickford said in a statement to Ricochet Media that his office intends, 'to work throughout the summer in consultation with Indigenous partners to develop regulations to create new Indigenous-led economic zones as part of Bill 5. This amendment creating a new category of zone is at the request of some First Nations who, like us, want to build projects that will unlock economic prosperity for generations.'
But Fiddler says Ontario has offered no direction or definition of what such a zone designation would entail.
'The impression we're getting is that they're just making things up on the fly,' Fiddler said. 'I think it's too late in the process to try to fix this bill with any kind of amendments, including creating Indigenous-led economic zones. We don't even know what that means.'
The Mushkegowuk Council is meeting in Sault Ste. Marie to discuss the bill on Thursday, including representatives of Moose Cree First Nation.
On April 9, Moose Cree Chief Peter Wesley stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Ontario energy minister Stephen Lecce to announce the construction of two new hydroelectric facilities that will generate 430 megawatts in the shared traditional territory with Taykwa Tagamou Nation. By the end of May, Ontario introduced Bill 5. Wesley couldn't believe it.
'We were involved from the very initial stages of the project and to have minister Lecce acknowledge that, wow, this is the groundwork of how it should be,' he said. 'What happened? To have Bill 5 come out, and 'we'll think about adding consultation as an afterthought?' It's not going to work. A few weeks ago, we thought we were on the right path. I don't know if that's there anymore.'
Moose Cree has been expressing disapproval of a prospective niobium mine 25 kilometres up the North French River since 2019. Wesley says he has voiced his community's opposition to the project in written letters to both Ford and Rickford, but has received no response.Moose Cree members took the train to demonstrate in Ottawa during the 2012 Idle No More movement. Wesley believes that if Bill 5 passes, his community will be prepared to stand up once more.'There might be a lot of civil unrest by First Nations again,' he said. 'We have some very outspoken members who will not stand for the North French to be touched – and they've made their views pretty clear.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
2 hours ago
- Associated Press
House of Commons passes One Canadian Economy Act
OTTAWA, ON, June 20, 2025 /CNW/ - Canada's new government has a mandate to build big, build bold, and build now. Today, the Prime Minister, Mark Carney, welcomed the passing in the House of Commons of Bill C-5, One Canadian Economy Act. The legislation will build one strong Canadian economy by: Taken together, these measures will create and connect Canadians to good-paying careers and more prosperity. The Prime Minister shared an update on this work with the premiers of the provinces and territories during their meeting earlier today. The leaders agreed to stay in close contact as they reinforce Canada's strength at home. Indigenous partnership is a critical component of this legislation, and fulsome consultation will be pivotal to the success of future projects. The Government of Canada is committed to respecting the rights of Indigenous Peoples recognized and affirmed by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 and the rights set out in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. To this end, Prime Minister Carney will be meeting with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis over the coming weeks. Bill C-5 now moves to the Senate for consideration and brings us one step closer to removing federal barriers to free trade by Canada Day. Quotes 'Today's passing of Bill C-5, One Canadian Economy Act, will remove trade barriers, expedite nation-building projects, and unleash economic growth, with Indigenous partnership at the centre of this growth. It's time to build big, build bold, and build now. As Canadians, we can give ourselves more than any foreign nation can ever take away.' — The Rt. Hon. Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada 'The adoption of Bill C-5 by the House of Commons is a crucial step in building one Canadian economy and getting big projects built faster. Thank you to colleagues who supported this legislation – you are helping build a stronger Canada.' — The Hon. Dominic LeBlanc, President of the King's Privy Council for Canada and Minister responsible for Canada-U.S. Trade, Intergovernmental Affairs and One Canadian Economy 'This legislation is about building a stronger, more united Canada. Let's build trust, tear down internal trade barriers, and create one single economy – from coast to coast to coast. Together, we're building a stronger Canada, for everyone.' — The Hon. Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Transport and Internal Trade 'I am pleased to see the One Canadian Economy Act achieve this milestone. This Act means we are no longer asking 'Why build?', but instead 'How do we get it done?'. We are removing barriers, leveraging Canada's resources and talented workers, centring Indigenous consultation and equity, and continuing to fight climate change – all to get building and to become an energy superpower. In the new economy we are building, Canada will be defined by delivery, not delay.' — The Hon. Tim Hodgson, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources 'Indigenous Peoples' voices are at the table where discussions are happening, and decisions are made. This government understands that Indigenous Peoples have the right to determine their future. As the first Indigenous Minister of Indigenous Services, I understand the importance of relationship moving forward – and I am pleased to see the Prime Minister has determined this as a priority and a critical part of the work ahead.' — The Hon. Mandy Gull-Masty, Minister of Indigenous Services Related Product This document is also available at SOURCE Prime Minister's Office
USA Today
5 hours ago
- USA Today
Los Angeles Dodgers ICE protests and boycott threats, explained
The Los Angeles Dodgers are facing a fan revolt in their hometown amid rising tensions due to the Department of Homeland Security's immigration raids and the team's recent actions — and inactions. After previous repeated refusals to comment on the situation in Los Angeles — despite the fact LAFC and Angel City FC soccer clubs have both backed the city's immigrant community — some fans have called for boycotting the Dodgers and plan on protesting the franchise beginning Saturday, June 21. Those calls grew louder following a recent attempt by federal agents to access the stadium. Considering the Dodgers say more than 40 percent of the fan base is Latino, the fallout from a boycott could be felt immediately. Here's how we got here. Federal agents attempt to access Dodger Stadium On Thursday, shortly after the Dodgers finally indicated they would announce plans to assist LA's immigrant community, fans woke up to rumors of federal agents using the parking lots at Dodger Stadium as a staging area. The team released a statement later in the day saying it had refused access to ICE agents and Thursday's game would go on as scheduled. ICE denied a presence at Dodger Stadium, claiming it wasn't there Thursday. Photos and videos show border control agents attempting to access stadium parking lots. As protesters quickly swarmed the area, calls for the Dodgers to speak up or face a protest continued to grow. Who is calling for a Dodgers boycott? The call for action is coming from multiple groups and supporters and is starting to gain steam around the area. Here's more from the Los Angeles Public Press: Buried Under The Blue, an organization that advocates for the Indigenous communities displaced to build Dodger Stadium, have also spoken out and are asking fans to boycott the team. The group, which routinely refers to the Dodgers as the Displacers and advocates for the memory of the original neighborhoods of Palo Verde, La Loma and Bishop (modern-day Chavez Ravine), are now referring to the team as the Deporters and are directing fans to partake in the ActionCali action. Lawyer Michael Alder of Alder Law took to Instagram to call for a boycott of the team, urging fans not to buy tickets, attend or watch games or buy merchandise. 'I know it might seem small,' Alder said, 'but if we stand together we will undoubtedly make a real impact. Fans have also been urged by groups like ActionCali to reach out to the Dodgers to voice their concerns. Is this all because of the ICE raids in Los Angeles? Yes and no. The Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids across the city have escalated concerns from fans, but the disconnect with the franchise actually began months ago. The Dodgers were noticeably silent back in March when the Department of Defense wiped a webpage dedicated to Jackie Robinson's military service and bravery in breaking MLB's color barrier — then the team celebrated Jackie Robinson Day a few weeks later as if nothing happened. In between those events, the Dodgers chose to visit the White House to celebrate their 2024 World Series title, despite manager Dave Roberts previously saying he would decline such an invite because of President Donald Trump. Most recently, the team asked Nezza not to sing the national anthem in Spanish during the 'No Kings' day protests. She did not comply. Meanwhile, the team allegedly removed a fan holding an anti-ICE sign from a recent game and made another fan remove a sarape scarf before he was allowed to enter Dodger Stadium. The actions here speak much louder than words, though the Dodgers haven't had too many things to say lately. Wait. The Los Angeles Dodgers didn't comment on ICE raids? Well, until Wednesday night — when talks of a boycott began growing louder — the official team position seemingly was to remain silent about what was happening to the city's immigrant community. Per the Los Angeles Times Dylan Hernandez: Don't expect this to change. 'We're not going to comment,' Dodgers executive vice president and chief marketing officer Lon Rosen said. Considering what's happened in the last week, do the Dodgers regret visiting President Trump at the White House earlier this season? 'We're not going to comment on anything,' Rosen said. When the Dodgers announced they accepted Trump's White House invitation, team president Stan Kasten claimed the decision had 'nothing to do with politics.' Kasten sounded as if he was counting on the fans to give the team a pass for visiting an aspiring tyrant, either because their love of the Dodgers overwhelmed their disgust for Trump or because they lacked the intellectual faculties to connect Trump's racist rhetoric to real-life consequences. That sentiment was clearly not shared in the clubhouse. What about the Dodgers players? Kiké Hernández has been one of the lone outspoken voices standing up for immigrants, posting a tribute to his adopted city on Instagram and asking for people to be treated with dignity and respect. "I may not be Born & Raised, but this city adopted me as one of their own," Hernandez wrote. "I am saddened and infuriated by what's happening in our country and our city. Los Angeles and Dodger fans have welcomed me, supported me and shown me nothing but kindness and love. This is my second home. And I cannot stand to see our community being violated, profiled, abused and ripped apart. ALL people deserve to be treated with respect, dignity and human rights." Pitcher Brusdar Graterol previously took a stand on Instagram the same day his teammates visited the White House without him. More players will certainly be forced to answer about the situation after Thursday. Dodgers delay immigrant assistance announcement If anyone thought the presence of federal agents at Dodger Stadium would encourage the team to finally speak out, they were mistaken. In fact, the team delayed their announcement indefinitely following the incident Thursday morning. "Because of the events earlier today, we continue to work with groups that were involved with our programs," team president Stan Kasten said in a Thursday statement. "But we are going to have to delay today's announcement while we firm up some more details. We'll get back to you soon with the timing." Which brings us back to the calls to protest and boycott the Dodgers. The franchise has a long, tenuous relationship with the neighborhood of Chavez Ravine, which is home to Dodger Stadium. When the Brooklyn Dodgers bolted for the West Coast, the area was predominately inhabited by Mexican-American communities, who had to flee their homes, or be forcibly removed, after the city seized the land via eminent domain in the 1950s. The team's relationship with the Latino community only began to repair when Mexican star pitcher Fernando Valenzuela became a must-see sensation for the Dodgers in the 1980s. This is not ancient history by any means. The Dodgers are only a few generations removed from displacing the local immigrant community, which explains why the silence from a franchise that worked for years to restore trust in the neighborhood it took over is suddenly fracturing.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Major projects bill expected to pass before MPs leave for the summer
OTTAWA — If you blink, you might miss it. Prime Minister Mark Carney's controversial major projects bill was set to finish its dash through the House of Commons today — the final day of the sitting before summer — with support from the Conservatives and not-so-quiet grumblings from the other opposition parties. 'Usually, on the last day of sitting before the summer, everyone is smiling, we're in a good mood, we pat ourselves on the backs. But today, I would say that's not really the case,' said Bloc Québécois MP Xavier Barsalou-Duval during a speech on Friday. The final vote on Bill C-5 in the House is set to happen shortly after 5 p.m. before making its way to the Senate for a final adoption expected within a week, on Friday, June 27. The legislation has two parts. The first, which has more support across party lines, aims to eliminate internal trade and labour mobility barriers in Canada. The second part, which would give cabinet sweeping powers to approve natural resource and infrastructure projects deemed in the national interest, has raised considerably more concerns. Indigenous communities, environmental groups, opposition parties and even some Liberal MPs have said they are uncomfortable with the lack of consultation with First Nations, Inuit and Metis people prior to tabling the bill, but also the extent of the powers that would give the government of the day the power to ignore other federal laws for five years. 'Pretending that this unprecedented power grab was ever discussed in the election is a sham, and we can add an 'e' to that. It's a shame,' said Green Party leader Elizabeth May. C-5 was rushed through committee earlier this week. Despite that, opposition parties managed to pass amendments which include exempting a number of laws — such as the Indian Act and the Conflict of Interest Act — from being ignored when considering major projects and publishing a list of national interest projects with timelines and costs. 'These amendments matter,' said Shannon Stubbs, energy and natural resource critic for the Conservatives when describing the changes in the House. 'They bring transparency, accountability, more certainty, more clarity and integrity to a bill that originally had none.' Stubbs said despite those changes, 'major concerns' remain. She cited the need to prevent ministers from removing projects from the national interest list at any time but also add in the bill clear timelines to approve projects to increase certainty for investors. On Friday, opposition parties claimed a small victory. NDP MP Jenny Kwan, with the help of the Bloc's Marilène Gill, argued the Speaker of the House should divide C-5 into two distinct parts so that MPs could vote on the portions on internal trade and major projects separately at third reading. Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia granted their request. 'While they are ultimately designed to strengthen the Canadian economy, they deal with different issues that could very well stand independently from one another,' he explained. The passage of C-5 concludes in a dramatic way a packed four-week spring sitting that saw Carney's government table significant omnibus bills, very fast, but adopt very few. The government tabled C-2, the Strong Borders Act, which seeks to secure the Canada-U.S. border, fight organized crime and fentanyl and boost the fight against financial crimes. It is facing criticism for sweeping new powers that would allow officials to obtain information without a warrant and for restricting the asylum claim process, among others. It also tabled C-4, the Making Life More Affordable for Canadians Act, which includes some of the government's campaign promises on affordability like a middle-class tax cut and removal of the GST on new homes for first-time homebuyers. However, the bill has been criticized as it also seeks to exempt federal political parties from modern privacy laws. Unlike the major projects bill, C-2 and C-4 were not fast-tracked, meaning that they will continue to make their way through the legislative process during the fall sitting. Interestingly, the first legislation to pass all stages in this new Parliament was not a government bill. Last week, MPs unanimously approved C-202, a Bloc bill to protect the supply management system which regulates the price and production of dairy, poultry and eggs, from future trade deals. That same bill was stalled in the Senate in the last legislature and ended up dying on the order paper when the election was called. This time, the Senate approved C-202 on division, and it is now awaiting royal assent. National Post calevesque@ Doug Ford apologizes to Ontario First Nations for his 'passionate' comments 'We have to get that balance right': Liberal MPs express worries about major projects bill Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.
