Climate: Clean Energy Notches A Funding Win For Moneymaking Solar

Plus: Building Waymo's electric robotaxi future; Trump's EPA is killing Energy Star
Current Climate brings you the latest news about the business of sustainability every Monday. Sign up to get it in your inbox.
Ithas been a gloomy period for clean energy-oriented fundraising since the Trump Administration kicked off in January–and proceeded to gut U.S. climate science and regulations while announcing plans to undo a range of federal programs incentivizing the shift away from greenhouse gas-spewing fossil fuels to noncarbon energy sources. But now Aligned Climate Capital, a cleantech fund managing a $2 billion portfolio, just raised $240 million for its latest solar power fund, topping its $200 million goal.
'The whole flow of capital to reinvest in funds has been slower, across the board. That's not just climate funds,' Aligned Climate CEO Peter Davidson told Forbes. 'But obviously climate funds, because of what's happening at the national level, [investors]
Among the reasons this funding round topped its target by 20% was because of the 'community' solar it backs–smaller solar farms of up to 10 megawatts of generation capacity that help supply local power systems without the grid connection headaches that bigger utility-scale projects face. And though it has some solar systems in California, many of its projects are concentrated in places that might not immediately seem like a hotbed of solar activity, such as Maine, New Hampshire and Delaware.
'Overwhelmingly, we're community solar power plant owners and operators,' said Davidson, director of the Energy Department's Loan Program Office during the Obama Administration and a former Morgan Stanley investment banker. 'We build them. We have our whole team that oversees construction, and we do operations and management, and we're running green power plants. By the time we purchase them, they're fully de-risked. We know the revenue so we have a very good sense when we transact exactly what the return of the assets is going to be. We've been doing this for 10 years, and so we have a very good network of developers we work with.'
In a time in which federal policy is shifting from renewables to promoting increased oil and gas extraction, the key to successful clean energy efforts is simple: ensure that the projects are moneymakers.
Inside The Waymo Factory Building An Electric Robotaxi Future
Step outside the main terminal at Phoenix's Sky Harbor airport to the rideshare zone on a hot spring day and you'll catch a glimpse of a fast-approaching future: driverless Waymo robotaxis queueing alongside human-driven Ubers and Lyfts to take waiting passengers to their next destination. The service just launched in Austin and continues to expand in San Francisco, Los Angeles and Silicon Valley, but Phoenix has been its home turf for years, kicking off paid public rides there in 2020. And now, the region that helped perfect the AI-enabled tech has quietly become Waymo's robotaxi production hub.
About 20 minutes east of Phoenix's airport in Mesa, Arizona, is a 239,000-square-foot factory that opened in October. Every day, it churns out several battery-powered, white Jaguar I-PACE electric SUVs loaded up with the company's custom-designed computer, cameras, radar and laser lidar sensors on a single production line. But the plan is to dramatically scale up the pace and automate output to keep up with growth plans, said Kent Yiu, Waymo's head of vehicle manufacturing, who previously managed production operations for Apple and General Motors.
'We looked at our five-year projection and said, 'Okay, to meet that, this facility will certainly need to be capable of doing tens of thousands per year,'' Yiu told Forbes. 'We have the capability, the capacity here to support that growth.'
The production scale is small compared to traditional auto plants that make hundreds of thousands of vehicles a year. But the 1,500 robotaxis Waymo has provide more than 250,000 paid rides a week or about 24 a day per vehicle, vastly more use than personal cars and trucks that are driven only a few times a day. And by the time the Mesa factory gets 10,000 Waymos on the road, the fleet could be booking 250,000 rides a day. That's well over 1.5 million a week. At that scale, Waymo's annual revenue could jump to $2 billion, up from a Forbes estimate of $100 million last year. The company declined to comment on those estimates.
Read more here
Dr. Steven Cohen, with Columbia University's Climate School, on the Trump Administration's elimination of 'Energy Star' appliance labels
EPA appears to be ending Energy Star, a voluntary energy efficiency program. Any idea why?
No. It's been around for a long time. Go to an electronics or appliance store and it's just part of the packaging.
I'm assuming that some non-governmental people put this plan together. I don't really understand some of these decisions. They're taking relatively non-controversial programs and ending them for no reason whatsoever.
This seems particularly odd since Energy Star saves people money by letting them see how much electricity a product uses.
Yes. The same is true of listing miles per gallon on a car. You might be against regulating a fleet's mile per gallon average, but wouldn't you want to know what you were buying and how much it's going to cost to run it?
This seems to come from an extreme conservative movement that just doesn't think the federal government should be doing anything. And the problem with that is our competition, especially China. Every successful economy is a mixed economy. You need capitalism for a whole lot of reasons, but the government has a role to play. But some elements want to eliminate as much of that as they can.
Energy Star has been around so long it's become a product label like organic, something many consumers look for. Isn't the designation beneficial for manufacturers?
Yes, I don't think there's any real industry opposition to having that information listed on a product. So it's just sort of this gratuitous stuff going on right now that doesn't make any sense.
Part of the value of Energy Star was that the government did the testing to certify the energy use of products. Having a third party do that is a useful thing.
NOAA's billion-dollar climate disaster database is going dark. There are many ways to ignore climate reality. One of the most effective is to stop measuring it (Forbes)
California and 15 other states sued the Trump administration, saying the federal government was illegally withholding billions of dollars awarded to states for building electric-vehicle charging stations (Reuters)
Republicans in the U.S. House are likely to kill a consumer tax credit for electric vehicles, according to Speaker Mike Johnson (Bloomberg)
Across America, big cities are sinking. A major reason is too much groundwater is being pumped out, new research shows, threatening buildings and infrastructure nationwide (New York Times)
The Interior Department ends air-quality monitoring at all national parks. The program collected data on the levels of harmful air pollutants at the 63 national parks in the United States (Washington Post)
For real energy dominance, we need the IRA. Former Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm argues that if Trump wants to achieve his goals, preserving Biden's manufacturing incentives is the only way (Heatmap)

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

18 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Trump Pledges 'Future Attacks' On Iran If No Quick Peace; Nuke Sites Bombings Were 'Spectacular Military Success,' POTUS Says

Two days after Donald Trump said he was going to give any decision on US involvement in Israel's war with Iran a couple more weeks, the president offered details on the bombing Saturday of three nuclear sites in the Islamic Republic and the potential of more to come. 'Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror,' Trump said from the White House tonight in a short speech covered live around the globe. More from Deadline U.S. Bombs Three Nuclear Sites In Iran, Donald Trump Announces Inside Gavin Newsom & Alex Padilla's Media Blitz Of Trump & JD Vance: "Is He Confused Again?" Governor Mocks POTUS JD Vance Says Federal Presence Still Needed In Los Angeles, Accuses Gavin Newsom And Karen Bass Of "Encouraging Far-Left Agitators" - Update 'Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace,' he went on to say. 'If they do not, future attacks would be far greater and a lot easier.' Noticeably not speaking from the Oval Office, Trump was surrounded by Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Praising the military, Trump said tonight that Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine would be giving a press conference early Sunday at 8 a.m ET with more details of the trio of attacks. Beyond the obvious logic of the Pentagon being in pole position in a matter like this, the 40,000 US troops in and around the Middle East are widely seen as a possible target for any reaction from Iran going forward. Just before Trump's less than 10-minute speech tonight, Iranian State TV displayed a graphic at one point of those nearby U.S. bases with the text 'Within Range.' Trump made no mention of those troops or bases in his comments Saturday. Also before Trump was in front of the cameras, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gave comments of his own, capped with 'Congratulations President Trump.' As Trump spoke, from the same place in the White House where Barack Obama stood in 2011 and revealed the successful killing of Osama Bin Laden, the administration released photos of a ball cap wearing POTUS and top officials in the Situation Room earlier Saturday. The group are seemingly watching video of military activity – also with Obama comparisons. President Donald J. Trump in The Situation Room, June 21, 2025 — The White House (@WhiteHouse) June 22, 2025 Declaring that 'Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated,' Trump repeated his threat of more to come. 'There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran, far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days,' he noted with a stumble or two in reference to the beginning of Israel's hits on foe Tehran. 'Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight's was the most difficult of them all, by far and perhaps the most lethal, but if peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill, most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes. There is no military in the world that could have done what we did tonight, not even close.' Away at his New Jersey residence this weekend, poll besieged Trump made public the attack on the Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan sites not long after returning to the White House this afternoon and participating in a meeting with his National Security team. 'Congratulations to our great American Warriors,' Trump posted online. 'There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE! Thank you for your attention to this matter.' Worries of what Iran's reaction will be in the region, to US bases and around the world became part of the TV and online coverage also as soon as news of the American bombing began. Also, concerns about secret Iranian facilities or unaccounted for nuclear material were part of the discussion in the absence of significant details of the American action in the hours before Trump's speech. With the world waiting for Trump's remarks from the White House, officials of the Islamic Republic appeared on Iranian state TV earlier Saturday. The official said that the regime 'didn't suffer a major blow' because 'the materials had already been taken out,' according to the BBC. In the last few days, Trump seemed to be shifting his position on Iran, At one point he was rushing back to DC from the awkward G7 meeting in Canada, but then having his press secretary kicking any decision down the line up to 'two weeks.' There were also reports of divisions with the top tiar of the administration over going into Iran with VP Vance and DCI Tulsi Gabbard allegedly cautioning against more conflict and another Middle East war for the USA. Today, Defense Sec. Hegseth's ex-employers at Fox News reported that B-2 bombers and Tomahawk missiles were used as well as half a dozen bunker busters dropped on the deep buried Fordow facility alone, officials from Tehran went on state TV to insist the sites were long since emptied. Additionally, those Iranian officials said 'the materials had already been taken out.' A comment many military pundits on US cable TV saw as nuclear materials and centrifuges are now on the move in Iran. Though America joining the Jewish State's more than weeklong bombardment of the Islamic Republic had split Trump's MAGA base with the likes of Tucker Carlson denouncing such a move, Senators such as John Fetterman (D-PA) and Lindsey Graham (R-NC) Saturday praised the US attack. Sen Tim Kaine (D-VA) had a very different response. 'Horrible judgment,' Kaine said online Saturday night. ' I will push for all Senators to vote on whether they are for this third idiotic Middle East war,' the Senator concluded. With American military forces engaged now in the conflict, it is unknown if Trump will still be heading to Europe for the NATO summit next week. Best of Deadline Sean 'Diddy' Combs Sex-Trafficking Trial Updates: Cassie Ventura's Testimony, $10M Hotel Settlement, Drugs, Violence, & The Feds A Full Timeline Of Blake Lively & Justin Baldoni's 'It Ends With Us' Feud In Court, Online & In The Media 'Poker Face' Season 2 Guest Stars: From Katie Holmes To Simon Hellberg

Yahoo

19 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Shuffle Board: Kering, Tailored Brands, Pendleton Name CEOs

Omnichannel specialty retailer Tailored Brands announced John Tighe as chief executive officer and board member, effective Aug. 5. Tighe, who served most recently as president of the parent company to Men's Wearhouse and Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, succeeds Peter Sachse, who will transition to executive chairman next month. Tighe joined Tailored Brands in May 2021 as executive vice president and chief customer officer and became president in March 2022. He previously served as president of Peerless Clothing and held leadership positions at J.C. Penney, including chief merchant and executive vice president, as well. Portland-based brand Pendleton Woolen Mills has appointed Jennifer Ingraffea as CEO. She succeeds John Bishop as the first female to hold the top position at the 162-year-old company. Bishop, who retired in February, will remain as CEO through July to work with the former Nike exec before transitioning to chairman of the board. More from Sourcing Journal GXO Cleared to Acquire Wincanton, Taps DHL Vet as New CEO Shuffle Board: Vera Bradley CEO Exits, Lectra Names Deputy CEO Shuffle Board: Better Cotton Names Nonprofit Exec Nick Weatherill CEO Luxury conglomerate Kering's board of directors, chaired by François-Henri Pinault, approved the appointment of Luca de Meo as chief executive officer of the group, as recommended by the appointments and governance committee. As part of a renewed governance structure, the role of chairman of the board of directors, held by Pinault, will be separated from that of CEO. OTB Group-owned label Marni confirmed the exit of creative director Francesco Risso after a decade with the brand, according to a press statement. The statement did not say when a new creative director would be announced. The Advanced Functional Fabrics of America (AFFOA), a public-private partnership led by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, announced that Dr. Eric Evans has been appointed as the new chair of the AFFOA board of directors. As chair, Evans will help lead the organization in its mission to accelerate the development and commercialization of textile technologies that integrate electronics and sensors, among other functionalities.

CBS News

20 minutes ago

• CBS News

Lawmakers respond to U.S. launching strikes on 3 Iranian nuclear facilities

Washington - Lawmakers across the political aisle offered a mixed response Saturday following President Trump's announcement that the United States launched strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities. Immediately following Mr. Trump's announcement, Congressional Republicans, including Sen. Lindsey Graham and Sen. Ted Cruz, backed Mr. Trump after he announced in a Truth Social post that "A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow." "There is not another military in the World that could have done this," Mr. Trump said in the post. "NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!Thank you for your attention to this matter." Here's what lawmakers are saying: Some Republican lawmakers back U.S. strikes in Iran "Good. This was the right call. The regime deserves it. Well done, President @realDonaldTrump," Sen. Graham, a South Carolina Republican, said on X. House Speaker Mike Johnson said in a social media post that "the military operations in Iran should serve as a clear reminder to our adversaries and allies that President Trump means what he says." "The President gave Iran's leader every opportunity to make a deal, but Iran refused to commit to a nuclear disarmament agreement," Johnson said in the post. "President Trump has been consistent and clear that a nuclear-armed Iran will not be tolerated. That posture has now been enforced with strength, precision, and clarity." Texas Sen. Cruz, who has backed of Israeli strikes against Iranian targets, said in a statement: "As long as Iran was able to access and conduct activities at Fordow, they could still rush to build a nuclear arsenal. Tonight's actions have gone far in foreclosing that possibility, and countering the apocalyptic threat posed by an Iranian nuclear arsenal." The strikes announced by Mr. Trump Saturday evening further escalated the conflict between Iran and Israel that started June 13. Mr. Trump, on Wednesday, was still mulling over whether the U.S. military would join Israel's ongoing attacks on Iran. Before the announcement of the strikes, Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia split with Mr. Trump and said, "This is not our fight." "Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war," she said in a post on X. "There would not be bombs falling on the people of Israel if Netanyahu had not dropped bombs on the people of Iran first." Rep. Rick Crawford, Republican chair of the House Intelligence Committee, praised Mr. Trump in a statement and said, "I have been in touch with the White House before this action and will continue to track developments closely with them in the coming days." Mr. Trump did receive pushback from Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who called the strikes "not constitutional." Massie introduced a resolution on Tuesday to prohibit U.S. involvement in the conflict. Some Democrats say U.S. strikes in Iran are unconstitutional Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries on Saturday demanded that Congress be "fully and immediately" briefed on the attacks in a classified setting. "President Trump misled the country about his intentions, failed to seek congressional authorization for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East," Jeffries said. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said Mr. Trump's decision to bomb Iran without Congressional authorization "is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers." "He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations," the New York Democrat wrote. "It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have been looking to limit Mr. Trump's ability to order U.S. strikes on Iran amid its ongoing war with Israel, emphasizing that only Congress has the power to declare war under the Constitution. The Constitution grants Congress the sole power to declare war, and the extent of the president's authority to wade into conflict abroad without the approval of the legislative branch has been challenged in recent years. "Dear colleagues: Don't make another mistake in dragging our country into another war," Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib of Michigan said in a post. "You can stop the President and the war mongers in Congress by signing on to our War Powers Resolution." Democratic Rep. Jim McGovern of Massachusetts called on Congress to return to Washington, D.C., to vote on Massie's legislation "to stop this madness." In contrast to other Congressional Democrats, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania said he fully supports the U.S. strikes on Iran. "As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS," Fetterman said in a social media post. "Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities. I'm grateful for and salute the finest military in the world." Sen. Bernie Sanders, who's on a tour this weekend in red Southern states, announced the news of the U.S. attacks on Iran to his supporters and was met the chants of "no more war" from the crowd. "It is so grossly unconstitutional," Sanders said. "All of you know that the only entity that can take this country to war is the U.S. Congress. The president does not have the right." and contributed to this report.