ECJ rejection of Minimum Wages Directive would deal blow to social Europe programme
The annulling of the Adequate Minimum Wages Directive by the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) would be 'profoundly damaging' to the EU at a time when it is already under attack by 'far-right Eurosceptics', according to a new trade union-commissioned report by the social policy think tank, Tasc.
The directive, which was transposed into law in Ireland last year, is under threat due to a case taken against its validity by Denmark, supported by Sweden. They argue the EU is exceeding its power to influence the setting of wage levels in member states.
In January, advocate general Nicholas Emiliou issued an opinion in the case recommending that the directive be annulled in full. The court is not obliged to follow the recommendation but tends to in about two-thirds of instances.
Despite this, the trade union movement has remained publicly optimistic the case will be rejected. The final judgment is expected within a matter of months.
READ MORE
The Tasc report, the EU Minimum Wage Directive and the Battle for Social Europe, which was commissioned by Ictu, Siptu and the Financial Services Union. suggests the directive is already having a significant impact across Europe towards achieving its primary goal, an increase in minimum rates of pay.
In Ireland, unions see one of the mechanisms set out in the directive to achieve this – the extension of collective bargaining coverage to at least 80 per cent of the workforce – as a primary objective.
As Ireland currently falls far short of this level, under the directive, the Government is required to produce an action plan before the end of the year on how to meet that goal. However, with the pending court decision, this is now in doubt.
Launching the Tasc report on Tuesday, senior economist Oisín Gilmore said a decision to annul the directive would have far-reaching consequences for the EU, its member states and citizens.
'If the ECJ were to adopt [Mr] Emiliou's reasoning, it would not only undermine the directive,' he said, 'but it could also cast doubt on the legal foundation of other key EU rights, such as the right to annual paid leave and to pay replacement for maternity leave.
'Such an outcome would erode trust in the EU's ability to deliver on the promises of social justice and economic fairness that underpin its legitimacy'.
Ictu general secretary Owen Reidy said the court should reject the case but that, even if it does not, both Ireland and the European Union must prioritise addressing low wages and in-work poverty.
'To this end, governments here and across Europe must enhance trade union rights and promote collective bargaining by improving union access to workplaces, implementing protections against union-busting and safeguarding union representatives from discrimination.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Government concerned UNIFIL's Lebanon mandate won't be renewed
There is mounting concern in Government that the United Nation's peacekeeping operation in southern Lebanon may not have its mandate renewed in August. Ireland has participated in the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) since 1978. Ireland has an unbroken record with UNIFIL and currently has more than 340 troops stationed in southern Lebanon. Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris has begun to contact other EU member states about the issue. He is due to raise it again when he travels to Brussels tomorrow for a Foreign Affairs Council meeting on Monday. The UN will review UNIFIL in August, amid concerns that the United States could withdraw financial backing for the operation. Israel has also been highly critical of the force. The Tánaiste has already discussed options relating to the future of UNIFIL with the Chief of Staff of the Defence Forces Lt Gen Rossa Mulcahy. It is understood Mr Harris will seek to impress upon his EU counterparts on the absolute need for the mission to continue, in order to ensure stability and peace in the region. It is expected that France will lead the campaign to extend UNIFIL's mandate when it comes to a vote in August. On 28 August last year, the UN Security Council unanimously passed resolution 2749 extending UNIFIL's mission for 12 months. However, the upcoming talks will be the first since the cessation of hostilities between Hezbollah, which has a strong base in southern Lebanon, and Israel. It is also expected that the Lebanese government will strongly support the renewal of the mandate. The Cabinet backed the Irish Defence Forces' continued participation in UNIFIL last month. In New York, Israel is said to be lobbying at the UN headquarters for a downgrade of the role of UNIFIL. The Trump administration is viewed as being sympathetic to that argument, but it is currently unclear what position it will adopt in August. Last month, Irish soldiers who are serving as peacekeepers in southern Lebanon came under fire near Israel's blueline, while on a joint patrol with the Lebanese Armed Forces. The UNIFIL Force Commander conveyed the Government's anger and concern at the shooting incident directly to the Israel Defence Forces (IDF). Mr Harris condemned the incident at the time and said it was an "utterly inappropriate, utterly unacceptable" attack on Irish peacekeeping troops in southern Lebanon. "This is the latest in a range of what I view as intimidatory behaviour by the IDF [Israel Defence Forces] towards peacekeepers, or as we saw recently, Irish diplomats too. So this is not acceptable," Mr Harris said. The incident took place close to the village of Yaroun and the patrol withdrew from the area when it occurred. No injuries to personnel on the patrol were reported and no damage reported to the armoured vehicles they were operating from. The location was roughly 10km from the main Irish military base in Lebanon, known as 2-45 or Camp Shamrock. It was also 5km from an Irish base on the Blue Line, called 6-52. Also last month, in south Lebanon.
Irish Examiner
7 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Nuclear diplomacy stuck, Israel says it killed top Iran commander
Iran deems European proposals to curb its nuclear programme unrealistic and a hurdle to agreement, a senior Iranian official said on Saturday, while Israel said it killed a veteran Iranian commander during attacks by both sides. The more than week-long air war between longtime foes Israel and Iran continued with reports of strikes on an Iranian nuclear facility. The US was weighing whether to back Israel in the conflict while other powers urged de-escalation. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi met British, French and German counterparts, plus the EU, on Friday in Geneva in search of a path back to diplomacy and a possible ceasefire. But proposals made by the European powers were "unrealistic", the senior Iranian official told Reuters, saying that insistence on them would not bring the agreement closer. "In any case, Iran will review the European proposals in Tehran and present its responses in the next meeting," the official said, adding that zero enrichment was a dead end and Tehran would not negotiate over its defensive capabilities. Israel launched attacks on June 13, saying Iran was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons, while Iran says its atomic programme is only for peaceful purposes. Israel is widely assumed to possess nuclear weapons, which it neither confirms nor denies. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said that Saeed Izadi, who led the Palestine Corps of the Quds Force, the Iranian Revolutionary Guards' overseas arm, was killed in a strike on an apartment in the city of Qom. Calling his killing a "major achievement for Israeli intelligence and the Air Force", Katz said Izadi had financed and armed the Palestinian militant group Hamas ahead of its October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which triggered the war in Gaza. The Revolutionary Guards said five of its members died in attacks on Khorramabad, according to Iranian media. They did not mention Izadi, who was on US and British sanctions lists, but said Israel had also attacked a building in Qom, with initial reports of a 16-year-old killed and two people injured. Israeli emergency teams work in an unpopulated building after it was hit by a missile fired from Iran, in Haifa, Israel, Friday, June 20, 2025. Picture: AP Photo/Baz Ratner HUNDREDS KILLED At least 430 people have been killed and 3,500 injured in Iran since Israel began its attacks, Iranian state-run Nour News said, citing the health ministry. In Israel, 24 civilians have been killed by Iranian missile attacks, according to local authorities, in the worst conflict between the longtime enemies. At a meeting of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) in Istanbul, Araqchi said Israel's aggression, which he said had indications of US involvement, should stop so Iran can "come back to diplomacy". "It is obvious that I can't go to negotiations with the US when our people are under bombardment under the support of the US", he told reporters on the sidelines, before meeting Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan. The top Iranian diplomat said US involvement in the conflict would be "very dangerous". Araqchi is set to visit Moscow, Iran's ally, on Monday. President Donald Trump has said he would take up to two weeks to decide whether the United States should enter the conflict on Israel's side, enough time "to see whether or not people come to their senses", he said. Iran would be able to have a nuclear weapon "within a matter of weeks, or certainly within a matter of months", he said on Friday, adding: "We can't let that happen." Yet in March, Tulsi Gabbard, his national intelligence director, testified to Congress that the US intelligence community judged that Tehran was not working on a nuclear warhead. The International Atomic Energy Agency said that a centrifuge manufacturing workshop at the Isfahan nuclear facility, one of Iran's biggest, was hit - but added it contained no nuclear material. Gulf Cooperation Council ambassadors expressed concerns to UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi about the safety of nuclear facilities close to their countries and "dangerous repercussions" of targeting them, Qatar state news agency said. Israel said it was attacking military infrastructure. Israeli emergency teams work in an unpopulated building after it was hit by a missile fired from Iran, in Haifa, Israel, Friday, June 20, 2025. Picture: AP Photo/Baz Ratner INTERCEPTIONS OVER TEL AVIV Early on Saturday, air raid sirens were triggered across parts of central Israel and in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, with missile interceptions visible over Tel Aviv and explosions echoing. There were no reports of casualties. The Human Rights Activists News Agency, a US-based rights organisation that tracks Iran, gave a higher death toll than Tehran, saying Israeli attacks have killed 639 people there. Those killed in Iran include the military's top echelon and nuclear scientists. Israel said it also killed a second commander of the Guards' overseas arm, whom it identified as Benham Shariyari, during an overnight strike. Iran's health minister, Mohammadreza Zafarqandi, said Israel has attacked three hospitals during the conflict, killing two health workers and a child, and has targeted six ambulances, according to Fars. Asked about such reports, an Israeli military official said that only military targets were being struck, though there may have been collateral damage in some incidents. An Iranian missile hit a hospital in the southern Israeli city of Beersheba on Thursday. Turkey, Russia and China have demanded immediate de-escalation. Despite the downbeat assessment from the senior Iranian official, French President Emmanuel Macron said he and Iranian counterpart Masoud Pezeshkian agreed on a Saturday call to accelerate talks. Israel says it will not stop attacks until it dismantles Iran's nuclear programme and ballistic missile capabilities, which it views as an existential threat, saying this could take more than a few weeks. -Reuters
The Journal
9 hours ago
- The Journal
Taoiseach calls for 'concrete action' after human rights obligations in EU-Israel deal breached
ISRAEL BREACHED ITS association agreement with the EU by not fulfilling human rights obligations, in its military actions in Gaza, under a cooperation deal with member states, a much-anticipated review has found. Israel's retaliatory offensive in Gaza – which has resulted in the deaths of 55,637 people, including women and children, since 7 October 2023 according to the health ministry there – is likely not in line with the EU-Israel Association Agreement, the review said. Taoiseach Micheál Martin, who was among the 17 European leaders who called on the EU to conduct the review last month in the aftermath of Israel's near-three month siege on Gaza, has welcomed the conclusions. He said today that 'concrete steps' must be taken in respect of the review, which he intends to discuss at a leaders' summit in Brussels next week. Martin said the review paints a 'grim picture of a sustained and deliberate failure by Israel to adhere to its international obligations, especially in Gaza but also in the West Bank'. According to the Taoiseach, the review – which will be formally presented by the EU's foreign affairs commissioner to European ministers on Monday – highlights a continued restriction of basic aid, such as food, medicine and other vital supplies, in Gaza. The review says that it amounts to 'collective punishment of the civilian population' – which is illegal under international law – and that it also amounts to the use of 'starvation as a method of war'. It also references the 'unprecedented level of killing and injury of civilians in Gaza' resulting from 'indiscriminate attacks without proportion or precaution'. Advertisement Many of these incidents in recent weeks have taken place at and near aid stations in the region . Israel has also been criticised in the review for its attacks on hospitals, the forced displacement of the civilian population and the murder of journalists in Gaza. Martin said that these events have taken place 'with a persistent lack of accountability'. In the West Bank, the review reports a 'sustained oppression' of the Palestinian population, including through 'state and settler violence, the appropriation of land, and the use of detention as a form of collective punishment'. Martin said there must be 'serious consequences' for when human rights obligations and international law requirements are not observed in European association agreements. While the review was a major step by European leaders, who have been criticised for their siding with Israel and lag in condemnation in the past, it is unlikely that immediate action will be taken in respect of the review. European ministers and leaders, including the EU Foreign Affairs Commissioner Kaja Kallas and President of the Commission Ursula von der Leyen, have recently voiced support for Israel in its war against Iran. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz this week said Israel was doing 'the dirty work… for all of us' with its campaign targeting Iran's nuclear programme. Halting diplomatic dialogue with Israel – a measure that was already rejected last year – also requires backing from all EU member states. With reporting by AFP Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
