From Asylum to Airport Detention: A Journey Cut Short

VANCOUVER, B.C. — In an era of unprecedented global migration and heightened security protocols, stories of hope and fear often collide at international borders. For thousands seeking refuge, the airport is not a gateway to freedom—it's the final stop in a journey of desperation.
Despite the promise of asylum protections under international law, many asylum seekers are detained upon arrival, held without charge, and sometimes deported back into danger.
This press release examines the legal landscape, historical precedent, and recent high-profile cases that highlight the fragility of asylum rights when they conflict with national security interests.
Amicus International Consulting, a firm specializing in legal identity transitions and global asylum advisory services, has seen a marked increase in clients facing 'airport limbo'—a state of uncertainty where neither asylum nor freedom is guaranteed.
Asylum and the Airport: Where Law Meets Reality
The 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol form the foundation of global asylum law, obligating signatory countries not to return individuals to territories where their life or freedom would be threatened. Known as the principle of non-refoulement, it is a central principle of international human rights law.
But at international airports, these protections can fall apart.
Travellers arriving without valid visas or documentation—even those declaring an intent to seek asylum—are often detained in secure transit areas or immigration holding centers. In many cases, they are denied entry before ever setting foot on sovereign soil, creating a legal gray area.
Case Study: The Detention of Edward Snowden
In 2013, former NSA contractor Edward Snowden found himself stranded in the transit zone of Moscow's Sheremetyevo Airport. After leaking classified documents about U.S. surveillance programs, Snowden attempted to seek asylum in multiple countries.
Though he had applied for asylum, he had no valid passport. The U.S. had cancelled his travel document mid-flight. Trapped in legal limbo for over a month, Snowden's case demonstrated how state power and passport control can override humanitarian protections. It also spotlighted how modern airports can serve as detention facilities by another name.
The Practice of 'Inadmissibility'
Countries including the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia commonly rely on inadmissibility determinations to prevent entry. In such cases, an arriving asylum seeker is denied access on the grounds of documentation failure, a criminal record, or security concerns—even before a refugee hearing can be held.
In many of these jurisdictions, immigration officers have the authority to exercise discretion at the border. And while claimants can request a hearing or legal review, the process is often delayed or inaccessible from inside detention.
Case Study: The Syrian Family in Malaysia
In 2017, a Syrian family fleeing civil war arrived at Kuala Lumpur International Airport, seeking asylum. With no valid entry visa, they were denied access and spent over seven months in the transit area, surviving on airline food and sleeping in terminal chairs.
Despite Malaysia not being a signatory to the Refugee Convention, human rights groups intervened, and eventually, Canada agreed to resettle them. Their case raised urgent questions about moral obligations beyond legal treaties and the role of non-signatory states in humanitarian crises.
Statelessness and Detention
One of the most vulnerable groups facing indefinite detention at airports is stateless individuals—those without nationality or recognized citizenship.
With no travel documents, no issuing authority to accept them, and no country of return, stateless people can languish in holding areas for years.
Notable Example: Mehran Karimi Nasseri
The inspiration behind Steven Spielberg's The Terminal , Mehran Karimi Nasseri, lived in Paris' Charles de Gaulle Airport's Terminal 1 for 18 years. A complex web of lost documents, denied entry, and bureaucratic impasses left him in a perpetual state of limbo. Though dramatized in pop culture, his case remains a chilling example of bureaucratic abandonment in global mobility systems.
When the System Backfires: Cases of Return to Danger
While many countries promise legal due process for asylum seekers, expedited removals have led to tragic outcomes.
In 2022, a Cameroonian journalist, fleeing political persecution, was deported back after being denied asylum at a U.S. airport. Within weeks, he was reportedly imprisoned and tortured by government forces.
In 2024, an Iranian LGBTQ+ activist was detained upon arrival in Istanbul. Despite declaring intent to seek asylum, he was returned to Tehran under a bilateral deportation agreement. His fate remains unknown.
These cases highlight the life-and-death consequences of ignoring asylum declarations made in transit.
How Technology Is Weaponizing Borders
Modern border surveillance technology—biometric scans, advanced passenger screening (APIS), and artificial intelligence—has made it easier for governments to pre-screen and flag travellers before they arrive.
In 2025, over 120 countries are expected to participate in Passenger Name Record (PNR) data sharing, which tracks a wide range of details, including meal preferences and seat selections. When correlated with immigration risk profiles, this can result in pre-arrival denials or on-the-spot detentions.
According to Amicus International's research, more than 4,000 travellers were denied boarding based on advanced biometric or risk analysis in 2024 alone.
The Legal Loophole: 'Not Yet Admitted'
A central problem lies in the legal status of individuals who arrive at an airport but are 'not yet admitted' into a country. In this state, they are often not considered to be under the country's jurisdiction, despite being physically present within its borders.
This loophole allows countries to bypass due process by claiming that immigration laws don't apply until the individual is officially admitted.
Critics argue that this destroys the intent of asylum law and creates a humanitarian vacuum in some of the world's most modern transportation hubs.
Amicus International: Creating Legal Pathways Before the Journey Begins
At Amicus International Consulting, clients are advised not to wait until they are at the airport to begin their asylum process.
Instead, the firm helps at-risk individuals: Obtain second passports through legal citizenship-by-investment or ancestry programs
through legal citizenship-by-investment or ancestry programs File pre-travel asylum or humanitarian visa requests
Legally change names and identities when doing so provides enhanced security
when doing so provides enhanced security Secure legal counsel in receiving countries before embarking on high-risk travel
before embarking on high-risk travel Create documented case files that support asylum or protected status
Amicus believes that the key to avoiding airport detention is preparation and proactivity, rather than post-arrival improvisation.
Case Study: Asylum Success Through Strategic Planning
In 2023, Amicus assisted a Rwandan political dissident targeted by government militias. Rather than risk detention in transit, the client was helped through a multi-jurisdictional citizenship program, securing Saint Lucia nationality via investment. With that passport, they entered Europe visa-free and applied for asylum once safely within a cooperative jurisdiction.
The asylum case was approved within nine months, and the client is now a professor at a public university in the Netherlands.
Legal Solutions, Not Smuggling
Amicus stresses that its approach is rooted in legality and ethics. It rejects any association with smuggling networks or fraudulent document operations. Instead, it provides clients with diplomatic, legal, and administrative solutions to ensure safety, dignity, and compliance with international law.
Policy Recommendations
To address this growing global issue, Amicus calls on governments and institutions to: Create expedited humanitarian visa programs at embassies and consulates Ensure immediate access to legal counsel upon declaration of asylum Ban the detention of stateless individuals for more than 90 days Reform inadmissibility policies to include pre-screened protections Enhance accountability for returns that result in torture or death
Conclusion: The Airport Is Not a Courtroom
As migration pressures increase globally, airports have become unexpected battlegrounds for asylum rights. Between biometric profiling and bureaucratic indifference, genuine refugees risk being turned away—sometimes with fatal consequences.
Amicus International Consulting believes that asylum is a right, not a privilege, and that systems must be redesigned to reflect this principle at every stage of the journey.
Contact Information
Phone: +1 (604) 200-5402Email: info@amicusint.ca
Website: www.amicusint.ca

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

New York Post

4 hours ago

• New York Post

Anti-Israel protester Mahmoud Khalil speaks out after release from Louisiana lockup

Anti-Israel protester Mahmoud Khalil lamented leaving behind some 'incredible men' on Friday as he left a Louisiana detention facility, which he hopes becomes a museum to what he described as 'America's racist policies.' 'I leave some incredible men behind me, over 1,000 people behind me, in a place where they shouldn't have been in the first place,' Khalil told reporters after walking out of the La Salle Detention Facility in Jena, La. 'I hope the next time that I will be in Jena is to actually visit this as a museum on America's racist policies against immigrants,' the former Columbia University student added. 3 Khalil said he'll join his wife and child in New York after being released from a federal detention center in Louisiana. AP After being picked up by federal immigration authorities on March 8, Khalil spent 104 days at the rural Louisiana detention center as the Trump administration fought to deport the Syrian-born permanent resident for allegedly engaging in activities 'aligned to Hamas,' a Palestinian terror group, while studying at Columbia. 'The Trump administration are doing their best to dehumanize everyone here,' Khalil charged outside the detention center, 'whether you are a US citizen, an immigrant, or just a person on this land doesn't mean that you are less of a human.' '[President Trump] and his administration, they chose the wrong person for this,' he said defiantly. 'That doesn't mean that there is a right person.' Khalil, wearing a keffiyeh, went on to slam his alma mater, accusing the Ivy League school of 'investing in the genocide of the Palestinian people.' 'There is no right person who should be detained, who are actually protesting a genocide, for protesting their university – Columbia University – that is investing in the genocide of the Palestinian people,' he said. Newark federal Judge Michael Farbiarz, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, ordered Khalil's release earlier Friday, finding that the Trump administration may be unfairly holding him in retaliation for his outspoken stance against Israel's war with Hamas. Farbiarz determined that Khalil is not a flight risk and 'not a danger to the community.' 3 Khalil said the Trump administration 'chose the wrong person for this.' AP 3 Khalil spent 104 days at the detention facility in Jena, La. DAN ANDERSON/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock The anti-Israel activist said the first thing he'll do when he returns home to New York is 'just hug my wife and son.' Khalil's wife, an American citizen, gave birth to their son in April while her husband was being held in the Louisiana facility. 'The only time I spent with my son was a specified one-hour limit that the government had imposed on us … so that means that now I can actually hug him and Noor, my wife, without looking at the clock,' Khalil said. 'The moment you enter this facility, your rights leave you, leave you behind,' he continued. 'So, once you enter there, you see a different reality – just a different reality about this country that supposedly champions human rights and liberty and justice.' 'But once you cross, literally, that door, you see that opposite side of what's actually happening in this country.' Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin slammed Farbiarz ruling and told The Post she expects a higher court to order Khalil's return to federal custody. 'An immigration judge, not a district judge, has the authority to decide if Mr. Khalil should be released or detained,' McLaughlin said in a statement. 'On the same day an immigration judge denied Khalil bond and ordered him removed, one rogue district judge ordered him released.' 'This is yet another example of how out of control members of the judicial branch are undermining national security. Their conduct not only denies the result of the 2024 election, it also does great harm to our constitutional system by undermining public confidence in the courts.' McLaughlin argued that 'it is a privilege to be granted a visa or green card to live and study in the United States of America' and that the Trump administration 'acted well within its statutory and constitutional authority to detain Khalil, as it does with any alien who advocates for violence, glorifies and supports terrorists, harasses Jews, and damages property.' 'An immigration judge has already vindicated this position. We expect a higher court to do the same.'

UPI

4 hours ago

• UPI

Ex-Columbia student Mahmoud Khalil released from ICE detention after judge's order

Pro-Palestinian protesters hold flags and signs seekingh the release of Mahmoud Khaul in New York City on March 10. He was arrested three days earlier and held in Louisiana until his release Friday that was ordered by a federal judge. Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo June 20 (UPI) -- Former Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil on Friday night was freed from federal detention in central Louisiana after a federal judge ordered his release. In Newark, N.J., U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz said that prosecutors didn't provide a legitimate justification for 104 days of detention since March 8 by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The Syrian national organized campus protests favoring Hamas while enrolled at Columbia University in New York City, which runs counter to U.S. foreign policy. Farbiarz, who was appointed by President Joe Biden, said it was "highly, highly unusual" the government still wanted him detained. "Together, they suggest that there is at least something to the underlying claim that there is an effort to use the immigration charge here to punish the petitioner - and, of course, that would be unconstitutional," the judge said. He was ordered to surrender his passport and travel documents, and restricted to four states and Washington, D.C. While in detention, Khalil missed the birth of his first child in New York in April, and he was allowed to hold him while in custody in May. His wife is a U.S. citizen. Just before 8 p.m. CDT, Khalil walked out of the detention center in Jena, La., about 220 miles northwest of New Orleans, with his lawyers and wearing a kaffiyeh, a symbol of Palestinian solidarity. He said no person "should actually be detained for protesting a genocide," Khalil said. "Justice will prevail." "After more than three months we can finally breathe a sigh of relief and know that Mahmoud is on his way home to me and Deen, who never should have been separated from his father," Dr. Noor Abdalla, Mahmoud Khalil's wife, said in a statement released by the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey. "We know this ruling does not begin to address the injustices the Trump administration has brought upon our family, and so many others the government is trying to silence for speaking out against Israel's ongoing genocide against Palestinians. But today we are celebrating Mahmoud coming back to New York to be reunited with our little family, and the community that has supported us since the day he was unjustly taken for speaking out for Palestinian freedom." Alina Das, one of Khalil's lawyers and co-director of New York University's Immigrant Rights Clinic, said: "The purpose of every step that the government has taken in this case has been to ensure that Mr. Khalil remains locked away until he is deported, as retaliation and punishment for his speech." After the birth of his son Deen, he wrote: "During your first moments, I buried my face in my arms and kept my voice low so that the 70 other men sleeping in this concrete room would not see my cloudy eyes or hear my voice catch. I feel suffocated by my rage and the cruelty of a system that deprived your mother and me of sharing this experience. Why do faceless politicians have the power to strip human beings of their divine moments? "Since that morning, I have come to recognize the look in the eyes of every father in this detention center. I sit here contemplating the immensity of your birth and wonder how many more firsts will be sacrificed to the whims of the US government, which denied me even the chance of furlough to attend your birth." He was arrested outside student housing on the campus. On June 11, Farbiarz ordered Khalil's release after determining that the government could no longer detain him over the claim he is a threat to the country's foreign policy. Then two days later, Trump administration said Khalil could be detained because they said he kept some prior work off his application for permanent residency. The judge allowed the detention to continue. The Justice Department wanted him detained until an immigration judge could weigh the matter, claiming tFarbiarz does not have jurisdiction. Farbiarz said it would be a "waste of time" to send the case to an immigration judge who would likely reach his same conclusion. Other pro-Palestinian activists have also been released as their immigration cases go through the courts. In April, Secretary of State Marco Rubio released a memo, citing an obscure provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. The secretary of state can deport noncitizens if the secretary determines their presence in the country would result in "potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States." The arrest was carried out by the ICE, which is part of Homeland Security. Khalil, who was born in 1995, grew up in a Palestinian refugee camp in Syria and was granted permanent U.S. resident status. H

Politico

9 hours ago

• Politico

Top Pentagon spy pick rejected by White House

It is not clear why the White House opted not to move forward with Angle's nomination, or if he ever held an interview with Trump. A spokesperson for the Pentagon referred POLITICO to the White House. The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Angle's name being withdrawn from consideration comes after POLITICO reported that both Hegseth and Gabbard have dwindling influence over the White House's Iran policy. Trump fired the previous head of the NSA , Gen. Timothy Haugh, and his top deputy without explanation this April, following a meeting with right-wing activist Laura Loomer at the White House. The Trump administration has been searching for permanent leadership for the powerful signals intelligence agency, as the outbreak of war between Israel and Iran raised the specter of direct American military involvement in the Middle East. Trump said Thursday he'll decide whether to join the war within the next two weeks. Angle does not have the typical background favored for the role. He is the commander of Allied Special Operations Forces Command and Special Operations Command Europe. And despite serving as deputy commanding general of operations for the U.S. Army Cyber Command in 2019, he has less background in cybersecurity and intelligence than recent heads of the NSA, including Haugh and his predecessor, Gen. Paul Nakasone. The head of the NSA is 'dual-hatted' and also helms U.S. Cyber Command. The Trump administration is reportedly reviewing that arrangement , though Hegseth testified Wednesday that the department for now is 'maintaining the status quo.' The role of director of the NSA requires Senate confirmation. With his background in special operations forces, Angle may have appealed to Hegseth's desire to reorient the Pentagon around 'lethality.' One of the two former senior national security officials and another former Trump administration official said Angle met Hegseth on the sidelines of a special operations forces conference in Tampa early last month. Maggie Miller contributed to this report.