75th anniversary of National Sample Survey celebrated in Krishnankoil

National Statistics Office (NSO) Sub-Regional Office at Virudhunagar installed a bilingual standee at Krishnankoil Bus Stop on Wednesday to commemorate the 75th anniversary of National Sample Survey.
The standee was inaugurated by Deputy Director, Directorate of Economics and Statistics (DES), G. Sundari in the presence of Assistant Director of NSO, Virudhunagar, V. Rethinam, and Assistant Director of Agriculture G. Dhanalakshmi.
Besides the staff of NSO, students and members of the general public also took part in the event.
The standee would display 17 sustainable development goals formulated by the United Nations.
The theme for the 75th anniversary celebration is 'From the Glorious Past to the Promising Future of Viksit Bharat.'
The Assistant Director sought cooperation from the local officials and members of general public for the smooth conduct of NSS surveys.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Indian Express

5 hours ago

• Indian Express

Statistics ministry to conduct first-ever household income survey in 2026

The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI) will conduct the first-ever Household Income Survey in 2026, with a Technical Expert Group (TEG) being set up to guide the ministry on the method of estimation and other aspects of the survey. In addition to measuring household income, the proposed survey will also try to assess the impact of adoption of technology on wages, the statistics ministry said on Monday. The survey will be MoSPI's latest attempt to measure household income in India, with pilots conducted in the past not resulting in a nationwide survey due to difficulties in collecting reliable income data, the ministry said. These past attempts date back to the 1950s, when it tried to collect information on income as part of its consumer expenditure surveys on an experimental basis. Further attempts were made in the 1960s as part of the Integrated Household Survey. 'However, these efforts were not continued as it was found that the estimates of income were lower than the estimates of consumption and savings put together,' MoSPI said. In the 1980s, it was again explored if it was operationally feasible to collect household income data, but it did not lead to a national survey. 'Recently, NSS (National Sample Survey) has taken a number of initiatives to plug-in the data gaps in different spheres of social and economic interests… The household income survey is another important initiative of the Ministry to generate vital information for deriving income distribution and welfare thereof,' MoSPI said. It added that there was an 'urgent need' for a dedicated income distribution survey 'to better understand the profound structural changes that have occurred in the Indian economy over the past 75 years'. According to MoSPI's latest Gross Domestic Product (GDP) data, India's per capita gross national income in 2024-25 was Rs 2.31 lakh in current prices, up 8.7 per cent from 2023-24. Surjit Bhalla-led expert group The expert group constituted on Monday will be chaired by economist Surjit Bhalla, formerly India's Executive Director at the International Monetary Fund and a part-time member of the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister. In addition to Bhalla and officials from MoSPI and other government ministries, the expert group comprises of Aloke Kar, former professor at Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, Sonalde Desai of National Council of Applied Economic Research, Praveen Jha from Jawaharlal Nehru University's Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, Srijit Mishra from University of Hyderabad's School of Economics, National Stock Exchange of India Chief Economist Tirthankar Patnaik, People Research on India's Consumer Economy Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer Rajesh Shukla, and Ram Singh, Director of Delhi School of Economics and an external member of the Reserve Bank of India's Monetary Policy Committee. 'The Expert Group will provide guidance with regard to finalisation of concepts and definitions, preparation of the survey method and instruments, sampling design and method of estimation, and incorporate best country practices as adopted across the world… The TEG will also provide guidance for finalisation of the survey results and report for release,' MoSPI said. MoSPI, over the last couple of years, has conducted a variety of surveys to shed light on different parts of the Indian economy in addition to the regular ones that are used to compile key macroeconomic indicators such as GDP, Consumer Price Index, and Index of Industrial Production. These include annual surveys on unincorporated enterprises, the service sector, a forward-looking survey on private sector capital expenditure, and domestic travel and tourism, among others. Last month, the ministry released the result of its maiden monthly Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), which had so far been conducted only on a quarterly basis for urban areas and annually for rural areas. The revamped monthly PLFS also seeks details about households' usual monthly income from rent, pension, interest, and remittances. However, the findings related to these details have so far not been released. Some of the key surveys whose results will be released over the next few months include the Annual Survey of Industries for 2023-24 and Household Social Consumption: Health. Siddharth Upasani is a Deputy Associate Editor with The Indian Express. He reports primarily on data and the economy, looking for trends and changes in the former which paint a picture of the latter. Before The Indian Express, he worked at Moneycontrol and financial newswire Informist (previously called Cogencis). Outside of work, sports, fantasy football, and graphic novels keep him busy. ... Read More

Economic Times

7 hours ago

• Economic Times

Centre plans first nationwide Household Income Survey in 2026; MoSPI sets up expert panel

The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI) on Monday announced that it has formed a Technical Expert Group (TEG) to oversee India's first full-scale household income distribution survey, scheduled for 2026. ADVERTISEMENT The National Sample Survey (NSS), despite over seven decades of survey experience, has never conducted a comprehensive income survey. Past efforts, including pilot studies and experimental rounds between 1955 and 1984, did not lead to a nationwide rollout due to data reliability issues. Dr. Surjit S. Bhalla, former Executive Director for India at the IMF, will chair the TEG. Members include Aloke Kar, Prof. Sonalde Desai, Prof. Praveen Jha, Prof. Srijit Mishra, Dr. Tirthankar Patnaik, Dr. Rajesh Shukla, and Prof. Ram Singh. Officials from MoSPI and other central ministries will also be part of the panel. The expert group will finalise survey design, methodology, and estimation techniques. It will also study international practices and assess how technology adoption impacts household income. NSS has recently launched new annual surveys on unincorporated enterprises, services, capital expenditure, and domestic tourism to fill key data gaps. The income survey is set to add a critical layer to India's macroeconomic indicators. ADVERTISEMENT

The Print

5 days ago

• The Print

India's GDP estimation system needs urgent reform, economists and statisticians explain why

At the event titled GDP Base Revision: Time to Regain Confidence , held at the India International Centre, leading Indian statisticians and economists gathered to discuss concerns about the country's economic data. 'We must ensure that GDP estimates reflect economic reality. If they don't, then the policies based on them won't work either,' said Sharma. New Delhi: A group of economists and statisticians recently came together to highlight the inconsistencies in the economic data reported for different sectors and raised serious questions about the reliability of current GDP measurement methods. Their discussion underlined the urgent need for reforms to restore confidence in India's economic data. The panel featured NK Sharma, former Director General (Statistics) at the National Statistical Office, Sanjay Kumar, former Additional Director General at NSO, and Amey Sapre, associate professor at the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy. The session was moderated by Siraj Hussain, former Union Secretary in the Ministry of Agriculture. Among the audience were journalists, students, members of the UPSC, and a retired officer of the National Sample Survey. The discussion comes at a time when the Centre is preparing to shift India's GDP base year from 2011–12 to 2022–23. The revision, led by a 26-member advisory committee, is expected to be completed by 2026. The goal is to better reflect the structural changes in the economy and improve the quality of GDP estimates, aligning India's statistical framework more closely with international best practices. Where the numbers don't add up The GDP or GVA of public administration is often considered to be mainly the salaries and wages of government employees, covering public administration and defence. Sharma said that after adjusting for inflation, the data shows a surprising 77 per cent growth in the real GDP of public administration over time. This raises the question of where such growth is coming from. 'On average, with 6-6.5% or 7% growth per year, we expect steady growth, assuming employment levels remain constant. Employment itself also rises steadily, but this change (77% ) is too large,' said Sapre. Kumar added that the number of government employees has not increased since 2011-12. 'Unfortunately, official data on the number of government employees (or related details) is not fully available or reliable in economic surveys for the years after 2011-12, but it is a perception.' Sharma raised several classification and reporting issues in the data. He referenced findings from the 74th round of NSSO data, where 12 per cent of businesses surveyed were not found at their listed addresses, and 20 per cent were misclassified. 'This creates confusion and makes the estimates less dependable,' he said. Kumar highlighted a key technical flaw in how GDP figures are adjusted for inflation. He explained that constant prices–used to measure real growth—are calculated using one type of price index, while current prices reflect another. Ideally, both should move in a similar direction once inflation is accounted for. However, he pointed out that the two sets of numbers are often out of sync, raising doubts about the accuracy of the methods. 'It's very hard to imagine that constant and current price estimates behave so differently unless the methodology itself is flawed,' Kumar said. This discrepancy suggests that the way inflation is adjusted in GDP calculations may not be consistent or reliable, which could distort the real picture of the economy's performance. The panel also highlighted the anomalies in how some services were measured. For example, vehicle repair and maintenance were tied to new sales, rather than to the total number of vehicles in use. 'Repairs are based on the whole stock, not on how many vehicles were sold in a year,' Sharma said, calling the assumption questionable. A broader concern was that the statistical system may not be equipped to capture economic shocks or transitions effectively. 'If we're using indicators from the organised sector to estimate growth in the unorganised sector, we're assuming they move the same way. That's simply not true,' Sapre said. Kumar said that for trade, the unorganised part is showing a growth rate of about 10–11 per cent per year at current prices. But if we look at other indicators–like household survey data–the growth is much lower, around 7 per cent, and in some years, as low as 3 per cent. He added that when looking at own account enterprises (small businesses without hired workers), the gross value added per worker has declined over time. This doesn't align with the high growth shown in the national accounts data. 'The unorganised communication sector is shown as growing faster than the organised sector, but that's hard to believe. PCOs and internet cafés have nearly disappeared—from 2 million in 2011–12 to just 30,000 in 2023. Their share should be going down, not up.' Kumar explained the main issue: national accounts use GVA per worker from larger, formal enterprises and apply it across all enterprise types, including small, informal ones. 'The GVA per worker in big firms is almost 2.4 to 3 times higher than in small units. Using the same productivity numbers for all leads to overestimation,' he said. Also read: Virender Sangwan changed eye care in India. His methods took surgery from Rs 5 lakh to Rs 50k Fixing what's broken There was broad agreement at the session that India's GDP estimation system needs urgent reform, especially as more states set ambitious growth targets. Without reliable verification mechanisms, inflated numbers could easily pass as fact. Citing Uttar Pradesh's ambition of becoming a $1 trillion economy by 2027, Sharma said, 'If states use consultants to present higher production data to meet targets, and if MoSPI has no mechanism to verify it, we could end up accepting unreliable figures.' One major concern was the use of MCA-21—a corporate database introduced during the 2011-12 base year revision. While it aimed to improve coverage of the formal sector, speakers noted problems with classification, limited accessibility, and a lack of foundational research. 'We didn't conduct enough research before adopting MCA-21. Now we've built the system around it and are stuck with its limitations,' Sharma said. MCA-21, launched in 2006 by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs under the UPA government, is an online system that streamlines company compliance. It lets companies, professionals, and the public file documents and get corporate information easily and safely. This makes registering a company simpler and results in fewer visits to government offices. Sharma also highlighted a lack of clarity in the methods used for estimation, pointing out that the government released only a summary of changes in the source and methods document, assuming users were already familiar with the old system—a move he considers a mistake. Looking ahead, Sharma said, new annual surveys for unorganised sectors offer some hope. He emphasised that while updated methodologies or data sources can improve the accuracy of GDP and sectoral estimates, this accuracy depends critically on the correctness of the base year data. He warned that if the base year estimates or methodology are flawed or overestimated, those errors will get carried forward and persist throughout the subsequent period (usually five years), resulting in misleading or incorrect growth and sector share figures. Sharma also called for revising key indices like the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) and the Index of Industrial Production (IIP) in sync with GDP updates. 'Otherwise, the system gets out of sync, and we start seeing unusual patterns in growth data.' Rebuilding trust in the numbers, the speakers agreed, hinges on better transparency and accessibility. 'We must make the system more transparent. Methods should be explained clearly. Data should be accessible,' said Sapre. (Edited by Aamaan Alam Khan)