Sebi unveils settlement scheme for NSEL brokers facing regulatory action

Markets regulator Sebi on Wednesday announced the introduction of a settlement scheme for certain stock brokers, who traded on the National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL) platform.
This long-awaited move is expected to bring major relief to traders whose funds have been stuck since the NSEL payment crisis in July 2013.
In a press release after its board meeting, Sebi said the scheme is for those stock brokers against whom enforcement actions have been initiated by the regulator.
By opting for the scheme, these brokers will have an opportunity to resolve pending proceedings and bring them to an expedited conclusion.
The Sebi board also cleared significant reforms to boost investment activity through Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs).
It approved a proposal to allow Category I and II AIFs to offer co-investment schemes under the AIF regulations. This will further facilitate AIFs and investors to co-invest and support capital formation in unlisted companies through AIFs.
Under the newly approved framework, 'Co-investment' refers to investments made by either the manager/sponsor of the AIF or an investor in Category I and II AIFs in unlisted companies, alongside the main AIF investment.
For instance, if an AIF scheme invests Rs 100 crore in a company, and the total capital requirement is Rs 300 crore, the fund manager can now offer an additional Rs 200 crore investment opportunity to investors under the scheme.
Previously, co-investments were primarily facilitated through the Portfolio Management Services (PMS) route.
However, a Sebi-appointed working group observed multiple challenges with this approach, such as the need for dual registration under both AIF and PMS regulations, and operational difficulties for unlisted companies managing a large number of shareholders.
To address these issues, the working group recommended enabling co-investment directly within the AIF framework. Now, Sebi has decided to allow the creation of a co-investment scheme (CIV scheme) within AIF regulations.
Each co-investment in an unlisted company will be handled through a separate CIV scheme. Further, certain regulatory requirements that apply to regular AIF schemes will be relaxed for these CIV schemes.
With this, investors now have two parallel co-investment routes -- the traditional PMS route and the newly introduced CIV scheme under the AIF umbrella.
On the settlement scheme for NSEL brokers, Sebi clarified that the proposal was approved by the competent authority, following the recommendations of its High Power Advisory Committee (HPAC). The matter was placed before the board for information and implementation.
The non-monetary terms of the settlement will vary, with voluntary debarment ranging from 1 to 6 months, depending on the severity of actions previously ordered. If a broker has already served a period of debarment under earlier Sebi directions that duration will be adjusted against the new term.
However, Sebi has specified that the scheme excludes certain brokers, specifically those named in charge sheets filed by the Economic Offences Wing, Enforcement Directorate, or other law enforcement agencies in the NSEL matter, as well as those declared defaulters at stock exchanges.
Last month, NSEL announced that it received over 90 per cent positive response from traders regarding a Rs 1,950-crore one-time settlement offer.
The board also approved a proposal to review the regulatory framework for Angel Funds under AIF regulations to rationalise their fundraising and enhance ease of doing business.
Also, the Sebi board has given the green signal to mandate select shareholders, including directors, key managerial personnel and current employees, to hold shares in demat form before filing an initial public offering (IPO) document.
These measures will help eliminate inefficiencies and risks associated with physical share certificates, including loss, theft, forgery, and delays in transfer and settlement.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

44 minutes ago

• Time of India

1% stamp duty hike likely to overcome Q1 property revenue shortfall

Bengaluru: Revenue shortfall from property registration in the first quarter of this fiscal has prompted the Karnataka govt to actively consider increasing stamp duty by 1%. The stamp duty was last revised in 2013. At present, the govt levies 5% stamp duty on the guidance value (minimum selling price of property fixed by the govt), 1% registration fee, 0.5% cess, and 0.1% surcharge. In all, property buyers pay 6.6% in cess and duty. They might end up 7.6% if the govt clears the hike proposal. Chief minister Siddaramaiah, who holds the finance portfolio, convened a meeting on June 18 to review the performance of the department of stamps & registration. Taking a serious note of the shortfall, he reportedly directed both finance and stamps & registration departments to take measures to improve revenues. Finance officials suggested upward revision in stamp duty. Sources said the CM will take a final call once there is consensus between revenue and S&R departments. Karnataka has the lowest stamp duty among its neighbours, barring Andhra Pradesh. Tamil Nadu levies 11% that includes stamp duty and registration fee, and Maharashtra imposes 7%. Underwhelming revenues from property registration have been a cause of concern, as it potentially implies a sluggish real estate sector. While Siddaramaiah fixed a target of Rs 26,000 crore for 2024-25, he was forced to downscale it to Rs 24,000 crore. But the department could collect only Rs 22,500 crore by the end of the year. This fiscal, the CM fixed a target of Rs 28,000 crore. Going by this, the department was to have collected Rs 7,000 crore on average in the first quarter that ends on June 30. It collected Rs 5,556 crore, logging a 35% shortfall. "The govt is obviously worried about the revenue shortfall, but a stamp-duty hike is not the solution. It should realise that the shortfall is mainly due to the ill-implementation of the policy mandating e-khata for registration and tech glitches in the Kaveri portal. The govt does well to rectify this instead of hiking stamp duty," said T Bhaskar Nagendrappa, state president of Credai (Real Estate Developers' Associations of India). He said the govt increased its guidance value by 39% in 2023, and any hike in stamp duty would make property purchase costlier and negatively impact the sector. "The irony is the govt decided to keep sub-registrar offices open on weekends. But what's the use if the portal is glitch-ridden and e-khatas are not issued," said one sub-registrar. Ends GFX Sagging S&R Revenues 2024-25 Original target: Rs 26,000 crore Revised target: Rs 24,000 crore Achieved: Rs 22,500 crore 2025-26 Annual target: Rs 28,000 crore Target till June 30: Rs 7,000 crore Achieved till June 19: Rs 5,556 crore Source: GoK

Time of India

an hour ago

• Time of India

Rs 26 lakhs awarded to employee for not working a single day for four months. Here's what happened

A man in Abu Dhabi has been awarded AED 110,400 (approximately Rs 26 lakh) in unpaid wages, despite never having started work at the company that hired him. The decision came after a court ruled in the employee's favour, highlighting that the delay in his joining was entirely the employer's fault. Employee Signed Contract But Never Got to Work As per a report by Khaleej Times, the employee, whose identity has not been disclosed, signed a fixed-term employment contract with an Abu Dhabi-based company. The agreement promised a basic monthly salary of AED 7,200, with a total compensation package of AED 24,000. The contract covered the period from November 11, 2024, to April 7, 2025. However, despite this agreement, the individual was never actually permitted to begin work. Frustrated by repeated delays and the absence of any opportunity to start his job, the man eventually filed a lawsuit seeking his withheld salary for the contract period. The court accepted his claim and ordered the company to compensate him for four months and 18 days of unpaid wages, after deducting eight days he admitted to being on leave. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Live Comfortably: 60 m² Prefab Bungalow for Seniors in Tanza Pre Fabricated Homes | Search Ads Search Now Undo Court Places Responsibility on Employer The Abu Dhabi Labour Court held the employer accountable for the delay in onboarding. Citing Federal Decree-Law No. (33) of 2021, the court underlined that employers are legally required to pay wages on time, following standards set by the Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratisation. It also referred to Article 912 of the Civil Transactions Law, which states that a worker's right to wages cannot be denied unless the employee has formally waived that right or acknowledged non-entitlement. The court examined various documents including the wage report, employment contract, and case file, and found that the fault clearly lay with the company. The evidence confirmed that the delay was not caused by the employee, as the employer had failed to provide any proof of misconduct or absenteeism. Employer's Argument Rejected by Court In response to the lawsuit, the company argued that the employee had taken leave and never reported to duty. However, the court found no records or documentation to support this claim. No formal investigation had been conducted into the employee's alleged absence. Consequently, the court dismissed the company's justification and concluded that the employee's failure to start work was directly linked to the employer's own inaction.

India Today

an hour ago

• India Today

CBI arrests government bank manager in Rs 183 crore fake bank guarantee scam

In a major financial fraud case involving forged bank guarantees worth Rs 183.21 crore, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has arrested two individuals, including a Senior Manager of Punjab National Bank (PNB), in connection with a scam involving an Indore-based company and the Madhya Pradesh Jal Nigam Limited (MPJNL).According to CBI, the Indore-based firm had secured three large irrigation projects worth Rs 974 crore in 2023 from MPJNL by submitting eight fake bank guarantees, purportedly issued by PNB. The MPJNL initially received forged confirmation emails that appeared to be from the official domain of PNB. These fraudulent communications falsely confirmed the authenticity of the bank guarantees, which subsequently led to MPJNL approving the a crackdown on June 19 and 20, the CBI conducted searches at 23 locations across five states, including New Delhi, West Bengal, Gujarat, Jharkhand, and Madhya Pradesh, following directives of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The operation resulted in the arrest of two individuals from Kolkata, including a serving senior manager of Punjab National Bank. Both the accused were presented before a local court in Kolkata and have been granted transit remand. Preliminary findings suggest that a well-organised Kolkata-based syndicate has been actively engaged in fabricating and distributing fake bank guarantees to win lucrative government contracts across multiple sources confirmed that the investigation is still ongoing in the case. Must Watch