Cambodia's High-Income Future with Clean Energy
A Vision of Progress – Can Cambodia's Energy Future Keep Pace with Its Rapid Growth?
Prime Minister Hun Manet is two years into his tenure, and he will have challenges to confront. His predecessor led the nation out of genocide, and brought it extraordinary development. During his decades of leadership, he brought the peace and stability needed for civil society to sprout from the ashes of civil conflict. Stability led to steady economic expansion: between 1995 and 2019 Cambodia's annual growth averaged 7.6% with textiles and tourism, agriculture and construction as the primary drivers. China saw its potential long ago and has massively invested in infrastructure, funding every hydropower dam, among other civil projects. The new administration looks to continue the progress of the previous, and lead Cambodia to the Vision 2050 goal of High-Income Nation status. 2050 is also a significant year for Cambodia's Climate Change indicators within the framework of the Paris Climate Agreement.
Cambodia's Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), created in compliance with the Paris Agreement 2015, necessitate reaching net-zero Carbon Emissions with 60% of its Forest Cover, by 2050. Cambodia's current forest cover stands at 43%, increasing it to 60% is an important component of achieving carbon neutrality. The forests act as carbon sinks, meaning they naturally remove carbon from the atmosphere. This amount of carbon sinking removes 50 Megatons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent per year. If the carbon isn't sequestered in the trees of the forest, it's released into the atmosphere by logging and forest fires, which drastically increase the temperature of the surface of the earth. See map below by NASA.GOV
NASA Forest fires recorded in the last 30 days. Feb 21 - March 21. Every red dot represents a fire.
The World Bank presents a sober analysis for 108 nations stuck in the middle-income trap, the situation of being unable to break into the ranks of high-income nation status. In their 2024 World Development Report on the Middle-Income Trap, they detail the problem and how to get out of it. It describes the 'Three Is' of development: Investment, Infusion, and Innovation. Transitioning from Investment to Infusion entails attracting foreign businesses to bring technical know-how, and transfer technical skills to the workforce. After the country has built up sufficient domestic infrastructure and human capital, the nation will be able to pivot to Innovation, and make themselves competitive on the global stage. Countries that don't do this will stay middle-income manufacturing hubs for the high-income nations.
These nations won't be able to get past the point of stagnation that occurs at $7-8K per capita without innovation. This looming problem is farther away for Cambodia, which will near $3,000 per capita in 2025. However, it will have to be solved to achieve Vision 2050.
India is in the middle-income trap. India will take another 75 years to reach one quarter of the American per capita income. Notable reasons attributed for this include the lack of political inclusivity and institutions, and social mobility. Elitism and majoritarianism are not conducive to prosperity. Protectionist policies that prevent corporations from being tested in international markets deprive them of useful stress tests. Limited social mobility leads to alienation of the disenfranchised, and ossification. This will not support societal stability, let alone growth.
20th Century technologies will leave Cambodia in the 20th Century. 'Infuse' now with the most advanced and promising technologies to prepare Cambodia for the 22nd century. Cambodian engineers will be among those innovating for posterity. The 35-year-old engineers of 2050 are currently 10-year-old students. Will only the children of the rich have opportunities to participate in the nation's bright future? Will all Cambodian students have the opportunity to work in emerging industries the world over, and return home with expertise, as the Koreans allowed? Will they have the chance to rise in society proportional to their industriousness, or will the best jobs and upper ranks be limited to the children of the current tycoons?
The World Bank encourages countries to treat crises as opportunities. Climate change is an ongoing catastrophe that will make or break nations. The Tropic Belt countries are among the most susceptible. The overarching difficulty is to concurrently remedy the challenges of ecological collapse and economic impoverishment. While most people consider them irreconcilable, Innovation will address both of these issues.
Nuclear Power is the shockingly simple ('simple') solution to a range of seemingly disconnected problems, now revealed to be opportunities. Nuclear Power generates limitless electricity of course, but also: fertilizers, animal feed, desalinization, fuels for cars, planes, trains, and other automobiles, clean concrete, Direct Air Capture and more promisingly, Direct Ocean Capture are some of the many products and methods that become more accessible with Nuclear Power.
Direct Ocean Capture is the single most effective method at removing Legacy Carbon (carbon previously released) from the environment. It simultaneously fights Ocean Acidification, the 'Evil Twin' of Climate Change that's currently decimating coral reefs and shellfish populations. By extension, food webs are collapsing.
With forward thinking and decisive leadership, Cambodia can secure the next 40-70 years of its energy supply while maintaining the forests and not sacrificing the environment. Nuclear Power will be a big investment, but the avenues exist to effectively execute this.
Russia has made agreements with 57 nations, specifically relating to Nuclear Power. China has Nuclear Power well established, and as the sole investor in hydropower dams, it would be a basic policy shift to redirect their time, expertise, and capital to Reactors. They're experimenting with Thorium Reactor designs, building one of commercial capacity in the Gobi Desert, that should be operational by 2030.
While Washington isn't currently sympathetic to green technology, this is temporary. Silicon Valley understands technology, at the least, and is massively investing in avant-garde energy solutions. Bill Gate's TerraPower started construction on a Salt-Cooled Reactor in Wyoming just last year. Meta and Microsoft are actively invested in Nuclear Power; AI takes a lot of electricity. Amazon is investing in Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and is exploring Nuclear Fusion, trying to get ahead on the energy source of the 22nd Century (IAEA Fusion FAQs). All serious solutions for Climate Change and long-term energy supply involve Nuclear Power.
France is the longtime leader of Nuclear Power, and is actively modernizing their aging system. Cambodia would find France an ideal partner to invest and share skills. Small Modular Reactors and Molten Salt Reactors are newer technologies well adapted for Cambodia, and now is the time to be on the forefront of implementing these.
Cambodia lacks strategic energy policy that considers the various difficulties it will face over the next century. There's little margin to waver or time to ponder; actions must now be taken to avoid the current direction of economic and ecological collapse. Energy independence brings a nation autonomy, and it can progress to being an energy exporter enjoying soft power. Earnings from this soft power could become hard power.
The World Bank observes that crises may be opportunities for a middle-income country to stress test its corporations, reform where needed and not just survive, but profit from the difficulties. Climate Change is an ongoing disaster affecting us all, but none more than residents of the Tropical Belt.
With clean, cheap electricity available, so many other doors open. Not only will a nation be able to prevent emissions into the future, they'll be able to use techniques like Carbon Sequestration, Direct Ocean Capture or Direct Air Capture, to remove Legacy Carbon and undo the damage of the previous Industrial Revolutions.
Cambodia is wary of over reliance on any one nation. That's sound geopolitical strategy, and yet more important in times of global tension. To avoid becoming a vassal or proxy, and maintain its constitutionally enshrined non-alignment and territorial integrity, Cambodia needs energy independence. Negotiating from a place of strength is the only way to effectively negotiate. To avoid the looming middle-income trap, it requires innovation. To make any economic progress without destroying its remaining forests and waterways, decisive leadership will be needed to direct the translation of policy into action.
'If we reform, we survive; if we don't, we perish,' the Prime Minister stated plainly in mid-March.
Hun Sen the Sage led the recovery, let Hun Manet the Visionary lead the economic renaissance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
4 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Trump's Iran strike could boost — or ruin — his troubled presidency
President Trump's decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites is a high-stakes gamble that could either breathe new life into or irreparably damage his troubled second term in the White House. Yet for the world at large, it may well prove to be a welcome development. Before we get into why Trump's decision aligns with the consensus among the world's biggest democracies — that Iran should not be allowed to obtain nuclear weapons — let's remember that Trump's popularity was falling fast before the strike. Only 42% of Americans approve of Trump's job performance, while 54% disapprove of it, according to a large-sample Reuters-IPSOS poll conducted June 11-16. Most Americans view Trump negatively, not only on the economy, which was once his strong point, but also on immigration, according to polls. The U.S. economy has slowed dramatically since Trump took office and launched his erratic tariff wars. According to the latest World Bank projections, the U.S. economy will only grow by 1.4% this year, which would be half of its 2.8% growth last year, in part because of the uncertainty created by Trump's on-and-off threats to impose huge import taxes on foreign goods. Likewise, many Trump voters in states with large immigrant communities, like Florida, are disappointed by Trump's decision to deport hundreds of thousands of immigrants without criminal records, including more than 350,000 Venezuelan Temporary Protected Status (TPS) holders who entered the country legally. During the 2024 campaign, Republicans claimed that Trump would focus on deporting violent criminals. Before his Iran strike, Trump was also haunted by his growing image as a wavering leader. His repeated reversals of his own tariff ultimatums — first vowing to impose 145% tariffs on China, then reducing them to 30% — made him an object of mockery in European capitals and among U.S. critics. A Financial Times columnist popularized the acronym TACO — Trump Always Chickens out — to describe the U.S. president's trade strategy. Trump got visibly upset when he was asked about the TACO reference at a recent press conference. His fear of being perceived as an indecisive leader may have pushed him — after weeks of reportedly telling Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu he would not get dragged into the conflict — to join Israel's military offensive against Iran's nuclear sites. But if Trump's Iran gamble turns out well and Iran's theocratic dictatorship either crumbles or gives up its uranium enrichment program through diplomatic negotiations — a big if — Trump will be credited with having done something four previous presidents contemplated but ultimately failed to do. Internationally, virtually all major Western democracies agrees that Iran is a threat to Israel, and to the world. In a statement at the end of the June 16 summit of the G-7 group of Western democracies in Alberta, Canada, the leaders of the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Japan, Italy and Canada said that 'We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon.' The G-7 bloc's statement added that 'Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror in the Middle East,' and that 'We affirm that Israel has a right to defend itself.' Days earlier, on June 12, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for the first time in 20 years issued a statement warning that Iran was not complying with its nuclear nonproliferation agreements. Translation: Iran was enriching uranium at levels only justified to build nuclear weapons. Skeptics who don't follow Iran's political history may ask themselves why the world doesn't allow Iran to have nuclear weapons like India, Pakistan and other countries. The answer is simple: Unlike other countries, Iran has a state policy of trying to 'eliminate' a nearby sovereign country — Israel— that has been recognized by the United Nations since 1948. This is not about Western countries being against Iran's Jurassic theocracy for imprisoning women for failing to cover their heads with a hijab, or for executing gays, or any of its other abhorrent internal policies. The reason is that if we allow a country that calls for the destruction of another nation to have a nuclear bomb, it will set a precedent that makes the world even more dangerous. In Iran's case, it's not just Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's crazy rhetoric, but his actions. Iran has long provided financial aid to terrorist groups like Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza. Iran's proxies have carried out terrorist attacks as far away as Argentina, where Hezbollah was found responsible for the bombing that killed 85 people and wounded hundreds at the AMIA Jewish Community Center in Buenos Aires in 1994. There are many ways in which Trump's political gamble may go wrong, especially if Iran moved some of its enriched uranium into a secret location outside Fordo, or if it unifies Iranians behind their decrepit regime. But if Iran's regime falls, or agrees to a serious international nuclear monitoring agreement, Trump's faltering second term will get a second wind. Don't miss the 'Oppenheimer Presenta' TV show on Sundays at 9 pm E.T. on CNN en Español. Blog:
American Military News
5 hours ago
- American Military News
Cambodia, Thailand wage tit-for-tat as border rift widens
This article was originally published by Radio Free Asia and is reprinted with permission. Cambodia on Tuesday blocked imports of Thai vegetables and fruit, and Thailand banned its nationals from working at some casinos inside Cambodia in fresh fallout from a border dispute sparked by a 10-minute firefight last month. Cambodia's Ministry of Information said that starting at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, authorities along the border with Thailand closed gates to block the import of Thai agricultural products. Prime Minister Hun Manet declared Tuesday that Cambodia will only allow the Thai imports if the Thai military reopens all border checkpoints and resumes normal operations. He also set that as a condition for discussing reductions in troops numbers at the border. Tensions and military deployments have spiked since Thai forces shot dead a Cambodian soldier on May 28. Thailand says Cambodian forces dug a trench on the Thai side of the border. 'Thailand must first show genuine goodwill and comply with our basic condition, which is to reopen the border crossings on both sides to the way they were. Only then will we talk about troop matters,' Hun Manet said Tuesday. Since June 7, Thailand has restricted border openings to 8am to 4pm. Usually they are open from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. Thailand's military was planning to propose a reduction in troop deployments along the border during a Thailand-Cambodia Regional Border Committee meeting scheduled for June 27-28. But Deputy Defense Minister Natthaphon Narkphanit said Cambodia, which was due to host the meeting, has indefinitely postponed it, The Nation reported. On Tuesday, the Thai military banned Thais from crossing the border to work at casinos and entertainment venues in Poipet, which lies on the Cambodian side of the main land border crossing point between the two countries, opposite the eastern Thai town of Aranyaprathet. Casinos are not legal in Thailand, so gambling establishments proliferate near at key border crossings in neighboring countries like Cambodia. The Bangkok Post newspaper reported that the order took effect on Tuesday at 8 a.m. and is in place until further notice. It is aimed at guaranteeing the safety of Thai people, the report said. Police Col. Napatrapong Supaporn, immigration police chief in Sa Kaeo province, was quoted as saying that Thais who are still in Poipet should return home for their own safety. Meanwhile, authorities in the Cambodian border provinces including Pursat and Preah Vihear announced on Facebook that hundreds of families had been evacuated from frontline areas to safer locations. This week, Cambodia submitted a request for the International Court of Justice in The Hague to rule on the demarcation of four locations at the border, including near the scene of last month's clash. The border dispute has historical roots and the two sides differ over which maps to use in demarcating territory. The last time there was a serious and bloody flare-up in tensions was between 2008 and 2011, over a disputed 11th century temple at Preah Vihear. The International Criminal Court has granted sovereignty over the temple to Cambodia.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Energy in Europe is also at stake as Israel-Iran tension escalates
Rising European energy prices are among the many risks of the current geopolitical crisis, which threatens to block one of the world's most important fuel shipping routes. Coupled with the trade war sparked by US tariffs, there are fears that the crisis may also drag down the global economy. The World Bank is expecting 2.3% growth for this year, after a 2.8% reading in 2024. Since Israel launched airstrikes against Iran's military and nuclear infrastructure on 13 June, oil prices have surged by more than 10% globally. High prices and supply disruptions, coupled with the implications of the trade war, are threatening to lower production globally. Markets are pricing in risks to the global oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) supply. Iran is controlling the highly strategic Strait of Hormuz, through which one-third of global seaborne oil and one-fifth of global LNG shipments travel. If that gets blocked, prices could skyrocket beyond $100. Currently, a barrel of crude oil is traded for more than $75, and international Brent is around $77. Related Israel-Iran crisis: How vital is the Strait of Hormuz for oil market? Israel-Iran conflict fuels best month for energy stocks since 2022 'I do not expect that the strait is going to be closed,' Dr. Yousef Alshammari, President of the London College of Energy Economics, said to Euronews Business. He added: 'It is simply because Iran needs the Strait of Hormuz open for ships to go through for its clients, India and China.' However, even when it is not closed, the passage has already impacted prices due to the risks associated with the crisis. Some oil tankers have refused to go through. According to the FT, the world's largest publicly listed oil tanker company Frontline said it would turn down new contracts to sail through the Strait of Hormuz. Meanwhile, 'insurance companies are likely to charge more currently, while Qatar is trying to delay its LNG shipments going through the Strait,' added Alshammari. Natural gas fields in the region are also attracting attention. Iran shares the largest natural gas field in the world, the South Pars field, with Qatar. The liquefied natural gas (LNG) coming from this region is vital for the rest of the world, including Europe. Though the EU has adequate supplies of LNG at the moment, the bloc's dependence on global LNG makes it vulnerable to geopolitical shocks as it is lowering its dependence on Russian gas. As the market weighed the recent risk of supply disruptions, European gas prices climbed significantly. The primary benchmark for European gas prices, the Dutch TTF (Title Transfer Facility) rose to a three-month high, nearing €41/MWh Friday at midday in Europe. Europe's imports from Qatar are providing nearly 10% of its LNG needs. Other countries in the region, including Egypt, also export LNG to Europe. However, after the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack, Israel closed down part of its own production, forcing Egypt to stop LNG shipments and prompting a spike in European natural-gas prices. Europe currently has a number of natural gas suppliers. Norway was the top supplier of gas to the EU in 2024, providing over 33% of all gas imports. Other suppliers included the United States, Algeria, Qatar, the UK, Azerbaijan and Russia. The largest LNG importing countries in the EU include France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands and Belgium. If shipments from Qatar are impacted, Belgium, Italy and Poland are the most impacted, as the country supplies 38-45% of their LNG imports, according to the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA). The good news is that demand for gas is usually at its lowest level in Europe at this time of the year. Even so, the hotter-than-usual weather across the bloc is boosting demand for cooling, which could increase the need for energy in the coming weeks. 'Spikes in energy prices push up inflation, and can have a knock-on effect on the central bank's policy,' Alshammari said. Central banks, including the US Fed and the Bank of England, have stopped short on cutting interest rates as the uncertainty is rising. If they see that inflation is more persistent in the near term, and that — in the case of the ECB and the BoE — the 2% target is floating away, further monetary tightening could squeeze the economy with higher costs for borrowing and investment. "As a result of the Ukraine War, there was a pivot from the EU in particular to get their liquefied natural gas, their LNG gas, not from Russia but from producers including Qatar,' Marco Forgione, Director General of the Chartered Institute of Export and International Trade, told Euronews. He added that anything constraining the transit of liquefied natural gas will have a quick impact on the EU, 'particularly in the manufacturing sector'. Oil demand is the highest in summer, partially due to industrial activity. But current supply constraints and higher prices could further squeeze manufacturing. For European businesses, who are already facing heightened trade tensions linked to US tariffs, facing the current complications is "like playing four-dimensional chess', Forgione said. He predicted that sudden spikes in oil prices and depressed shipping rates may result in significant consumer price increases, supply shortages, and shrinkflation. This is where a product shrinks in size but the price remains the same. Iran's energy infrastructure is in the crosshairs of the conflict. The country is the ninth-largest oil producer globally. At full capacity, the country produces 3.8 million barrels of oil a day, according to the US Energy Information Administration. But due to Western sanctions, Iran's oil exports are mainly shipped to China and India. Iran exports 1.5 million barrels per day, providing 10% of China's oil imports. If the world's second-largest economy, China, is deprived of this import, it could impact its economy as it is forced to source this from elsewhere, meaning prices could skyrocket. The potential geopolitical consequences of the Iran-Israel conflict are leaving markets on edge, and it seems volatility is here to stay. Meanwhile, Europe's role in the conflict remains to be seen. 'My biggest worry is that it turns out to be a wider conflict, involving European countries, UK and France. This is the scenario that nobody wants to see happen,' added Alshammari.
