Israel's gamble on force could push Iran to accelerate nuclear plans
In just a few days of war, Israel has killed more than a dozen of Iran's top nuclear scientists, taken out much of its top military hierarchy and attacked key parts of its nuclear programme.
It has been a powerful display of Israeli military and intelligence dominance, but has not critically damaged Iran's widely dispersed and heavily protected nuclear programme, Israeli military commanders and international nuclear proliferation experts agree.
And far from curbing nuclear proliferation, Israel's gamble on force could drive Iran to speed up its efforts to get a bomb if the current conflict ends without full destruction of the programme or a deal with iron-clad controls and broad inspection powers.
Israel's initial attacks have delayed by a few months Iran's ability to 'break out', or make a functioning nuclear weapon, an Israeli military official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
But US intelligence officials believe Tehran was up to three years away from being able to deliver a weapon and not actively pursuing a bomb, CNN reported on Tuesday – which would make that delay relatively inconsequential.
Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, claimed he launched the attacks because Iran was on the threshold of having a nuclear bomb. But even if that is true, strikes so far will not have bought much more time, and Israel may not be able to do more lasting damage without US help.
What the attacks have achieved is to stir up fear among the Iranian leadership and anger among Iran's population. The hatred many Iranians harbour for their own government did not blunt the horror of a missile strike that killed dozens of children in their homes, and Israeli orders to evacuate entire neighbourhoods evoked the grim spectre of Gaza's fate.
Israel developed its own nuclear arsenal as a deterrent, though it has never officially acknowledged what is an open secret. Many in Iran are convinced they need the same, and this war will probably have mitigated public resentment of the cost of those advances.
After the collapse over the past year of regional proxies that had served as the regime's defensive shield, there was a greater focus inside Iran on the possibility of a nuclear programme, according to Sima Shine, Iran specialist and former head of research at Israel's the Mossad intelligence agency.
'I have never seen so much talking about nuclear military capability as I saw in the last year and a half,' Shine said. Most focused on Iran's decision not to build a bomb, rather than its capacity to do so, but the decision to hold back can easily be set aside.
'If the war ends without destroying the nuclear programme, allowing Iran to break out, they probably will do [it],' she said.
A western military official with experience in the region agreed that Israel's attacks, although framed as pre-emptive strikes, are just as likely to be a spur to proliferation. 'My own view is that if they have the capacity after this, they will go as fast as they can to get a nuclear weapon.'
The biggest obstacle to the military destruction of Iran's nuclear project is the facility at Fordow near the holy city of Qom, buried so deep under a mountain that it is out of reach of even Israel's most powerful munitions.
It houses centrifuges and much of the country's highly enriched uranium, and the only bombs that might be able to destroy it are the US's most powerful bunker-busting munitions.
Amid Israeli euphoria at the impact of the first strikes, national security adviser Tzachi Hanegbi warned the Israel Defense Forces cannot dismantle Iran's nuclear programme alone.
'It cannot be done via kinetic means,' he told Israeli media. The military can instead create conditions for a long-term deal, brokered by the US that would totally block Iran's nuclear programme, added.
Netanyahu has left little doubt that he would prefer US military cooperation to a diplomatic solution, and has been encouraging Trump to abandon the anti-war stance that helped bring him to power. 'I understand America first, I don't understand America dead,' he told ABC TV in an interview.
The Israeli leader dreams not only of destroying the nuclear programme but also of regime change in Tehran. But with each missile that lands in civilian areas, his appeals to the Iranian people sound more hollow on the ground.
'We underestimate the psychological impact of the Gaza war, including on Iranians who hate [the government],' said Vali Nasr, professor of international affairs at Johns Hopkins University.
'Gaza also has a bad, vicious government that has been used as justification for action against it. Israel has shown a kind of willingness to kill at will, especially civilians.'
Fear of Israeli attacks has been amplified by western tolerance of mass killings, and extreme military tactics that former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert has described as war crimes.
'There was a belief that the international liberal order would keep Israel in check, that Europe and the US would not tolerate Israel using its military might with abandon,' Nasr said. Confidence in any capacity to restrain was blown apart in the rubble of Gaza.
If Trump ultimately decides to stay out of this war, and Iran is slow to accept a deal that would curb its programme, Israel may still have military options to inflict more lasting damage at Fordow.
'There has always been a fixation in Israel and in the world with bombing the nuclear sites. Even if it is impossible to destroy Fordow from the air, other methods exist,' said Alex Grinberg, an analyst and former Iran researcher in the IDF intelligence research division.
Israel's capture of much of an extensive nuclear archive likely gave it access to plans for Fordow, which could make it easier to cripple support systems, block access or even send in special forces to destroy the plant in a ground operation.
There is precedent for these approaches in other Israeli raids. An attack this week on the electricity supply to another enrichment facility, at Natanz, destroyed centrifuges by causing them to spin out of control.
Last year Israel sent special forces commandos to destroy an underground Hezbollah missile factory deep inside Syria. Fordow is heavily defended, but as Israel now claims to dominate the airspace in western Iran, it could fly in elite teams in on a C-130 aircraft to attempt to storm the site.
Despite Netanyahu's preference for a campaign of physical destruction, a deal to restrict Iran's nuclear activities and through a strict inspection regime would probably offer a more lasting shutdown of Iran's nuclear ambitions, said David Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security.
'One of the problems with Israel's strategy is that if they leave, if they stop bombing, then Iran can rebuild. And then they have to start bombing again.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Has Iran actually tried to kill Trump? Here's what we know
Days after it was reported that Donald Trump rejected Israel's plot to assassinate Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the president publicly announced that the United States knows his location and is holding off killing him 'for now.' Israeli officials, meanwhile, have openly demanded his death. This week, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said Khamenei 'can no longer be allowed to exist.' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, turning to Fox News over the weekend to make the case for the United States to join a war with Iran, said Khamenei sees the president as 'public enemy number one.' Israel has sought to justify intervention using allegations of Trump's assassination threats as leverage, while the United States has faced years of blowback in the wake of Middle East wars and the 2020 killing of a top Iranian general. During his first administration in 2020, Trump ordered a drone strike near Baghdad International Airport that killed Qassem Soleimani, commander of the elite Quds Force with Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps, after he had survived several assassination attempts from western, Israeli and Arab states over the past two decades. The strike, which was planned over several months, ignited fierce blowback across the region, denounced by Iran's foreign minister at the time as an act of international terrorism. By 2024, U.S. intelligence officials had collected evidence they believe shows Tehran was seeking ways to kill then-candidate Trump, according to Politico. In September, Trump claimed there were 'big threats on my life by Iran.' Neither of the two assassination attempts against then-candidate Trump in the summer of 2024 have been linked to Iran. One month earlier, a Pakistani national with alleged ties to Iran was accused of seeking to carry out a murder-for-hire plot targeting U.S. government officials, according to federal prosecutors. Asif Raza Merchant was accused of joining a complex plot to carry out assassinations last year, including trying to hire hit men who were undercover officers, according to an indictment. In November, a fugitive Iranian government operative was accused of hiring a pair of New Yorkers he met in prison to carry out an assassination plot against a critic of the regime. He allegedly admitted to FBI agents that he'd also been tasked with finding a hit squad to kill then-President-elect Trump. Farhad Shakeri claimed he was asked by regime officials to 'put aside his other efforts... and focus on surveilling, and, ultimately, assassinating' Trump, according to a criminal complaint in Manhattan federal court. In February, Trump, who campaigned against U.S. involvement in foreign wars, said Iran would be 'obliterated' if he was assassinated by state actors. 'That would be a terrible thing for them to do,' he told reporters. 'Not because of me. If they did that, they would be obliterated. That would be the end. I've left instructions: if they do it, they get obliterated. There won't be anything left.' Iran has denied ever targeting the president. 'A new scenario is fabricated,' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted on X following accusations against Shakeri. 'The American people have made their decision. And Iran respects their right to elect the president of their choice. The path forward is also a choice. It begins with respect,' Araghchi wrote. Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said the allegations were part of a 'repulsive' plot by Israel to 'complicate matters between America and Iran.' In January, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian stressed that Iran 'never attempted' to kill Trump, 'and we never will.' 'This is another one of those schemes that Israel and other countries are designing to promote Iranophobia,' Pezeshkian told NBC News. 'Iran has never attempted to, nor does it plan to assassinate anyone. At least as far as I know.' Asked whether there have been any plots against the president under Iran, he insisted there have been 'none whatsoever.' On June 15, Netanyahu asked Fox News host Bret Baier whether 'these people who chant 'death to America'' and 'tried to assassinate President Trump twice' should 'have nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them to your cities.' Baier then pressed Netanyahu about his claim that Iran launched two assassination attempts. 'Through proxies, yes.' he said. 'Through, through their intel, yes, they want to kill him,' he added. 'He's enemy number one.' Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who has emerged as a prominent voice across right-wing media against the United States joining Israel's war, told Texas Senator Ted Cruz that the United States would be bombing Tehran if those assassination allegations were credible. 'We should attack Iran immediately if that's true,' he said. Cruz insisted that 'nobody disputes' Iran is trying to kill the president, calling it an 'objective fact' following his interview with Carlson. On Thursday, Trump said he plans to decide on whether to order U.S. warplanes to strike Iranian nuclear facilities within the next two weeks, depending on whether Tehran engages in talks over ending their nuclear weapons program. In a statement relayed through White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, Trump said: 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.' The president's statement followed a week of escalating strikes between Israel and Iran. More than 600 Iranians and at least two dozen Iranians have been killed, according to officials.
The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Israel and Iran: where is the conflict heading? – Today in Focus extra
The Guardian's senior international correspondent Julian Borger reports from Tel Aviv as the Israel-Iran conflict enters its second week and the world awaits Donald Trump's decision on whether the US will enter the war
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Israel-Iran war, blow by blow: Maps and graphics reveal locations of EVERY strike so far as conflict escalates
Israel began pounding Iran on June 13, in a conflict that has the world holding its breath because of fears it could rapidly escalate and drag Britain and the US in. The IDF's blistering aerial assault – codenamed 'Operation Rising Lion' – has targeted dozens of key nuclear sites, military bases and surface-to-air missile launchers. Oil and gas infrastructure have also been hit, as well as Iran's state news broadcaster, which was struck while live on air. Among the eliminated are nuclear scientists and senior Iranian commanders, including the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) – an elite wing of Tehran's military. In a televised address to the nation, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the attack was neccessary to 'roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival'. Iran was thought to be 'closer than ever to obtaining a nuclear weapon'. Iran immediately retaliated with drone strikes, before launching several waves of ballistic missiles aimed at Israeli cities such as Tel Aviv and Jerusalem as part of its own 'Operation True Promise III'. Israel's largest oil refinery in Haifa was shut down following an attack that severely damaged the facilities. The IRGC claimed their precision-guided missiles struck the headquarters of Mossad, Israel's spy agency, as well as another military intelligence unit known as Aman, near Tel Aviv. Israel's state-of-the-art air defences, including its 'Iron Dome', have been in near-constant action. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's Supreme Leader, told Israel to prepare for 'a severe punishment'. He has previously called Israel a 'terrorist base' and a 'cancerous tumour' that must 'be removed and eradicated'. Iran has also issued bloodcurdling threats urging the US, UK and France not to rush to Israel's defence, warning that their military bases and ships will be in the firing line should they intervene. Donald Trump has demanded Tehran's 'unconditional surrender', boasting his forces could assisinate Khamenei. Posting on social media on June 17, he said the Ayatollah was an 'easy target' but remained safe 'for now'. Actual US strikes aimed at targets inside Iran remain on the table. America is assembling an armada of warships and fleets of fighter jets in the region ahead of possible military action. Britain itself has ordered military reinforcements to be sent to the Middle East as the war rages. Keir Starmer told reporters en route to the G7 summit in Canada that he would 'always make the right decisions for the UK and our allies'. Britain already has fighter jets in the region as part of an operation to counter threats in Iraq and Syria. Tehran has repeatedly insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful and that it has never intended to make a bomb, despite the fears of Israel and the West. However, its ever-growing stockpile of enriched uranium – needed to produce an atomic weapon – had triggered major concerns. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear watchdog, said Iran's activity was a 'matter of serious concern'. On June 12, the day before Israel's sudden attack, the IAEA ruled that Iran was in breach of its safeguard obligations. Iran criticised the 'politically motivated' decision, announcing it would bolster its nuclear programme with a new enrichment facility in a 'secure location'. Officials also said centrifuges – machines that enrich uranium – would be upgraded at Fordo, one of the nation's most secretive and heavily fortified nuclear sites, buried deep beneath the mountains near the holy city of Qom.
