Government steps in to help run Spelthorne Borough Council
Government-appointed commissioners are to intervene in running a Surrey council with debts of more than £1 billion.Jim McMahon, Minister of State at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, said the government had appointed officials to oversee Spelthorne Borough Council.The interventions come after government inspectors expressed concerns over its record of implementing recommendations from external auditors and from the Local Government Association.Council leader Joanne Sexton said the council was "determined to address the challenges facing the authority" and would work "collaboratively with the commissioners to ensure long-term improvement in the areas highlighted".
Under the intervention, which will last until May 2030, commissioners Lesley Seary, Peter Robinson, Deborah McLaughlin and Mervyn Greer will oversee changes to council services to deliver "value for money and financial sustainability".Commissioners will be in place until January 2026, at which point their role will be reviewed.As of March 2023 Spelthorne's debt stood at nearly £1.1 billion.The authority was found to have the second highest level of debt for a district or borough council in England, after nearby Woking, relative to its size.A letter from the government to Daniel Mouawad, Spelthorne's chief executive, says the commissioners will aim to close budget shortfalls and reduce the council's "exceptionally high level of external borrowing".Costs for the commissioners will be met by the council rather than the government, Mr McMahon said.An inspection of the authority in January found the council had a "culture of optimism bias", lacked consistent leadership, and did not have the awareness to identify issues or areas for improvement.To some degree the authority had been "blindsided" by the financial situation, the inspection report added.A council spokesperson added that most decisions would continue to be made by the local authority, but with the oversight of the commissioners.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Finextra
an hour ago
- Finextra
How Retailers Can Balance Customer Experience and Policy Abuse: By Doriel Abrahams
In today's e-commerce landscape, retailers face an increasingly challenging problem - policy abuse. New research report revealed that a staggering 70% of U.K. consumers believe retailers make it far too easy to abuse their returns policies - and yet these same shoppers are also demanding the convenience and seamless experience these policies provide. This creates a significant issue for retailers navigating the need to deliver frictionless customer experiences while also implementing protection to mitigate such issues. It's becoming an ever more complicated issue between convenience and security, with many businesses struggling to balance customer satisfaction metrics against the rising rates of returns abuse, refund fraud, and policy manipulation that directly impact the bottom-line. After the pandemic, and with most shopping now happening online, fixing this problem isn't just about preventing losses - it's crucial for keeping legitimate customers happy, creating operational efficiencies and staying ahead of competitors. Why the rise in retail policy abuse? The report also found an even more concerning trend - that the majority of U.K. shoppers (52%) admit to deliberately abusing online retail policies within the past year. Even more telling is the fact that 29% of those who took advantage of retailers' policies did so specifically to avoid paying full price. So what's driving this behaviour and normalising fraud? Several factors appear to be at play here. Firstly, the cost-of-living crisis has pushed consumers to find other ways to stretch their budgets. And secondly, the very nature of shopping online has created a separation between buyers and sellers, reducing the moral considerations that might otherwise prevent policy abuse such as this. Thirdly, many consumers have also come to view these tactics as "shopping hacks" rather than abuse, particularly as they see retailers making record profits despite inflation. What is the cost of overcorrection? Retailers might be tempted to respond with blanket policy restrictions, but our research suggests this approach carries some significant risks. Nearly one in five consumers (18%) have completely abandoned retailers that implemented stricter return policies. This highlights the delicate balance retailers must strike. While policy abuse costs billions annually, the potential revenue loss from alienating legitimate customers could be even more devastating. And with customer acquisition costs continuing to rise, retention is becoming even more valuable than ever. It's time to move beyond a 'one-size-fits-all' approach The fundamental problem with current approaches is their lack of nuance and personalisation. Most retailers implement uniform policies that treat all customers the same - either too permissive (inviting abuse) or too restrictive (driving away loyal customers). The solution lies in personalisation at scale and differentiating between these different sets of customers. By understanding who they're doing business with, retailers can implement dynamic policies tailored to each individual customer behaviour and history. Forward-thinking retailers are already leveraging advanced technology to maintain this balance. By implementing systems that can accurately identify trustworthy customers versus potential abusers, businesses can offer differentiated experiences. However, this approach demands sophisticated identity management and behaviour analysis capabilities. The most effective solutions leverage network intelligence across millions of shoppers and transactions to accurately distinguish legitimate shopping behaviour from abuse patterns. The research makes clear that policy abuse is a significant and growing challenge for retailers. However, the solution isn't to punish all customers with restrictive policies. Instead, by leveraging technology to distinguish between trustworthy customers and potential abusers, retailers can strike the crucial balance between customer-friendly experiences and protection against serial exploitation. In today's competitive retail environment, those who master this balance will not only protect their margins but also build deeper customer loyalty through experiences that feel both flexible and fair. It can be solved - but only through intelligence, personalisation, and a commitment to differentiating between genuine customers and potentially fraudulent transactions.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Mystery EuroMillions winner has two days to claim £1M prize
A EuroMillions UK Millionaire Maker winner has only two days left to claim a £1,000,000 prize from a 27 December draw. The winning ticket, with code XDQM36414, was purchased in Wiltshire, and the deadline to claim is Wednesday. National Lottery operator Allwyn has made extensive appeals for the mystery winner to come forward over the past six months. If the prize remains unclaimed, the £1,000,000 and any accrued interest will be allocated to the National Lottery Good Causes fund. Lottery winners have 180 days to claim their winnings, and unclaimed funds support various community and national projects nationwide.
Coin Geek
an hour ago
- Coin Geek
Bank of England set to introduce stringent rules in 2026
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... The Bank of England (BoE) plans to introduce more restrictive rules on banks' exposure to digital assets by 2026 to protect financial stability, according to its top executive. During the 'Risk Live Europe' event in London, David Bailey, executive director of prudential policy at the BoE, said that the United Kingdom is exploring stricter regulations around digital asset exposure. 'There are also examples where it might be more appropriate to start more towards the restrictive end of the spectrum, while evidence is gathered to see if standards can be relaxed over time,' said Bailey during his speech at the risk management and financial markets conference, as reported by CoinDesk. 'The prudential treatment of banks' exposures to cryptoassets, and specifically those with features associated with heightened price volatility and where investors could lose the entirety of their investment, is an example in this space.' Bailey also said that the U.K.'s plans would be 'informed' by the guidelines set out by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's (BCBS) disclosure framework for banks' exposure to digital assets. The Committee—an international body that sets global standards for the regulation and supervision of banks to promote financial stability and strengthen banking systems—finalized its framework for banks' 'disclosure of cryptoasset exposures' in July of last year and agreed to implement the standard by January 1, 2026. The final disclosure framework includes a set of standardized tables and templates covering banks' digital asset exposures, requiring banks to disclose qualitative information on their digital asset-related activities and quantitative information on the capital and liquidity requirements for their digital asset exposures. 'The use of common disclosure requirements aims to enhance information availability and support market discipline,' said the BCBS when announcing the final framework. Additionally, the Basel Committee recommended that banks only allow 1% of their investments to be in digital assets, a factor that likely plays into the BoE's mooted, more restrictive rules on digital asset exposure. The BoE's latest pronouncement on digital asset policy comes as HM Treasury and the U.K.'s finance sector regulators are speeding up progress on the country's broader digital asset regulatory framework. UK regulatory progress In April, the Treasury published high-level draft regulations for cryptoassets and stablecoins. Titled the 'future financial services regulatory regime for cryptoassets,' it officially delegated detailed rulemaking authority of the majority of the digital asset space to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), except for systemic stablecoins, which fall under the purview of the BoE and the U.K.'s banking regulator, the Prudential Regulation Authority. It also outlined several high-level digital asset activities that would bring an entity within U.K. regulation, placing foreign issuers of stablecoins outside this scope. This was followed, in May, by the FCA—the U.K.'s top finance sector regulator—publishing two consultation papers, one on 'stablecoin issuance and cryptoasset custody,' and the other on 'a prudential regime for cryptoasset firms.' The consultation paper on stablecoin issuance and cryptoasset custody aims to ensure regulated stablecoins maintain their value and that customers are provided with clear information on how the backing assets are managed. Meanwhile, the consultation paper on a prudential regime for cryptoasset firms seeks to establish rules to develop a safe, competitive, and sustainable digital asset sector. However, all of this regulatory progress must be taken in context with the U.K. Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves, indicating that the country plans to work with the United States to support innovation across the digital asset industry. In an April 29 statement, Reeves set out the U.K.'s stool by saying she aims to make the country the 'best place in the world to innovate.' The Chancellor also said that the U.K. and U.S. would use their upcoming joint 'Financial Regulatory Working Group' to 'continue engagement to support the use and responsible growth of digital assets.' Aligning with President Donald Trump's pro-crypto regulatory agenda would signal a shift away from the more safety-first and consumer protection approach that has characterized how digital assets have been treated thus far in the U.K. under the financial promotion regime—currently the only major piece of regulation in the country that deals directly with the digital asset sector. Watch: Richard Baker on engineering a smarter financial world with blockchain title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">
